Here are the US cities where buyers can still get a home for $300K — or less
The fondly remembered real estate market of 2019 still exists, if you know where to look.
Before the COVID-19 pandemic rocked the country's housing markets, median sale prices under $300,000 were the national norm. The typical US home today, however, costs buyers well over $400,000.
While homeownership feels out of reach for many Americans, frugal buyers should check out these cities for the most affordable options.
Advertisement
6 First-time homebuyers along the West Coast and in the Northeast are out of luck — affordable listing prices are heavily concentrated elsewhere.
Louis-Photo – stock.adobe.com
6 Detroit's housing market is known for its affordability — including these shipping container homes offered at steep discounts.
UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
More than 140 locations across the US boast median listing prices $300,000 or less, including more than a dozen metros, according to new Realtor.com data. Economists documented a high concentration of affordable buyers' markets still thriving in the South and the Midwest.
Advertisement
While that's not happy news for city dwellers in New York or Boston, where high density and high demand mean ever-increasing prices, buyers looking in cities like Detroit are in luck.
The Motor City topped the list of most affordable metros with median listing prices of $109,000. Detroit's economy is leaps and bounds ahead of where it was a decade ago, yet the housing market remains undervalued. The typical homeowner in Detroit spends less than 20% of their income on housing expenses, according to the US News Housing Market Index. The national average is more than 30%.
'Some of these cities, such as Detroit or Baltimore, have gone through challenging periods,' said Hannah Jones, senior economic research analyst at Realtor.com. 'However, recent investment and growth have put them back on the map as appealing, affordable places to put down roots.'
6 The median listing price for a home in Birmingham, Alabama is a mere $181,500.
Robert Hainer – stock.adobe.com
Advertisement
6 St. Louis is number three in affordability, with typical listing prices just shy of $200,000.
Getty Images
6 With a median listing price of $289,999, Philadelphia ranks high in affordability in the northeast.
Christian Hinkle – stock.adobe.com
Median prices under $200,000 can also be found in Birmingham, AL and St. Louis, MO.
While the West Coast notched no spots and the Northeast barely appeared beyond Pennsylvania, the South looked mighty affordable in the Realtor.com roundup. More than a dozen Southern metros clocked in under the $300,000 mark, including Memphis, TN at $218,200 and Oklahoma City at $285,855.
Advertisement
Major cities like Baltimore, Indianapolis, Pittsburgh and Memphis also made the under-$300,000 list.
Affordability could even be found even in popular Florida and Texas metros.
6 Southern states dominated the list with cheap home prices, even in popular locales throughout Florida, Texas and Tennessee.
luisrojasstock – stock.adobe.com
In Florida, median sales prices in Clearwater, Jacksonville and Ocala came in just under $300,000. The Sunshine State enjoyed a real estate boom over the last several years, but recent sluggish sales point to a new cooling off period. Texas buyers should take a look at the highly affordable homes in Lubbock, El Paso and San Antonio to get the best bang for their buck.
Housing inventory in the two popular states has rebounded beyond pre-pandemic levels, according to Realtor.com, helping to lower once-surging listing prices.
The housing market is still far away from bridging the country's affordability gap, but slowing sales trends — including the fact the sellers now outnumber buyers for the first time in more than a decade — suggest the beginning of the end to the runaway growth of the 2020s housing market.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
First-time homebuyers are an endangered species in the U.S.
The dream of homeownership is fading for millions of Americans. Figures from the National Association of Realtors (NAR) show that only 24% of housing sales last year were by first-time homebuyers — that's down from 50% in 2010. The typical purchaser is also older than in the past, with an average age of 38, or about 10 years above historical norms. Such trends reflect the challenges of climbing on the property ladder as home prices hover near record highs, inventory remains low and with mortgage rates at their highest level in years. "There are fewer first-time homebuyers and they are older than we've ever seen, both because of headwinds inside and outside of the housing market," NAR deputy chief economist Jessica Lautz told CBS MoneyWatch. Opportunity missed Americans who are shut out from buying their first homes miss out on an opportunity to build wealth through homeownership, Lautz said. "It's their biggest asset, and with the delay into homeownership first-time homebuyers are losing about 10 years of housing wealth. And that's for those who can enter into the market," she said. "For those who can't, they lose out on housing wealth by not having that as the biggest asset in their nest egg." Only about 1 in 5 listed homes in March were affordable for households with $75,000 in annual income, according to a NAR analysis of property listings. Today, a household with annual income of $50,000 can only afford 8.7% of listings, down from 9.4% a year ago, according to the data. "The lack of homes, especially at affordable price points where they would be entering the market, has been plaguing first-time homebuyers for the last several years," Lautz said. "It's been a continual issue, especially with interest rates. It makes the cost of homeownership quite high." Along with inadequate construction of affordable housing, many existing homeowners are reluctant to sell their properties given their lower mortgage rates. "People who are homeowners have no motivational factors to move, so that's not freeing up inventory," Lautz said. "It's almost created a hoarding situation for those in low-interest rate mortgages who don't want to separate from them." Financial squeeze Other factors are making it hard for people to buy a first home. The high cost of rent gets in the way of saving for a down payment, while credit card debt, car loans and child care costs also hold first-time homebuyers back. More recently, meanwhile, the resumption of student loan payments is putting many people under financial pressure. Some Americans are managing to save enough for a first home by temporarily moving in with family or friends to minimize the cost of rent, Lautz said. But that approach isn't viable for everyone. "It has been a pathway to ownership for some. But for someone who is 38-years-old, moving in with mom and dad can get uncomfortable," she said. "For an older homebuyer, that might be less attractive for everyone involved." Australian reporter covering Los Angeles protests shot with rubber bullet by police officer Kristi Noem says "we are not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen" amid L.A. crackdown Magic in the dark: The fantastical worlds of Lightwire Theater
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
B.C.‘s youth unemployment rate second-highest in Canada with 16.6 per cent in May
VICTORIA - High school students walking across graduation stages this month will step into an uncertain job market as B.C. has the second-highest youth unemployment rate in Canada. Figures released by Statistics Canada this month show the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate among people ages 15 to 24 was 16.6 per cent in May, up from 13.4 in April 2025 and up from 10.5 per cent in May 2024. Only Alberta has recorded a higher unemployment rate in that age category with 17.2 per cent, while the national youth unemployment rate is at 14.2 per cent. B.C.'s youth unemployment rate for May 2025 is below the rate of June 2020, when the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate among youth hit 28.6 per cent based on figures from Statistics Canada because of COVID-19. But the current unemployment rate among youth exceeds youth unemployment 15 years ago when it hit annual peak of 15.6 per cent in June 2010 in the midst of the so-called Great Recession caused by the financial crisis of 2007-2008. B.C.'s overall employment rate for May 2025 was 6.4 per cent, up from 6.2 per cent in April 2025 and 5.6 per cent in May 2024. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows Where Seniors Drive the Longest to Reach Social Security Offices
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. As the Social Security Administration (SSA) undergoes major changes, seniors are driving hours just to get to their closest Social Security office. The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities released a new study that found 13.5 million seniors are affected by long drives to get to the most nearby office. Roughly 25 percent of the entire U.S. population has to drive more than an hour to get to a Social Security branch. Why It Matters Roughly 70 million Americans rely on Social Security payments each month. While the SSA usually sends out checks via direct deposit or mail, some beneficiaries are required to make a trip to their local field office in case issues arise with their benefits. Earlier this year, the Department of Government Efficiency announced it would be closing several field offices as it works to consolidate government real estate and reduce operational costs. But the shuttering of offices has worsened drive times for seniors who need to visit one. What To Know Roughly half of seniors who receive Social Security live at least 33 minutes from a Social Security office and in 31 states, more than 25 percent of seniors face travel times of more than an hour. The following states saw an even higher number, with 40 percent of seniors facing a drive of an hour or longer: Arkansas Iowa Maine Mississippi Montana Nebraska North Dakota South Dakota Vermont Wyoming In Arizona, Idaho, Kentucky, Minnesota, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oregon, Tennessee, Wisconsin and Virginia, from 25 percent to 40 percent of seniors have to travel an hour or more. The SSA has changed its policy in recent months, now mandating that recipients who do not pass its anti-fraud check will have to visit an office in person. This will likely cause an additional 1.93 million trips to SSA offices yearly. The agency also announced its plans to cut 7,000 employees and prioritize digital technology and artificial intelligence to speed up processes that previously required more staff. A Social Security Administration office in Washington, D.C., is pictured on March 26. A Social Security Administration office in Washington, D.C., is pictured on March 26. SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "It's of little surprise that states where Social Security recipients face the longest drive times tend to be ones that have more swaths of rural areas, like Kentucky, Iowa, or Wyoming. Complicating matters further could be further staffing cuts to the administration, which would push back appointment times and extend the process of meeting with a representative in-person and gaining assistance even longer." White House spokeswoman Liz Huston said in a previous statement: "Under President Trump's leadership, SSA has charted a new course for the agency that prioritizes enhancing customer service, reducing waste, fraud, and abuse, and optimizing its workforce towards direct public service." New SSA Commissioner Frank Bisignano said previously: "I think we should get away from focusing on head count to focus on what our objective is, which is to do a great job for the public." What Happens Next As many seniors may prefer to speak with a person in an office rather than online or in a phone call, any further closures of Social Security offices could have dire consequences. "The reality for many seniors is they still prefer going to a physical location and meeting with a person to discuss problems they're having or communicate for clarity on their benefits. Further administrative cuts will just make this process more difficult," Beene said.
