
Backwardness, not religion, sole criterion for fresh OBC survey in Bengal: Mamata
Kolkata: "Backwardness, and not religion, was the sole criterion for the fresh OBC survey in Bengal," CM
told the state assembly on Tuesday, tabling the report which has identified 140 communities in the OBC category.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
While there are 49 and 91 subgroups in the OBC-A and OBC-B categories, respectively, 50 more groups are being evaluated for inclusion.
The legal gridlock on the OBC issue has had an overriding impact on Bengal, from pausing admissions in schools, colleges and universities to state govt recruitments. Banerjee said the issuance of OBC certificates for college admissions and govt jobs would resume immediately. "Many recruitment boards kept the process on hold due to the legal confusion.
That will now be resolved," she said.
A Calcutta High Court 2024 ruling (now challenged in SC) had scrapped several groups in the Bengal OBC list, bringing down the 17% OBC reservations to 7% and cancelling around five lakh caste certificates.
The fresh report allows the Bengal govt to restore OBC reservations to 17%, allocating 7% for OBC-A and 10% for OBC-B. This is set to increase slightly with the 50 additional groups being evaluated.
Banerjee said a deliberate misinformation was being spread over the issue of OBC reservations, dubbing it a "political conspiracy" to mislead people. "A false narrative is being circulated on social media and even by some sections of the media, claiming that reservations are being granted on the basis of religion. This is a complete lie," she said.
The CM said the HC striking down OBC status for 113 classes and cancelling the OBC-A and OBC-B sub-categories reduced the overall OBC reservation from 17% to just 7%, severely affecting thousands of beneficiaries across the state.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
On May 22, 2024, the HC, while striking down the OBC list, had observed: "Religion indeed appears to have been the sole criterion for declaring these communities as OBCs." The state govt challenged this in Supreme Court and undertook to conduct a fresh survey within three months and complete it by June-end.
Following this, a new Backward Classes Welfare Commission, headed by former Calcutta HC judge Asim Kumar Banerjee, was constituted.
The commission began reviewing the inclusion of 117 communities — including the 113 that were earlier excluded — based on a fresh benchmark survey by the Bureau of Applied Economics and Statistics. An additional 26 communities also applied for inclusion, prompting the commission to expand its survey.
In the report, CM Banerjee said that on May 8, 2025, a new govt notification created fresh sub-categories within the 66 OBC communities that the HC had not invalidated.
On May 27, 51 communities were reinstated into the OBC list by the commission, followed by another 25 on June 3. Sub-categorisation was also resumed, placing 35 communities under OBC-A and 41 under OBC-B on the same day.
"Every morning, we wake up to a flood of fake news on social media. That is why I felt it was necessary to clarify the entire matter in the assembly," the CM said.
Taking a swipe at Left Front, Banerjee said: "No proper surveys were conducted during the CPM era.
It was only after we came to office that a benchmark survey was done to create this list. OBC-A groups are comparatively more backward, which is why they are entitled to greater reservation."
Leader of opposition Suvendu Adhikari tried to intervene, but Speaker Biman Banerjee did not allow him to speak. Adhikari alleged that the entire process was an example of appeasing a particular religious community. "The real OBCs will remain deprived," he said, adding that they would present their views during the next hearing in Supreme Court.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
HC stays govt mandate for quota in minority institutions for Class 11 admissions
Mumbai, The Bombay High Court on Thursday granted an interim stay on the Maharashtra government's mandate to minority educational institutes to reserve seats for Schedule Castes/Schedule Tribes and Other Backward Classes for first-year junior college admissions. A bench of Justices M S Karnik and N R Borkar passed the order on a bunch of petitions filed by some minority institutions, challenging the May 6 resolution issued by the government's school education and sports department applying the constitutional/social reservations in minority education institutes. The high court said it found substance in the petitioners' arguments and hence the mandate of social reservation will not be applicable for Class 11 admissions in minority educational institutions. The HC bench said it was granting a stay on the clause of the resolution that included minority educational institutes for the reservation. It directed the government to file its affidavit in reply to the petitions and posted the matter for further hearing on August 6. The high court on Wednesday questioned the government's rationale behind the resolution and asked if it was willing to withdraw the same or issue a corrigendum clarifying that minority institutes would not be included in the reservation. On Thursday, government pleader Neha Bhide told the court that she has no instructions from the government to withdraw the resolution or issue a corrigendum. As per the pleas, Article 15 of the Constitution excludes minority educational institutes, aided or unaided, from applicability of reservations for socially and educationally backward classes. The petitions claimed that under Article 30 , the right of admission is exclusively with the management of the institution. A similar GR was issued in 2019 but it was withdrawn after petitions were filed then, they said.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Sanjoy Chakravorty: A caste census is a Pandora's Box that India must open anyway
It appears that India's much delayed 2021 Population Census will likely take place in 2027 and that it will include caste enumeration. If this does happen and the results are released, we will see caste data at the national level for the first time after 1931. The demand for a caste census has been growing for years, especially from the Congress, several other members of the INDIA block and many states. In fact, the 2011 Census had included an enumeration of castes, but the data was never released (for reasons discussed below). Bihar conducted a state-level caste survey in 2022. The governments of Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu, among others, have been vociferous in their support of this step. With the acquiescence of the Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs this April, all major political interests are now aligned in favour of a caste census. Also Read: Himanshu: India's caste census must serve its purpose Caste demography represents a massive and critical gap in India's self-knowledge. There is some information on the most marginalized groups: Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, who comprise roughly 16.6% and 8.6% respectively of the population. Together, they make up about one-quarter of the country's people. Another 20% are people who do not identify as Hindu: Muslims (14.2%), Christians (2.3%), Sikhs (1.7%), Buddhists (0.7%), Jains (0.4%) and others, according to the 2011 Census. That leaves about 55% of the Indian population as undifferentiated Hindus, including Forward and Dominant Castes and Other Backward Classes (OBCs). Therefore, the purpose of a caste census is primarily to disaggregate and understand the composition of this 55%. While there is some interest in learning more about the demography of Forward and Dominant Castes, the most important objective of a caste census is to estimate the size and composition of the OBC population. This is surely India's largest social group. But how large is it? No one knows. The Mandal Commission (1980) placed it at 52% of the total population. The National Sample Survey Organization calculated it to be 32-36% in 2000 and 41% in 2006. Other government and non- government surveys place the number in the 30-35% range. The Bihar caste survey counted 63% of the state's population as OBC. Also Read: Caste census? Okay, but we must handle it with care Why is there so much imprecision and uncertainty about India's OBC population? There are several answers to this question. For one, self-identification of social identity can be tricky: people may have mixed identities, or they may believe they have an identity that does not match official categories, or they may choose not to identify as 'Backward' in any way. Second, the official categories themselves aren't fixed. The Union ministry of social justice and empowerment, which is in charge of maintaining caste lists, moves castes in and out of the OBC list based on dynamic factors (like education and economic conditions). Moreover, the OBC category is itself very diverse: castes that may be lagging in some regions may be dominant landowning groups or thriving small business communities in others. So much so, that there exists a quasi-official category called 'upper OBCs' that includes caste groups like Yadav, Kurmi, Koeri and Bania (in Bihar). Also Read: We need a reformation: Caste salience must fall for India's social capital to rise One of the main reasons for the caste census data of 2011 not being released, as reported, is that people self-identified in tens of thousands of castes, so it became impossible to impose some sort of order on the data. This is also what happened when the British Indian government began conducting the census exercise in 1867-72. The original intent was to capture caste data under the so-called Chaturvarna system: Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya and Shudra. That turned out to be impossible. By the 1901 Census, there were 1,641 castes and sub-castes listed; by 1931, the last census with caste information, that list had grown to 4,147. C.F. McGrath, who was the commissioner of Independent India's first Census in 1951, had earlier concluded that the 'meaningless division into the four castes alleged to have been made by Manu should be put aside." Also Read: The Bihar caste survey marks a big step towards a reality check The only solution to this 'problem' of India's teeming diversity is to reduce it; to impose order by using a preset rather than open-ended caste list. This is what Bihar's survey did and is presumably what the national Caste Census of 2027 plans to do. The obvious problem with this is that by reducing choice, millions of people may feel un- or mis-represented and therefore opt out of the system. This points us to a deeper problem with this approach. A census does not merely record reality, but alters it by imposing order (by using categories and lists). A census therefore shapes the world it seeks to describe and reactions to it then reshape the census and the world it describes. One possibility with a pre-set caste list is that unlisted castes will begin to disappear as recognized social identities. Another possibility is that resistance and political action will shape future caste lists. Also Read: A national caste census looks all but inevitable A census is a powerful tool with wide-ranging and long-lasting consequences. The British Indian censuses were arguably the most important social experiments ever carried out in the subcontinent. The categories and categorical definitions they created—especially for religion but also for caste and tribe—have come to be accepted as real and permanent. This space does not permit any further exposition. Interested readers may look up my 2019 book The Truth About Us. There is no doubt about India's need for a Caste Census that provides robust information on the composition of 55% of its population. Core policies on welfare, education and employment should ideally be based on this data, but have been shooting in the dark at shape-shifting targets so far. But let us not play down the challenges of doing this well and recognize that, even if done well, the Caste Census will inevitably change the composition and politics of caste in ways that are impossible to predict now. The author is a professor of geography, environment and urban studies and director of global studies at Temple University.


New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Pre-primary sections to start in 210 Telangana government schools
HYDERABAD: The Director of School Education, Telangana, on Tuesday announced the approval of 210 pre-primary sections under the Annual Work Plan and Budget (AWP&B) 2025–26 for Samagra Shiksha. As per government instructions, the Education department will introduce pre-primary classes — nursery, LKG and UKG — in government schools across the state from the 2025–26 academic year. Until now, government schools did not have pre-primary sections. Officials said the move aims to ease the financial burden on underprivileged families, who were previously forced to enrol their children in private schools with high fees. Some of the government schools that will offer pre-primary classes include MPPS Parkal (Hanamkonda), MPUPS Mylaram (Hanumakonda), MPPS Dhammanapet (Jagtial) and GPS Shambhunipet (Warangal).