logo
Trump administration issues list of demands to Columbia to restore funding

Trump administration issues list of demands to Columbia to restore funding

Yahoo14-03-2025

The Trump administration has sent a letter to Columbia University's interim president and board of trustees that includes a list of demands the school must meet if it wants the administration to reverse its cancellation of $400 million in federal funds Columbia was authorized to receive.
The letter, sent Thursday, is an ultimatum that demands Columbia make changes and impose policies to align it with the MAGA movement's political views. It is essentially a ransom note, outlining steps Columbia must take 'as a precondition for formal negotiations' on restoring the millions in government funding the university had been awarded.
Among the steps the administration demands is that Columbia place its Middle East, South Asian and African Studies Department under academic receivership, which would effectively give control over the program to a chair outside of Columbia's faculty — a move that smacks of textbook racism. But the administration's list of demands goes much further, requiring that Columbia:
hand out expulsions or multiyear suspensions to demonstrators who participated in pro-Palestinian protests inside Hamilton Hall last year. (The university appears to have already taken steps in this direction.)
abolish its University Judicial Board and 'centralize all disciplinary processes,' including expulsions and suspensions, under the university president.
ban masks 'intended to conceal identity or intimidate others,' and require any masked individuals to display their Columbia ID.
adopt a controversial definition of antisemitism the administration formally adopted in Trump's first term and has revived in his second.
institute 'time, place, and manner rules,' which are basically restrictions around protests.
'empower' its security with 'full law enforcement authority,' including authorizing the 'arrest and removal of agitators' who foster an 'unsafe or hostile work or study environment.'
develop a 'plan' to investigate and punish student groups 'engaged in violations of University policy' — like some forms of protest, perhaps.
'reform' its admissions processes, which as already undergone homogenizing changes in response to the Supreme Court's ruling against racially conscious admissions policies.
Read the administration's letter below:
The executive director of Columbia's Knight First Amendment Institute, Jameel Jaffer, condemned the letter as part of an effort to "subjugate universities to official power' in a statement on Friday.
This authoritarian power-grab at Columbia aligns with a broader conservative push to impose its political will on American universities, which Vice President JD Vance has previously called 'the enemy.' The Trump administration recently opened dozens of investigations into universities it claims are running diversity programs that discriminate against white and Asian students.
And the administration recently arrested and is attempting to deport Mahmoud Khalil, a legal U.S. resident and Columbia University student who engaged in the pro-Palestinian demonstrations on campus last year.
Trump's administration is treating American campuses, which foster curiosity and independent thought, just as his vice president described them — as the enemy. In this culture war, it appears as though Columbia University is going to be the administration's first hostage.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US spies said Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon. Trump dismisses that assessment
US spies said Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon. Trump dismisses that assessment

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US spies said Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon. Trump dismisses that assessment

WASHINGTON (AP) — Tulsi Gabbard left no doubt when she testified to Congress about Iran's nuclear program earlier this year. The country was not building a nuclear weapon, the national intelligence director told lawmakers, and its supreme leader had not reauthorized the dormant program even though it had enriched uranium to higher levels. But President Donald Trump dismissed the assessment of U.S. spy agencies during an overnight flight back to Washington as he cut short his trip to the Group of Seven summit to focus on the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. 'I don't care what she said,' Trump told reporters. In his view, Iran was 'very close' to having a nuclear bomb. Trump's statement aligned him more closely with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has described a nuclear-armed Iran as an imminent threat, than with his own top intelligence adviser. Trump met with national security officials, including Gabbard, in the Situation Room on Tuesday as he plans next steps. Administration officials downplayed the inconsistency between Trump and Gabbard, saying that enriching uranium can put Iran on track to having a nuclear weapon. Gabbard blamed the media for misconstruing her earlier testimony, asserting that 'President Trump was saying the same thing that I said." 'We are on the same page," she told CNN. Asked for comment, Gabbard's office referred to those remarks. In her March testimony to lawmakers, Gabbard said the intelligence community 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.' She also said the U.S. was closely monitoring Iran's nuclear program, noting that the country's 'enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.' Gen. Erik Kurilla, who leads U.S. forces in the Middle East, recently testified to Congress that Iran could produce enough nuclear material for 10 weapons in three weeks. However, he did not say how long it would take to assemble the pieces into a bomb. A senior intelligence official said Trump was right to be concerned because its uranium enrichment far exceeds what would be needed for domestic purposes. Another senior administration official said Iran was as close to having a nuclear weapon as it could be without having one. Both spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive issues. Trump's contradiction of Gabbard echoed his feuds with U.S. spy leaders during his first term, when he viewed them as part of a 'deep state' that was undermining his agenda. Most notably, he sided with Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2018 when asked if Moscow had interfered in the 2016 election, saying Putin was 'extremely strong and powerful in his denial.' The latest break over Iran was striking because Trump has staffed his second administration with loyalists rather than establishment figures. Gabbard, a military veteran and former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii, was narrowly confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate because of her scant experience with intelligence or managing sprawling organizations. Gabbard, who left the Democratic Party in 2022 and endorsed Trump in last year's election, testified Tuesday before the Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee in a closed session that had been previously scheduled about the budget. Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, who is the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee but isn't on the budget panel, said he's unaware of any new information that would change the assessment of Iran's nuclear capabilities. 'Director Gabbard stated publicly in March that the Iranians were not actively pursuing a bomb,' Warner said. 'I've seen nothing in recent intelligence that contradicts what Director Gabbard said.' The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly warned that Iran has enough enriched uranium to make several nuclear bombs if it wants to. Iran maintains its nuclear program is peaceful. An earlier intelligence report, compiled in November under then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, also said Iran 'is not building a nuclear weapon.' However, it said the country has 'undertaken activities that better position it to produce one, if it so chooses,' such as increasing stockpiles of enriched uranium and operating more advanced centrifuges. The report did not include any estimates for a timeline for how quickly a bomb could be built. Trump's immigration agenda is another place where he's split with intelligence assessments. He cited the Alien Enemies Act, a 1798 wartime law, to deport Venezuelan migrants, which he justified by claiming that the Tren de Aragua gang was coordinating with the Venezuelan government. However, an intelligence assessment in April found no evidence of that. Gabbard fired the two veteran intelligence officers who led the panel that created the assessment, saying they were terminated because of their opposition to Trump. In response to those reports, the White House released a statement from Gabbard supporting the president. 'President Trump took necessary and historic action to safeguard our nation when he deported these violent Tren de Aragua terrorists,' the statement said. 'Now that America is safer without these terrorists in our cities, deep state actors have resorted to using their propaganda arm to attack the President's successful policies.'

Behind the Curtain: Trump's gut-check
Behind the Curtain: Trump's gut-check

Axios

time15 minutes ago

  • Axios

Behind the Curtain: Trump's gut-check

President Trump's hard-line approach sometimes softens. Last week, he appeared to buckle — under pressure from farm interests, as conveyed to him by Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins — on his steadfast demand for the deportation of anyone who's in the U.S. illegally. He took to Truth Social to say some workers here illegally, working on farms or hotels, are actually "very good, long time workers." Those are the same undocumented workers ICE is rounding up, often in front of cameras, to lock up and ship away. But hard-ass Trump resurfaced this week, vowing to target those same "very good, long time workers" across America's biggest cities, run by Democrats. Why it matters: Trump, in private, is clearly wrestling with the political realities of long-time workers who paid taxes and committed no crimes (after coming here illegally) getting deported by the millions. His economic advisers are warning him of hotels, restaurants, landscaping, construction and meatpacking companies going belly up. Republican senators are warning about families getting torn apart and local businesses and services shuttering. Polls are showing broad support for locking up criminals and locking down borders — but much deeper division on going after people who played by U.S. rules after coming here illegally. As Axios reported last month, the hardest of the hard-liners — White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem — want all undocumented immigrants expelled, regardless of economic and political consequences. That's the current position. But don't be surprised if the position softens, because Trump himself softens. State of play: For now, the enforcement pendulum has swung back in favor of the very hard line of Miller and Noem — meaning raids at farms/hotels/restaurants. Within the White House, Rollins' move that initially led Trump to back off raids on farms, hotels and restaurants angered some top aides, notably Miller, the architect of Trump's immigration and deportation policies. The intrigue: Some Republican lawmakers and activists tell Axios they believe the debate over immigration enforcement is far from over. They note that Trump has already changed his mind twice, and that we haven't yet seen the true economic impact from waves of immigrant arrests. Steve Bannon — the powerful MAGA podcaster, and top aide in Trump's first term — believes the president once again could be swayed to go easy on such economically crucial industries. "There's constant pressure. There are constantly people coming to him," Bannon said Wednesday at a press breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor. "He's someone that takes the business community's interests in mind," Bannon added, referencing Trump's career in hotels and construction. Bannon also said that within the right-wing populist movement, Trump is actually a "moderate." Behind the scenes: Axios reporters are hearing about low morale within ICE. The agency is being stressed by the demands by Miller and Noem that agents arrest 3,000 immigrants a day nationwide — a quota that many within ICE don't believe is achievable. Some agents are stressed by the tactics some of their colleagues are using in making arrests. Others are disheartened by the response that masked, heavily armed agents have received in several communities. We've also heard that some ICE agents are afraid of being fired for not meeting arrest quotas — the agency still hasn't hit the 3,000-per-day goal. What we're watching: Senate Agriculture Committee chair John Boozman (R-Ark.) told Axios he plans to meet with Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins again soon to discuss the worksite raids issue. In the meantime, he's been fielding complaints from farmers across the country. "A lot of their workforce have questionable papers, and so they're concerned," Boozman said. "When you get mixed signals, it breeds uncertainty. So it's hard for businesses to plan," he added, echoing the concerns many businesses have expressed about Trump's tariff policies.

"A Phone So Sh*tty You Won't Want To Use It": The Internet Is Clowning Donald Trump So Hard For His Bizarre Comments Following The Launch Of "Trump Mobile"
"A Phone So Sh*tty You Won't Want To Use It": The Internet Is Clowning Donald Trump So Hard For His Bizarre Comments Following The Launch Of "Trump Mobile"

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

"A Phone So Sh*tty You Won't Want To Use It": The Internet Is Clowning Donald Trump So Hard For His Bizarre Comments Following The Launch Of "Trump Mobile"

President Donald Trump faced ridicule on Tuesday as critics suggested he'd delivered the perfect anti-advertisement for the newly launched Trump-branded smartphone. Just hours after the Trump Organization unveiled its latest venture — 'Trump Mobile' — the president said he doesn't 'believe in telephones.' Trump made the comment while explaining to reporters on Air Force One why he cut short his attendance at the G7 summit in Canada. Trump said he left the gathering of world leaders early to return to Washington, D.C., so that he could address rising tensions between Israel and Iran. atrupar / X / Via When asked what he could do in the US capital that he couldn't do in Canada, Trump responded: 'Just be a little bit, I think, more well-versed. Not having to use telephones so much, because I don't believe in telephones. Because people like you listen to them, you know, so being on the scene is much better.' Critics highlighted the irony, noting how Trump's dismissal of telephones clashed with the announcement of the phone company. Related: "Honestly Speechless At How Evil This Is": 26 Brutal, Brutal, Brutal Political Tweets Of The Week Related: "Let Them Eat Teslas": People At The "No Kings" Protests This Weekend Brought Signs That Were So Clever I'm Still Laughing About Them implausibleblog / X / Via This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: This Conservative Said He Wears A Fake ICE Uniform For A Really, Really, Really Gross Reason Also in In the News: This Dem Lawmaker Is Going Viral For His Extremely Shady Question To Secretary Kristi Noem Also in In the News: MAGA Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really Doesn't Like This Army Vet's Now-Viral Speech

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store