Romanian officials reroute flooded stream away from Praid salt mine
Authorities evacuated 45 households near the mine areas at risk of collapse after the worst floods in 30 years in the central Romanian county of Harghita have swollen the nearby stream.
While part of the mine has been producing salt, with an annual production capacity of around 70,000-100,000 metric tons, its huge galleries and medical centre attract half a million tourists each year.
On Monday, the government approved support schemes worth 300 million lei ($67.82 million) for immediate help to the state-owned mine as well as up to 200 local companies that will be affected from the loss of tourism.
European experts were also expected on site to assess potential solutions to save the mine.
($1 = 4.4234 lei)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
9 minutes ago
- Reuters
India's long bond rally falters as fiscal risks mount, demand ebbs
MUMBAI, Aug 14 (Reuters) - The rally in India's long-duration bonds is faltering due to dwindling demand from banks, insurers and pension funds, coupled with rising fiscal concerns and limited potential for further rate cuts, according to several investors. Long bonds, or government securities with maturities of 10 years or more, are typically favoured by long-term investors who seek stable returns to match their future liabilities. Slowing tax revenues and weaker nominal GDP growth are straining government finances and souring bond sentiment, already hit by the Reserve Bank of India's signal that the bar for further rate easing will be high. The benchmark 10-year bond yield has risen 24 basis points since the RBI's surprise 50-basis-point rate cut in June, when it shifted its stance to "neutral" from "accommodative". The yield is now hovering at nearly 100 basis points above the policy repo rate. "The primary drivers of the 17 basis points rise in 10-year government securities yields in the past two weeks in our view are weak direct tax receipts, worries over higher supply, and investor positioning," Neelkanth Mishra, chief economist at Axis Bank wrote in a note on Thursday. The government received higher non-tax receipts in the form of RBI's dividend payout but gross direct tax revenues fell 2% between April 1 and August 11. Nominal GDP growth is expected at 8%–8.5% in the financial year 2026, below the budget assumption of around 10%. Still, economists do not expect the government to miss its fiscal deficit target of 4.4% of GDP for the year. "Traction in tax collections going forward could remain critical in achieving the fiscal deficit target for the year," economists at HDFC Bank said in a note. The bond market is also grappling with a growing mismatch between supply and demand for long-duration securities. Axis Mutual Fund pegs gross long-bond supply at 11.98 trillion rupees, outpacing expected demand of 10.82 trillion rupees from insurers, pension and provident funds, while ICICI Prudential Life's head of fixed income, Ketan Parikh said 30-year yields could rise to 7.30–7.40% from 7.20% without clarity on debt supply structure. Appetite is also capped by revised held-to-maturity norms for banks and a higher equity tilt in the national pension scheme, they said. "The 30-year bond is trading at a spread of 180 bps over overnight rates, but the supply-demand scenario is a problem," said Shantanu Godambe, vice president, fixed income investments at DSP Mutual Fund. "A lot of funds and investors have cut down duration as we're nearing the end of the rate easing cycle. But if a supply cut happens as the market is expecting, then we'll see sanctity coming back to that segment and some spread compression on the longer end." The RBI's bond purchases helped absorb supply in the first half of the year, but fresh buying is unlikely in the second half following the recent cut in the cash reserve ratio, said IDFC First Bank's chief economist Gaura Sen Gupta. Long-duration bonds may still offer value for long-term investors, though near-term volatility remains a risk, analysts said. "Unless India faces a significant growth shock or sees renewed momentum from Bloomberg index inclusion, the rally in long bonds is likely over," Devang Shah, head of fixed income at Axis MF wrote in a recent note.
Western Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Gatwick ‘optimistic' minister will approve expansion plan
Chief executive Stewart Wingate claimed the benefits from the West Sussex airport bringing its emergency runway into routine would last 'for generations'. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has a deadline of October 27 to decide whether to give the go-ahead to the proposal. Gatwick submitted a modified development consent order (DCO) application after the Cabinet minister announced in February she would back the scheme if adjustments were made, covering issues such as noise mitigation and the proportion of passengers who would travel to and from the airport by public transport. The project would see Gatwick move the emergency runway 12 metres north, enabling it to be used for departures of narrow-bodied planes such as Airbus A320s and Boeing 737s. This would increase the airport's capacity by around 100,000 flights a year. Gatwick's plan also involves remodelling and replacing existing taxiways – which connect runways to terminals, hangars and other facilities – extending both terminals, and installing new aircraft gates. Local campaigners opposed to expansion are concerned about the impact on surface transport, noise, housing provision and wastewater treatment, but the airport insists it has conducted 'full and thorough assessments' of those issues. Mr Wingate said: 'The critical final decision on our northern runway plans is just weeks away and follows a rigorous and lengthy planning process. 'I remain optimistic the Secretary of State will approve our privately-financed, shovel-ready plans to unlock further growth for London Gatwick and the UK economy, generating new jobs, trade and tourism opportunities for generations to come.' Gatwick says its plans would create £1 billion per year in economic benefits and generate an additional 14,000 jobs. Mr Wingate will start his new role as managing director for UK airports for Vinci Airports and Global Infrastructure Partners on September 1, overseeing the future development and strategic direction of Gatwick, Edinburgh and Belfast International airports. His replacement at Gatwick will be Pierre-Hugues Schmit, currently Vinci Airports's chief commercial officer. Gatwick announced on Thursday its underlying earnings for the first six months of the year were £262 million.
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
A policy that benefited the richest and cost the UK £100bn: it's long past time to end the fuel duty freeze
Nothing speaks so eloquently of the rundown state of Britain than potholes on the roads. Motorists rightly complain of the damage caused to their vehicles. Cyclists risk serious injury every time they mount their bikes. Increased road use from a rising population is one reason for the problem. Cuts to repair budgets are another. Fixing the problem will be expensive, with one estimate putting the cost of mending potholes in England and Wales at a hefty £17bn. Complaints about the state of the roads have made governments reluctant to arouse the ire of motoring lobby groups by raising fuel excise duty – the tax paid at the pump on fuel. The last chancellor to do so was Alistair Darling 15 years ago. The cumulative cost to the exchequer of the freezes and cuts to fuel duty since 2010 is put at £130bn – a colossal sum given the struggle governments have had to balance the books during that time. In reality, the days are numbered for fuel duty. Of the 34m vehicles on the UK's roads, 1.6m are fully electric, but that figure will rise steadily over time. Once petrol and diesel vehicles are phased out completely, the £24.4bn currently raised from fuel duty will dwindle to zero. That represents a sizeable and permanent hit to the public finances. Rachel Reeves has more immediate things to worry about. The weakness of the economy means the chancellor is at grave risk of breaking her self-imposed rule that day-to-day government spending should be matched by tax receipts. Reeves fears that breaking the rule would incur the wrath of the financial markets, while cutting spending would incur the wrath of Labour MPs. So she is scrabbling around for tax increases that don't break Labour's manifesto commitment not to raise the rates of income tax, VAT or employee national insurance contributions. This is not going to be easy. One estimate last week said Reeves will need to find more than £50bn to stick to her fiscal rule with a reasonable margin for error. Even though other forecasts suggest the figure may be lower than that, there will still be difficult choices to make. Faced with these pressures, Reeves should do two things. First, she should end the freeze on fuel duty, which has been kept in place no matter whether the cost of petrol and diesel is high or low. It is not just that Reeves could well do with the several billion pounds that a rise in fuel duty would harvest. Fuel duty is now a third lower, in real terms, than it was when Darling was at the Treasury, effectively cutting the cost of motoring and so creating incentives to drive more. Increased congestion and the potholed roads are consequences of that. The stated rationale for the protracted freeze since 2010 is that it helps hard-pressed motorists, but the main beneficiaries have not been white-van man but the better off, who drive more, own more vehicles and buy gas-guzzling SUVs. The richest fifth of households have benefited twice as much from the fuel duty freeze as the poorest fifth. Raising fuel duty in the budget should be a no-brainer for Reeves. But the chancellor also needs to come up with a plan for what to do once the era of all-electric vehicles finally arrives, and here there is an obvious solution: road pricing. Conceptually, there should be little problem with this idea. People expect to pay more for a train journey in rush hours. Hotels charge more for rooms on a Friday or Saturday when demand is higher. The same principle should apply to roads. There are reasons why ministers are reluctant to grasp this nettle. Fuel duty, while a regressive tax, is easy to understand. There are no issues with privacy and surveillance, as there would be with road pricing. Governments are sensitive to charges that they are planning to wage war on motorists. Given that only 5% of vehicles are electric currently, the transition may take longer than originally envisaged. No question, doing nothing has its attractions. But the costs of inaction will grow over time. A report by the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change (TBI) said the loss of tax revenue from cars would be £10bn by 2030, £20bn by 2035 and £30bn by 2040. This would inevitably lead to chunky tax increases. Reducing the cost of motoring by continually freezing fuel duty would lead to more and longer traffic jams. Those still driving petrol and diesel vehicles would face a triple whammy: spending longer in traffic; paying higher taxes elsewhere to compensate for the lost fuel-duty revenue from those who transferred to electric vehicles; and paying three to four times more for tax and fuel than those who drive EVs. The TBI report outlined the four ways road pricing might work. Drivers could face a flat-rate charge for each mile they drive; costs could vary according to geographic area or specific roads, with costs increased in areas where congestion was higher; road users could be charged for each minute they spend driving; and finally an 'Uberised' model, where charges vary dynamically on the road used and the time of travel. Technically, it would be possible to make any of the approaches – or a combination of them – work. It speaks volumes that the report was published four years ago this month, since when inertia has reigned supreme. That needs to change because the do-nothing option is really no option at all. Larry Elliott is a Guardian columnist
