logo
Giant Hungarian Horntail dragon stuns onlookers at it roars through London

Giant Hungarian Horntail dragon stuns onlookers at it roars through London

A giant roaring dragon, which features in one of the Harry Potter films, surprised Londoners on Monday morning as it roared its way through the capital's streets.
The 25-foot animatronic dragon, which weighs 1.3 tonnes, appeared captured as it made its way past Westminster Bridge, the Houses of Parliament and King's Cross Station.
The theatrical stunt was staged to mark the launch of Triwizard Tournament – Making of Champions, a new feature at Warner Bros Studio Tour London – The Making of Harry Potter, which celebrates the 20th anniversary of the cinematic release of Harry Potter And The Goblet Of Fire.
The Hungarian Horntail featured in the fourth Harry Potter novel and film, where Harry battles the beast in the first task of the Triwizard Tournament.
The fictional dragon roared and bared its teeth past London landmarks before making its way to the tourist attraction in Leavesden, Hertfordshire.
Harry Potter filmmaker and animatronic designer, Joe Scott, designed the dragon, replicating the creature in the film, complete with moving head, mouth and eyes, and sound effects.
The recreation of the famous dragon was carefully crafted over 750 hours, using materials that included 25kg of fibreglass.
The team first created a series of detailed sketches and CGI mock-ups, before sculptors, carpenters and scenic artists built the dragon's head, which was 3D printed using a scan of the original Hungarian Horntail from the film.
A total of 119 spikes were individually applied to decorate the dragon's head and tail, which took 265 hours, whilst 38 razor-sharp teeth were 3D printed in resin to create bite in the creature's animatronic mouth.
'Revisiting the creation of the Hungarian Horntail 20 years on from Harry Potter And The Goblet Of Fire has been magical,' said Mr Scott.
'Creating the dragons for the Triwizard Tournament was no mean feat, with engineers, animatronics, designers and the special effects teams all working together to bring them to life.
'It's fantastic to see the craftsmanship that went into this on display at the new feature – inspiring visitors with the magic of our filmmaking secrets.'
The Triwizard Tournament – Making of Champions, which will run from May 15 to September 8, at Warner Bros Studio Tour London features behind-the-scenes secrets and digital recreations from the fourth film.
Further additions include Mad Eye Moody's arrival in the Great Hall and wizarding journalist Rita Skeeter, best known for her poison pen articles, will be welcomed to the Studio Tour along with her self-writing quill.
Laura Sinclair-Lazell, head of show experience at Warner Bros Studio Tour London says: 'We're excited to launch our brand-new summer feature, Triwizard Tournament – Making of Champions, where visitors can learn behind-the-scenes secrets of the fourth Harry Potter film.
'To celebrate and bring the magic of Warner Bros Studio Tour London to the streets of the capital, we recreated the iconic moment of the escaped Hungarian Horntail dragon 20 years on from Harry Potter And The Goblet Of Fire.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Even in my wildest pregnancy moments, I can't imagine twerking like Meghan
Even in my wildest pregnancy moments, I can't imagine twerking like Meghan

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Even in my wildest pregnancy moments, I can't imagine twerking like Meghan

When I was a week overdue with my second child (ironically named Harry), I did sort of go mad. Not Meghan-twerking-in-a-hospital-room crazy, but bonkers nonetheless. I went into labour with my first child, a daughter, a day before her due date, and remained in denial until my husband finally persuaded me to go to the maternity ward, eight centimetres dilated. But with my son, my due date came and went, along with my sanity. My father, a retired GP, recalls me calling him day and night, demanding to know why, in his medical opinion, the baby hadn't arrived yet. It was undoubtedly the hardest seven days of all three pregnancies – including having to be induced with my third, another daughter. So like many mothers, I watched Meghan and Harry's latest Instagram video with a mixture of genuine empathy and gobsmacked astonishment. On one hand, I understand the sheer lunacy that can accompany being overdue. On the other, I'm not sure even in my wildest moments I would have chosen to 'twerk' my way through it. I mean, I'm not sure twerking would even feature on the bingo card of 'things you do while in labour': gas and air? Check. Epidural? Check. Lash out at husband? Check. Perform a sexy slut drop, while lip-syncing, to the camera? Probably not, no. What's even more mind-boggling about the 80-odd second video – in which a very heavily pregnant Meghan, accessorising her black dress with a cannula, dances to a song called The Baby Momma Dance – is the fact the privacy-obsessed couple have released it. Designed to celebrate their daughter Lilibet's fourth birthday on Wednesday, they captioned the footage, which also features the fifth in line to the throne performing Peter Crouch-esque robotics in a grey hoodie: 'Both of our children were a week past their due dates… so when spicy food, all that walking, and acupuncture didn't work – there was only one thing left to do!' (Harry only has a cameo role, natch.) It came after Meghan also shared a series of intimate photos of Lilibet, writing: 'Happy birthday to our beautiful girl! 'Four years ago today, she came into our lives – and each day is brighter and better because of it. Thanks to all of those sending love and celebrating her special day!' In one photo, mother and daughter have windswept hair with water behind them. In another, the Duchess cradles Lilibet – named after the late Queen's childhood nickname – as a newborn. To echo the thoughts of anyone watching the latest Insta-update – what on earth is going on here? I appreciate the Sussexes have always had a rather nuanced interpretation of privacy with the whole Oprah-induced 'infamy, infamy, they've all got it in for me' thing. South Park's notorious episode celebrating their World Wide Privacy Tour of every available TV studio perfectly summed up the irony of a couple opining press intrusion while dishing every last piece of dirt on their nearest and dearest to anyone who would listen. But the children were always supposed to be out of bounds. Lest we forget, the couple refused to tell anyone where they planned to give birth to Archie until the very last minute – forcing their PRs to scramble to inform the media hours after the event that he had, in fact, been born at that celebrity newborn haunt, The Portland. That pregnancy, Meghan later revealed, was overshadowed by her mental health struggles, including suicidal thoughts, amid the 'stress and isolation' of being a member of the Royal family. Now no one's quite as interested in their bodily functions, disclosure appears to be the new black – for Meghan at least. While one can imagine Harry preferring to keep his personal space free from social media invaders (notwithstanding his propensity to constantly spill the beans about his daddy issues), the Duchess appears more than willing to let it all hang out these days. Hence the behind-the-scenes cookery show, the endless podcasts, and the repeated public protestations about her business interests – including just this week revealing As Ever was being paused, before following up hours later with an Instagram post appearing to contradict that claim, announcing more products will arrive next month. Not to mention the bizarre briefings about Spencer surname swaps, which we now learn was allegedly because the couple feared the King was delaying the issuing of their children's passports over the use of their HRH titles. Mother of all two-fingered salutes to trolls You can take the actress out of the spotlight, but you can never quite take the spotlight off the actress. It isn't only queens of England that need to be seen to be believed, you know. Meghan has insisted that she never reads the news or checks social media. Recollections may vary, however, after she persuaded Gwyneth Paltrow, of Hollywood and vaginal egg fame, to record a kooky clip for the kind of followers who are willing to pay a tenner for a jar of Montecito jam, following claims that there was a rift between the two. (You may recall that Meghan also once claimed to have not really heard of the Royal family, despite being photographed outside Buckingham Palace, aged 15.) Mindful, perhaps, of the conspiracy theories still swirling online that she was never actually pregnant, it's hard not to see the latest video as the mother of all two-fingered salutes to those hurtful trolls. And the nasty media who continually mocked her for stroking her baby bump. An elephant never forgets. It certainly brings new meaning to that anecdote in Spare about Kate allegedly taking great offence at Meghan discussing her ' hormones '.

Artwork featuring JK Rowling's name taken off display to stop ‘tampering'
Artwork featuring JK Rowling's name taken off display to stop ‘tampering'

STV News

time4 hours ago

  • STV News

Artwork featuring JK Rowling's name taken off display to stop ‘tampering'

An artwork featuring author JK Rowling's name has been taken down by the National Trust, which wants to 'protect it from further tampering or damage'. Visitors who went to Hardwick Hall in Derbyshire between April and November 2024 were invited to nominate a 'contemporary Virtuous Woman', whose name was then sewn into the fabric. Since the project ended, the participatory artwork, A Virtuous Woman, has continued to be on display, featuring Rowling's name which was at an unspecified time 'stitched over by other participants'. Last week on X, feminist campaigner Jean Hatchet said she had 'corrected' the work by taking off the stitching over Harry Potter author Rowling's name. It follows criticism of Scotland-based Rowling's views on gender issues that have seen her called transphobic by activists, which she has denied. A spokeswoman for the National Trust said: 'The artwork was open to contributions for eight months and closed in November when the piece was finished and put on public display. 'During the participation phase, JK Rowling's name was stitched onto the piece seven times and in two instances it was stitched over by other participants. 'At the time the artwork was completed and subsequently hung, JK Rowling's name appeared five times without any overstitching. 'We ask people not to damage or tamper with artworks once they are finished and on public display. 'The piece has been taken off display for investigation and to protect it from further tampering or damage. We take all claims and incidents of damage to items in our care seriously and investigate each one.' Ms Hatchet criticised the response from the National Trust, saying she removed the 'stitching with the correct tool', took 'great time and care', and did not damage it. The stitched names of British queens, artist Yoko Ono, former prime minister Baroness Margaret Thatcher, climate campaigner Greta Thunberg, and Taylor Swift among others appear not to have stitching over them on the recycled textile. The work comes from artist Layla Khoo in association with the University of Leeds and National Trust, and is inspired by wealthy Elizabethan woman Elizabeth Talbot, known as Bess of Hardwick, commissioning a series of large embroideries featuring noble women from the ancient world, such as Cleopatra. The trust had previously responded to criticism from the organisation, Women's Rights Network Derbyshire and Staffordshire, who advocated for 'a simple addition to their description', with a statement explaining why the crossing-out stitching on Rowling's name remains. Responding on X, the trust said that it is a 'collaborative piece of art formed of participants' views from a variety of age groups, life experiences and beliefs', and 'any contributions to the piece have been made by those who chose to take part'. 'None of the views expressed or actions taken by participants represent the views of the National Trust, the artist or the University of Leeds,' the organisation said Ellie Evans, from WRN Derbyshire and Staffordshire, criticised the artwork being covered up, saying the move would 'erase all the women'. Rowling declined to comment. Khoo and the University of Leeds have also been contacted. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Artwork featuring JK Rowling's name taken off display to stop ‘tampering'
Artwork featuring JK Rowling's name taken off display to stop ‘tampering'

Powys County Times

time6 hours ago

  • Powys County Times

Artwork featuring JK Rowling's name taken off display to stop ‘tampering'

An artwork featuring author JK Rowling's name has been taken down by the National Trust, which wants to 'protect it from further tampering or damage'. Visitors who went to Hardwick Hall in Derbyshire between April and November 2024 were invited to nominate a 'contemporary Virtuous Woman', whose name was then sewn into the fabric. Since the project ended, the participatory artwork, A Virtuous Woman, has continued to be on display, featuring Rowling's name which was at an unspecified time 'stitched over by other participants'. Injustice to JK Rowling corrected. Don't erase the names of women from art or life. #TerfsDidThis @LightninLex – perfect wingwoman as always. — Jean Hatchet (@JeanHatchet) May 31, 2025 Last week on X, feminist campaigner Jean Hatchet said she had 'corrected' the work by taking off the stitching over Harry Potter author Rowling's name. It follows criticism of Scotland-based Rowling's views on gender issues that have seen her called transphobic by activists, which she has denied. A spokeswoman for the National Trust said: 'The artwork was open to contributions for eight months and closed in November when the piece was finished and put on public display. 'During the participation phase, JK Rowling's name was stitched onto the piece seven times and in two instances it was stitched over by other participants. 'At the time the artwork was completed and subsequently hung, JK Rowling's name appeared five times without any overstitching. 'We ask people not to damage or tamper with artworks once they are finished and on public display. 'The piece has been taken off display for investigation and to protect it from further tampering or damage. We take all claims and incidents of damage to items in our care seriously and investigate each one.' Ms Hatchet criticised the response from the National Trust, saying she removed the 'stitching with the correct tool', took 'great time and care', and did not damage it. The stitched names of British queens, artist Yoko Ono, former prime minister Baroness Margaret Thatcher, climate campaigner Greta Thunberg, and Taylor Swift among others appear not to have stitching over them on the recycled textile. The work comes from artist Layla Khoo in association with the University of Leeds and National Trust, and is inspired by wealthy Elizabethan woman Elizabeth Talbot, known as Bess of Hardwick, commissioning a series of large embroideries featuring noble women from the ancient world, such as Cleopatra. Any contributions to the piece have been made by those who chose to take part. None of the views expressed or actions taken by participants represent the views of the National Trust, the artist or the University of Leeds. (3/3) — National Trust (@nationaltrust) May 25, 2025 The trust had previously responded to criticism from the organisation, Women's Rights Network Derbyshire and Staffordshire, who advocated for 'a simple addition to their description', with a statement explaining why the crossing-out stitching on Rowling's name remains. Responding on X, the trust said that it is a 'collaborative piece of art formed of participants' views from a variety of age groups, life experiences and beliefs', and 'any contributions to the piece have been made by those who chose to take part'. 'None of the views expressed or actions taken by participants represent the views of the National Trust, the artist or the University of Leeds,' the organisation said

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store