Jamie Dimon calls out bland letters from CEOs — and reveals the 2 he always reads
Jamie Dimon took aim at insipid CEO letters, criticized nonsense regulations, and struck a wary tone on the economy at the Morgan Stanley US Financials Conference on Tuesday.
The JPMorgan boss said that "some CEOs, they're pretty good; others are just constant corporate pablum, so I don't read them," according to an AlphaSense transcript of his comments.
"I always read Buffett's, Andy Jassy's, and Jeff Bezos," Dimon said, referring to Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett and the current and former CEOs of Amazon.
During the event, the billionaire banker invoked Bezos' quote that " your margin is my opportunity" to underscore JPMorgan's competitiveness. He also channeled Buffett's love of bargains and willingness to wait for the right opportunity.
"I like buying stocks when they're cheap," Dimon said about JPMorgan's buyback strategy. "Basically we're going to be patient," he said about the bank's excess capital, describing it as "just earnings in store and cash waiting to be deployed." That echoes Buffett's view of Berkshire's huge cash hoard as dry powder for future deals.
The head of America's biggest bank also spoke colorfully about annual reports, financial regulations, and company culture. On the subject of 10-Ks, he said that "no one reads them anymore because they're so full of crap."
In regard to banking regulations, Dimon said "you probably throw the whole goddamn thing out since it doesn't work — 80,000 pages of shit." He added that some regulatory calculations are "through the looking glass" and someone who took time to think about them would say, "What the hell is that?"
Dimon also emphasized the value of open communication in the workplace, saying it "gets rid of politics and BS" when meetings aren't just "run for the boss."
The Wall Street heavyweight issued a cautious economic outlook, saying he expected employment to fall and inflation to rise a "little bit" as the Trump administration's import taxes and immigration crackdown take effect.
"The tariffs are just hitting," Dimon said. "It may just make the soft landing a little bit softer" without making " the ship go down."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oracle stock touches all-time high after earnings beat
Oracle stock (ORCL) jumped 14% on Thursday to touch an all-time high of $202.44 after the company's fiscal fourth quarter results topped Wall Street's expectations. Oracle's adjusted revenue of $15.9 billion was ahead of the projected $15.6 billion, while its earnings per share of $1.70 surpassed the expected $1.64. The company raised its annual revenue forecast, as it expects strong demand for its AI cloud services. "What is clear is that more customers will use the Oracle database to leverage AI," CEO Safra Ada Catz told analysts in a call after the market close Wednesday. Catz said she expects the company's fiscal year 2026 revenue to hit 'at least $67 billion,' up from the prior guidance of $66 billion. Synovus vice president Dan Morgan told Yahoo Finance that Oracle is seen as a safer AI stock relative to its peers amid Trump's trade war. "They seem to be in a better position when we think of AI than, let's say, some of the chipmakers who are so reliant on manufacturing in China, in the Pacific Rim, who obviously would be devastatingly impacted by tariffs," Morgan said. Following the results, analysts at JPMorgan, Jefferies, UBS, Deutsche Bank, and other investment firms raised their price targets on the stock to as high as $240 on Thursday. 'Overall, we continue to respect Oracle's achievements in the AI arena while remaining mindful of valuation,' JPMorgan analyst Mark Murphy wrote in a note to investors Thursday morning. In his own note, Jefferies analyst Brent Thill observed that Oracle trades at 32 times its projected calendar year 2026 earnings, while Microsoft (MSFT) has a 2026 forward price-to-earnings ratio of 29. Thill has a Buy rating on Oracle stock and raised his price target on shares to $220 from $200. JPMorgan's Murphy, who also raised his price target to $185 from $135, holds a Neutral rating on the stock. Oracle's financial results had come in below expectations in the prior two quarters. "It's been a long wait for people who own the stock because ... [Oracle] missed the last two quarters, both on the top and the bottom line, despite the fact that they were booking an enormous amount of business," Citizens head of technology equity research Pat Walravens said on Market Domination Overtime. Oracle is set to invest $7 billion in the so-called Stargate AI project, according to Bloomberg, though the project has reportedly hit snags amid President Trump's trade war. 'So the reality is that Stargate is still in formation,' Catz said. The company's capital expenditure forecast for its 2026 fiscal year of $25 billion was ahead of Wall Street's estimate of $20 billion, and Catz said it 'may turn out to be understated.' 'We will build and operate more cloud infrastructure data centers than all of our cloud infrastructure competitors combined,' chairman Larry Ellison said on the call with analysts Wednesday. 'It is worth considering that the upward CapEx revision for FY26 is substantial, largely wiping out any positive FCF [free cash flow] Oracle would have otherwise produced,' JPMorgan's Murphy wrote. Laura Bratton is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Bluesky @ Email her at Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
How Will Dip in Q2 IB Revenues & Trading Surge Impact BAC's Fee Income?
At Morgan Stanley US Financials, Payments & CRE Conference on Wednesday, Bank of America BAC CEO Brian Moynihan warned of weakness in investment banking (IB) fees in the second quarter, while trading revenues are expected to show signs of expects IB fees to decline more than 20% year over year in the second quarter as tariff-related headwinds continue to hamper deal-making sentiments. In the first quarter, IB fees of $1.52 billion million declined 3% as the plunge in equity underwriting income was more than offset by higher advisory revenues and debt underwriting income. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for IB fees is pegged at $1.53 billion for the ongoing driven by heightened market volatility and a rise in client activity, Bank of America projects trading revenues to grow in the mid-to-high single-digit range in the quarter. This will mark the 13th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth in sales and trading revenues for the company. Last quarter, BAC's sales and trading revenues (excluding net DVA) of $5.65 billion represented the highest number in a decade. The consensus estimate for sales and trading is pegged at $5.11 billion for second-quarter 2025, suggesting year-over-year growth of 9%. With sales and trading accounting for about 43% of Bank of America's fee income, ongoing momentum in this area should help offset pressure elsewhere. As such, the consensus estimate for non-interest income is $11.87 billion, implying a rise of 2% from the prior-year quarter. Like Bank of America, JPMorgan JPM anticipates markets revenues to grow in the mid-to-high single-digits range on a year-over-year basis for the second quarter. This is likely to be driven by a significant rise in market volatility and higher client activity. Additionally, JPMorgan's IB fees are expected to be down in the mid-teens C, on the other hand, projects second-quarter IB fees to increase by a mid-single-digit percentage on a year-over-year basis as deal-making activities rebounded and stock markets recovered from the ambiguity over the final tariff decision. Moreover, like BAC and JPMorgan, Citigroup's trading business is showing signs of strength. Citigroup projects markets revenues to grow in the mid-to-high single-digits range. Shares of Bank of America have risen 12.8% in the past three months. In the same time frame, JPMorgan soared 19.1%, and Citigroup was up 16.6%. Three-Month Price Performance Image Source: Zacks Investment Research From a valuation standpoint, Bank of America trades at a 12-month trailing price-to-tangible book (P/TB) of 1.69X, below the industry. P/TB Ratio Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Moreover, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for Bank of America's 2025 and 2026 earnings implies year-over-year growth of 12.2% and 15.3%, respectively. In the past month, earnings estimates for 2025 have moved marginally upward, while 2026 estimates have been revised slightly lower. Earnings Estimates Trend Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Bank of America currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Bank of America Corporation (BAC) : Free Stock Analysis Report JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) : Free Stock Analysis Report Citigroup Inc. (C) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Wall Street is on the cusp of ending the dumbest recruiting cycle known to man, and we all could stand to benefit from it
JPMorgan and Apollo took steps to delay the early recruitment of junior bankers. The move challenges the traditional recruiting cycle for entry-level PE jobs. If successful, the switch would shake up the entire industry and benefit people outside PE. They were the shots heard round Murray Hill. Recent announcements by JPMorgan and Apollo aimed at slowing down the early recruitment of junior bankers have sent young Wall Streeters into a frenzy. First, JPMorgan threatened termination for first-year analysts accepting future-dated private-equity jobs. Then, private-equity firm Apollo delayed recruiting young bankers. Not long after, Business Insider was first to report that PE giant General Atlantic told young bankers it's also pumping the brakes. The entire episode is still unfolding, but it risks upending years of planning by people pursuing one of the most sought-after careers in finance. And the end result could be PE firms pulling from a much bigger pool of talent as opposed to the select few who zeroed in on nabbing a job in the industry years ago. The news isn't just important for your Wall Street buddy who played lacrosse in college, though. Upending the well-worn practice of PE recruiting could ultimately impact all of us. And it's not a bad thing. The power of PE Understanding the magnitude of JPMorgan's and Apollo's announcements is realizing the effort it takes to get a job in PE. Imagine you have a big test on Monday. While most of your classmates spent the weekend partying, you buckle down and hit the books so you're fully prepared. But when Monday comes your teacher postpones the test so everyone else can study more. That doesn't negate the work you did, but it definitely stings a bit. Now imagine it's not a test but the chance at a job with a base salary upwards of $150,000 that you spent years, not just a weekend, getting ready for. Starting to get the idea? Still, you might be asking yourself: Why do I care about changes to PE recruitment? (To be fair, you clicked the link, but I'll allow it.) The truth is, this impacts more people than just those who consider a Friday night at Hair of the Dog a good time. Private-equity's reach is immense, and it's only set to get bigger. At the end of last year, PE firms had $1.2 trillion in global buyout dry powder, according to Bain & Company. That's a lot of cash ready to be put to work at a time when dealmaking takes off. The industry is also evolving beyond the typical PE strategies we're used to, like bundling up smaller companies. Firms are becoming big lenders, often beating regulator-constrained banks at their own game. (Whether that's a good or bad thing remains to be seen. But that's a conversation for another day.) In short, it's a PE-backed world, and we're all just living in it. A recruiting cycle 'that serves no one' Working off the premise that private equity remains an unavoidable part of our future, the industry's hiring tactics, even at the junior level, suddenly seem a lot more important. Apollo's move could be viewed as a way to avoid picking a fight with the biggest US bank. Apollo CEO Marc Rowan's statement to BI offers some more insight. First, he alludes to JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon's criticism of the early recruitment of junior bankers. "When someone says something that is just plainly true, I feel compelled to agree with it," Rowan wrote via email. He then touched on why a reset was called for. "Asking students to make career decisions before they truly understand their options doesn't serve them or our industry," he wrote. "When great candidates make rushed decisions it creates avoidable turnover—and that serves no one," Rowan added. I'm not trying to carry PE's water here, but that makes sense to me! Not only is it incredibly dumb to ask young people to commit to their next job before they start their first one, but it also limits PE firms from a recruiting perspective. Under the current framework, people vying for these PE positions tend to fit a certain profile. From prestigious universities to finance clubs to summer internships to analyst jobs, the path to PE glory doesn't leave much room for detours. That's not to say these people make bad PE employees. God knows we've got plenty of examples of those who followed that exact route to success. But who says there isn't a great potential PE dealmaker out there taking the long road, so to speak? Maybe they didn't learn about PE or realize they wanted to get into the industry until the treadmill was moving too fast for them to jump on. Wanting to be in PE for a long time doesn't make you the most qualified person to work in PE. Meanwhile, pulling from such a small, selective talent pool could put firms at risk of groupthink. If you need to tick a certain number of boxes before getting a sniff at PE, you'll likely find a lot of people who were taught to think the same way. And when it comes to investing, that rarely turns out well. Moving away from that model is also good for the rest of us. As our interactions with PE firms grow, having people on the inside who understand life outside the PE rat race can benefit us all. There are no gurantees it'll hold Full disclosure: I'm still not convinced this will ultimately change anything. We've been down this path before. A few years ago a group of PE recruiters made a pact to hold off approaching junior bankers too early … only for one of them to break the truce and try front running the others. (This is Wall Street after all.) There's also nothing stopping another PE firm, let's call them Whitepebble or LLS, from using Apollo's pause as a way to scoop up even more talent. Or for another bank, let's call them Nevermore or Wizard, from telling aspiring bankers they'll be happy to help with their PE aspirations when they're recruiting on college campuses this fall. I'm also not naive enough to think that Apollo will open up the floodgates to anyone when it eventually starts recruiting associates. Even getting a sniff at such a prestigious firm will still be an honor for only a select few. But a slight deviation from the regimented system we have in place, where committing to a long-term career before you're even considered a legal adult is almost a prerequisite, is a step in the right direction. What do you think of the change? Is it a good thing that firms are taking a pause? Or will the PE industry lose something by slowing down early recruitment? Email me at .
