Trump Calls London Mayor "Nasty Person", Says "He's Done Terrible Job"
Asked by a reporter if he intended to come to London in September during a state visit, Trump responded affirmatively but then clarified: "I'm not a fan of your mayor. I think he's done a terrible job."
"The Mayor of London... a nasty person," he added.
The comments prompted Starmer to state: "He's a friend of mine, actually."
But doubling down on his view of Khan, Trump went on: "I think he's done a terrible job. But I would certainly visit London."
There is no love lost between Trump and Khan, like Starmer a member of the Labour Party.
In January, on the eve of Trump's return to the White House, Khan penned an article warning of western "reactionary populists" posing a "century-defining challenge" for progressives.
During his first term in power, Khan also became embroiled in a war of words after speaking out against a US travel ban on people from certain Muslim countries.
Trump then accused Khan, the first Muslim mayor of a Western capital when he was first elected in 2016, of doing a "very bad job on terrorism", calling him a "stone cold loser" and "very dumb".
In a podcast recorded before Trump's re-election on November 5, 2024, Khan accused the incoming president of targeting him because of the colour of his skin.
"He's come for me because of, let's be frank, my ethnicity and my religion," he said.
But in a interview with AFP in December, Khan said the American people had "spoken loudly and clearly" and "we have got to respect the outcome of the presidential elections".
In a statement later Monday, a spokesperson for Khan said the mayor was "delighted that President Trump wants to come to the greatest city in the world".
"He'd see how our diversity makes us stronger not weaker; richer, not poorer," he added.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Chief Minister Stalin wanted to challenge the Waqf (Amendments) Act in SC: MP Wilson
DMK Rajya Sabha Member P. Wilson on Saturday said amendments to the Waqf Act brought about in 1995 were sufficient, and the BJP's decision to form a committee and its actions were 'oppressive'. Speaking at the 'Save Waqf, Save Constitution' panel discussion organised by the All India Muslims Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), he said Chief Minister M.K. Stalin passed a resolution in the Assembly when the Waqf (Amendments) Act, 2025, was introduced in Parliament. 'Only the BJP opposed the resolution and staged a walkout from the Assembly. The BJP has betrayed the Muslim community and the AIADMK has formed an alliance with them. When the Bill was sent to a Joint Parliamentary Committee, the DMK appointed two of its MPs, A. Raja and M.M. Abdullah, who travelled across India for over nine months and participated in consultative meetings and opposed the amendments. The committee's objections were given in writing, and we caused a ruckus in Parliament. We debated it for 15 hours, and it was passed early in the morning. We voted against it,' he said. He added that the Chief Minister M.K. Stalin had said that the Waqf Act should be challenged in Supreme Court. 'After it was passed in the Rajya Sabha on April 4 and became an Act on April 5, we filed a case against it on April 7.' Former Madras High Court judge Justice D. Hariparanthaman said the latest Waqf Act amendments should be compared to the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act and compared to the rights available to the majority community. 'Section 104 of the Waqf Act which says that anyone can donate to Waqf... has been removed. Now, not even a Muslim can donate but he/she should have been a Muslim for five years. Does HR and CE Act have such a section? A Muslim, Christian, Jain is not prevented from donating to the Mylapore temple. This is the first act that prevents donation. All powers of the Waqf Act are being taken over by the Central government,' he said. R. Vijayasankar, former Editor, Frontline, highlighted the role of the media in spreading hate against Muslims and underlined the lack of representation of Muslims, Scheduled Castes and Other Backward Communities within mainstream media. Advocate A. Arulmozhi, retired IAS officer G. Balachandran, and Rahmathunissa, member, AIMPLB, also participated.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
25 minutes ago
- First Post
‘Everyone's a loser': From Canada to Laos, Trump's sweeping tariffs spare no one, not even the US
President Donald Trump's tariff onslaught this week left a lot of losers – from small, poor countries like Laos and Algeria to wealthy US trading partners like Canada and Switzerland. They're now facing especially hefty taxes – tariffs – on the products they export to the United States starting Aug. 7. read more President Donald Trump's latest wave of sweeping tariffs is shaking the foundations of global trade and leaving a trail of economic pain across rich and poor nations alike. Countries such as Laos, Algeria, Canada and Switzerland are now facing steep levies as Trump intensifies his protectionist agenda. But while allies scramble for exemptions and rivals brace for economic fallout, but analysts say no one has truly come out ahead not even the United States. 'In many respects, everybody's a loser here,'' Barry Appleton, co-director of the Center for International Law at New York Law School told AP. Since returning to the presidency six months ago, Trump has torn up traditional trade norms, replacing multilateral agreements with a unilateral approach driven by threats and economic clout. 'The biggest winner is Trump,' said Alan Wolff, former deputy director-general of the World Trade Organization. 'He bet that he could get other countries to the table on the basis of threats, and he succeeded dramatically.'' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's tariff regime began on April 2, dubbed 'Liberation Day' when he imposed 'reciprocal' taxes of up to 50% on imports from countries with which the U.S. runs trade deficits, and a 10% baseline tax on others. Declaring the trade imbalance a national emergency under a 1977 law, Trump bypassed Congress to implement the sweeping changes, now being challenged in court. After an initial market selloff, Trump paused the new tariffs for 90 days to allow room for negotiations. Some countries took the opportunity to strike deals, though often under heavy pressure. The United Kingdom agreed to a 10% tariff, up from 1.3%, despite having maintained a trade surplus with the U.S. for nearly two decades. The European Union and Japan settled for 15%, lower than the threatened 30% and 25%, respectively. Other countries that agreed to higher tariffs include Pakistan, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines. Even those with reduced levies compared to April levels remain far worse off than pre-Trump norms. Angola's tariffs dropped from 32% to 15%, but were below 1.5% in 2022. Taiwan saw its April rate of 32% lowered to 20%, but still faces a financial burden. '20% from the beginning has not been our goal, we hope that in further negotiations we will get a more beneficial and more reasonable tax rate,' Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te said Friday. Trump also rolled back Lesotho's tariff from 50% to 15%, but economic damage there may already be done. On the harsher end, nations that refused to bend or angered Trump in other ways got slammed. Laos and Algeria whose GDPs per capita are a fraction of America's now face tariffs of 40% and 30%, respectively. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Brazil was hit with a 50% tax, reportedly in retaliation for its treatment of former President Jair Bolsonaro. Despite a consistent U.S. trade surplus with Brazil, the tariff went ahead. Canada was slapped with a 35% import tax, a move some analysts tie to Ottawa's plan to recognise Palestinian statehood, a position contrary to Trump's strong support of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Switzerland, which didn't secure a deal, was struck with a 39% tariff, more than the 31% initially proposed. 'The Swiss probably wish that they had camped in Washington'' to make a deal, Wolff commented. 'They're clearly not at all happy.'' Trump's actions are now facing legal scrutiny. A group of American companies and a dozen states are suing, arguing that he overstepped his authority under the 1977 law. A New York court recently blocked the tariffs, but allowed collection to continue pending appeal, which may end up before the US Supreme Court. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Judges on the US Court of Appeals have expressed scepticism about the justification behind Trump's measures. 'If (the tariffs) get struck down, then maybe Brazil's a winner and not a loser,'' Appleton said. Although Trump frames tariffs as a way to tax foreign countries, in practice, U.S. importers bear the cost and pass it on to American consumers. Goldman Sachs estimates that foreign exporters have absorbed only a fifth of the tariff burden, leaving U.S. businesses and households to shoulder the rest. Major retailers and manufacturers including Walmart, Nike, and Ford — have raised prices in response. 'This is a consumption tax, so it disproportionately affects those who have lower incomes,'' said Appleton. 'Sneakers, knapsacks … your appliances are going to go up. Your TV and electronics are going to go up. Your video game devices, consoles are going to up because none of those are made in America.'' With average U.S. tariffs rising from 2.5% at the start of 2025 to 18.3% — the highest since 1934 — Yale's Budget Lab estimates the policy will cost the average American household $2,400 this year. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The U.S. consumer's a big loser,″ Wolff concluded. With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
25 minutes ago
- First Post
US-Israel strategy aims to end Gaza war, disarm Hamas: Witkoff
President Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, has assured families of Israeli hostages that the US is working closely with Prime Minister Netanyahu on a strategy to end the Gaza war. read more Palestinians climb onto trucks as they seek for aid supplies that entered Gaza through Israel in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza Strip. Reuters On Saturday, President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy assured the relatives of hostages held by the Palestinian terrorist organisation Hamas that he was working with the Israeli government on a strategy that would successfully end the Gaza war. Trump has made ending the Gaza war a top priority for his administration, although discussions have been stalled. Steve Witkoff is visiting Israel as the government faces growing pressure over the deteriorating humanitarian situation in the region. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In a recording of the meeting, reviewed by Reuters, Witkoff is heard saying: 'We have a very, very good plan that we're working on collectively with the Israeli government, with Prime Minister Netanyahu … for the reconstruction of Gaza. That effectively means the end of the war.' The White House did not immediately reply to a request for comment on his statements. Witkoff also stated that Hamas was willing to disarm in order to end the conflict, despite the group's continuous refusal to lay down its weapons. In reaction to the reported words, Hamas, which has controlled Gaza since 2007 but has been brutally battered by Israel during the conflict, stated that it will not give up 'armed resistance' until a 'independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital' is formed. Indirect talks between Hamas and Israel aimed at negotiating a 60-day ceasefire in the Gaza conflict and an agreement for the release of half the captives ended last week in impasse. On Saturday, Hamas released its second video in two days of Israeli hostage Evyatar David. In it, David, skeletally thin, is shown digging a hole, which, he says in the video, is for his own grave. Witkoff met with Netanyahu on Thursday. Afterward, a senior Israeli official said an understanding between Israel and Washington was emerging that there was a need to move from a plan to release some of the hostages to a plan to release all the hostages, disarm Hamas and demilitarize the Gaza Strip, echoing Israel's key demands for ending the war. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Gaza starvation On Tuesday, Qatar and Egypt, who are mediating ceasefire efforts, endorsed a declaration by France and Saudi Arabia outlining steps toward a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. As part of it, they said Hamas must hand over its arms to the Western-backed Palestinian Authority. Witkoff arrived in Israel with Netanyahu's government facing a global outcry over devastation in Gaza and the starvation growing among its 2.2 million people. The crisis has also prompted a string of Western powers to announce they may recognize a Palestinian state. On Friday, Witkoff visited a U.S.-backed aid operation in southern Gaza, which the United Nations has partly blamed for deadly conditions in the enclave, saying he sought to get food and other aid to people there. Dozens have died of malnutrition in recent weeks after Israel cut off all supplies to the enclave for nearly three months from March to May, according to Gaza's health ministry. It said on Saturday that it had recorded seven more fatalities, including a child, since Friday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Israel blames Hamas for the suffering in Gaza and says it is taking steps for more aid to reach its population, including pausing fighting for part of the day in some areas, air drops and announcing protected routes for aid convoys. U.N. agencies have said that airdrops of food are insufficient and that Israel must let in far more aid by land and quickly ease the access to it. The Gaza war began when Hamas killed more than 1,200 people and took 251 hostage in an attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, according to Israeli figures. Israel's offensive has since killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health officials. According to Israeli officials, 50 hostages now remain in Gaza, only 20 of whom are believed to be alive.
