Whitehall has left generation of teenagers with no hope, says Andy Burnham
The mayor of Greater Manchester will warn in a key speech that the number of 'neets', which now stands at almost 1 million - the highest figure in 11 years – will continue to rise unless the Department for Education (DfE) adopts a new schools policy more geared to their requirements.
Over recent weeks, government ministers have attempted to make a 'moral' case for welfare cuts and changes to the benefit system, partly by highlighting the number of young people who are not in employment or trying to get work, and instead are living on benefits.
Based on experience from Manchester, Burnham will say that one of the main causes of this is a school system that fails them and is overly focused on the traditional university route, rather than catering for the requirements of those who want to pursue technical paths.
He will say that schools in England are judged by Ofsted on their performance against the English baccalaureate (EBacc), described on the DfE's website as a collection of GCSEs 'considered essential to many degrees'.
He will argue that this has left England with an education system designed for some but not all young people. In Greater Manchester, about two-thirds do not pursue the traditional university route.
The rise in the number of neets is causing increasing concern among MPs at Westminster and educationists, with senior figures in government also growing ever-more alarmed by the loss of a potentially huge skill base to the economy.
The Policy Connect thinktank and the independent Skills Commission last month launched a new inquiry, to be chaired by a cross-party group of MPs, aimed at developing policies to ensure that, by 2050, the UK has the lowest percentage of young people who are not in education, employment or training in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
The neets rate has remained at 12% or higher for several decades. According to labour market statistics published by the Office for National Statistics in February, the UK unemployment rate for young people aged 16 to 24 was 14.8%, up from 11.9% the year before.The problems is bound up with ethnic inequalities, with young people from Black Caribbean backgrounds having a neet rate more than double that of young people with white British backgrounds. Regional inequalities are also substantial, with neet rates of 15% in the north-east of England, compared with 9.4% in the south-west.
Results from a recent survey of schools in the Greater Manchester region based on 100,000 students reveal that many young people are losing their sense of connection with school as they progress. While 67% of pupils told the #BeeWell survey that they felt a sense of belonging in year 7, this dropped to 51% by year 10. About 64% of pupils reported 'good' wellbeing in year 7, compared with 55% in year 10.
In a speech to the Institute for Government on Wednesday, Burnham will say: 'Whitehall is simply not hearing the voices of these young people who need something very different from the education system. It is clear from the BeeWell survey that too many get to the end of secondary school and feel that the system has disinvested from them. Too many are leaving without hope and a clear path for the future.'
He will call on the DfE to change schools policy and bring in a principle of parity between academic and technical education and the devolution of responsibility for the post-16 technical system. He will say: 'Different regions of England have different economies and therefore it stands to reason that post-16 technical education is a prime candidate for devolution. The Department for Education's long-running resistance to this is a significant barrier to growth.'
To balance the EBacc, Burnham and his team have developed a Greater Manchester baccalaureate, or MBacc – a selection of subjects linked to seven sectoral gateways to the Greater Manchester economy. The ambition, by 2030, is to provide a high-quality 45-day work placement for every young person who wants one, linked to T-levels and BTecs.
The mayor will say that the country's failure to tackle longstanding problems such as the rise in neets is a reflection of the top-down way in which it has been run. Burnham will call for radical change in the architecture and culture of the British state, with the new devolved bodies across England being given a much greater role in setting direction.
He will say: 'As a former minister, I have great respect for Whitehall and for the people who work within it. But it is not wired for growth. By definition, growth can't be ordered from the top down by individual silos but has to be nurtured from the bottom up, linking education to transport, employment, planning and housing.
'I give credit to the civil servants in government who have driven England's devolution journey to this point but the truth is that all now need to get with the programme. Devolution needs to go much deeper and faster if we are to get the growth we need.'
A DfE spokesperson said: 'Getting young people into education, employment or training is key for our mission to grow the economy under our Plan for Change.
'Through our new Youth Guarantee, every 18- to 21-year-old in England will have help to access an apprenticeship, quality training and education opportunities or help to find a job.
'To give all young people the foundations they need to achieve and thrive, we're also recruiting 6,500 new teachers, rolling out careers advice, increasing opportunities through Skills England, widening access to apprenticeships, improving mental health support in schools and delivering a cutting-edge curriculum to ensure pupils are set up for life, work and the future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
12 minutes ago
- Spectator
We need to purge the Ministry of Defence
On Afghanistan, you'll recall, a massive data breach of vast dimensions and bitter consequences has already been revealed, after years of secrecy and lies. The state has forked out billions to transport tens of thousands of entirely unvetted people into Britain, where they and their descendants will reside at public expense. And, to top it off, there was an immense cover-up, the fabricating of official numbers and a super-injunction to muzzle the press. The only part of the whole debacle that the regime executed with any ability was the deceit and the cover-up. It is better at hiding the truth from the public than it is at doing anything else. You might have thought it could not get worse. But the British state — and our Ministry of Defence — will always sink to the occasion. There are always new and innovative ways of failing to deliver. Today, the BBC reports on a freedom of information request it made which turned up 49 data breaches (of which only four were previously known) by the unit handling relocation applications from Afghans. Each one means official incapability, a growing bill in litigation and implied responsibility. The lawyers who represent the Afghans who have had their information carelessly handled or exposed by the British state are full of demands. Some of those are highly practical: we need to know where the gangrene is; the state cannot continue its paranoid mania for deceit and secrecy. It must be honest about its failures if we are to have any hope of stopping more in the future. But of course, they also have other concerns: money, this mostly means. They will want compensation and they'll want a lot of it. And why not? The state has failed these people. Who knows, yet, how bad those failures are? You can, it turns out, put a price on peace of mind – and that price is to be extracted in the form of years of litigation, extracted from the readers of this magazine in taxation, in interest paid on government borrowing, paid for by their children, by their grandchildren, paid forever. Now here's the scary part. This is only the beginning. These stories, reported by the BBC, are only the ones the regime is now permitting us to know about. There will be more horrors that we haven't heard yet — that will only be fed to us in drips, or leaked unexpectedly by people whose movements and motives cannot be predicted. There will be awful stories the regime will fight viciously to keep from you for the rest of time. Be prepared for years of lawsuits, and years of payouts, years of your money being spent on these errors. Almost everyone I speak to in the defence and security world now has an unrecoverable opinion of the Ministry of Defence. It can't build drones; it can't protect its own people from cyber attacks; it can't procure anything. Its failures are endemic and flagrant. As one analyst of the Ukraine war, surveying the breathtakingly useless Watchkeeper drone programme that is now being wound up, said recently, everyone in the MoD should probably be fired. The department should be completely purged and rebuilt from scratch with a less disastrous institutional culture and a wholly new collection of better people. It is completely incompetent at all of its functions. It must not survive to keep on failing.
The National
13 minutes ago
- The National
Labour set to sign £2bn contract with Israeli weapons firm
If the £2 billion ($2.69bn) deal goes ahead, it would see Elbit Systems train up to 60,000 British soldiers a year. Elbit Systems provides around 85% of Israel's drones and land-based military equipment. READ MORE: 'Widespread' use of AI generated reviews at Fringe Festival, performers claim The arms firm has played a major role in supplying Israel with weaponry for its genocide in Gaza, which has killed more than 62,000 Palestinians. The company's UK wing, Elbit Systems UK, is close to winning a major contract that would make it a "strategic partner" of the Ministry of Defence (MoD). Elbit is reportedly bidding against Raytheon for the Army Collective Training Service contract, after the MoD reduced the bidders to two in February. If Elbit wins the contract, it will work with the MoD to transform military training "through digitalisation, simulation, a different relationship with industry, and by changing how and where the military trains". The potential deal was first revealed by Private Eye this week, and was subsequently reported by Middle East Eye. Elbit Systems was one of the major targets for Palestine Action group, before it was proscribed as a terror organisation on July 5. On July 1, activists blocked the entrance to the firm's factory in Bristol, in England, where they covered the building in red paint to 'symbolise Palestinian bloodshed'. Activists in Scotland have also targeted Elbit Systems. In May, two companies linked to the weapons manufacturer - Allianz and BNY Mellon - were sprayed with red paint by Palestine Action. Since the proscription order came into effect, membership of or support for the direct action group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. In July, a report by Francesca Albanese, the UN's special rapporteur for Palestine, said that "for Israeli companies such as Elbit Systems ... the ongoing genocide has been a profitable venture". READ MORE: Duolingo apologises after German training app calls JK Rowling 'cruel' Since 2023, Elbit's UK arm has run the MoD's Project Vulcan, a £57m contract of simulation-based training for tank crews. If the new deal goes through, it would mark a significant step up in the company's relationship with the MoD. It comes as pressure is growing on the UK Government to announce a full arms embargo on Israel. In September last year, the Labour Government suspended 30 out of around 350 arms export licences to Israel. However, licences for parts for F-35 fighter jets, which are directly used in Gaza, were among those exempt from the embargo. Calls for a full arms embargo on Israel have continued to grow, with the UK Government insisting it is not sending weapons directly to Israel. Instead, the parts are sent to the F-35 "programme", an international defence programme which produces and maintains the fighter jets, with the UK contributing components for both assembly lines and an international pool. While Israel is not one of the "partner nations" of the programme, it is a customer. Private Eye said it had asked the MoD if it would be appropriate to "give a company so involved in the Gaza war such a major contract". However, the magazine added that the MoD did not respond. The National has also contacted the MoD for comment.
Rhyl Journal
16 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Labour Party membership falls by almost 200,000 in five years
Figures published on Thursday showed the party had shed another 37,215 members over the course of 2024, around 10% of its total membership at the start of the year. The losses bring Labour's membership to 333,235 at the end of last year, well down on its recent peak of 532,046 at the end of 2019. But the party is still the largest in the UK, despite a surge in membership for Reform UK. Nigel Farage's party did not include a membership figure in its own accounts, published by the Electoral Commission on Thursday, but a ticker on Reform's website said it had 234,460 members. The Liberal Democrats suffered a slight fall in membership from 86,599 to 83,174 despite recording its best electoral results, while the Greens gained around 5,000 new members. The Conservative Party does not routinely publish its membership figures in its annual accounts, but did record an increase in income from membership fees of around £500,000. Some 131,680 people were eligible to vote in the Tory leadership election last year, 40,000 fewer than in the 2022 contest. Thursday's accounts also showed both main parties reporting deficits for the year after the most expensive general election in British history. Labour recorded a loss of £3.8 million after spending £94.5 million over the course of the year, while the Conservatives spent £52 million and lost £1.9 million. Smaller parties fared better. The Liberal Democrats and Reform UK recorded surpluses of £1.1 million and £1.5 million respectively, and the Greens enjoyed a £232,457 surplus. While most of the details were published by the Electoral Commission on Thursday, Labour's figures were published on the party's own website after it was late submitting its accounts to the watchdog. It is understood that unforeseen administrative delays were responsible for the late submission, while a party spokesman said they expected the Electoral Commission to publish the document 'imminently'. The Electoral Commission said Labour's 'failure to meet the submission deadline' would be 'considered in line with our enforcement policy'. Labour general secretary Hollie Ridley and treasurer Mike Payne said last year's loss reflected 'the need to respond at pace to shifting circumstances in the general election campaign'. It follows a loss of £851,000 in 2023 and comes despite incomes from donations more than doubling to £39.4 million. Meanwhile, the Conservatives' loss came as its income fell by more than £9 million, including a reduction in income from donations. Tory chairman Nigel Huddleston and treasurer Catherine Latham said the party would now make 'substantial investments in digital media infrastructure and staff and volunteer training' as it moved to create a 'more dynamic and nimbler organisation'. The Liberal Democrats reported £12.6 million in income for 2024, while Reform UK reported £10.8 million and the Greens £5.2 million.
