logo
'We have hippos here more famous than their entire city' and other opinions you read most

'We have hippos here more famous than their entire city' and other opinions you read most

Yahoo08-02-2025

(In this column, Opinion Editor Kevin Aldridge briefly recaps the most-read letters to the editor and guest columns on Cincinnati.com this week in case you missed them. You can read all these opinions in their entirety by clicking on the links.)
Rapper Kendrick Lamar's popular diss track, "Not Like Us," not only won Song of the Year at the 67th annual Grammy Awards (more on that later), it was the overarching theme of Cincinnati comedian Mark Chalifoux's clap-back to a guest column in the Salt Lake Tribune that made a harsh case against the Queen City possibly becoming the new host of the Sundance Film Festival.
Chalifoux took no prisoners in his comedic take defending Cincinnati and explaining exactly why Park City, Utah, the current home of the film festival, is "not like us." His op-ed making the case for why the Sundance Institute should choose Cincy over "a glorified ski resort" topped our most-read opinions for the week.
"To start, let's acknowledge that Park City is neither a park nor a true city. It's a glorified ski resort so small it must share the festival with Salt Lake City. That would be like if Cincinnati became the new host city and sent half the festival to Batavia, a suburb of less than 2,000 people," Chalifoux wrote in his takedown of Park City.
"Park City advocates tout their 'film tradition' but let's remember that actual movies are filmed in Cincinnati every year," he continued. "The last notable movie filmed in Park City was 1994's 'Dumb and Dumber.' While the movie is an all-time classic, dumb and dumber is how an objective observer would assess Park City and Boulder as the future of Sundance.
"We have hippos here more famous than their entire city."
Aside from being a must-read, Chalifoux's guest column is a stern warning to those who would try to make a joke out of the Queen City. I guess we will have to wait and see who gets the last laugh when the future home of Sundance is decided.
I'd love to hear your thoughts about Cincy's chances of landing the film festival and what it could mean for the region. And were you, too, offended by the shots fired at our town in the Salt Lake Tribune guest column? Drop me a letter to the editor or op-ed with your thoughts.
Now back to the Grammys. Not everyone agrees that Kendrick Lamar's "Not Like Us" is a hit no matter how many Grammys the talented rapper collected. In fact, Mike Hauer of Villa Hills, Ky. was pretty much disgusted by the entirety of the awards show.
In his Feb. 5 letter to the editor, Hauer criticized Lamar's "unsuitable" lyrics, which he reminded readers that "the Enquirer would not print," and the "repugnant" attire of some of the celebrities and performers in attendance. (Rapper Kanye West's wife, Bianca Censori, wore an "invisible dress" that made her appear nude.)
"How much more disgusting 'entertainment' are we expected to endure?" Hauer wrote. "Are we so numb to good taste that anything goes? Someone needs to set reasonable standards for these folks because they obviously are going to push acceptability to the lowest levels."
And the award for the Most Appalled Viewer goes to...
So tell me, do you agree with Mike Hauer about this year's Grammys being "the best example of societal decline (he's) seen in many years?" Should we be more concerned about the images and content some entertainers are producing that's being consumed by younger generations, as Hauer suggests? Let me know what you think.
Perhaps one of the most stunning news events of the week was President Donald Trump floating a proposal for the United States to take over Gaza in the wake of Israel's war with Hamas. Hardly anything Trump does these days is surprising, but this announcement caught many people off-guard. Despite Trump's claim that "everybody loves" the plan, the rebuke of it was widespread and swift − particularly in our Opinion section.
U.S. Rep. Greg Landsman of Cincinnati called it "an unserious plan" by "an unserious person." Local Palestinians Mohammad Ahmad of Covington and Leila Shaikh, a student at UC, and Lisa Beshara Saia of Hyde Park, whose maternal grandmother was Palestinian, said Trump's plan disregards "the fundamental rights of Palestinians" and is nothing more than a "money grab dressed up as diplomacy." They declared "Gaza is not, and will not be, for sale!"
But it was Temple Shalom rabbi Ari Jun's guest column that resonated most with readers. Jun wrote that he has spent the past year and a half combating lies and half-truths concerning Israel's war in Gaza. He said he's been quick to forcefully explain why terms such as "genocide" or "ethnic cleansing" were wrong when equated with the Israel-Hamas war. So when he heard Trump's proposal, Jun said he couldn't remain silent.
"What President Donald Trump has suggested for Gaza is nothing short of the dictionary definition of ethnic cleansing: 'the deportation or forcible displacement of persons belonging to particular ethnic groups' (per Britannica)," Jun wrote. "Suggesting that Palestinians will get a 'good, fresh, beautiful piece of land' does not make this fact better or acceptable. Similar proposals were made early in the Zionist movement when some suggested Jews should just find somewhere else to go other than the place they considered home for millennia."
What do you think of President Trump's idea? Do you support taking over Gaza and redeveloping it? Would you favor sending in American troops to make it happen? Do you agree with Rabbi Jun that such actions would constitute "ethnic cleansing"? We've received several submissions condemning the president's plan, but I'd like to hear from those who think Trump might be onto something. Keep sending me your views.
And in case you missed them, here's a chance to catch up on a couple more of the most-read opinions this week:
Letter: Kearney's plan to spend railroad money validates fears of those who opposed sale
Op-ed: Something must be done about the national debt. Elon Musk just might save us
Op-ed: Cincinnati Children's Hospital doesn't threaten minors. Anti-trans politicians do
In last week's column, I asked you to share your thoughts about Hamilton County's negotiations with the Cincinnati Bengals on a new lease for Paycor Stadium and the proposed redevelopment of Hyde Park Square. Here's a sampling of your responses:
"I can't stand the Bengals and wish they would lose every game they play. But in the meantime, I hope the people paying for this garbage get a better deal than the last one," wrote M. Wayne Sanford of Crescent Springs. "I just had to let off steam because everyday people are being screwed by a very rich family."
"The Bengals are owned by a rich person. No way should people who don't like the Bengals, or don't follow football be responsible to foot the bill," said Joseph Cittadino of Loveland. " Is Mike Brown ready to spread the wealth? If I'm paying for the stadium, then I want it to use anytime I need it, or simply share the profits with all of us in Cincinnati... I say let them move and become some other city's headache."
"The Bengals leaving would be a force multiplier in showing Cincinnati as a dying city versus a great place to work, live and play as all metro areas want to become," wrote Mark Landers. "The county commissioners need to understand the legal implications of their constant meddling in items such as lease negotiations where they are clearly outside their sphere of expertise. Move forward in good faith negotiations and a deal will get done. Remember, there are only 31 (other) NFL teams and many metros would welcome the Bengals."
Vicki Weber of Hyde Park wrote that the proposed redevelopment of Hyde Park Square threatens to permanently alter one of Cincinnati's most cherished landmarks.
"The planned boutique hotel and apartment building are 85 feet tall, with the apartment building stretching 400 feet − both grossly out of scale with the neighborhood, exacerbating traffic, parking, and pedestrian safety concerns," she said. "Approving this project would undermine zoning laws and set a dangerous precedent for all of Cincinnati's historic neighborhoods − the very foundation of the city's unique identity and appeal. While I support development that fosters thriving businesses and addresses housing shortages, our community's character and livability must be preserved in the process."
Bob Sheeran who owns property near Hyde Park Square said he has "deep concerns" about the proposed zoning change.
"While I welcome thoughtful improvements to our beloved Hyde Park Square, I firmly believe that the Planned Development zoning, which allows for greater density and increased building height, is not suitable for our community," he wrote. "I urge city planners and developers to consider the long-term impact of this zoning change. Let's work together to find a solution that enhances Hyde Park Square while preserving its historic character and charm. Development should be a positive addition to our community, not a detriment to its unique identity."
Marjorie Compton of Hyde Park added: "I am excited about the revitalization of Hyde Park Square. In the past few years, the vibrancy of the Square had declined. However, I am distraught that the developer wants variances to the current Hyde Park ordinances. What makes this walkable community so attractive is its charm. A huge (35 feet above the current limit) building will totally change the character of our beloved neighborhood. In addition, traffic will be adversely affected in an already heavily trafficked area, where two elementary schools fight for the safety of their students."
Look for these letters in their entirety and others on these hot topics soon on Cincinnati.com and in The Enquirer.
As always, you can join the conversation on these and other topics by sending your thoughts to letters@enquirer.com. Letters of up to 200 words may be submitted and must include name, address, community and daytime phone number. Op-eds are submitted the same way except they should be 500-600 words and also include a one-sentence bio and headshot. Submissions may be edited for space and clarity.
If you need some tips on how to write an op-ed, click here.
Opinion and Engagement Editor Kevin S. Aldridge can be reached at kaldridge@enquirer.com. On X: @kevaldrid.
This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Cincy a no-brainer for Sundance Film Festival and other top opinions

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Harvey Weinstein Found Guilty of Sexual Assault After Tensions Explode on New York Jury
Harvey Weinstein Found Guilty of Sexual Assault After Tensions Explode on New York Jury

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Harvey Weinstein Found Guilty of Sexual Assault After Tensions Explode on New York Jury

Harvey Weinstein has been convicted of one count of committing a criminal sexual act but acquitted on another in his sex crimes retrial in New York City. The majority-female jury on Wednesday found the former Hollywood producer guilty of sexually assaulting Miriam Haley, but acquitted him of a second charge of sexually assaulting Kaja Sokola. The jury could not reach a unanimous verdict on a third count involving Jessica Mann and was told to resume deliberations Thursday morning. More from Variety Amanda Seyfried Grossed Out She Invited 'Dictator' Harvey Weinstein to Past Sundance Premiere: 'It's Just the Way It Was - We All Needed Him' Harvey Weinstein Says He Has 'Regrets' and 'Acted Immorally' Ahead of New York Retrial Verdict: 'But Never Illegal, Never Criminal' Harvey Weinstein's New York Retrial Closes With Prosecutors Urging Jury to 'Let Him Know the Rules Apply to Him' Ahead of Deliberations The partial verdict comes after a weeks-long trial that began in April, during which three women testified about the alleged sexual assaults committed by the former Hollywood producer. Weinstein faced two counts of committing a criminal sexual act in the first degree and one count of third-degree rape. Prior to the mixed verdict, Weinstein himself addressed the court, urging the judge to declare a mistrial as several jurors reported ongoing tensions in the deliberation room. 'This is my life that's on the line,' Weinstein told Judge Curtis Farber, adding, 'I am not getting a fair trial.' Weinstein then told the judge, 'You are endangering me, Your Honor.' Earlier on Wednesday, the jury foreperson in Weinstein's retrial informed the judge that tensions remained during deliberations and requested a private meeting with the judge and attorneys to discuss the situation. In court, Farber conveyed the foreperson's account, stating that there was infighting among the jurors and that the foreperson was 'not going to change his position — whatever that position is.' 'He did indicate that at least one other juror made comments to the effect of 'I'll meet you outside one day,' and there's yelling and screaming,' the judge said. 'A crime was committed against this juror,' Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala argued, describing the situation in the deliberation room as 'menacing and harassment.' Aidala added: 'Their verdict is all about coercion and threats.' Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo, however, argued that the foreperson didn't seem frightened or apprehensive — just 'stubborn.' 'He said he'd made up his mind, he didn't want to change it, and people were pressuring him to change it,' Colangelo said. 'That's what jury deliberations involve.' In his 2020 trial, Weinstein was found guilty of sexually abusing Haley and Mann. He was serving a 23-year sentence in New York until those convictions were overturned in April 2024. Weinstein pleaded not guilty to all charges in his retrial; both Haley and Mann testified against him again. In their testimonies, Haley alleged that Weinstein forcibly sexually assaulted her at his apartment in 2006, while Mann accused him of raping her at a hotel in 2013. Sokola, who did not testify in Weinstein's 2020 trial, was first identified by the prosecution during opening arguments in late April. (She was previously referred to as Complaining Witness No. 3.) In her testimony, Sokola described two alleged sexual assaults by Weinstein: one in 2002, when she was 16, and another in a Manhattan hotel in 2006 — the latter being the incident for which Weinstein was charged in the retrial. Weinstein is still serving a separate 16-year prison sentence following his 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles. Best of Variety 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week

Former President Obama shares rare family photo on daughter Sasha's 24th birthday

time2 hours ago

Former President Obama shares rare family photo on daughter Sasha's 24th birthday

The Obama family marked Sasha Obama's 24th birthday this week with a celebratory and rare family photo. Former President Barack Obama shared birthday wishes for his youngest daughter, writing in an Instagram post Tuesday, "Happy birthday, Sasha! Watching you grow into the incredible woman you are has been a true gift. I'll always be proud of you and will always be here for you." Michelle Obama also shared the same picture of the family, who are all smiling in the snapshot. "Happy birthday to my sweet girl, Sasha!" the former first lady captioned her Instagram post. "Can't believe how quickly time has flown. I'm so proud of the woman you've become. Love you always! 💕🥳🎉." Sasha Obama was born in June 2001, nearly eight years before the family moved into the White House for the former president's first term in January 2009. She and her older sister Malia Obama, now 26, grew up in the presidential home for eight years, during their father's two terms in office, until 2017. In a July 2024 interview with Melinda French Gates' podcast, "Moments That Make Us," Michelle Obama opened up about raising her daughters at the White House during their formative years. "Well, those girls had to be smart and confident and independent straight away, even when they were living in a house with butlers and maids and florists," she said. "But I was raising them thinking, 'You're not going to live here, and with me, forever. So I've got to hand you your life soon and let you manage it.'" Sasha Obama graduated from the University of Southern California in May 2023, and Malia Obama, who graduated from Harvard University in 2021, now works in the film and TV industry. Her short film, "The Heart," premiered earlier this year at the Sundance Film Festival.

Molly Gordon kidnaps Logan Lerman in ‘Oh, Hi!' trailer. Fans are still on her side.
Molly Gordon kidnaps Logan Lerman in ‘Oh, Hi!' trailer. Fans are still on her side.

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Molly Gordon kidnaps Logan Lerman in ‘Oh, Hi!' trailer. Fans are still on her side.

The new movie Oh, Hi!, which just dropped a trailer that suggests that Misery really could have been a romantic comedy with the right approach. It's a classic tale: Girl meets boy. Boy invites girl on their first weekend away as a couple. Girl playfully ties boy to the bed … only for him to inform her, while he's still handcuffed, that he's actually not looking for a relationship right now. Naturally, girl never gets those handcuff keys, and boy remains tied to the bed. Yikes! Oh, Hi!, which debuted earlier this year at the Sundance Film Festival, is directed by Sophie Brooks and co-written by The Bear's Molly Gordon. It stars Gordon as Iris, a girl who completely misinterpreted her situationship's intentions on their weekend getaway. Logan Lerman, meanwhile, plays the commitment-phobic Isaac, who Iris believed was her boyfriend. But Iris isn't an idiot: He took her on this trip! He made her scallops! If all that evidence wasn't proof the two were on the road to love, she's not sure what is. And with Isaac still handcuffed after their whole 'what are we?!' conversation went horribly awry, she has a plan: She'll do whatever she can to make him want to take the next step in their relationship — as long as he doesn't find a way to call the police first. While the movie doesn't exactly frame Iris as of sound mind here, people who watched the movie trailer really seem to get her plight. Sure, many people in the comments section on YouTube pointed to Iris's deranged behavior, which some said would have been interpreted much more negatively had the gender roles been reversed. However, others totally understood where Iris is coming from: 'The way that this made me feel valid for my situationship telling me he wasn't ready for a relationship after being super romantic with me and feeling like I was going insane,' one person wrote in the YouTube comments. Meanwhile, on TikTok, there were lots of Iris sympathizers. One called her reaction a 'rational response, [to be honest]' while another said that they 'support women's rights and wrongs' before adding, 'but idk she may be right.' 'Totally get where she's coming from,' one commenter declared, while another admitted, 'I'd crash out too if Logan Lerman said that to me.' 'Sending this to everyone i've ever had a situationship with thanks,' one joked, while another said they were just 'one more situationship' away from becoming Iris. It's a perspective Gordon and Brooks understand. In an interview with Deadline earlier this year, Gordon spoke about how the idea for the film came about after she and Brooks both went through breakups. 'We kind of wanted to make something about the communication breakdown of our generation,' Gordon explained. 'I mean, it's always been ridiculously hard to date, but we do feel like it might be the hardest that it's ever been, and we just wanted to kind of poke fun at all the funny experiences that we've had and our friends have had.' In an interview with the Hollywood Reporter, Brooks said of the film: 'I think a lot of things in our culture about women pursuing love and wanting love become desperate or sad or embarrassing, and it's romantic for a man to be pursuing love and wanting a partner, and it's sad and desperate for a woman to want it. I really push against that. Part of being a human is wanting connection and I think it was exciting for us to kind of lean into some tropes that we thought were funny and absurd. Molly and I talk about how this movie is — If we were 10% crazy, what would we do?' Whether Iris is 10% crazy or a bit larger of a percentage is up for audiences to decide, of course — and how she gets out of the situation with Isaac, ideally alive, is anyone's guess. Oh, Hi! hits theaters on July 25.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store