logo
Assembly Speaker Robin Vos seeking broad tax cuts in upcoming budget

Assembly Speaker Robin Vos seeking broad tax cuts in upcoming budget

Yahoo26-02-2025

Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester) speaks at a WisPolitics event. Photo by Baylor Spears/Wisconsin Examiner.
Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester) criticized much of Gov. Tony Evers' budget proposal on Tuesday, saying Republicans wouldn't get behind the spending increases and taxation proposals. He said Republican lawmakers are starting the process of coming up with their own proposals, including for a broad tax cut plan.
Evers' 2025-27 state budget proposal dedicates $4 billion to K-12 and higher education, cuts nearly $2 billion in taxes and raises income taxes for the state's wealthiest residents. Evers said during a Wisconsin Counties Association conference on Tuesday that his proposal was 'realistic' and that he hopes the Legislature will agree.
Vos said the plan was unrealistic, however, because it would increase state spending by about 20% and included plans to raise taxes. He also complained Evers presented his plans without speaking with lawmakers first.
Wisconsin has an estimated budget surplus of about $4 billion. Democrats are seeking greater investments in the state's public services while Republicans want to limit state spending.
Vos told the audience at the WisPolitics event people are thinking about the budget surplus the wrong way.
'People believe we have this huge surplus, which is true on one-time money, but we have very little money for the government to be able to expand or increase funding for programs,' Vos said.
Vos said the last state budget was 'really disappointing' because Republicans met Evers' goals by increasing spending on education, but Evers vetoed most of Republicans' tax cut proposals. In the upcoming session, Republicans will seek to focus on using the budget surplus for cutting taxes.
Evers proposed an array of tax cuts in his budget including eliminating taxes on cash tips, sales taxes on electricity and gas for Wisconsin homes and on over-the-counter medications. Vos compared tax cuts to 'chocolate cake,' saying they are all good. However, he said his caucus will likely look at doing broader tax cuts and that he wants cuts that 'people can actually feel.'
'My preference is something that is ongoing and meaningful to families,' Vos said.
Vos said that lawmakers will work to pass a tax cut bill package before the end of the budget process.
'Hopefully that'll get signed, but if not, unfortunately, the budget will probably have to wait until we can find consensus on that tax cut,' Vos told reporters after the event.
Evers also proposed a new tax bracket with a marginal rate of 9.8% for the state's wealthiest residents — those making above $1 million for single filers and married joint filers. The current top tax bracket has a 7.65% rate and applies to single filers making $315,310 and joint filers making $420,420.
Vos said Republicans would not support increasing taxes.
Evers for his fourth budget in a row proposed that Wisconsin join the 40 other states in the country that have taken the federal Medicaid expansion, which ensures coverage for people making up to 138% of the federal poverty line. One difference in this budget cycle, however, is that the Trump administration and Republican lawmakers are seeking to cut Medicaid funding in order to help pay for tax cuts. The new reality, Vos said, appears to validate his ongoing opposition to accepting the federal Medicaid expansion.
'Thank goodness we never expanded Medicaid,' Vos said.
Vos said he would prefer block grants from the federal government, and that it would be better for Wisconsin to get 90% of the money from the federal government without 'strings attached' than to get 100% of the money and have to follow federal guidelines for how to spend it.
Vos was also critical of expanding postpartum Medicaid to cover new mothers for the first year after giving birth, casting doubt on a Republican-backed bill that supports Wisconsin joining the 48 other states that have done this. Currently, Wisconsin only covers up to 60 days after birth for eligible mothers.
Evers included the extension in his budget proposal and a Republican-authored bill that would extend coverage has 23 Senate cosponsors and 67 Assembly cosponsors.
Despite the widespread bipartisan support for extending postpartum Medicaid, Vos said he was not the only person in his caucus who opposes expanding coverage. He said it doesn't make sense to expand Medicaid coverage because those with incomes up to 100% of the federal poverty line can still keep coverage after the 60 days and those who could lose coverage could seek coverage through Obamacare.
'I am not the only person in the Legislature who is opposed to it. Many Republicans are opposed to expanding welfare, it's just they are more than happy to let me stand in front of the arrows,' Vos said.
Vos also critiqued changes to the state budget proposed by Evers that would update language to be gender neutral.
The proposal would change certain words like 'father' to 'parent' and 'husband' to 'spouse.' Another section that is about artificial insemination would change 'the husband of the mother' to 'the spouse of the inseminated person.'
Republicans have locked on the latter phrase to claim that Evers is trying to erase mothers and fathers.
Evers told reporters Monday that the changes were made to ensure with 'legal certainty that moms are able to get the care they need,' noting that same sex couples could have been excluded from coverage under the old language. He accused Republicans of lying about the issue.
'I didn't know that Republicans were against IVF, but apparently they are because that is what it's about,' Evers said.
Vos said the change was 'dystopian' and said the changes don't fix any issue and Evers was just coming up with an explanation. He later told reporters that the language made the state a 'national embarrassment.'
Vos also complained about Evers' process for coming up with a plan to reform the state's prisons, saying he should have included lawmakers in developing it.
The proposed plan, which would cost over $500 million, would make wide changes to many of the state's facilities including transitioning Lincoln Hills and Copper Lake youth correctional facilities into adult facilities, updating Waupun Correctional Institution, the state's oldest prison, and eventually closing Green Bay Correctional Institution.
Vos said it's known that lawmakers have had an interest in the issue and questioned why they weren't consulted in developing the plan.
'He chose not to do that because he has one way of operating, which is his way or the highway. Those of us that have some interest in corrections reform will get together and come up with our own package and present it to the governor and say, 'Here it is,'' Vos said.
Vos also weighed in on Wisconsin's upcoming spring elections.
State Superintendent Jill Underly, the Democratic-backed candidate, is running for a second term in office against education consultant Brittany Kinser, the Republican-backed candidate.
Vos said that Kinser is 'the best candidate' because she supports school choice and appears willing to work with the Legislature. He added that he isn't sure whether he has ever met with Underly. He also criticized Underly for changes to the evaluation of Wisconsin's standardized test scores.
He described the recent February primary as 'low profile' and said that with a 'different electorate' at polls in April, Kinser likely has a chance to win.
The higher profile spring election is for an open seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The technically nonpartisan race pits Susan Crawford, the liberal candidate against Waukesha County Judge Brad Schimel, the conservative candidate.
Vos said he thinks that the race will be about the candidates, but it is 'possible' that the race could be a referendum on Trump. He noted that Democrats are seeking to turn out voters who agree with them and billionaire Elon Musk and Trump are trying to bring out Republicans in the race. A group tied to Musk canceled a social media ad this week that featured a photo of the wrong Susan Crawford.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Some free commonsense advice for Democrats about winning back men
Some free commonsense advice for Democrats about winning back men

The Hill

time42 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Some free commonsense advice for Democrats about winning back men

You don't need a Ph.D. in sociology to know that there is one group in America you can mock, smear and stereotype with impunity — without facing cancelation, outrage or any serious blowback. That group? Men. For years now, we've been told that men suffer from 'toxic masculinity.' We are accused of 'mansplaining,' assumed to be 'racists,' 'sexists' and God knows what else. At some point, 'man' became a four-letter word. I bring this up because Democrats are now planning to spend $20 million trying to win back male voters they lost in 2024. The initiative is called 'SAM' — short for 'Speaking with American Men: A Strategic Plan.' Here's a free tip for the strategists: If you want to win back men, maybe start by telling your cultural allies to stop calling them bigots. Case in point: On 'The View,' host Joy Behar suggested that instead of spending $20 million to win back male voters, Democrats should use the money to teach 'men not to be such sexists.' Imagine if a man had said something like that about women? You can't even tell a lame joke about women drivers anymore without risking cancelation. But label men 'sexists' on national television? That's comedy gold. Then there's the DNC's own website, with its long list of 'Who We Serve.' It includes: African Americans, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, Latinos, gay, lesbian and transgender folks, seniors, veterans, union members and women. You get the picture, right? There's a group for everyone — except, curiously, men. Let's get this straight: Democrats want to win back men, but won't even acknowledge them on a list of who they serve? Brilliant strategy. Do men hold power in this country? Sure, some do. But what kind of power does a white, working-class coal miner in West Virginia have — just because he's a man? Or the blue-collar guy living paycheck to paycheck. How is he powerful? Memo to the cultural elite: Not all men are running Fortune 500 companies. A lot of them are just trying to keep the lights on. If Democrats truly want men back in the fold, they might want to stop treating them like a nasty virus nobody wants to get close to. Because right now, it sure doesn't look like men are welcome. Aaron Solis, writing on Medium, nailed it. 'Society — and feminists in particular — have decided it's perfectly acceptable to generalize men, but not women,' he wrote. 'If the roles were reversed, and men created equally negative, subjective terms to generalize women, the backlash would be overwhelming.' That's the kind of insight Democrats could have gotten for free — no need to spend $20 million. Post-elect surveys show that more than half of male voters under 30 backed Trump over Harris. That includes about 60 percent of white male voters, roughly one-third of Black male voters and about half of young Latino men. That's not a fluke. That's a warning sign. Yes, there are many reasons voters switch parties. It's never just one thing. But the way Democratic elites talk about men — the sneering, the stereotyping — definitely plays a role. And until they face up to that, no slick $20 million campaign is going to change the outcome. And if that sounds like 'mansplaining' — too bad! Bernard Goldberg is an Emmy and an Alfred I. duPont-Columbia University award-winning writer and journalist. He is the author of five books and publishes exclusive weekly columns, audio commentaries and Q&As on his Substack page. Follow him @BernardGoldberg.

Missouri governor signs stadium aid package intended to keep Chiefs, Royals in state
Missouri governor signs stadium aid package intended to keep Chiefs, Royals in state

Fox Sports

timean hour ago

  • Fox Sports

Missouri governor signs stadium aid package intended to keep Chiefs, Royals in state

Gov. Mike Kehoe signed a legislative package on Saturday, approved by Missouri lawmakers earlier in the week, that includes hundreds of millions of dollars of financial aid intended to persuade the Kansas City Chiefs and Kansas City Royals to remain in the state. Kehoe, a Republican, had called lawmakers into special session and they approved of the package Wednesday. The Chiefs and Royals currently play at the Truman Sports Complex on the east side of Kansas City, where Arrowhead Stadium and Kauffman Stadium share parking facilities. But their leases with Jackson County, Missouri, expire in January 2031, and the two franchises have been trying to decide the best route forward for the past several years. Last year, Jackson County voters defeated a sales tax extension that would have helped finance an $800 million renovation of Arrowhead Stadium — the home of the Chiefs — and a $2 billion ballpark district for the Royals in downtown Kansas City. The slow movement by those on the Missouri side of the state line in supporting the franchises prompted lawmakers in Kansas to authorize bonds for up to 70% of the cost of new stadiums in their state. The Royals have bought a mortgage for property in Kansas, though the team also has continued to pursue other possible sites in Missouri. The offer from Kansas is scheduled to expire June 30, and both teams have indicated they will hope to have a plan formulated by then. Missouri's legislation authorizes bonds covering up to 50% of the cost of new or renovated stadiums, plus up to $50 million of tax credits for each stadium and unspecified aid from local governments. If they choose to stay in Missouri, the Chiefs have floated plans for a $1.15 billion renovation of Arrowhead Stadium. The Royals have insisted all along that they intend to build a replacement for Kauffman Stadium. The stadium subsidies already were a top concern in Missouri when a deadly tornado struck St. Louis on May 16, causing an estimated $1.6 billion of damage a day after lawmakers had wrapped up work in their annual regular session. Disaster relief tied to stadium funding had widespread support. On Wednesday, Democratic state Rep. Kimberly-Ann Collins described to lawmakers how she had witnessed the tornado rip the roof off her house and damage her St. Louis neighborhood. "Homes are crumbled and leveled," said Collins, adding: "It hurts me to my core to see the families that have worked so hard, the businesses that have worked so hard, to see them ripped apart." The Chiefs, in a statement to The Associated Press, described the legislative vote this week as a "significant step forward" that enables the team to continue exploring options to remain in Missouri. The Royals described the legislation as "a very important piece of our decision-making process" but made no site-specific commitment. "Our focus remains the same: to prioritize the best interests of our team, fans, partners and regional community as we pursue the next generational home for the Kansas City Royals," the team said in a statement to the AP. Though they have no specific plans in the works, the St. Louis Cardinals also would be eligible for stadium aid if they undertake a project of at least $500 million. They built their existing Busch Stadium nearly 20 years ago. "We have the chance to maybe save what is the symbol of this state," said state Rep. Jim Murphy, a Republican from St. Louis County. The legislation did face some bipartisan pushback from those who described it as a subsidy for wealthy franchise owners. Others raised concerns that a property tax break for homeowners, which was added in the Senate to gain votes, violates the state constitution by providing different levels of tax relief in various counties while excluding others entirely. "This bill is unconstitutional, it's fiscally reckless, it's morally wrong," Republican state Rep. Bryant Wolfin said. Reporting by The Associated Press. Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account , and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily! recommended Get more from National Football League Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more

AOC warns Cuomo has sights on presidency, rebukes Dem leadership
AOC warns Cuomo has sights on presidency, rebukes Dem leadership

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

AOC warns Cuomo has sights on presidency, rebukes Dem leadership

Lefty New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez warns that if former Gov. Andrew Cuomo wins the city's mayoral race, he will use it as a stepping stone for a presidential bid. 'This is not just about New York City, but this is about the United States,' the far-left Dem told an enthusiastic crowd she stumped for fellow socialist and mayoral wannabe Zohran Mamdani at Terminal 5 in Manhattan on Saturday. 'I mean that literally, because Andrew Cuomo has made clear that if he wins this race, he wants to run for president of the United States of America,' AOC said. Advertisement 3 Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo is widely seen as the frontrunner in the mayoral race, though socialist Zohran Mamdani has polled within striking distance. William Farrington Ocasio-Cortez, 35, an acolyte of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), 83, also fussed about Cuomo's age and suggested that the 67-year-old is standing in the way of a new generation of leadership — after she became one of the first prominent Dems to support the re-election bid of memory-addled 82-year-old then-President Joe Biden last summer. 'In a world and a nation that is crying to end the gerontocracy of our leadership that wants a new day, that wants to see a new generation ascend, it is unconscionable to send Andrew Cuomo to Gracie Mansion once again,' the city congresswoman said. Advertisement Cuomo has never actually held Gracie Mansion before, as he was never mayor of the Big Apple, though he did serve as governor of the Empire State from 2011 to 2021. Cuomo has not publicly made a determination about a 2028 run, though he has admitted that he wants to be a national figure if he wins the mayoral race. 3 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is hoping Mamdani can pull off an upset similar to the feat she achieved in 2018. William Miller Ocasio-Cortez argued that the Big Apple's June 24 mayoral Democratic primary is an opportunity to shift America's trajectory dramatically to the left. Advertisement 'If we can change the page in the biggest and best city in the United States, then we can change the page in the country,' she proclaimed. Mamdani, 33, an assemblyman who has gained momentum in some recent polling, has been championing a platform chock-full of far-left agenda items. They include city-run grocery stores, a 2% tax hike on Big Apple millionaires, a 4.5% corporate tax increase, free child care, free bus rides and steering policing in the direction of social work and mental-health counseling. Cuomo is generally seen as the frontrunner in the race, as many local Democrats fear the consequences of a Mamdani win. Advertisement 3 Mamdani has championed a far-left policy agenda. William Miller Ocasio-Cortez ripped the endorsements of Cuomo as coming from the 'establishment' and griped over how several of the Dems that backed him previously called on him to resign in the wake of the sexual-harassment accusations that he has denied. 'I cannot tell you how shocked I have been,' the Bronx and Queens rep said of the Dems that previously denounced Cuomo and are now flocking back to him. 'As a survivor of sexual assault, I will never unsee that. 'The [message the] political establishment sends to so many people is that it does not matter your positions, your content, your ideas, how experienced you are,' she complained. 'It doesn't matter how much you work with them. They will still choose their old friends and an old generation every single time.' Last year, the congresswoman was edged out of her bid to be the top Democrat on the powerful House Oversight Committee by the late Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), who died last month of cancer. The Cuomo campaign did not respond to a Post request for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store