logo
Four charts show why Trump's vision of energy independence is a myth

Four charts show why Trump's vision of energy independence is a myth

CNN24-02-2025
President Donald Trump swept into office with a three-word energy policy: Drill baby drill. In Trump's telling, unleashing US oil drilling will reduce gas prices – and thereby Americans' cost of living – and increase the nation's energy independence.
But there is a very simple reason why Trump's seemingly simple plans don't add up: Not all oil is the same.
Oil falls on a spectrum from light to heavy, depending on how much sulfur it contains. The recent shale revolution – with new fracking methods extracting more oil from Texas, New Mexico and North Dakota – has pushed the US to become the biggest oil producer in the world. It's also generating an expensive, light crude oil that's being exported to the tune of 13 million barrels per day.
Oil experts call it 'the champagne of crudes.'
But that is not the kind of oil that has powered cars and industry in the US for decades. America was built on a thick, gunky crude that comes from other countries including Canada, Saudi Arabia and Central and South American nations.
'All crude is not the same,' said Bob McNally, president of consulting firm Rapidan Energy Group. 'Some crudes are like coffee grounds – they're gunky, awful, viscous, dirty. Some crudes are like champagne, light and un-sulfurous.'
The US pumps a lot of home-grown champagne out of the ground; a full 80% of the oil produced here is light crude, according to the Energy Information Administration.
'It's much lighter and sweeter,' said Hugh Daigle, an associate professor at the University of Texas Austin and an oil expert. 'It's less viscous.'
Meanwhile, the US uses a lot of 'coffee-ground' oil. The nation imports around 6.5 million barrels of crude oil a day from others — most of it either heavy- or medium-density. By far the biggest source of US oil imports is its northern neighbor, Canada, which sent 1.42 billion barrels of crude oil to America in 2023.
Most Canadian oil comes from Alberta's tar sands region, where the oil looks like asphalt, molasses or coffee grounds. It's the reliance on Canada's crude that's triggering fears of higher gas prices if Trump follows through on his threat to implement a 10% tariff on Canadian energy.
Trump recently claimed the US could get along just fine without Canadian oil.
'We don't need their oil and gas; we have more than anybody,' Trump said at the World Economic Forum last month.
A White House spokesman, Kush Desai, said in a statement that Trump is using 'every lever of executive power to deliver progress on border security' including the 'threat of tariffs that disproportionately affect Canadian oil producers — who are landlocked and reliant on exporting to the United States via pipelines.'
But US oil refineries could also be impacted by those tariffs.
Many US refineries – some of which have been around since the 1930s or earlier – were built decades before America's light-oil boom and therefore made to handle the heavy crude they first imported from the Middle East and South America – the same type of crude that Canada now produces.
Refining US light oil is much simpler because it already has low sulfur content. McNally likens it to putting it 'through a still like you're making hooch in a hollow in West Virginia.'
Some US refineries have adapted to refine the country's light, home-grown oil, though it varies by region and geography. For instance, Gulf Coast refineries process mostly domestic oil because they're relatively close to the Permian basin in Texas and New Mexico. Meanwhile, refineries in Midwestern and Western states are heavily reliant on Canadian oil because it's also relatively nearby.
The other factors refineries need to consider are the price of crude oil (dirtier and heavier crude is cheaper than lighter), and the end products the refineries are making – everything from gasoline for cars, jet fuel, propane and asphalt.
There's a lot that goes into oil companies' business calculations, said Jenna Delaney, a Rapidan Energy Group analyst focusing on global crude.
'It's complex, it's regionally specific and it's a lot more complicated than saying, 'we produce this crude, we should use all of it and not export any of it,'' Delaney said.
Trump's idea to use only US oil is simply not realistic, experts told CNN. Doing so would throw US refineries into turmoil, and gas prices could skyrocket as a result.
'We'll be importing Canadian oil for the foreseeable future, as far as I'm concerned,' Daigle said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Walmart is raising prices because of tariffs. Customers are still flocking to Walmart
Walmart is raising prices because of tariffs. Customers are still flocking to Walmart

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Walmart is raising prices because of tariffs. Customers are still flocking to Walmart

Walmart is getting hit by tariffs, like every other business in America. But customers are still flocking to Walmart because they believe the retailer offers them the biggest bang for their buck. The retail behemoth once again on Thursday showed how it uses its size to dominate the industry. Its economies of scale help keep prices as low as possible, even as Trump's tariffs raise costs. Walmart also relies on its strength in groceries and necessities to win over shoppers looking for discounts. More than half of Walmart's sales come from groceries. Walmart said Thursday that sales at US stores open for at least a year jumped 4.8%, and it gained market share across income groups, led by growth with upper-income households. The company also raised its sales outlook for the year. CEO Doug McMillon said that tariffs have created pressures for the company and its seeing its 'costs increase each week.' But it's keeping prices down 'for as long as we can.' Customers have not made major shifts to their purchasing behavior because of tariffs, he said, but some middle and lower-income households have stopped buying some discretionary products that have gone up in prices. 'Value is still en vogue. That's the key message from Walmart,' Neil Saunders, an analyst at GlobalData Retail, said in a note to clients. 'Broad consumer and macro trends remain favorable to Walmart.' Still, Walmart's stock fell 3% during pre-market trading. The company missed analysts' profit forecasts. Heading into Thursday, Walmart's stock had increased 36%. Walmart is surging ahead of its rivals, such as Target and Home Depot. Target, in particular, is in a funk and its CEO is stepping down. Target on Wednesday reported sales fell for the third consecutive quarter. Shares tumbled 6%. Target has been one of the worst-performing stocks on the S&P 500. Target CEO Brian Cornell is stepping down after 11 years at the retailer, as the company faces slumping sales and backlash to its retreat on DEI. He will be replaced early next year by Michael Fiddelke, Target's current chief operating officer. Some investors and analysts criticized the move, arguing Target should have hired an outside voice to lead the company. The company's business is falling behind Walmart because it stocks more non-essential goods such as home decor than Walmart. Many shoppers, strained by inflation over the past several years, are buying fewer discretionary products and focusing on essentials. Target also imports about half of its merchandise, compared to roughly 33% at Walmart, so it needs to raise prices at almost double the rate of Walmart to mitigate the tariff impact, Bank of America analyst Robert Ohmes said in a report this week. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Powell to give his last Jackson Hole speech under watchful gaze of Wall Street and the White House
Powell to give his last Jackson Hole speech under watchful gaze of Wall Street and the White House

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Powell to give his last Jackson Hole speech under watchful gaze of Wall Street and the White House

WASHINGTON (AP) — Just three weeks ago, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell spoke to reporters after the central bank had kept its key interest rate unchanged for a fifth straight meeting and said the job market was 'solid.' His assessment was important because if the job market is healthy, there is less need for the Fed to cut its key interest rate, as President Donald Trump has demanded. Two days later, the Labor Department issued a report that cast doubt on that assessment, showing hiring was weak in July and much lower than previously estimated in May and June. So, there will be a lot of attention paid by Wall Street and the White House to Powell's high-profile speech Friday at the Fed's annual economic symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. If the famously data-dependent Powell shifts gears and takes a gloomier view of the job market, that could open the door for a rate cut at the Fed's next meeting in September. Powell could also stick to the cautious approach he's maintained all year and reiterate that the central bank needs more time to evaluate the impact of Trump's sweeping tariffs on inflation. Most economists expect Powell to signal that a rate cut is likely this year, but won't necessarily commit to one next month. That could disappoint Wall Street, which has put high odds on a September cut. Powell's speech, his last address at Jackson Hole as chair before his term ends in May, will occur against a particularly fraught backdrop. About a week after the jobs numbers, the latest inflation report showed that price growth crept higher in July. Core prices, which exclude the volatile food and energy categories, rose 3.1% from a year ago, above the Fed's 2% target. Stubbornly elevated inflation pushes the Fed in the opposite direction that weak hiring does: It suggests the central bank's short-term rate should stay at its current 4.3%, rather than be cut. That would mean other borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans, and business loans, would stay elevated. 'So the plot has thickened,' said David Wilcox, a former top Fed economist and now director of economic research at Bloomberg Economics and also a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute. 'The dilemma that the Fed is in has become, if anything, more intense.' Powell is also navigating an unprecedented level of public criticism by Trump, as well as efforts by the president to take greater control of the Fed, which has long been independent from day-to-day politics. Most observers credit Powell for his nimble handling of the pressures. An iconic moment in his tenure was Trump's visit to tour the Fed's renovation of its office buildings last month. Trump had charged that Powell mismanaged the project, which had ballooned in cost to $2.5 billion, from an earlier estimate of $1.9 billion. With both the president and Fed chair in white hard hats on the building site, in front of cameras, Trump claimed the cost had mushroomed even further to $3.1 trillion. Powell shook his head, so Trump handed him a piece of paper purporting to back up his claim. Powell calmly dismissed the figure, noting that the $3.1 billion included the cost of renovating a third building five years earlier. 'That was just such a classic Powell,' said Diane Swonk, chief economist at KPMG. 'He just doesn't get fazed. He's got a humility that oftentimes I think is lacking among my colleagues in economics." Powell appeared to at least temporarily assuage Trump during the tour, after which the president backed off his threats to fire the Fed chair over the project. The attacks from Trump are the latest challenges for Powell in an unusually tumultuous eight years as Fed chair. Not long after being appointed by Trump in 2018, Powell endured the president's criticisms as the Fed slowly raised its key rate from the low levels where it had remained for years after the 2008-2009 Great Recession. Powell then found himself grappling with the pandemic, and after that the worst inflation spike in four decades that occurred as government stimulus checks fueled spending while crippled supply chains left fewer goods available. Powell then oversaw a rapid series of rate hikes that were widely predicted to cause a recession, but the economy continued plugging ahead. In his latest attempt to pressure the Fed, on Wednesday Trump called on Fed governor Lisa Cook to step down, after an administration official, Bill Pulte, accused her of mortgage fraud. Pulte is head of the agency that regulates mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Cook said in a statement that she wouldn't be 'bullied' into resigning and added that she was preparing to answer the charges. For Powell, there's a difficult decision to make on interest rates. The Fed's 'dual mandate' calls for it to keep prices stable while seeking maximum employment. But while the weak jobs data suggest the need for a cut, many Fed officials fear inflation will get worse in the coming months. 'There is still a fair amount that's still outstanding,' Raphael Bostic, president of the Fed's Atlanta branch, said in an interview, referring to tariff-led price hikes. 'One feedback we've gotten both in our surveys and from direct conversations (with businesses) suggests that many still are looking to see the price that they charge their customers increase from where we are today.' Other economists, however, point to the sharp slowdown in housing as a sign of a weak economy. Sales of existing homes fell in June to their lowest level in nine months amid elevated mortgage rates. Consumer spending has also been modest this year, and growth was just 1.2% at an annual rate in the first half of 2025. 'There's not a lot to like about the economy right now outside of AI," said Neil Dutta, an economist at Renaissance Macro. 'The weakness in the economy isn't about tariffs,' but instead the Fed's high rates, he added. Sign in to access your portfolio

S&P affirms U.S. credit rating, but warns of tariffs outcome
S&P affirms U.S. credit rating, but warns of tariffs outcome

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

S&P affirms U.S. credit rating, but warns of tariffs outcome

-- S&P Global Ratings has affirmed its "AA+" credit rating for the United States with a stable outlook, noting that revenue from President Donald Trump's tariffs could potentially offset the fiscal impact of his tax cuts and spending legislation. The rating agency, which was the first to downgrade the U.S. government's credit rating in 2011, made the announcement on Monday. Lisa Schineller, primary U.S. analyst at S&P Global Ratings, emphasized that future rating decisions would depend on policy outcomes rather than just intentions. "Outcomes are what's really going to weigh and inform the rating," Schineller said in an interview. "The outcomes of how you execute the budgetary legislation, how the tariff revenue comes, their combined impact on growth and investment that leads to either better or worse or similar fiscal out-turns, that's our focus." While the immediate rating remains unchanged, S&P indicated that questions about the economic effects of U.S. trade policies could influence the country's credit rating in the coming years. Related articles S&P affirms U.S. credit rating, but warns of tariffs outcome These Under-the-Radar Stocks Offer Better Risk-Reward Ratio Than Nvidia Apollo economist warns: AI bubble now bigger than 1990s tech mania

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store