The coming of agentic AI: The next era of human-machine synergy
The evolution of AI
The story of AI began in the 1950s with the advent of symbolic AI; systems designed to reason using logic and handcrafted rules. While foundational, these early systems were rigid, unable to adapt to real-world complexity. The 1980s brought expert systems, which encoded domain knowledge explicitly. Though revolutionary for tasks like medical diagnosis and financial modelling, their maintenance proved unsustainable at scale.
The real shift came in the late 1990s and 2000s with the re-entry of machine learning. Instead of handcrafting intelligence, we began teaching machines to learn patterns from data. Algorithms like decision trees, support vector machines, and eventually deep learning architectures unlocked the ability to process images, speech, and text at scale. In 2012, a convolutional neural network achieved ground breaking accuracy in image classification marking the arrival of deep learning as a dominant force.
We saw a seismic shift in AI capabilities with the advent of transformer architectures, introduced in the seminal 2017 paper 'Attention Is All You Need.' This innovation enabled models to understand large language context, paving the way for Large Language Models (LLMs) capable of generating fluent, context-aware responses and performing tasks from summarization to reasoning. Landmark models like BERT revolutionized understanding through bidirectional context, while generative models like the GPT series demonstrated unprecedented abilities in content creation, dialogue, and code generation. This progress was driven by advanced algorithms, massive datasets, and exponentially growing computational power, catalysing the shift from narrow, task-specific AI to general-purpose systems with emergent intelligence, paving the way for
Agentic
AI.
The rise of agentic AI
Today, we stand at the edge of another monumental shift: the emergence of Agentic AI. Agentic AI systems exhibit autonomy, goal-oriented behaviour, memory, reasoning, and the ability to interact and modify plans as per real-world environment.
This is built on the foundation of powerful Large Language Models (LLMs), enhanced with capabilities for self-reflection, memory, and planning. These systems not only understand and generate language but can also evaluate their own actions and adapt their behaviour, enabling continuous improvement and proactive task execution.
Agentic AI's core capabilities:
1.
Perception and Awareness
: Understands real-world inputs across text, vision, and audio.
2. Reasoning and Planning: Makes strategic decisions, breaks down goals, and adapts through learning.
3. Autonomous Execution: Carries out tasks across systems, learns from feedback, and improves over time.
Together, this LLM-driven intelligence and reflective agent architectures blur the line between tool and teammate. These systems can proactively initiate tasks, collaborate, and continuously evolve mirroring the human-like cognitive flexibility and purpose-driven actions.
Impact on human life
Each wave of AI advancement has expanded our collective capability. Symbolic AI gave us expert systems in finance and medicine. Machine learning unlocked personalization powering recommendation engines, fraud detection, and predictive analytics. Deep learning brought breakthroughs in vision and speech - enabling virtual assistants, real-time translation, autonomous vehicles, and medical imaging.
Agentic AI takes this further by transforming how we interact with machines. Imagine an AI assistant that doesn't just draft your emails, but understands your calendar, reads context from past meetings, and autonomously books travel, schedules follow-ups, and flags opportunities, continuously learning from your preferences.
In enterprise, Agentic AI will streamline complex workflows. In healthcare, it can serve as a tireless collaborator, synthesizing patient data, flagging anomalies and coordinating care across departments. In education, it will act as an always-available tutor, adjusting teaching strategies in real-time to individual student needs. In scientific research, Agentic systems can formulate hypotheses, run simulations, and interpret results at a speed and scale previously unimaginable.
The road ahead: Promise and responsibility
As we venture deeper into the era of Agentic AI, the possibilities are infinite. We foresee:
Cognitive Companions: Agents capable of dialogue, empathy modelling, and proactive assistance.Autonomous Digital Workers: Agents execute complex business processes with minimal oversight.Hyper-Personalized Interfaces: AI that adapts to user preferences and behaviours, providing intuitive and context-aware interactions.Augmented Human Intelligence: Seamless collaboration between human creativity and machine precision to solve grand challenges.Multi-Agent Collaboration: Closely working with other AI agents to solve complex problems through specialized expertise.
It is important to remember that agentic systems must be designed with rigorous safeguards; embedding transparency, fairness, interpretability, and alignment with human values. Robust testing, continuous red-teaming, and human-in-the-loop oversight will be vital to ensure trust and accountability.
Conclusion
The evolution of Agentic AI mirrors our growing understanding of both computation and cognition. More than building smarter machines, we are shaping a new interface between human intention and digital action. Agentic AI holds the promise of being our most powerful collaborator yet, the one that understands, learns, and acts on our behalf.
As we look ahead, let us embrace this transformative moment with optimism and responsibility. The future of Agentic AI is not just technological, it is deeply human.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
Explained: Why this mathematician thinks OpenAI isn't acing the International Mathematical Olympiad — and might be ‘cheating' to win gold
TL;DR AI isn't taking the real test: GPT models 'solving' International Math Olympiad (IMO) problems are often operating under very different conditions—rewrites, retries, human edits. Tao's warning: Fields Medalist Terence Tao says comparing these AI outputs to real IMO scores is misleading because the rules are entirely different. Behind the curtain: Teams often cherry-pick successes, rewrite problems, and discard failures before showing the best output. It's not cheating, but it's not fair play: The AI isn't sitting in silence under timed pressure—it's basically Iron Man in a school exam hall. Main takeaway: Don't mistake polished AI outputs under ideal lab conditions for human-level reasoning under Olympiad pressure. Led Zeppelin once sang, 'There's a lady who's sure all that glitters is gold.' But in the age of artificial intelligence, even the shimmer of mathematical brilliance needs closer scrutiny. These days, social media lights up every time a language model like GPT-4 is said to have solved a problem from the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) — a competition so elite it makes Ivy League entrance exams look like warm-up puzzles. 'This AI solved an IMO question!' 'Superintelligence is here!' 'We're witnessing the birth of a digital Newton!' Or so the chorus goes. But one of the greatest living mathematicians isn't singing along. Terence Tao, a Fields Medal–winning professor at UCLA, has waded into the hype with a calm, clinical reminder: AI models aren't playing by the same rules. And if the rules aren't the same, the gold medal doesn't mean the same thing. The Setup: What the IMO Actually Demands The International Mathematical Olympiad is the Olympics of high school math. Students from around the world train for years to face six unspeakably hard problems over two days. They get 4.5 hours per day, no calculators, no internet, no collaboration — just a pen, a problem, and their own mind. Solving even one problem in full is an achievement. Getting five perfect scores earns you gold. Solve all six and you enter the realm of myth — which, incidentally, is where Tao himself resides. He won a gold medal in the IMO at age 13. So when an AI is said to 'solve' an IMO question, it's important to ask: under what conditions? Enter Tao: The IMO, Rewritten (Literally) In a detailed Mastodon post, Tao explains that many AI demonstrations that showcase Olympiad-level problem solving do so under dramatically altered conditions. He outlines a scenario that mirrors what's actually happening behind the scenes: 'The team leader… gives them days instead of hours to solve a question, lets them rewrite the question in a more convenient formulation, allows calculators and internet searches, gives hints, lets all six team members work together, and then only submits the best of the six solutions… quietly withdrawing from problems that none of the team members manage to solve.' In other words: cherry-picking, rewording, retries, collaboration, and silence around failure. It's not quite cheating — but it's not the IMO either. It's an AI-friendly reconstruction of the Olympiad, where the scoreboard is controlled by the people training the system. From Bronze to Gold (If You Rewrite the Test) Tao's criticism isn't just about fairness — it's about what we're really evaluating. He writes, 'A student who might not even earn a bronze medal under the standard IMO rules could earn a 'gold medal' under these alternate rules, not because their intrinsic ability has improved, but because the rules have changed.' This is the crux. AI isn't solving problems like a student. It's performing in a lab, with handlers, retries, and tools. What looks like genius is often a heavily scaffolded pipeline of failed attempts, reruns, and prompt rewrites. The only thing the public sees is the polished output. Tao doesn't deny that AI has made remarkable progress. But he warns against blurring the lines between performance under ideal conditions and human-level problem-solving in strict, unforgiving settings. Apples to Oranges — and Cyborg Oranges Tao is careful not to throw cold water on AI research. But he urges a reality check. 'One should be wary of making apples-to-apples comparisons between the performance of various AI models (or between such models and the human contestants) unless one is confident that they were subject to the same set of rules.' A tweet that says 'GPT-4 solved this problem' often omits what really happened: – Was the prompt rewritten ten times? – Did the model try and fail repeatedly? – Were the failures silently discarded? – Was the answer chosen and edited by a human? Compare that to a teenager in an exam hall, sweating out one solution in 4.5 hours with no safety net. The playing field isn't level — it's two entirely different games. The Bottom Line Terence Tao doesn't claim that AI is incapable of mathematical insight. What he insists on is clarity of conditions. If AI wants to claim a gold medal, it should sit the same exam, with the same constraints, and the same risks of failure. Right now, it's as if Iron Man entered a sprint race, flew across the finish line, and people started asking if he's the next Usain Bolt . The AI didn't cheat. But someone forgot to mention it wasn't really racing. And so we return to that Led Zeppelin lyric: 'There's a lady who's sure all that glitters is gold.' In 2025, that lady might be your algorithmic feed. And that gold? It's probably just polished scaffolding. FAQ: AI, the IMO, and Terence Tao's Critique Q1: What is the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO)? It's the world's toughest math competition for high schoolers, with six extremely challenging problems solved over two 4.5-hour sessions—no internet, no calculators, no teamwork. Q2: What's the controversy with AI and IMO questions? AI models like GPT-4 are shown to 'solve' IMO problems, but they do so with major help: problem rewrites, unlimited retries, internet access, collaboration, and selective publishing of only successful attempts. Q3: Who raised concerns about this? Terence Tao, one of the greatest mathematicians alive and an IMO gold medalist himself, called out this discrepancy in a Mastodon post. Q4: Is this AI cheating? Not exactly. But Tao argues that changing the rules makes it a different contest altogether—comparing lab-optimised AI to real students is unfair and misleading. Q5: What's Tao's main point? He urges clarity. If we're going to say AI 'solved' a problem, we must also disclose the conditions—otherwise, it's like comparing a cyborg sprinter to a high school track star and pretending they're equals. Q6: Does Tao oppose AI? No. He recognises AI's impressive progress in math, but wants honesty about what it means—and doesn't mean—for genuine problem-solving ability. Q7: What should change? If AI is to be judged against human benchmarks like the IMO, it must be subjected to the same constraints: time limits, no edits, no retries, no external tools. Tao's verdict? If you want to claim gold, don't fly across the finish line in an Iron Man suit and pretend you ran. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Microsoft looks to boost AI performance in European languages
US tech behemoth Microsoft is investing millions of dollars to funnel more European-language data into AI development, company president Brad Smith told AFP Monday. With today's leading AI models mostly trained on material in English, "the survival of these languages and the health of these cultures is quite literally at stake" without a course correction, Smith said in an interview. AI models are "less capable when it is in a language that has insufficient data," he added -- which could push more users to switch to English even when it is not their native language. Microsoft will from September set up research units in the eastern French city Strasbourg to "help expand the availability of multilingual data for AI development" in at least 10 of the European Union's 24 languages, including Estonian and Greek. The work will include digitising books and recording hundreds of hours of audio. "This isn't about creating data for Microsoft to own. It is about creating data for the public to be able to use," Smith said, adding that the information would be shared on an open-source basis. The US-based company has in recent months striven to position itself as especially compatible with a gathering political push for European technological sovereignty. Leaders in the bloc have grown increasingly nervous at their dependency on US tech firms and infrastructure since Donald Trump's reelection to the White House. In June, Microsoft said it was stepping up cooperation with European governments on cybersecurity and announced new " data sovereignty " measures for its data centers on the continent. Smith said that Monday's announcement was just the latest evidence of the company's commitment to Europe. Most leading AI firms are American or Chinese, although Europe has some standouts like France's Mistral or Franco-American platform Hugging Face. Away from Microsoft, some European initiatives such as TildeLM are pushing to develop local-language AI models. The Windows and Office developer also said Monday that it was working on a digital recreation of Paris' Notre-Dame cathedral that it plans to gift to the French state, as well as digitising items from the country's BNF national library and Decorative Arts Museum.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Microsoft looks to boost AI performance in European languages
Paris: US tech behemoth Microsoft is investing millions of dollars to funnel more European-language data into AI development, company president Brad Smith told AFP Monday. With today's leading AI models mostly trained on material in English, "the survival of these languages and the health of these cultures is quite literally at stake" without a course correction, Smith said in an interview. AI models are "less capable when it is in a language that has insufficient data," he added -- which could push more users to switch to English even when it is not their native language. Microsoft will from September set up research units in the eastern French city Strasbourg to "help expand the availability of multilingual data for AI development" in at least 10 of the European Union's 24 languages, including Estonian and Greek. The work will include digitising books and recording hundreds of hours of audio. "This isn't about creating data for Microsoft to own. It is about creating data for the public to be able to use," Smith said, adding that the information would be shared on an open-source basis. The US-based company has in recent months striven to position itself as especially compatible with a gathering political push for European technological sovereignty. Leaders in the bloc have grown increasingly nervous at their dependency on US tech firms and infrastructure since Donald Trump's reelection to the White House. In June, Microsoft said it was stepping up cooperation with European governments on cybersecurity and announced new " data sovereignty " measures for its data centers on the continent. Smith said that Monday's announcement was just the latest evidence of the company's commitment to Europe. Most leading AI firms are American or Chinese, although Europe has some standouts like France's Mistral or Franco-American platform Hugging Face. Away from Microsoft, some European initiatives such as TildeLM are pushing to develop local-language AI models. The Windows and Office developer also said Monday that it was working on a digital recreation of Paris' Notre-Dame cathedral that it plans to gift to the French state, as well as digitising items from the country's BNF national library and Decorative Arts Museum.
