
Mumbai startup founder's 'don't ghost after payday' post sparks workplace debate
The founder of a Mumbai-based startup has triggered a workplace debate after he opened up about how a few employees took their salaries and then quit the next day without a word.Kiran Shah, founder of Market Fit@Go Zero, said that until recently, his startup followed a common industry practice of paying salaries on the 10th or even the 15th of the following month. However, he found this system inconvenient for employees with early-month financial obligations.advertisementThus, in December 2023, he shifted the salary date to the 1st of every month, hoping to ease the burden on his team. His decision, however, came with a side effect.
In his LinkedIn post, Shah said that four employees have quit the very day they received their salary since the change.'Does it hamper the company operations? Of course it does. Will I change the salary processing back to 10th? Of course not. If I start penalising the entire team for a couple of such dumb folks, then it puts a question mark on the culture I am building at GZ,' Shah said.While addressing the ethics of abrupt resignations, Shah did not mince his words.'Don't ghost your employer once you get the salary. If you are not happy with the work or remuneration or boss or founder or colleagues or location or any damn thing, have a communication with your manager. Or even the founder - I am super approachable to anyone in the organisation. But do it in a professional way that doesn't burn bridges,' he said, adding: 'The company will run after a few hiccups due to your suddenly exit, but puts a big question mark on your character and your growth as an individual.'
advertisement
However, several LinkedIn users disagreed with Shah, who called out his approach and questioned the company's HR culture.'You need better HR. Stop doing HR. You are a founder,' a user said.Others pointed out that paying salaries on time isn't a generous gesture but a basic responsibility: 'Receiving salaries on time is the right of every employee. Most startups these days are exploiting employees by expecting them to work extra hours in light of the 'hustle culture' and still end up not receiving their salaries. Such startups need to have proper HR processes in place. The problem is much bigger than setting up a credit date.'Another comment read, 'If someone has worked for you through the month, regardless of performance or other factors, paying them is not a favour—it's your obligation. Whether someone chooses to stay or leave is their decision, but consistency and fairness in how we treat people shouldn't waver. Frankly, if salary dates become a point of negotiation or uncertainty, it reflects a culture of insecurity - and that, to me, is far more concerning.'Some also encouraged self-reflection over blame. 'You should be more concerned about why your employees are leaving, rather than how they are leaving,' one user said. Another added, 'Most companies pay by the end or start of the month. If people don't return after payday, it points to deeper problems. Employees tied only to the salary and not the vision might not be the right fit to begin with.'advertisementWhat is your take on this?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Lawyer bail plea rejected in 2.6cr cheating case
Mumbai: Observing that if this court exercises discretion in favour of applicant it will give a wrong message to society, a sessions court on Monday rejected the bail plea of advocate Vinaykumar Khatu, who is accused of defrauding a Delhi-based 74-year-old woman, a client, of Rs 2.57 crore by allegedly presenting her with forged orders purportedly issued by Bombay high court. "This court cannot ignore the antecedent of applicant. Admittedly, two offences were registered against applicant for misrepresenting himself as an IAS officer. If this court exercises discretion in favour of applicant, it will give a wrong message to society. The seriousness of allegations and antecedent of applicant prevent me from exercising discretion in favour of applicant," sessions judge VG Raghuwanshi said. The judge also said that if one decides to rely on WhatsApp chat then he cannot ignore that accused had stated about stay granted by honourable high court in his chat with the accountant and it is also clear that huge amounts were transferred to the accounts of his friends, associates and him after the date of fabricated orders. It was also held that offences relating to criminal breach of trust and forgery of valuable security were added against accused. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Nürtingen: GEERS sucht 700 Testhörer für Hörgeräte ohne Zuzahlung GEERS Undo "A judgment of civil court can be considered a valuable security…Court judgments often create or modify legal right and liabilities. Thus, the judgments fit within definition of valuable security," the judge said. The accused was a lawyer of the woman, Urmila Talyarkhan, who was involved in a property dispute relating to a land in Alibaug. After a lower court ruled against her, Talyarkhan appealed the decision to the district court. Her advocate failed to appear for the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the appeal on Mar 13, 2018. Residing in Delhi at the time, she remained unaware of this dismissal until 2022, as her advocate did not inform her. It was alleged that through a business acquaintance, Talyarkhan was introduced to Khatu. She retained Khatu for six matters, including the land dispute appeal, and a suit against her husband. Khatu allegedly charged an exorbitant fee of Rs 10 lakh per case. She allegedly transferred Rs 2 crore from her friend's account to those associated with the accused. Following Khatu's advice, she filed a second appeal in Bombay high court, with applications for condonation of a four-year delay and a stay order. Denying the allegations, the accused said that he was arrested on Oct 19, 2024. "Nothing needs to be seized from him. There is no possibility of tampering evidence," the lawyer submitted. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !


Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Teton Capital Said to Agitate for Changes at Atlantic Union Bank
(Bloomberg) -- Financier David Sokol's investment fund has taken a stake in Atlantic Union Bankshares Corp. and is pushing the US regional bank to consider cutting costs, shrinking its board and overhauling its executive compensation, according to people familiar with the matter. Teton Capital — run by the former Berkshire Hathaway Inc. executive — holds a less than 5% stake in Atlantic Union, said the people, who asked to not be identified because the details aren't public. Sokol, who was once considered a potential successor Warren Buffett, has been critical of Atlantic Union's performance since announcing a $1.6 billion purchase last year of Sandy Spring Bancorp, viewing it as an expensive foray into a new territory that isn't delivering good results, the people said. Sokol wants Atlantic Union to consider winnowing down its 14-director board, the people said. He believes it should also evaluate all overhead expenses to cut costs and align its executive compensation with stock performance, they said. Representatives for Teton Capital and Atlantic Union declined to comment. Atlantic Union closed 2% higher in New York trading Friday, giving the Richmond, Virginia-based company a market value of about $4.4 billion. Atlantic Union's shares have fallen around 19% this year. The bank added three members to its board this year following the closing of the Sandy Spring acquisition. That deal was supported by more than 95% of Atlantic Union's shareholders, according to a regulatory filing. The bank also added two additional board members via its all-stock acquisition last year of American National Bankshares. Sokol oversaw Berkshire Hathaway's energy utility and aviation company NetJets before resigning in 2011. More stories like this are available on


Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Unblocked! After legal feud, US Supreme Court allows Elon Musk's DOGE broad access to Social Security data
The US Supreme Court on Friday granted billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency access to personal information on millions of Americans amid an extended legal battle. DOGE plays a very important role in the Trump administration's aim to slash the federal workforce. According to Reuters, the justices put on hold Maryland-based US District Judge Ellen Hollander's order that blocked DOGE's access to the personal information of Americans. Judge Hollander's order blocked DOGE's access to the Social Security data systems that contained the medical and financial records of millions of Americans. It was cited in the order that granting such access could violate federal privacy laws in the country. According to NBC, the conservative-majority court granted an emergency application filed by the Trump administration. The application requested the justices to lift an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maryland. This comes at a time when Donald Trump and Elon Musk are caught in the middle of a major feud, with the latter taking to X to criticize the reigning US President. The Social Security data request was made by the Elon Musk-led DOGE before the fallout between the billionaire and the President. At the time, DOGE wanted to modernize the existing systems and detect waste and fraud at different levels. Their request revolved around Social Security numbers, medical records, and crucial financial information of Americans. 'These teams have a business need to access the data at their assigned agency and subject the government's records to much-needed scrutiny,' Solicitor General D. John Sauer was quoted as writing in the court documents. Meanwhile, the challengers' lawyers wrote, "The agency is obligated by the Privacy Act and its own regulations, practices, and procedures to keep that information secure — and not to share it beyond the circle of those who truly need it," according to the court documents.