HP CM seeks permanent member from state in BBMB
Sukhu urged for an increase in the state's free power share in hydropower projects operated by public sector undertakings (PSUs) and central public sector undertakings (CPSUs), particularly those where the cost has already been recovered. He said that while the state was significantly contributing to the development of the nation, therefore its rightful dues must also be safeguarded.
During the meeting, Sukhu also discussed the long-pending demand of handing over the Baira Siul project to the state, which was constructed in 1980-81. He thanked the Union minister for giving in-principle approval to the handover of Luhri, Sunni and Dhaula Sidh projects of the SJVNL, as well as the Duggar project of NHPC to the State. He said that cost assessment of these projects was currently underway.
He also demanded the release of central funds for the development of the Jathia Devi Township and held discussions on various ongoing projects under the urban development department.
Sukhu also called on Union jal shakti minister CR Patil and advocated for the protection of rights of the state in the Kishau hydro-electric project. He emphasised the need for a favourable funding pattern. He said the financial burden of the Kishau project should be borne entirely either by the central government or by the major beneficiary states, such as Delhi, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan.
During the meeting, the CM also raised critical issues concerning the Renuka Dam project. He called for due consideration of the Local Area Development Fund and the free power component. During a meeting with Union minister for health and family welfare JP Nadda, he sought central support for strengthening health infrastructure in HP. He specifically requested the establishment of a dedicated cancer care centre in the state and introduction of advanced medical technologies and modern equipment in government hospitals.
While meeting Union minister for culture and tourism Gajendra Singh Shekhawat, he requested for speedy approval for Auhar project and added that state government envisages to develop it as major water sports destination. He added that projects for Dehra and Pong dam were also awaiting approval.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Are courts supposed to sit powerless as Governors make State legislatures defunct by sitting on Bills: Supreme Court asks Centre
Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai on Thursday (August 21, 2025) asked the Union government if the Supreme Court is supposed to suspend its role as the 'custodian of the Constitution' and sit powerless while Governors make competent State legislatures defunct and thwart the democratic will of the people by sitting on Bills for years together. The Chief Justice, heading a Presidential Reference Bench of five judges, referred to how the Tamil Nadu Governor had kept crucial State Bills pending for almost four years without a word explaining why. The oral observations from the Chief Justice came in response to Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's submissions for the Union government that the top court, through its April 8 judgment in the Tamil Nadu Governor case, had encroached into the terrain of law-making and slighted high Constitutional authorities like the Governors and the President by imposing time limits on them. Presidential Reference hearing in Supreme Court: Follow highlights on August 21, 2025 'Stick to your turf' Mr. Mehta said that inaction on the part of a Constitutional authority like the Governor was better addressed in the political sphere, with Chief Ministers leading delegations to the Prime Minister or the President to coax Governors into action. The Supreme Court was not the only problem-solver in the country. Every problem cannot be resolved through a judicial order, he said. The Solicitor General said the court should stick to its rule declared in the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) judgment that each organ of governance — the legislature, executive, and judiciary — must stick to its turf. The top law officer said the country's governance system was not hierarchical. 'We do not intend to micro-manage the government. We will never interfere. We cannot ask how a district is to be administered… But suppose, if a particular function is entrusted to the Governor, and for years together he withholds a Bill, will that also be beyond the power of judicial review of this court... When this Court has in the past set aside the very Constitutional Amendment [The Forty-second Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976], which had limited the power of judicial review as a violation of the Basic Structure, can we say this court is now powerless in the face of inaction by a Governor?' Chief Justice Gavai asked Mr. Mehta. Also Read | Can Supreme Court's opinion on a Presidential Reference alter its prior ruling? Constitutional powers The Solicitor General responded that time limits may apply to statutory authorities like a District Collector, but not to Constitutional powers like the President and Governors. He said a Governor's position was sui generis, as They are appointed by the Union government but are also an integral part of the State legislature. The law officer said there may be several reasons, at times political or democratic, for a Governor to delay assent to a State Bill. How could the Supreme Court step in and prescribe deadlines when none exist in the Constitution, he asked. Justice Narasimha said State Bills would be left hanging in vacuum if no outer time limits were set for the Governor to grant assent. Also Read | Presidential Reference Bench says Supreme Court stepped in to resolve an 'egregious situation' in Tamil Nadu Governor case 'No flood of litigation against Governors' 'Though you cannot specify a time limit, but, at the same time, there should be some way by which the process [of assenting to Bills] works. Can it be a situation when it means 'full stop' if the Governor chooses to not act on a Bill... there is nothing further?' Justice Narasimha asked. Mr. Mehta responded that only 'two or three States' have come to the Supreme Court complaining of their Governors. There was no flood of litigation against Governors. To this, Justice Surya Kant observed that Governors' decisions to act or not act varied from State to State. He asked whether the Centre was shutting off aggrieved States from approaching the court against gubernatorial inaction. EXPLAINED | What is a Presidential reference? Political, not judicial solutions The Centre's law officer maintained that the judiciary cannot tie down the President and Governors to three-month timelines as done in the April 8 judgment. 'But if there is a wrong, there must be a remedy… This court is a custodian of the Constitution,' the Chief Justice reacted. Mr. Mehta said each organ was a custodian of the Constitution in its own field. Justice Narasimha said seeking a solution in the political sphere each time would result in a logjam. The Solicitor replied that issues like delays in assenting to Bills were not solvable by the court. The solution lay in the political sphere where elected representatives were answerable to the people, at least every five years. 'But the Governor is not answerable to the people,' the CJI pointed out. Also Read | 14 questions raised by President Murmu in Presidential Reference 'Judicial restraint needed' Referring to the April 8 judgment's direction that pending State Bills would be deemed as approved if the President and Governors did not act within the three-month deadline, Mr. Mehta said that restraint in the exercise of judicial power, especially when it concerned high Constitutional authorities, was a facet of the separation of powers, which was a part of the basic structure of the Constitution. The Chief Justice said that while the Bench could quite appreciate the Centre's arguments against restricting Governors and the President to a 'time-bound programme' and the grant of 'deemed assent', it could not accept a situation in which the Governor merely sat for four years on State Bills. 'Then what happens to the democratic set-up of the government? What happens to the will of the two-third of the majority of the legislature of a particular State? We are on the question of a Governor, however high he may be, sitting on Bills passed by a competent legislature,' Chief Justice Gavai observed. The Solicitor's reply was illustrative. He asked if the President could step in and decide long-pending cases in the Supreme Court. 'It cannot be that every problem has a solution only at the doors of this court, and political and democratic solutions are not solutions,' Mr. Mehta said, concluding his submissions for the Union government.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
PM Modi says Online Gaming Bill will encourage e-sports, save society from harmful effects
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on August 21 hailed the government's new Online Gaming Bill 2025, saying that it will encourage e-sports and save society from harmful effects of online money games. In a post on social media platform X (formerly known as X), Modi wrote, 'This Bill, passed by both Houses of Parliament, highlights our commitment towards making India a hub for gaming, innovation and creativity.' 'It will encourage e-sports and online social games. At the same time, it will save our society from the harmful effects of online money games,' he added. The prime minister's post was quoting Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw's own post on the Bill, seeking to explain that 'The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025' passed by both houses of the Parliament, 'takes a balanced approach – promoting what's good, prohibiting what's harmful for middle-class and youth.' (This is a developing story, more updates coming…)
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Aligarh's name should be changed': Here is Keshav Maurya's suggestion; demand made at Hindu Gaurav Diwas event
NEW DELHI: Uttar Pradesh deputy chief minister Keshav Prasad Maurya on Thursday demanded to rename Aligarh to 'Harigarh,' citing a parallel with cities such as Ayodhya and Prayagraj. "You all know Ayodhya was once called Faizabad. But under the leadership of our respected chief minister (Adityanath), it was renamed Ayodhya again. Similarly, Prayagraj was earlier known as Allahabad. Just two days ago, Shahjahanpur's Jalalabad was renamed Parshurampuri. Then there should be no delay in renaming Aligarh to Harigarh," Maurya said as cited by PTI. Speaking at a 'Hindu Gaurav Diwas' ceremony marking the death anniversary of former UP CM Kalyan Singh, Maurya also expressed his wish for "Babuji", as Singh was affectionately known, to be awarded India's highest civilian honour, the Bharat Ratna, . Kalyan Singh, an Aligarh native and two-time chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, is remembered for his role in the Ram Janmabhoomi movement and for fostering the BJP's early growth in the state. Along with the deputy CM, UP chief minister Yogi Adityanath, Union cabinet minister Dharmendra Pradhan, Union minister Jitin Prasada, and other dignitaries, who paid homage to Kalyan Singh, were also present at the stage. The deputy CM also targeted the Samajwadi Party (SP), criticising the party's approach on PDA (Pichhda, Dalit, Alpsankhyak), calling it 'nothing but divide and rule.' "On Babuji's death anniversary, we pledge to uproot the SP's cycle (party symbol) and send it to Saifai. That will be a true tribute to Babuji," he said, earning applause from BJP workers present.
