
Rachel Reeves admitted ‘I'm under so much pressure' before tears at PMQs sparked riddle & sent markets crashing
In another meltdown day for Downing Street following the benefits vote fiasco, TV cameras showed her sobbing on the frontbench.
5
5
5
Money markets took fright at the extraordinary scenes, forcing Sir Keir Starmer later to give Ms Reeves his full backing.
No 10 denied the pair had rowed. The Chancellor was said to be upset about a personal matter.
Her tears at PMQs plunged Labour into a fresh crisis — and sparked panic on the money markets.
Speculation mounted about Reeves's future when Starmer publicly refused to guarantee her job.
She admitted feeling 'under so much pressure' minutes before her outburst, dubbed ' waterworksgate '.
It followed Tuesday's last-minute climbdown on cuts to personal independence payments (PIP) to fend off a Labour revolt and pass the flagship Welfare Bill.
Sources dismissed rumours Ms Reeves and Sir Keir had a bust-up before noon's PMQs, but claimed she'd had terse words with Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle.
Ms Reeves's spokesman insisted her crying was down to personal reasons he 'would not be getting into'. And allies denied she was on the brink of quitting.
The Chancellor, 46, was comforted by sister Ellie, a Labour minister, but Sir Keir did not speak to her as she was led to her office next to the Commons chamber.
No 10 had to delete a clip from Sir Keir's X because it showed Ms Reeves crying next to him, though it insisted the Chancellor was 'going nowhere'.
The PM and Ms Reeves were said to have spoken last night and were working 'business as usual'.
Money markets earlier panicked at the prospect of a change of Chancellor and possible abandonment of her spending rules.
UK ten-year borrowing costs surged to 4.6 per cent and the Pound fell by one per cent against the Dollar to less than $1.36.
Tuesday's gutting of the welfare reforms left Ms Reeves needing to plug a bigger hole in public savings — either by spending cuts, tax rises or borrowing.
Squirming Keir Starmer refuses to say Rachel Reeves will be Chancellor at next election after horror Budget
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch pounced at Prime Minister's Questions — quizzing Sir Keir about whether Ms Reeves would remain in place.
Taking aim at the puffy-eyed Chancellor, Ms Badenoch said: 'She looks absolutely miserable.
'Labour MPs are going on the record saying the Chancellor is toast. The reality is she's a human shield for his (the PM's) incompetence. Will she really be in post for the next election?'
In response, the PM did not confirm Ms Reeves would remain in post until 2029.
COMMONS MELTDOWN
11.50: Rachel Reeves says she is under 'so much pressure' just before Prime Minister's Questions.
12.00: She appears at PMQs.
12.13: Sir Keir Starmer dodges the question, and Ms Reeves is seen shedding tears in the background.
12.45: Downing Street insists the Chancellor is 'going nowhere'.
13.00: A spokesperson says Ms Reeves was dealing with a 'personal matter'.
He would only tell Ms Badenoch: 'I have to say I'm always cheered when she asks me questions or responds to a statement because she always makes a complete mess of it and shows just how unserious and irrelevant they are.'
Ms Reeves is said to have been given a ticking off by the Speaker on Tuesday for taking too long to answer questions, to which she snapped back.
It is believed he again collared her before PMQs yesterday when she is understood to have welled up and confided to being 'under so much pressure'.
A spokesperson for Sir Lindsay did not comment.
In her first year in the job, Ms Reeves has faced fierce criticism over winter fuel, welfare cuts, the National Insurance raid, sluggish growth, taxing farmers and taking freebies.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting defended her last night, calling her a 'tough cookie'. He told The Sun: 'We are not invincible and superhuman as politicians.'
But senior Tory Robert Jenrick said: 'Rachel Reeves's benefits Bill is dead, and so is her career.
'She's been humiliated by her backbenchers and been forced into her most embarrassing U-turn yet.
'By her own metric she's crashed the economy, lost the confidence of the markets and now, it seems, the confidence of the Prime Minister too. It's time for Reeves to go.'
5
5
Yesterday Cabinet Minister Pat McFadden warned about Labour's U-turns, telling Times Radio: 'The process of the last couple of weeks does have financial consequences.
'They will all be taken together with other moving parts in the economy, in the fiscal picture at the Budget.
'Recent antics'
'But I'm not denying that when you set out on a plan that has a cost attached to it, then you have to change that or take it forward in slower time, that is a decision with financial consequences.'
One Labour MP hit out at Ms Reeves's mutinous colleagues for forcing the concessions, saying: 'We've got to live within our means, and I'd gently point out to colleagues that their recent antics have not helped that cause.'
JP Morgan says the Chancellor could face a financial black hole of up to £18billion. The bank's Allan Monks added: 'It appears likely that there will be pressure to raise taxes at the Budget.'
Business confidence remains fragile after firms swallowed the jump in tax and labour costs in April, according to research by the British Chambers of Commerce.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
25 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Labour sees biggest first-year poll drop for governing party since 1990s
Sir Keir Starmer's party has averaged 24% in polls in the past month, down 10 points from 34% in the weeks following the 2024 election. It is common for political parties to experience a slide in the polls after taking power – it has happened to every UK government bar one in the past 40 years – but a drop of this size is unusual. The last time it was in double digits was 1992-93, when the Tory administration led by Mr Major saw its poll numbers fall 12 points, from an average of 43% in the weeks after the April 1992 election to 31% a year later. The findings have been compiled by the PA news agency, using its own archive of national poll data combined with figures published in the long-running British General Election academic studies. Polls measuring voting intention do not always appear in the immediate aftermath of an election – for instance, the first polls of this parliament were not carried out until the start of August 2024, one month after Labour's victory on July 4. To compare Labour's poll performance fairly with that of previous governments, the average poll numbers in the weeks after a general election have been compared with those for the month leading up to the first anniversary of that election. Almost every government in the past four decades has seen their poll standings slip over this period, but mostly by single digits – and often from a much higher starting point than Labour's 34% in 2024. For example, the Labour government led by Tony Blair saw its vote share in the polls drop by an average of six points during its first year in office in 1997-98, though from the lofty heights of 59% to 53%, still well ahead of all other parties. Labour's second term under Mr Blair saw a larger poll drop of seven points, but from 49% to 42% – again, comfortably ahead of its rivals. The Conservative government led by Boris Johnson elected in 2019 saw its first-year poll ratings also slip by seven points, but from 46% to 39%. There were smaller drops at the start of Labour's third term in 2005-06 (down five points in 12 months) and at the start of Conservative leader David Cameron's first term as PM in 2010 (down three points), though Mr Cameron's second win in 2015 was followed by a larger six-point fall. The one recent exception to this trend was the Conservative minority government led by Theresa May that was elected in 2017, with Tory support in the polls increasing by two points over 12 months, from 40% to 42%. A first-year drop in the polls for a governing party is typically accompanied by a rise in support for the main opposition in Parliament. But the past 12 months have seen something different and new in UK politics: a simultaneous and large fall in support for both the government and the opposition, with the Conservatives slipping from an average of 25% in the aftermath of the 2024 election to 18% over the past month. And while Labour and the Tories have both slid in the polls, smaller parties have risen – notably Reform, which has climbed from third place on 17% to first place on 29%. The Liberal Democrats have also edged up, from 12% to 14%, while the Greens have increased from 6% to 9%. Opinion polls are snapshots of the prevailing public mood, not projections or forecasts – and they do not predict what could happen at the next general election. But the amount of movement in recent polls, in particular the fall in support for both Labour and the Conservatives, points to an unsettled mood among voters and a volatile political landscape. Sir Keir's personal approval ratings make similarly challenging reading for the Prime Minister. Polling company Ipsos has measured public satisfaction with prime ministers since the late 1970s. Its data tracks the proportion of adults in Britain who say they are either satisfied or dissatisfied with how the PM is doing their job. The difference between these two numbers represents the approval score. The most recent Ipsos survey, completed in early June – not quite a full year since the general election – suggests 19% of adults are satisfied with Sir Keir's performance and 73% are dissatisfied, giving him a net approval score of minus 54. This is lower than any other score recorded by Ipsos for a prime minister roughly 12 months after taking office. The next lowest score is minus 48, for Labour's Gordon Brown in June 2008, and minus 37 for the Conservatives' Rishi Sunak in October 2023. The highest approval ratings were for Mr Blair in May 1998 (a plus score of 44) and Mr Major in November 1991 (plus 15). The other scores are minus 3 for Mr Cameron (May 2011); minus 7 for Conservative PM Margaret Thatcher (June 1980) and minus 25 for Mrs May (July 2017), while Mr Johnson had a net approval rating of zero a year into office in July 2020, with the same proportion of people saying they were satisfied and dissatisfied. Sir Keir's current score of minus 54 is not quite the worst ever approval rating for a prime minister reported by Ipsos, however. Mrs Thatcher dropped as low as minus 56 in March 1990, while both Mr Major and Mr Sunak sank as far as minus 59, in August 1994 and April 2024 respectively.


Sky News
32 minutes ago
- Sky News
New front door to House of Lords cost £9.6m... but doesn't work
A former spending watchdog has been asked to investigate after a new front door was installed at the House of Lords that cost nearly £10m and does not work. A security officer had to be permanently stationed at the door to press a button to open it, which one peer calculated was costing £2,500 each week. It also emerged the cost of the work spiralled by nearly 60% from the original estimate of £6.1m. The Lord Speaker has now written to independent crossbencher Lord Morse, who led the National Audit Office for a decade, to investigate the £9.6m door debacle. In his letter, Lord McFall of Alcluith, who chairs the House of Lords Commission that oversees the running of the site, said: "The commission identified that it was unclear how many issues were due to manufacturing and installation failures and how many were due to issues with the initial identification of requirements and subsequent need for alterations. "Additional information will be needed to understand the failures, including information on costs - both how the initial project figure of £6.1m was arrived at and the increase to the current total of £9.6m, and any unanticipated additional costs such as increased staffing to manage and operate the entrance. "It will be important to assess the quality of the decision-making in establishing the project and the ways in which the evidence provided for the specifications of the new entrance were tested to ensure they took account of user requirements." He added: "The problems that have arisen around delivery of the new entrance pose larger questions about effective programme delivery, including capability within parliamentary departments." Speaking at Westminster, senior deputy speaker Lord Gardiner of Kimble, who also sits on the commission, said: "It is unacceptable that the Peers' Entrance does not operate as it should. The commission has directed urgent work to resolve this." He added: "The cost to remedy defects will not be borne by the House and will be met by Parliament's contractors." Former Tory minister Lord Robathan said: "I do not hold the senior deputy speaker responsible for this scandal, but it is a scandalous waste of public money." Demanding to know who was responsible "by name", he said: "It is now nearly £10m for a door that does not work. Somebody accountable should be identified and should perhaps resign for this terrible waste of public money." Tory peer Lord Hayward said: "The senior deputy speaker told us the total cost, but the staff manning that door, calculated on the written answer he provided to me, are costing £2,500 per week. That cost has to be borne by someone." In response, Lord Gardiner said: "On the issue of the number of people involved in the manual use of the door while it is being repaired and made usable, I am assured that they are within the existing complement of members of staff."


Powys County Times
40 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
MPs declare more than £1m of gifts and hospitality in year since election
MPs have received more than £1 million in gifts since the election, including foreign travel, accommodation and tickets to sporting events and concerts. Rows over free tickets and other gifts given to senior Labour figures, including Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, posed an early problem for the Government, which had made restoring trust in politics a major part of its election campaign. But analysis of the MPs' Register of Interests by the PA news agency shows hundreds of MPs have declared receiving gifts in the past year. Some 236 MPs declared gifts from UK sources, totalling £477,539, while 144 said they had been on overseas trips paid for by donors, charities, think tanks or foreign governments, worth another £810,761. In total, 318 MPs declared that they had received gifts in the year since the election, just under half the number sitting in the Commons. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage declared the highest value, receiving gifts worth a total of £98,709 over the past year. The bulk of these took the form of flights and accommodation on a number of trips to the United States, paid for by Reform donor Christopher Harborne and party volunteer George Cottrell. But they also include £8,413 for a helicopter journey from JC Bamford, whose owner has previously backed the Tories, and tickets worth £2,000 from boxer Derek Chisora to watch his fight against Joe Joyce last August. The biggest recipient of hospitality from UK sources was the Prime Minister, thanks to his regular attendance at Arsenal games. Sir Keir declared £11,170 worth of football tickets over the past year. A long-standing Arsenal season ticket holder, he has previously said that he is no longer able to sit in the stands because of security concerns, but has been offered a seat in the club directors' box so he can continue to attend matches with his son. The Prime Minister declared a total of £17,344 in hospitality and other gifts since the election, with other donations including tickets from Universal Music and the FA to see Taylor Swift and the loan of clothes to his wife. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch declared just one gift – £14,350 from Tory donor Neil Record to cover work space, accommodation and hospitality for a series of meetings in Gloucestershire in March this year. While several MPs received significant sums in gifts, most declared lower amounts or none at all, with the median MP receiving £1,208 in gifts over the year. Some 49 MPs received free tickets to football matches in the past year, totalling almost £59,000. But gifts from football clubs and organisations such as the FA and the Premier League totalled more than £70,000, and included concert tickets as well as hospitality at matches. The single largest gift of sporting tickets, however, was declared by shadow business minister Greg Smith, who received hospitality worth £5,160 at last year's British Grand Prix from hosts Silverstone. Four other MPs, including Leader of the Commons Lucy Powell and shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel, also received hospitality at Silverstone last year. Eight MPs received hospitality from the Lawn Tennis Association at Wimbledon in 2024, while golf's R&A provided tickets for four MPs at the Open. Another 49 MPs received tickets to awards ceremonies including the Baftas, the Brit Awards and the British Kebab Awards, while 23 were given tickets and hospitality for horse racing events, and 21 received tickets to concerts. The most popular of those concerts were part of Taylor Swift's Eras Tour, with nine MPs receiving free tickets totalling £14,628, mostly from the Premier League and the FA. As well as the Prime Minister, they included Cabinet ministers Darren Jones, Peter Kyle, Bridget Phillipson and Wes Streeting, and Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey. During the last election, Labour campaigned on a pledge to restore probity to public life after the scandals that had plagued the previous Conservative government. Last year Sir Keir sought to toughen up transparency rules for ministers, introducing a new monthly register of gifts and hospitality for ministers rather than the previous quarterly releases. He also changed the Ministerial Code in November to include the seven principles of public life directly in the rules and allow the independent adviser on ministerial standards to launch his own investigations. But Alastair McCapra, chief executive of the Chartered Institute of Public Relations, warned the continued culture of gifts and hospitality in British politics risked creating a 'full-blown crisis of legitimacy'. He said: 'At the heart of this credibility gap is the shadowy relationship between business and politics. 'The entrenched culture of gifts and hospitality in British politics creates the perception of corruption, and the suspicion of back doors to access are damaging a Labour Party that campaigned on promises of transparency, integrity and a break from the past. 'Political scandals thrive in the gaps between information and silence. 'If the Government and the business community are serious about building back trust, they must prioritise and accept a relationship that is transparent and accountable to the public.'