Hillary Clinton sounded alarm on Joe Biden's political viability 'by 2024', House investigators hear
Klain spoke with staff on the House Oversight Committee for over five hours on Thursday, as Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., continues to probe whether top Biden aides concealed signs of mental decline in the ex-president.
A source familiar with his voluntary interview told Fox News Digital that Klain believed Biden was mentally sharp enough to serve as president, and was not too old to run.
But the ex-secretary of state and former Biden national security adviser Jake Sullivan both "approached Ron Klain stating they believed Joe Biden was not politically viable" months before he dropped his re-election bid in July 2024, the source said.
Sullivan told Klain that Biden "was less effective in 2024 compared to 2022," the source said.
It's not immediately clear if Biden's mental acuity was the reasoning for their doubts, nor if they made the case to Klain together or separately.
But it's a significant indictment coming from top national Democrats of Biden in general, long before concerns about his fitness for office within the party were made public knowledge.
Adrienne Watson, a representative for Sullivan, denied the account in a statement to Fox News Digital.
"Jake did not have a conversation with Ron about Joe Biden running for president before the debate," Watson said.
Sullivan had been a top aide to both Biden and Clinton, having served as the latter's senior policy advisor during her 2016 campaign.
Klain, who served as White House chief of staff for the first half of Biden's term, conceded that the then-president was less energetic and more forgetful, though he defended his "acuity to govern," the source said.
"Mr. Klain stated that President Biden often confused names and proper nouns, and it got worse over time," the source said.
Fox News Digital was told that Klain also said there was no reason to doubt President Donald Trump's own mental fitness.
Klain said nothing to reporters when going in or out of the committee room Thursday.
He's the sixth former Biden administration aide to appear for Comer's probe.
And despite the interview being largely staff-led, Comer did make an appearance for the early half of the sit-down, and Reps. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., and Ro Khanna, D-Calif., were both briefly there as well.
Both Biggs and Khanna called Klain "credible" from what they saw inside the room.
"I think he is telling what he knows accurately," Biggs told Fox News Digital.
On the other side of the aisle, Khanna told reporters, "He answered every single question. He was fully cooperative."
Three other former Biden White House aides who previously appeared – Annie Tomasini, Anthony Bernal, and ex-White House doctor Kevin O'Connor – all appeared under subpoena and pleaded the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering questions.
Longtime Biden aide Ashley Williams and ex-staff secretary Neera Tanden, like Klain, came for voluntary transcribed interviews.
Jeff Zients, who served as Biden's chief of staff for the final two years, was also asked to sit for a transcribed interview, a committee aide previously told Fox News Digital.
A source familiar with the Biden team's thinking previously called Republicans' probe "dangerous" and "an attempt to smear and embarrass."
"And their hope is for just one tiny inconsistency between witnesses to appear so that Trump's DOJ prosecute his political opponents and continue his campaign of revenge," that source said.
Fox News Digital also reached out to Klain's attorney as well as a contact for comment for Clinton but did not hear back by press time.
Originally published as Hillary Clinton sounded alarm on Joe Biden's political viability 'by 2024', House investigators hear
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
10 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Trump administration faces mounting pressure to release AUKUS probe details as a senior Democrat demands answers
The Trump administration is facing mounting pressure to release more information about the review into the AUKUS submarine deal. US Democratic congressman Joe Courtney has taken aim at the US Department of Defence for a 'dearth of communication' and a lack of transparency. Mr Courtney, who is also the co-chair of the Congressional Friends of Australia Caucus, said there was a 'systemic issue' with the Pentagon with supplying information requested by Congress. The Trump administration's review of AUKUS — originally due to conclude by June — has been delayed, with uncertainty hanging over the timeline. Speaking to The Australian, Mr Courtney said US Navy leadership had briefed the Pentagon on the ongoing AUKUS review, but was unable to ascertain the questions and answers involved. The Pentagon's review of the $350 billion AUKUS arrangement, led by US Undersecretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby, has not stopped Australian investments into the security partnership, which has so far amounted to $1.6 billion. Mr Courney, who is the Democrats' ranking member of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces, said it was 'really problematic' for work to continue without further guidance being provided to AUKUS members. The senior Democrat said it was hard to know how seriously President Donald Trump would take the review once it was completed and that it was not Mr Colby's responsibility to disclose his findings. 'The buck stops at the White House,' he said. 'We were told initially it was a 30-day review which obviously had people really sceptical that something that has been worked on for four years and had so much effort with the optimal pathway could get a fair analysis in 30 days. 'It does seem like the Department (of Defence) pumped the brakes in terms of the framework.' Mr Courtney said while there was still work going on, it could be assumed AUKUS was 'here to stay'. He said the Trump administration's approach was 'very frustrating' and a 'head scratcher'. Last week, the Democrats' ranking member of the House armed services committee Adam Smith warned the Department of Defence and Congress was going to 'have to work together' and claimed the Department had shunned Congress 'more than any other DoD or administration' he had seen. 'I have not personally had a one-on-one conversation with the Secretary of Defence. I've sought out meetings with the Under Secretary for Policy. I've basically been told to p**s off … Which is unbelievable to me,' he said. Earlier this month, shadow defence minister Angus Taylor said the Albanese government must now give clear assurances to the US that Australia will be a reliable security partner. 'We should be working closely with them to make sure that we have peace through deterrence and strength in our region,' Mr Taylor said. 'We should have a joint commitment with them to the security of Taiwan and peace in the Taiwan Strait. 'These are incredibly important things to be focusing on right now — and it's why AUKUS is so important.'
West Australian
16 hours ago
- West Australian
Donald Trump targets Beyoncé, Kamala Harris, Oprah, escalates distraction campaign amid Epstein files pressure
US President Donald Trump has launched fresh accusations against top Democratic figures Beyoncé, Oprah Winfrey, Al Sharpton, and Vice President Kamala Trump is claiming they illegally received millions of dollars for political endorsements—an allegation made in a new Truth Social post that appears aimed at shifting focus from ongoing controversies linked to himself. In his post, Mr Trump alleges that Democrats paid 'Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT (she never sang, not one note, and left the stage to a booing and angry audience!),' he said.'Three Million Dollars for 'expenses' to Oprah, Six Hundred Thousand Dollars to very low rated TV 'anchor,' Al Sharpton (a total lightweight!), and others to be named for doing, absolutely NOTHING!' He goes on to claim, 'YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PAY FOR AN ENDORSEMENT. IT IS TOTALLY ILLEGAL TO DO SO. Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted!' The claims, unsupported by any public evidence and not corroborated by campaign filings or independent fact-checkers, come at a time when Mr Trump faces intensifying scrutiny over his own dealings, especially renewed attention to his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and demands from both supporters and critics for full disclosure of the 'Epstein files.' Jeffrey Epstein was a wealthy financier charged with operating a sex trafficking ring that exploited dozens of underage girls for sexual abuse, including recruiting victims from multiple countries, before he died in jail awaiting trial in 2019. The release of the Epstein files has been highly anticipated, with many hoping the documents will reveal new information about powerful individuals connected to Epstein's trafficking network and shed light on unresolved questions about his death. Mr Trump's latest social media outburst follows a pattern of rapid-fire postings unrelated to the mounting questions about Epstein's death and Mr Trump's own actions. This includes recent Truth Social posts ranging from attacking US agency officials and Washington football team branding, to sharing AI-generated videos of Barack Obama's fictional arrest and promoting unrelated government document dumps. Republican strategists and political analysts note that such diversions are typical of Mr Trump's tried-and-tested playbook: generating new controversies or provoking media outrage in an effort to overwhelm coverage of more damaging topics. 'As controversy over Epstein refuses to die down, Mr Trump and his inner circle have repeatedly tried to pivot public attention to new outrages,' said Republican strategist Alex Conant in a recent interview. 'Nobody turns the page better than Donald Trump. His entire first term was constantly changing narratives… this is different because he's in a real fight with his base.'
Perth Now
16 hours ago
- Perth Now
‘All be prosecuted': Trump attacks Beyoncé, Kamala and Oprah
US President Donald Trump has launched fresh accusations against top Democratic figures Beyoncé, Oprah Winfrey, Al Sharpton, and Vice President Kamala Trump is claiming they illegally received millions of dollars for political endorsements—an allegation made in a new Truth Social post that appears aimed at shifting focus from ongoing controversies linked to himself. In his post, Mr Trump alleges that Democrats paid 'Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT (she never sang, not one note, and left the stage to a booing and angry audience!),' he said.'Three Million Dollars for 'expenses' to Oprah, Six Hundred Thousand Dollars to very low rated TV 'anchor,' Al Sharpton (a total lightweight!), and others to be named for doing, absolutely NOTHING!' He goes on to claim, 'YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PAY FOR AN ENDORSEMENT. IT IS TOTALLY ILLEGAL TO DO SO. Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted!' US President Donald has called for Beyoncé, Former Vice President Kamala Harris, and Oprah to be prosecuted. Credit: Truth Social The claims, unsupported by any public evidence and not corroborated by campaign filings or independent fact-checkers, come at a time when Mr Trump faces intensifying scrutiny over his own dealings, especially renewed attention to his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and demands from both supporters and critics for full disclosure of the 'Epstein files.' Jeffrey Epstein was a wealthy financier charged with operating a sex trafficking ring that exploited dozens of underage girls for sexual abuse, including recruiting victims from multiple countries, before he died in jail awaiting trial in 2019. The release of the Epstein files has been highly anticipated, with many hoping the documents will reveal new information about powerful individuals connected to Epstein's trafficking network and shed light on unresolved questions about his death. Mr Trump's latest social media outburst follows a pattern of rapid-fire postings unrelated to the mounting questions about Epstein's death and Mr Trump's own actions. This includes recent Truth Social posts ranging from attacking US agency officials and Washington football team branding, to sharing AI-generated videos of Barack Obama's fictional arrest and promoting unrelated government document dumps. If you'd like to view this content, please adjust your . To find out more about how we use cookies, please see our Cookie Guide. Republican strategists and political analysts note that such diversions are typical of Mr Trump's tried-and-tested playbook: generating new controversies or provoking media outrage in an effort to overwhelm coverage of more damaging topics. 'As controversy over Epstein refuses to die down, Mr Trump and his inner circle have repeatedly tried to pivot public attention to new outrages,' said Republican strategist Alex Conant in a recent interview. 'Nobody turns the page better than Donald Trump. His entire first term was constantly changing narratives… this is different because he's in a real fight with his base.'
