Supply Chain Partners Face Significant Fines If They Contribute To Speeding, Fatigue Or Overloading By Truck Drivers
Transporting New Zealand has launched a set of resources raising awareness about the "Chain of Responsibility" provisions in the Land Transport Act, that can result in serious fines for those who influence truck drivers to breach transport rules.
Transporting New Zealand Chief Executive Dom Kalasih says that it isn't just truck drivers with road safety responsibilities.
"If your conduct contributes to truck drivers exceeding speed limits, breaching work time rules, or operating over-weight vehicles, you can be liable for a fine of up to $25,000 under the Land Transport Act."
"This is relevant to everyone from transport company directors, cargo owners, processors, and ports. All those supply chain parties whose instructions, expectations and facilities can contribute to non-compliance."
"While it is ultimately the responsibility of truck drivers and road freight businesses to ensure they are operating safely and compliantly, the Chain of Responsibility provisions recognise that other parties are often in a position of power when it comes to getting freight delivered."
"Transporting New Zealand has always maintained a zero-tolerance policy towards deliberate non-compliance by transport operators, and that remains unchanged."
Kalasih says he hopes that the Chain of Responsibility resources will encourage conversations between transporters, their clients, and transport facilities like processing plants and ports.
"Issues that really put road freight companies under pressure include last minute timing and delivery changes, unrealistic ultimatums from supply chain partners, and a lack of weighing facilities or parking facilities."
Kalasih would like to see supply chain partners have clear chain of responsibility policies, and increased use of written contracts with appropriate protections for transporters.
"If all parties across the supply chain play their part, it puts truck drivers and road freight companies in the best position to deliver the freight task safely and efficiently."
Chain of Responsibility Resources
Chain of Responsibility Posters can be downloaded here: https://www.transporting.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Chain-of-Responsibility-Posters-for-download-and-printing.pdf
Physical copies can be ordered by emailing info@transporting.nz with order details and a business address.
Transporting New Zealand's Terms and Conditions for Carriage of Goods template is available for members through their member portal: https://www.transporting.nz/terms-conditions-for-carriage-of-goods-template
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
5 days ago
- RNZ News
Southern councils reluctantly agree to jointly deliver water services
Clutha River Mata-Au. Photo: RNZ / Tess Brunton The Clutha District Council has reluctantly agreed to partner with other southern councils to deliver water services with councillors saying they feel backed into a corner. Councils have less than a month to submit their water service delivery plans to the Department of Internal Affairs. Four southern councils had been working towards a jointly owned, council-controlled organisation, but last month, the Waitaki District Council pulled out , leaving the others to work out if they should stick with the plan or strike out on their own. Earlier this week, the Central Otago and Gore district councils both voted to stay the course and continue with the Southern Water Done Well model. On Wednesday, Clutha District councillors met to consider if the updated figures for only three councils stacked up and they should stick with their earlier decision to adopt the Southern Water Done Well model. Analysis by Morrison Low Advisory, that was tabled at the extraordinary meeting, found that ratepayers across the three councils would collectively save approximately $392 million by 2054 through setting up the joint entity. This was $220 million less than the estimated savings if the Waitaki District Council remained in the partnership, but the analysis suggested the figures used conservative assumptions and more savings could be made if other councils joined in the future. The decision was not unanimous, with multiple councillors on both sides of the vote expressing their frustration and concerns. Clutha District Mayor Bryan Cadogan said he was gutted and furious, but the new entity was the only option they had to avoid government intervention as they faced rising debt, costs, rate rises above 20 percent and a looming deadline. It was the worst process that he had ever seen a government push through, he said. "Most councils walk out of this totally enfeebled. There's going to be some ghastly costs and ghastly decisions moving forward." But he urged councillors not to vote against the partnership, saying the council could not afford to go it alone and if it tried, the government would step in and councillors would not have a seat at the decision-making table. Clutha district Mayor Bryan Cadogan Photo: supplied Councillors had a moral and democratic responsibility to protect their ratepayers from having a complete stranger from Wellington intervene and call the shots for their district, he said. Councillor Dane Catherwood said they were being pushed into a corner, but he was worried about ratepayers facing separate rates and water bills and that it would be more expensive if the entity went ahead. Clutha Deputy Mayor Ken Payne said it felt like they only had one option, even if he did not like it. Councillor Gaynor Finch said she did not want to hand over the district's assets, but she thought this option was the only way to avoid government intervention. Councillor Brent Mackie said he resented the feeling their ratepayers were being threatened and their district was being bullied and pushed around. Councillor Jock Martin said he believed if the council backed its own staff and process, they could do a better, cheaper job. The analysis was peer reviewed by Concept Consulting and Infometrics, and considered by the Department of Internal Affairs, with all three noting that this model remained the best and most viable option for the three councils to deliver water services. Councillors also voted to agree that the Timaru District Council and Waitaki District Council might join the partnership and they were willing to explore future opportunities to collaborate with other southern councils. During the meeting, they were told that the Waitaki District Council, which has been hosting weekly workshops on its own water plan, had been advised by the Department of Internal Affairs that its plan had significant gaps. On that basis, the department staff told them a specialist would likely be sent in to take over decision-making and they were expected to get the council to rejoin the southern partnership. Councillor Alison Ludemann said no extra costs should fall on the councils already in the partnership if another council sought to buddy up and any request needed to be discussed by the councils. For Clutha ratepayers, the analysis found that a new joint water services entity would mean three waters debt and revenue no longer impacted the council's borrowing limits and the council would improve its debt to revenue ratio, allowing for an increase of approximately $8 million of additional borrowing capacity. The analysis also found, while this model was the best overall, there was a risk that some local control was eroded and some high value jobs might be lost in some districts as the work was centralised. It also said the benefits of the model would be derived over the long term and the transition to a regional price might increase charges for some customers. Southern Water Done Well chair and Central Otago District Mayor Tamah Alley said the entity would be designed to protect local communities and ensure fair, effective governance. "The model is regionally focused, community-driven, and ensures that decisions about water services remain in local hands," she said. Working together remained the best way for councils to achieve their shared goal to provide the best most efficient services for their communities today and into the future, she said. "We remain committed to collaboration and would welcome future conversations with any council interested in being part of a community-led, regional solution." The new water services entity was due to start operations by July 2027, covering 24 urban water supplies and 10 rural supplies. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
6 days ago
- RNZ News
Defence mulls whether to follow in Australia's footsteps for navy contracts
HMNZS Te Mana. Photo: Supplied/ NZ Defence Force No decisions have been made on the make-up of the country's naval fleet, the Ministry of Defence says. Australia has picked Japan to build its next fleet of warships in contracts worth billions of dollars . New Zealand has a policy of buying equipment like Australia's, to stay "interoperable". The ministry said it was investigating a range of options to replace the ageing fleet after 2029. "No decisions have been made on the make-up of New Zealand's maritime fleet." Business cases would have to be done. "Key considerations when developing a business case include: what is the Australian approach, and is there any reason for New Zealand to take a different approach." The defence capability plan has a focus on naval drones between now and 2029, and Budget 2025 puts upgrades to Devonport naval base and buying $2 billion-plus of maritime helicopters to the fore. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
6 days ago
- RNZ News
Defence mulls over whether to follow in Australia's footsteps for navy contracts
HMNZS Te Mana. Photo: Supplied/ NZ Defence Force No decisions have been made on the make-up of the country's naval fleet, the Ministry of Defence says. Australia has picked Japan to build its next fleet of warships in contracts worth billions of dollars . New Zealand has a policy of buying equipment like Australia's, to stay "interoperable". The ministry said it was investigating a range of options to replace the ageing fleet after 2029. "No decisions have been made on the make-up of New Zealand's maritime fleet." Business cases would have to be done. "Key considerations when developing a business case include: what is the Australian approach, and is there any reason for New Zealand to take a different approach." The defence capability plan has a focus on naval drones between now and 2029, and Budget 2025 puts upgrades to Devonport naval base and buying $2 billion-plus of maritime helicopters to the fore. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
