Utah passes new protections for children of influencers after Ruby Franke case
Republican Gov. Spencer Cox signed a law that gives kids a way to remove media they are featured in from the internet. It also orders parents who make more than $150,000 off the content annually to set aside 15 percent of those earnings into a trust fund that the children can access once they turn 18 years old.
Cox signed the law under encouragement from Franke's now ex-husband, Kevin, after he told lawmakers earlier this year that he wishes he never let his ex-wife post their children online, The Associated Press reported.
'Children cannot give informed consent to be filmed on social media, period,' he said. 'Vlogging my family, putting my children into public social media, was wrong, and I regret it every day.'
Kevin and Ruby Franke launched a family YouTube channel titled '8 Passengers' in 2015. Ruby Franke documented their life as a Mormon family in Utah and became close with parenting content creator Jodi Hildebrandt, who encouraged her to cut off ties with Kevin Franke and move the youngest two children into her home.
Ruby Franke's 12-year-old son, who was emaciated, escaped through a window and knocked on a neighbor's door. The two women were arrested on child abuse charges. The eldest child detailed his mother's obsession with 'striking content gold' and looking for views on videos at the expense of her children.
The new Utah law applies to children who are featured in online content as well as those who appear in TV or movies.
Eve Franke, 11, who police found emaciated with her head shaved, wrote a letter in support of the bill and noted that sometimes YouTube is a good thing that 'brings us together,' but 'kids deserve to be loved, not used by the ones that are supposed to love them the most,' The Associated Press reported.
Several other states have taken steps to protect children from online exploitation in the content-creation industry, including Illinois, California and Minnesota, where children's earnings are protected.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
25 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
E.J. Fagan: The Heritage Foundation founder's legacy is complicated
Edwin Feulner, the founder and longtime president of the Heritage Foundation, died last month. He will be remembered as one of the most consequential visionary leaders in modern conservatism. He will also be remembered as the person, more than anyone else, responsible for the Republican Party's turn away from truth, expertise and good governance. Feulner founded the Heritage Foundation with two other Republican congressional staffers in 1973. At the time, they saw the Republican Party of Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and the party's congressional leadership as conservatives in name only who paid lip service to conservative ideas but, in their view, acted like Democrats in office. He decided that the core problem turning Republicans away from conservatism in office was the policy advice they were receiving. When the policy agenda darted toward a new problem, Republican leaders would consult the same experts in think tanks such as the Brookings Institution, the federal bureaucracy and universities that Democratic leaders consulted. Their advice was often to address the problem with a new government program. For example, Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency in response to rampant pollution in industrial America and staffed it with environmental experts. It was remarkably successful at reducing air and water pollution in the 1970s, but at the cost of new intrusions into the economic lives of everyday Americans. Feulner and his peers saw not a success, but a betrayal caused by what he saw as liberal experts whispering into the ears of would-be conservatives. Heritage would solve this problem by providing Republicans with their own experts. The think tank created a roster of policy analysts who would promote conservative ideas. They would whisper into the ears of Republican policymakers instead. Feulner was a true innovator. Before Heritage, most think tanks were structured either as contractors such as the RAND Corp., providing policy analysis at the request of the federal government, or universities without students, where individual scholars pursued their own intellectual priorities. Feulner organized the Heritage Foundation like an interest group. They closely aligned their reports with the congressional policy agenda, marketed their findings aggressively in the media and placed dozens (if you ask Heritage, hundreds) of conservative experts in the executive and legislative branches. Almost all think tanks founded since were modeled on how Feulner chose to run Heritage. He made an early alliance with Ronald Reagan. When Reagan became president in 1981, Heritage handed him a 20-volume, 3,000-page policy planning document called the 'Mandate for Leadership.' The document laid out hundreds of specific conservative policy recommendations that the administration could quickly implement. Many 'Mandate' chapter authors were hired into senior positions in the agencies they wrote about. If that sounds familiar, it is because they have published a similar document every presidential election since, including 'Project 2025' last year. Heritage quickly grew into one of the largest think tanks in Washington, D.C. By the time Feulner stepped down in 2013, the think tank had become an $80 million organization. It could claim credit for numerous major conservative policy changes across many areas of federal policymaking, ranging from Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative to Newt Gingrich's Contract with America and welfare reform to the health care reform architecture that Mitt Romney and Barack Obama used to save America's private health care insurance system. However, his legacy is more complicated outside conservative circles. No person is more responsible for the Republican Party's turn against expertise. Heritage provided a platform for analysts to make claims that were not supported by scientific evidence. Under Feulner's leadership, Heritage convinced Republicans in Washington, D.C., to deny climate change and turn against clean energy, that tax cuts would pay for themselves and that America's racial gaps had less to do with systemic racism and more to do with the genetic inferiority of Black and Latino people. He taught Republicans to distrust scientists and bureaucrats if they didn't tell them what they wanted to hear. Feulner would often say that he was just helping policymakers solve problems with conservative ideas. Indeed, some problems are best addressed by reducing the role of government in American life or through promoting a hawkish foreign policy. But, unlike real experts, Heritage and Feulner's promise was that every problem could be solved with a conservative solution, or that every nonconservative solution would be a disaster. In my research, I show that Heritage's reports would often produce wildly different predictions about legislation when compared with respected nonpartisan experts such as the Congressional Budget Office and academic research. The result is that Feulner bears much of the responsibility for the polarization of American politics. There is a strong connection between the growth and influence of Heritage and polarization. When political parties cannot agree on the basic facts underlying policy debates, they cannot work together to solve the problems. When government cannot solve problems, people lose faith in the political system itself.
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP's FBI talk on Texas sparks firestorm with Democrats
Claims by Texas Republicans that the FBI is getting involved in efforts to track down and possibly detain Democratic state lawmakers who fled Texas to stop a partisan redistricting effort is getting strong pushback from Democrats in Congress. Democratic lawmakers are investigating how involved the FBI is in the Texas redistricting battle, but lawmakers who have weighed in on the matter say that FBI intervention would be an egregious politicization of the nation's top law enforcement agency. Claims that FBI Director Kash Patel is helping to track down state-level Texas Democrats come after Senate Democrats received information that the Justice Department ordered 1,000 FBI personnel to come through 100,000 Jeffrey Epstein-related documents in March to flag mentions of President Trump. Democrats say that if Patel is taking sides in the Texas redistricting fight, it would be a misuse and politicization of the FBI — something they warned about during Patel's Senate confirmation proceedings earlier this year. 'Shouldn't the FBI be tracking down terrorists, drug traffickers and child predators? The Trump administration continues to weaponize law enforcement to target political adversaries,' House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.) said in a statement on social media. Responding to a claim by Texas Sen. John Cornyn (R) that the FB I will help find Texas Democratic lawmakers who fled the Lone Star State, Jeffries said: 'These extremists don't give a damn about public safety.' 'We will not be intimidated,' he declared. Jeffries said in a Thursday interview with ABC News Live that the FBI lacks the legal authority to intervene in a state-level political dispute. 'There would be no authority for the FBI to target Democrats from the Texas legislature in connection with an act that Democrats have taken that is authorized by the Texas Constitution,' he said. He said the redistricting effort in Texas is 'a clear power grab because Donald Trump and House Republicans are desperate to try to hold on to their thin majority in the House of Representatives.' The FBI declined to comment on Republican claims that the agency was assisting Texas law enforcement in tracking down Democratic state lawmakers who have taken refuge in Illinois and other states. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), a senior Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, called out the Trump administration for abusing its power and misusing law enforcement personnel. 'This ridiculous misuse of federal law enforcement for political ends should be rejected by any fair-minded person,' Whitehouse said. Whitehouse, the ranking member of the Judiciary panel's Federal Courts Subcommittee, said in December that there was 'a lot of quiet concern about Kash Patel' and how he would lead the FBI. 'You really don't want an FBI director who wants to use that position to try to direct, intimidate and control the American media, and you really don't want one who comes in with an enemies list of his own that he wants to pursue without justification,' Whitehouse told MSNBC in an interview at the time. Democratic lawmakers warned the FBI to step back from the Texas redistricting fight after Cornyn, the senior Republican senator from Texas, who faces a tough primary fight against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton next year, urged Patel to help track down Texas Democrats and investigate them for the potential crimes. 'I am proud to announce that Director Kash Patel has approved my request for the FBI to assist state and local law enforcement in locating runaway Texas House Democrats,' Cornyn said in a statement Thursday morning. 'I thank President Trump and Director Patel for supporting and swiftly acting on my call for the federal government to hold these supposed lawmakers accountable for fleeing Texas,' Cornyn said. Democrats called the development a potentially 'dangerous' politicization of the FBI. 'The FBI should be working to keep our communities safe, not getting involved in the political thuggery of Texas Republicans. What legal grounds they could possibly have to play a role in this escapes me – but if they were to get involved, it would certainly set a dangerous precedent for the politicization of the Bureau,' Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) told The Hill. Van Hollen sponsored an amendment to the Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations bill for fiscal year 2026 that would have blocked the Trump administration from spending money to relocate the FBI headquarters to anyplace other than Greenbelt, Maryland, the site chosen by the General Services Administration in 2023. The amendment was initially adopted to the spending bill but then stripped on a party-line Republican vote. Democratic sources say the growing politicization of the FBI will likely become an issue in the upcoming September government funding negotiations. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) kept the Commerce, Justice, Science spending bill out of a three-bill appropriations package that passed the Senate on Friday after Democrats objected. Thune was doing events in South Dakota on Thursday and did not comment on the latest partisan back-and-forth of the FBI's involvement in the Texas redistricting battle. Speaker Mike Johnson's (R-La.) office did not respond to a request for comment. Cornyn, who faces a tough fight with Paxton that will decide the future of his long Senate career, has spearheaded the push to bring the FBI into the political food fight over Texas redistricting. Democrats suspect Cornyn is jumping into the fray to win points with the Republican base ahead of next year's primary at a time that some polls show him trailing Paxton. Cornyn sent a letter to Patel Tuesday to 'encourage' the FBI to 'take any appropriate steps to aid in Texas state law enforcement efforts to locate or arrest potential lawbreakers who have fled the state.' He argued the departure of state lawmakers from Texas was designed to 'avoid legislative responsibilities' and a 'violation of their oath of office.' Cornyn said he is specifically 'concerned' that Democratic legislators 'solicited or accepted funds to aid in their efforts to avoid their legislative duties' and 'may be guilty of bribery or other public corruption offenses.' Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said on Thursday that 'Texas DPS and the FBI are tracking down derelict Democrats.' 'They will be taken directly to the Texas Capitol,' he wrote in a social media post on X. Not Above the Law, a coalition of left-of-center activist groups, said that Cornyn's efforts to push the FBI into the Texas political fight threatened political rights and freedoms 'core to our democracy. 'Federal law enforcement must never be weaponized as a political tool of the president or manipulated by state-level politicians to serve partisan agendas. Using federal agents to encroach on state matters sets a dangerous precedent that threatens the rights and freedoms of every Americans,' the group said in a statement. The signatories to the statement include Lisa Gilbert, co-president of Public Citizen, Praveen Fernandes, vice president of the Constitutional Accountability Center, Kelsey Herbert, campaign director at MoveOn, and Brett Edkins, managing director for policy and political affairs at Stand Up America.
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Porter, Hilton lead in wide-open California governor's race: Poll
Democratic former Rep. Katie Porter (Calif.) and Republican former Fox News host Steve Hilton are at the top of California's primary for governor, new polling shows, after Vice President Harris decided against a bid. Emerson College Polling found Porter in the lead with 18 percent support, followed by Hilton at 12 percent. In California's nonpartisan system, the top two candidates move on from the primary to the general, regardless of party affiliation. The poll comes after Harris, who was expected to clear the field if she entered the race, announced she would not run to replace term-limited Gov. Gavin Newsom (D). Republican Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, Democrat former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and Republican-turned-Democrat Rick Caruso were next up, with 7, 5 and 4 percent, respectively. The rest of the field, including Former Biden Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis (D) and former state Controller Betty Yee (D), earned just 3 percent or less each. 'With Kamala Harris officially out of the race, Katie Porter has emerged as the Democratic frontrunner, increasing her support from 12 percent to 18 percent since the April Emerson poll,' said Spencer Kimball, executive director of Emerson College Polling, in a release. Hilton has made his jump to 12 percent after entering the race in late April. Since the April poll, the share of undecided voters dropped from 54 percent to 38 percent. Given California's system, it's possible that two Democrats could advance to the general in an intra-party fight, or the race could see a more classic Democrat-on-Republican contest. The last time a Republican won California's governorship was 2006, when former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) scored reelection. And though Trump made inroads in California in November, the state has gone blue in the presidential race every cycle since 1992. Meanwhile, Harris's decision not to run for governor has raised questions about whether she could try again for the White House in 2028. Newsom, whose tenure as governor is up next year, has also long been seen as a potential 2028 contender. The Emerson College Polling survey was taken Aug. 4-5 among 1,000 active registered voters in California and had a credibility interval, similar to a poll's margin of error, of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
