Google parent Alphabet beats quarterly revenue estimates, boosts capital spending
The search giant beat estimates for quarterly revenue and profit on the back of new AI features and a steady digital advertising market. Google Cloud's revenue growth surged nearly 32 per cent, well above estimates for a 26.5 per cent increase.
"With this strong and growing demand for our Cloud products and services, we are increasing our investment in capital expenditures." CEO Sundar Pichai said in an earnings release.
Shares of the company, which have risen more than 18 per cent since its previous earnings report in April, were down 1 per cent in extended trading.
Google had earlier pledged about $75 billion in capital spending this year, part of the more than $320 billion that Big Tech is expected to pour into building AI capabilities.
The companies have defended their aggressive AI spending amid rising competition from Chinese rivals and investor frustration with slower-than-expected payoffs, saying those massive investments are necessary to fuel growth and improve their products.
Alphabet reported total revenue of $96.43 billion for the second quarter ended June 30, compared with analysts' average estimate of about $94 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG.
Google's advertising revenue, which represents about three-quarters of the tech major's overall sales, rose 10.4 per cent to $71.34 billion in the second quarter, beating expectations for $69.47 billion, according to data from LSEG.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Waymo to launch autonomous ride-hailing in Dallas next year
Alphabet's Waymo said on Monday it will roll out its autonomous ride-hailing service in Dallas in 2026, accelerating its U.S. expansion as electric vehicle maker Tesla pushes to grow its recently launched robotaxi business. After years of cautious growth, Waymo has recently increased its pace, launching in new cities through partnerships with ride-hailing platforms and fleet operators. In Dallas, Waymo will operate through a new multi-year partnership with car rental company Avis Budget Group, which will manage fleet operations, including maintenance and depot infrastructure, Waymo said in a blog. Waymo currently serves more than 250,000 paid trips every week with about 1,500 vehicles in cities such as Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Austin. This year, Waymo began its service in Austin exclusively on the Uber platform, months before Tesla started a limited robotaxi trial in the city with about a dozen Model Y SUVs and a human safety monitor in the front passenger seat. Tesla CEO Elon Musk has said the company will rapidly expand its robotaxi services to other U.S. cities and is seeking regulatory approval from California, Nevada, Florida, and Arizona. Commercializing autonomous vehicles has been challenging, with several companies such as GM's Cruise shutting down after collisions, recalls, and federal investigations. Amazon-backed Zoox is among the few still operating, preparing to launch commercial services later this year. Until Tesla's Austin trial, Waymo was the only company to operate paid driverless taxis in the United States. Rides will be available through the Waymo app. The company is also planning launches in Miami and Washington, D.C., in 2026 as part of its broader national rollout.
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
US housing market posts worst spring selling season in 13 years
[BOSTON] The US housing market just logged its slowest spring season in more than a dozen years, leaving Glennda Baker, a veteran real estate agent in Atlanta, struggling to sell 21 listings. She's been slashing prices. But months of chatter about AI taking jobs and tariffs tanking the economy is feeding into buyer indecision. 'People say price solves everything,' Baker said. 'But price doesn't solve uncertainty.' Spring is traditionally the busiest season in real estate, not unlike Christmas for retailers. And while the most unaffordable housing market in decades has sidelined all but the most determined buyers, there were signs earlier this year that conditions were right for a rebound. By April, mortgage rates dipped, price growth flattened and the years-long inventory drought looked like it had finally broken. But that coincided with US President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff bombshell, which sent shock waves through financial markets and pushed house hunters back into hiding. Fewer sales contracts were signed in the US from April to June than in any year since 2012, according to data from Redfin. That was back when the housing market was still finding its footing after the collapse that fuelled the financial crisis. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up Before 2025, the previous two springs were also weak, pulled down by high rates and prices, but anxiety over the future of the economy has made things worse this time, said Chen Zhao, head of economics research at the brokerage. Prices, however, are unlikely to plunge because sellers are starting to pull listings off the market, limiting inventory, she said. 'We thought we hit rock bottom but we keep discovering there's more rock bottom to be had,' Zhao said. 'You have a lot of people being afraid of what's to come.' With consumer confidence ticking up and the stock market on a hot streak, the hope is that deals that normally might have happened in the spring will get pushed into summer. But there's likely to be only a small bump, according to Thomas Ryan, an economist at Capital Economics. The rental market is gaining strength because many would-be buyers still cannot afford to purchase, he said. And as borrowing costs remain higher for longer, people have stopped assuming they can buy now and be able to refinance at a later date, according to Ryan. 'The outlook for the housing market is dire,' he said. 'Affordability is at its worst since the 1980s. Nothing has changed on that front.' Location matters One silver lining is that buyers have gained some negotiating power as listings climbed across much of the country. But as always in real estate, what matters most is geography. Prices continue to rise fast in the Northeast and Midwest, where inventory shortages are severe. Yet in Sun Belt markets such as Florida and Texas, where homebuilders were most active in recent years, the market is sinking. In Las Vegas, active listings shot up more than 38 per cent from a year earlier while sales plunged 15 per cent, according to Redfin data for the four weeks to Jul 20. The fear of missing out has shifted from buyers to sellers, said Angela O'Hare, an agent with Real Broker in the Las Vegas area. It does not help that sellers have to compete with homebuilders offering to subsidise mortgage rates and help cover closing costs, she said. 'Sellers who need to sell will make it happen,' O'Hare said. 'I had a listing at US$950,000. I cut it down to US$799,000 and had three offers.' Even some of the country's hottest markets have lost some steam. In Narragansett, a picturesque beach town in Rhode Island south of Providence, homes that would have gotten a dozen offers a year ago now get three, if they are priced right, said Johnny Sheil, an agent with Mott & Chace Sotheby's International Realty. 'We are seeing a lot more price decreases throughout Rhode Island now,' Sheil said. 'Uncertainty scares some people.' BLOOMBERG
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: What the world got wrong about tariffs
NEW YORK: At the beginning of the year, the world was in striking agreement on one point: If Donald Trump went ahead with tariffs, it would strengthen the dollar and trigger stagflation. Chief executives, investors and commentators all said the same. Economists estimated that every percentage point increase in the tariff rate would shave 0.1 per cent off US growth and add 0.1 per cent to inflation. But so far, the consequences have been far less disruptive than just about anyone expected. Some analysts still think that's because Trump's threats have been mostly posturing. But the effective US tariff rate has already risen from 2.5 per cent to 15 per cent. Tariff revenue is rolling in at an annual rate above US$300 billion, roughly four times the pace this time last year. Many economists had assumed that, by lowering imports, tariffs would strengthen the dollar almost automatically, as an accounting identity. Instead, it suffered its worst fall over the first half of a year since the early 1970s. This unexpected turn is now attributed to the fact that the dollar started the year historically overvalued. Many foreigners were heavily exposed to dollar assets. Of late, they have been hedging those risks and investing more outside the US. Many countries are increasingly attractive places to park money, in part because tariff threats inspired them to push economic reform and cut trade deals with non-US partners. WHY STAGFLATION HAS YET TO MATERIALISE The bigger mystery is why the stagflationary impact of tariffs has yet to materialise in the aggregate data. Is the US really enjoying a free lunch, taking in US$300 billion a year in tariff revenues with none of the expected heartburn? By some estimates, foreign exporters are indeed absorbing 20 per cent of the costs – a much larger share than they did in response to tariffs in Trump's first term. The remaining 80 per cent, however, is still getting paid in roughly equal shares by US corporations and consumers. The likely answer is that the negative economic effect of tariffs is being countered by other forces, including the mania for artificial intelligence and more government stimulus. Since January, estimates of what the big tech companies will spend this year on building out AI infrastructure have risen from US$60 billion to US$350 billion. Smaller businesses are scrambling to catch the wave too, further boosting growth. And all this excitement is neutralising the fear that trade policy uncertainty would dampen animal spirits and freeze new capex. AI-driven bullishness is also lifting growth by keeping financial conditions loose, even with higher interest rates. According to a new index from the Federal Reserve, those conditions would be neutral, not loose, were it not for the stock market, which has continued rising this year due largely to AI stocks. Meanwhile, the promise of tax relief makes it easier for US corporations to absorb a larger than expected share of the tariff costs, rather than pass it all on to consumers. Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is expected to save US businesses around US$100 billion this year and more than that in 2026, mainly in tax breaks. ECONOMIES AREN'T SHAPED BY JUST ONE FACTOR That is not to say tariffs have no negative economic effect. The costs are in fact starting to show up in higher prices for major household appliances, sporting goods and toys. Yet the overall inflation rate has been held in check by falling rents and prices for other kinds of goods, including used cars and energy. And those prices are declining for reasons unrelated to tariffs; used-car prices are still retreating from highs created by supply disruptions during the pandemic. So economists were not entirely wrong about the tariffs. And stagflation may yet materialise, particularly if the average effective rate continues to climb. But so far even a much higher rate has not been enough to overwhelm the larger forces sustaining growth and containing inflation. In a way what we are seeing is a replay of 2023. That year, too, many expected a big shock (then mainly from Fed rate rises) to dramatically slow US growth, only to find the impact offset by the AI spending boom and the US government's seemingly bottomless capacity to keep doling out fiscal support. What the world got wrong, then and now, starts with its mental frameworks. The timeworn mistake of employing simple models, in which a headline-grabbing input A leads in a straight line to outcome B, has been greatly magnified by the global obsession with Trump. He is the only input anyone cares to analyse anymore. But complex economies are rarely shaped by just one factor, not even a shock as big as Trump's tariffs.
