6-cent gas tax hike central to new transportation deal in WA Legislature
Transportation budget writers in the Washington Legislature are settling on a revenue package that would hike the state's gasoline tax 6 cents a gallon beginning July 1.
The potential gas tax increase, the first in the state since 2016, raises nearly half of the estimated $3.2 billion the new package is expected to bring in over six years. It would up the state's levy from 49.4 cents per gallon to 55.4 cents, then lift it by 2% each year.
The proposal is the product of bipartisan negotiations between legislators in the House and Senate seeking a solution to soaring project costs and flagging gas tax collections as drivers transition to more efficient vehicles.
'We're close,' said House Transportation Committee Chair Jake Fey, D-Tacoma.
The new proposition in Senate Bill 5801 makes a sizable dent in what's estimated to be a $1 billion shortfall over the next two years and $8 billion over the next six years. Lawmakers say more money is needed to fund highway megaprojects, the Washington State Patrol, state ferries and the removal of culverts and other barriers blocking fish migration.
Meanwhile, the two chambers are negotiating over what the new revenue will pay for as they hash out a two-year transportation plan in the $15 billion to $16 billion range.
Initial revenue packages released last month totaled $4.4 billion in the House and $3 billion in the Senate.
The revised gas tax proposal hews closer to what the Senate previously unveiled. The House had teased raising the tax 9 cents, then indexing it to inflation.
The Senate's original plan received some Republican backing, passing 31-18 in March with three Democrats opposed and four Republicans in support.
Washington's gas tax is already one of the highest in the country, before accounting for the 18.4-cent federal rate.
On top of the gas tax hike, the latest framework includes hikes for the diesel fuel tax — 3 cents a gallon in both fiscal years 2026 and 2028, then those increases indexed to rise 2% annually for inflation.
There are also added taxes on vehicle sales, rental cars, luxury vehicles, private jets and a $1 per attendee fee on operators of stadiums and other venues with a capacity of 17,000 or more.
One of the bigger-ticket items is $317 million from a $30-per-ton weight fee on heavy-duty trucks that would also rise with inflation in future years. Lawmakers also pencil in $138 million from violations of the state's new speed cameras in work zones.
The tax cornucopia also drops some controversial ideas in the earlier House and Senate proposals.
There's no increased fee on electric vehicle registrations. There's no new 10% surcharge on e-bike purchases. There's no vehicle registration fee for transit operators. And there's no ferry fare increase.
Most notable may be the absence of a new highway use fee the House had floated.
The creative fee, patterned after a similar approach in Virginia, would have charged drivers based on their car's fuel economy, with more efficient vehicles paying more. Fey and other Democrats have toyed with such a road usage charge for over a decade. He was disappointed to see it not included in Tuesday's revenue proposal.
Senate Transportation Committee Chair Marko Liias, D-Edmonds, said negotiators dropped the charge because of how late in the process it came and the resulting lack of time 'to understand the impacts.'
The plan includes other policy changes, including tolling on the entire State Route 520 corridor, not just the floating bridge, mandating biodiesel fuel for state ferries and providing a sales tax exemption for zero-emission buses.
But it doesn't include added uses for Tacoma Narrows Bridge toll proceeds or increased enforcement for expired vehicle registration tabs, as the Senate had proposed.
The proposal, heard in the House Transportation Committee on Tuesday, is set for a vote from the panel Wednesday morning.
The legislative session is scheduled to end Sunday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
Winklevoss twins reveal more details in Gemini IPO filing as crypto-friendly Trump boosts investor demand
Gemini's revenue fell and losses widened in the first half of 2025, the cryptocurrency exchange said in a US IPO filing, joining a wave of digital-asset firms seeking to tap public markets. Terms of the offering were not disclosed in the filing, made public on Friday. The company reported a net loss of $282.5 million on a total revenue of $68.6 million in the six months ended June 30, compared with a net loss of $41.4 million on a revenue of $74.3 million year earlier. Advertisement 3 Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss attend the signing ceremony for the GENIUS Act at the White House last month. Getty Images US IPO activity has rebounded in recent months following a slowdown earlier this year caused by uncertainty over trade policy changes, with several new listings drawing strong investor demand. Digital asset companies have also featured prominently in the IPO market in recent months, including blockbuster debuts from stablecoin issuer Circle and cryptocurrency exchange Bullish. Advertisement Bullish's debut on Wednesday made it the second listed cryptocurrency exchange in the country after Coinbase Global. Gemini will become the third public crypto exchange once it goes public. 'The question for investors regarding Gemini revolves around the business mix and moat of trading versus custody, how they differentiate on trust and growth, and what they do that Coinbase can't copy by Tuesday,' said Michael Ashley Schulman, partner and CIO at Running Point Capital. Gemini said it will use IPO proceeds for general corporate purposes and to repay all or part of its third-party debt. The exchange also supports stablecoins on its platform, a segment that has drawn attention following last month's signing of the GENIUS Act, a new US law establishing a regulatory framework for stablecoins. Advertisement 3 The GENIUS Act is a new US law establishing a regulatory framework for stablecoins. AFP via Getty Images Gemini issues the Gemini Dollar (GUSD), a stablecoin pegged 1:1 to the US dollar. The company, which also supports more than 70 cryptocurrencies and operates in over 60 countries, confidentially filed for an IPO in June. Gemini, which was founded in 2014 by billionaire twins Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, plans to list on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol 'GEMI.' Goldman Sachs and Citigroup are acting as lead bookrunners. Advertisement The Winklevoss twins rose to prominence after suing Facebook, and its CEO Mark Zuckerberg, alleging he stole their idea for the social network. They settled in 2008 for cash and Facebook stock. 3 Executives of cryptocurrency exchange Bullish celebrate at New York Stock Exchange on Wednesdday. REUTERS Regulatory boost Regulatory clarity under the Trump administration, rising institutional adoption, and increasing ETF inflows have bolstered investor confidence and helped integrate crypto into mainstream finance. In a watershed moment for the industry, Coinbase became the first blockchain-focused company to join the S&P 500 earlier this year. Block, which facilitates bitcoin purchases, joined the index in July. The shift marks a turnaround for an industry that spent more than a decade under heavy regulatory scrutiny worldwide. 'We've seen a shift from speculation to sustainability. Institutional investors are looking for proof points – real clients, regulated products, and long-term market alignment. This is how the sector matures, and it will likely set the stage for other crypto firms keen to list their shares,' said Nick Jones, founder of crypto firm Zumo.
Politico
24 minutes ago
- Politico
California Dems release map drawn to oust 5 House Republicans
California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference Thursday, Aug. 14, 2025, in Los Angeles. | Marcio Jose Sanchez/AP By Blake Jones and Melanie Mason 08/15/2025 07:29 PM EDT SACRAMENTO, California — California Democrats on Friday finalized their plan to snatch five GOP House seats next year by redrawing the state's congressional lines, according to a copy of the new House map submitted to the Legislature on behalf of the DCCC. The new lines, which voters would need to approve in a Nov. 4 special election, adds registered Democratic voters to districts held by Republicans and frontline Democrats, while making some safe blue districts slightly more competitive. State legislators are expected next week to place the new district lines on the statewide ballot, sparking a furious campaign to override the work of the state's independent redistricting commission for the next several election cycles. California's bold and risky play, led by Gov. Gavin Newsom and senior members of the state's congressional delegation, is designed to cancel out Republicans' bid to flip five Democratic-held House seats in Texas — a tactic urged by President Donald Trump to retain the House majority.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Democratic plans emerge to reshape California's congressional delegation and thwart Trump
A decade and a half after California voters stripped lawmakers of the ability to draw the boundaries of congressional districts, Gov. Gavin Newsom and fellow Democrats are pushing to take that partisan power back. The redistricting plan taking shape in Sacramento and headed toward voters in November could shift the Golden State's political landscape for at least six years, if not longer, and sway which party controls the U.S. House of Representatives after the 2026 midterm elections — which will be pivotal to the fate of President Trump's political agenda. What Golden State voters choose to do will reverberate nationwide, killing some political careers and launching others, provoking other states to reconfigure their own congressional districts and boosting Gov. Gavin Newsom's profile as a top Trump nemesis and leader of the nation's Democratic resistance. The new maps, drawn by Democratic strategists and lawmakers behind closed doors, were expected to be submitted to legislative leaders by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and widely leaked on Friday. They are expected to appear on a Nov. 4 special election ballot, along with a constitutional amendment that would override the state's voter-approved, independent redistricting commission. The changes would ripple across hundreds of miles of California, from the forests near the Oregon state line through the deserts of Death Valley and Palm Springs to the U.S.-Mexico border, expanding Democrats' grip on California and further isolating Republicans. The proposed map would concentrate Republican voters in a handful of deep-red districts and eliminate an Inland Empire congressional seat represented by the longest-serving member of California's GOP delegation. For Democrats, the plans would boost the fortunes of up-and-coming politicians and shore up vulnerable incumbents in Congress, including two new lawmakers who won election by fewer than 1,000 votes last fall. "This is the final declaration of political war between California and the Trump administration," said Thad Kousser, a political science professor at UC San Diego. How will the ballot measure work? For the state to reverse the independent redistricting process that the electorate approved in 2010, a majority of California voters would have to approve the measure, which backers are calling the "Election Rigging Response Act." The state Legislature, where Democrats hold a supermajority in both the Assembly and Senate, will consider the ballot language next week when lawmakers return from summer recess. Both chambers would need to pass the ballot language by a two-thirds majority and get the bill to Newsom's desk by Aug. 22, leaving just enough time for voter guides to be mailed and ballots to be printed. The ballot language has not been released. But the decision about approving the new map would ultimately be up to the state's electorate, which backed independent redistricting in 2010 by more than 61%. Registered Democrats outnumber Republican voters by almost a two-to-one margin in California, providing a decided advantage for supporters of the measure. Newsom has said that the measure would include a "trigger," meaning the state's maps would only take effect if a Republican state — including Texas, Florida and Indiana — approve new mid-decade maps. "There's still an exit ramp," Newsom said. "We're hopeful they don't move forward." Explaining the esoteric concept of redistricting and getting voters to participate in an off-year election will require that Newsom and his allies, including organized labor, launch what is expected to be an expensive campaign very quickly. "It's summer in California," Kousser said. "People are not focused on this." California has no limit on campaign contributions for ballot measures, and a measure that pits Democrats against Trump, and Republicans against Newsom, could become a high-stakes, high-cost national brawl. "It's tens of millions of dollars, and it's going to be determined on the basis of what an opposition looks like as well," Newsom said Thursday. The fundraising effort, he said, is "not insignificant... considering the 90-day sprint." The ballot measure's campaign website mentions three major funding sources thus far: Newsom's gubernatorial campaign, the main political action committee for House Democrats in Washington, and Manhattan Beach businessman Bill Bloomfield, a longtime donor to California Democrats. Those who oppose the mid-decade redistricting are also expected to be well-funded, and will argue that this effort betrays the will of the voters who approved independent congressional redistricting in 2010. What's at stake? Control of the U.S. House of Representatives hangs in the balance. The party that holds the White House tends to lose House seats during the midterm election. Republicans hold a razor-thin majority in the House, and Democrats taking control of chamber in 2026 would stymie Trump's controversial, right-wing agenda in his final two years in office. Redistricting typically only happens once a decade, after the U.S. Census. But Trump has been prodding Republican states, starting with Texas, to redraw their lines in the middle of the decade to boost the GOP's chances in the midterms. At Trump's encouragement, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott called a special legislative session to redraw the Texas congressional map to favor five more Republicans. In response, Newsom and other California Democrats have called for their own maps that would favor five more Democrats. Texas Democratic lawmakers fled the state to deny the legislature a quorum and stop the vote. They faced daily fines, death threats and calls to be removed from office. They agreed to return to Austin after the special session ended on Friday, with one condition being that California Democrats moved forward with their redistricting plan. The situation has the potential to spiral into an all-out redistricting arms race, with Trump leaning on Indiana, Florida, Ohio and Missouri to redraw their maps, while Newsom is asking the same of blue states including New York and Illinois. California Republicans in the crosshairs The California gerrymandering plan targets five of California's nine Republican members of Congress: Reps. Kevin Kiley and Doug LaMalfa in Northern California, Rep. David Valadao in the Central Valley, and Reps. Ken Calvert and Darrell Issa in Southern California. The map consolidates Republican voters into a smaller number of ruby-red districts known as "vote sinks." Some conservative and rural areas would be shifted into districts where Republican voters would be diluted by high voter registration advantage for Democrats. The biggest change would be for Calvert, who would see his Inland Empire district eliminated. Calvert has been in Congress since 1992 and represents a sprawling Riverside County district that includes Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Palm Springs and his home base of Corona. Calvert, who oversees defense spending on the powerful House Appropriations Committee, comfortably won reelection last year despite a well-funded national campaign by Democrats. Under the proposed map, the Inland Empire district would be carved up and redistributed, parceled out to a district represented by Rep. Young Kim (R-Anaheim Hills). Liberal Palm Springs would be shifted into the district represented by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Bonsall), which would help tilt the district from Republican to a narrowly divided swing seat. Members of Congress are not required to live in their districts, but there would not be an obvious seat for Calvert to run for, unless he ran against Kim or Issa. Leaked screenshots of the map began to circulate Friday afternoon, prompting fierce and immediate pushback from California Republicans. The lines are "third-world dictator stuff," Orange County GOP chair Will O'Neill said on X, and the "slicing and dicing of Orange County cities is obscene." In Northern California, the boundaries of Kiley's district would shrink and dogleg into the Sacramento suburbs to add registered Democrats. Kiley said in a post on the social media site X that he expected his district to stay the same because voters would "defeat Newsom's sham initiative and vindicate the will of California voters." LaMalfa's district would shift south, away from the rural and conservative areas along the Oregon border, and pick up more liberal areas in parts of Sonoma County, In Central California, boundaries would shift to shore up Reps. Josh Harder (D-Tracy) and Adam Gray (D-Merced). Gray won election last year by 187 votes, the narrowest margin in the country. Valadao, a perennial target for Democrats, would see the northern boundary of his district stretch into the bluer suburbs of Fresno. Democrats have tried for years to unseat Valadao, who represents a district that has a strong Democratic voter registration advantage on paper, but where turnout among blue voters is lackluster. Feeding frenzy for open seats The maps include a new congressional seat in Los Angeles County that would stretch through the southeast cities of Downey, Santa Fe Springs, Whittier and Lakewood. An open seat in Congress is a rare opportunity for politicians, especially in deep-blue Los Angeles County, where incumbent lawmakers can keep their jobs for decades. Portions of that district were once represented by retired U.S. Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard, the first Mexican American woman elected to Congress. That seat was eliminated in the 2021 redistricting cycle, when California lost a congressional seat for the first time in its history. Los Angeles County Supervisor Hilda Solis has told members of the California Congressional delegation that she is thinking about running for the new seat. Another possible contender, former Assembly speaker Anthony Rendon of Lakewood, launched a campaign for state superintendent of schools in late July and may be out of the mix. Other lawmakers who represent the area or areas nearby include State Sen. Blanca Rubio (D-Baldwin Park), state Sen. Bob Archuleta (D-Pico Rivera) and state Assemblywoman Lisa Calderon (D-Whittier). In Northern California, the southern tip of LaMalfa's district would stretch south into the Sonoma County cities of Santa Rosa and Healdsberg, home to Senate Pro Tem Mike McGuire. McGuire will be termed out of the state Senate next year, and the new seat might present a prime opportunity for him to go to Washington. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
