Experts: Austin's proposed wildfire risk map unlikely to hike property insurance rates
While there is little disagreement that the proposed map would lead to higher building costs, experts say it's unlikely the map alone would lead to a hike in insurance rates – and that it could even lower them over time.
The Wildland-Urban Interface Code, known around City Hall as the WUI or WUIC, outlines minimum building requirements for new developments and property renovations 'to prevent ignition of and spread of wildfire,' according to the Austin Fire Department. That includes using fire-resistant materials for roofs and limiting kinds of vegetation near a building.
Assistant Fire Chief André de la Reza said it would be difficult to 'find someone whose house has been in a wildfire who would say these are bad ideas.'
The current WUI map puts 38% of the city at varying degrees of risk. It mostly consists of peripheral areas where building density is lower and structures are closer to plots of flammable grasslands, pastures and other types of wildlands. Properties fall into three risk categories – A, B or C – that are based on proximity to those flammable areas. Each has different mitigation requirements with Zone A, the riskiest, having the most stringent.
Under the proposed map, the percentage of the city considered at risk would increase to 51% because it would expand Zone C, the lowest risk zone.
That's because city officials want to update the WUI code to include properties within a half-mile of wildland plots larger than 40 acres. Under the current map, Zone C includes properties within 1.5 miles of flammable areas larger than 750 acres.
There's widespread agreement that the proposed map would lead to cost increases for developers who want to build in the expanded areas of the map because fire-resistant materials are more expensive.
'When you're having to use either concrete wood or hardened wood, those items cost more,' said Taylor Jackson, CEO of the Home Builders Association of Greater Austin, which has called on the City Council to hold off on adopting the new map so it can explore better alternatives. 'There are some more significant options that would have more impact on wildfire prevention than just updating a code.'
Jackson and representatives from other local industry groups have also voiced concerns about the effect a new map could have on property insurance premiums.
But several experts told the American-Statesman that it's unlikely the map would affect rates.
Karen Collins, vice president of property and environmental at the American Property Casualty Insurance Association, said insurers typically don't rely on this type of risk map because they aren't updated frequently enough to use them to calculate rates. Rather, she said they are primarily designed to set standards for building and land-use codes over a multiyear period.
'Companies need a much faster, more frequent, refresh,' Collins said.
She pointed to a 2022 survey of insurance providers taken in Oregon after backlash over a proposed statewide risk map that asked whether they would use the map to set rates. All, in legally binding answers, said no.
Eric Macomber, a wildfire legal fellow at Stanford University Law School, said that while public risk maps could be included as part of risk calculations, the models that insurers use to set rates already use many of the same details the maps are based on.
'This means that the release of public maps based on the same underlying information probably will not have a dramatic effect on premiums or insurance availability,' he wrote in an email.
In fact, he said 'it's conceivable that they could work to stabilize or even lower premiums' in the long term because the new building requirements would reduce risk.
Florida State University professor Charles Nyce, an expert in risk management and insurance, agreed that requiring fire mitigation efforts for new developments would likely have a net-positive effect even though construction costs would rise in the short term.
But just because the proposed WUI map is unlikely to drive up insurance premiums doesn't mean that they won't increase for other reasons.
'In recent years, inflation in the cost of building materials and construction labor, higher reinsurance costs, and the frequency and size of weather events has added to insurance costs,' Ben Gonzalez, a spokesperson for the Texas Department of Insurance, said in a written statement.
Data from the department show that average home insurance premiums in Texas jumped to $2,803 in 2023 from $1,961 in 2019.
'Texas, by far, has had more disasters than any other state,' said Collins, the insurance association vice president. 'The more that consumers can take steps to reduce the risk, the better position they are going to put themselves in for insurance access and costs.'
Austin Fire Department officials urge property owners to make use of the city's free 'Structural Ignition Zone Evaluations' for personalized guidance on how to harden a property to diminish wildfire risks.
To request an evaluation, you can fill out an interest form online. You can also call the Fire Department's nonemergency line at 512-974-0130.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Austin's proposed wildfire risk map unlikely to raise insurance rates
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former Austin mayoral candidate sues over TRE ballot language
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A former Austin mayoral candidate is challenging the city over how it is presenting a tax rate election to voters in November. Last week, Austin City Council approved its budget for next fiscal year and set a property tax rate, which is high enough that it triggers a tax rate election, or TRE, in November. Council members also approved an ordinance ordering that special election to be held on Nov. 4. Austin signs off on $6B+ budget, triggering property tax rate election If voters approve the new tax rate, the average homeowner's property tax bill will go up by a total of $302.14 annually. The ordinance council members passed, ordering the TRE, lays out the rules of the election and what will appear on the ballot for voters. According to the ordinance, the TRE will be under Proposition Q on November's ballot, and it will say, 'this is a tax increase,' and describe what the money will go toward. However, Jeffery Bowen, a candidate in the 2024 Austin mayoral race, filed a lawsuit this week claiming that the ballot language as described in the ordinance doesn't make it clear that the property tax hike would be recurring, and that the ballot's description of what taxpayers would get out of the increase is not clear enough. Austin Mayor Kirk Watson, who defeated Bowen for the seat of city mayor last November, provided KXAN with the following statement: 'The City of Austin is confident the ballot language is appropriate and meets all legal requirements. We also have confidence in the court system and will respond in that venue.' The full lawsuit can be viewed below. Original Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus with App_1755530250Download According to the ordinance, the ballot will be prepared to permit voting 'FOR' or 'AGAINST' Proposition Q, which will state the following: CITY OF AUSTIN PROPOSITION QTHIS IS A TAX INCREASE Approving the ad valorem tax rate of $0.574017 per $100 valuation in the City of Austin for the current year, a rate that is $0.05 higher per $100 valuation than the voter-approval tax rate of the City of Austin, for the purpose of funding or expanding programs intended to increase housing affordability and reduce homelessness; improve parks and recreation facilities and services; enhance public health services and public safety; ensure financial stability; and provide for other general fund maintenance and operation expenditures included in the fiscal year 2025 -2026 budget as approved or amended by City Council. Last year, the ad valorem tax rate in the City of Austin was $0.4776 per $100 valuation. According to Bowen's lawsuit, Bowen hand-delivered a letter to the city council on Aug. 13 that outlined the deficiencies in the ballot language, and demanded that the council 'fulfill its nondiscretionary duty to adopt ballot language for the tax increase election that does not mislead voters about the tax increase proposition.' The lawsuit alleged that, 'instead, the Austin City Council prescribed its own ballot language for the tax increase proposition that will grossly mislead voters and promote its passage.' The first issue the lawsuit alleged was that city council violated Texas law that was set forth by the Texas Supreme Court in Dacus v. Parker (Tex. 2015) because the ballot language does not explain the 'purpose' of the tax increase in definite and clear terms. The lawsuit specifically pointed out the phrase of the ballot that states, 'and provide for other general fund maintenance and operation expenditures included in the fiscal year 2025-2026budget as approved or amended by City Council,' alleging that several parts of the phrase 'mislead' voters. It also said the ballot language fails to meet Dacus standards because 'several of the program descriptions are misleading for vagueness and non-neutral advocacy.' The other issue the lawsuit alleged was that the ballot is also too vague to establish an enforceable 'contract with the voters,' because it does not describe exactly how the current council and future councils could spend the money. The lawsuit said that because the tax increase would be a 'forever tax,' the ballot language should be 'definite and clear and become the foundation on which voters and taxpayers can rely—if the proposition passes—for how this huge tax increase will be spent, not only by this City Council but by all City Councils in the future.' Bowen's suit, which was filed in the Third Court of Appeals in Austin, asks the court to 'issue a writ of mandamus ordering and compelling the Mayor and City Council of the City of Austin to promptly hold a validly called meeting of the Council to adopt ballot language that corrects each the deficiencies in the Council-adopted ballot language noted above so as to have accurate language on the November 4, 2025 ballot.' In other words, Bowen is asking the court to force the mayor and city council to change the ballot language for the proposition. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Austin expected to approve $6B+ budget, triggering property tax rate election
AUSTIN (KXAN) — After hours of public comment and debate Wednesday, Austin City Council is likely to approve its budget for next fiscal year, including setting a tax rate, on Thursday. All but one member of the dais has indicated they support a property tax rate high enough to trigger an election in November (TRE). PREVIOUS: Austin mayor 'disappointed' with cost of some tax rate election proposals 'Nobody enjoys paying more taxes, but we do enjoy our parks—we do need to drive on our roads. There are crucial, essential things a city has to do, and the cost of doing those things has risen,' Austin City Council Member Ryan Alter said. How much will the city ask for in a tax rate election? Some Austin city council members and the mayor indicated Wednesday they were not comfortable going above 5 pennies in the below scenario. Previously, the council was considering anywhere from the city manager's proposed base budget to 8 pennies. As the graph indicates, at 5 cents, a tax rate election would mean the average homeowner's property tax bill goes up by $302.14 annually, $197.92 of that from the TRE. That does not include rates. What would you get for it? City council members so far seem to almost unanimously agree that more money is needed to fully fund the Homeless Strategy Office's $101 million plan, for parks, public safety and some social services. Staff brought forward a base tax rate election proposal Wednesday, which included some funding for the Homeless Strategy Office's (HSO) plan, the housing trust fund, Emergency Medical Services programs, funding for parks, public health, sidewalks and funding for overtime at the Austin Fire Department. 'I wanted to make sure that we have the appropriate overtime for our fire department. I am not in favor of changing our staffing models,' Austin City Council Member Paige Ellis told KXAN of her priorities. She brought forward an amendment on that issue. Austin firefighters push back against proposed budget's staffing requirement changes That base proposal was amended Wednesday, and council members will continue to add to it or take away from it on Thursday. Some amendments included reinstating funding for police oversight, fully funding the homelessness plan and adding additional funding for a homeless navigation center. 'Addressing the needs from public safety, whether that's EMS needs or fire needs, looking at things including library funding, the list goes on and on,' Austin City Council Member Ryan Alter said of early amendments made. Austin's homeless strategy office identifies $101 million needed for new strategies to address issues Austin City Council Member Marc Duchen said Wednesday, while he thinks these are important services, he does not support a tax rate election as high as 5 cents and will be voting against items that raise the property tax rate. Previous coverage Aug. 14: Austin budget discussions underway, property tax election all but certain Aug. 12: Get up to speed with the latest tax rate election proposals Aug. 8: Austin mayor 'disappointed' with some tax rate election proposals Aug. 5: Austin leaders lay out initial tax rate election proposals Aug 1: Texas cities, counties may face new limits on raising property taxes July 15: Austin leaders concerned budget cuts too much from community needs July 12: Austin City Manager TC Broadnax releases proposed $6B+ budget What is a tax rate election? Because of a 2019 state law, taxing entities cannot raise the property tax rate more than 3.5% from the year prior without triggering a TRE. After City Manager TC Broadnax released his proposed budget, which sat at that 3.5% voter approval rate and would not trigger an election, council members and the mayor started proposing alternatives that cut less services but also add to your property tax bill. That increase in the property tax rate would ultimately trigger a tax rate election in November. The body started discussion on Wednesday, and while the vote is expected to happen Thursday, it may take until Friday to officially vote on the budget and tax rate. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Austin mayor ‘disappointed' with cost of some tax rate election proposals
AUSTIN (KXAN) — After Austin city council members laid out their proposals for a tax rate election Thursday, Mayor Kirk Watson told KXAN he doesn't like the cost to taxpayers in some of those plans and will only vote to send a tax rate election to voters if the money will fund core city services. 'I must admit that right now I'm disappointed that the numbers we're talking about are higher than I would feel comfortable voting for,' Watson said. 'There could be something that I would vote for that's higher than what my proposal is, but it would have to be funding core basic services in a way that I felt comfortable with.' Austin leaders lay out tax rate election proposals — how much could it cost you? Because of a 2019 state law, taxing entities cannot raise the property tax rate more than 3.5% from the year prior without triggering a tax rate election (TRE). That's where the city manager's base budget sits right now — at the 3.5% rate allowed without triggering a TRE — which would still mean a total monthly increase of $18.18 per month or $218.16 annually for the 'average' ratepayer and taxpayer. Some Austin city council members are calling for the overall impact to taxpayers to be much higher than that — at the highest end, $267.20 more annually. That's on top of the base budget and would bring the annual increase for the average homeowner and rate payer to as much as $485.36. Those council members want the city to put money toward homelessness, housing, parks maintenance, wildfire mitigation and other services. You can find a full list of proposals and what they would fund here. 'Absolutely. This is a process and we are looking to see where we can come together, what number that might be,' Austin City Council Member Ryan Alter said when asked if he would be willing to come down on the amount requested from taxpayers. He's one of the council members proposing the most expensive tax rate election. Watson also put forward a proposal that calls for a 3.5-cent tax increase, which would raise the average homeowner's property taxes by $138.54 over the city manager's base proposal. Most of the money in that proposal would go toward fully funding the Homeless Strategy Office's plan. 'What I really want us to prioritize, what I want to see a real emphasis on… is now that we have the plan, let's use that plan, let's fund that plan,' Watson said. All of the proposals on the table, with the exception of one, look to fully fund the Homeless Strategy Office's plan. Wildfire mitigation and parks maintenance also appear to be common themes in those proposals. Austin city council will take up their budget and tax rate starting on Wednesday. 'If I'm going to ask voters to raise their taxes to pay for those services I want to be able to ask them to do it for basic, core services and I'm going to be very stingy about that on their behalf,' Watson said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword