
Africa Day: celebrating the continent's heritage and future
The history of Africa Day is deeply rooted in the liberation movements that marked the 20th century. The starting point was in 1958, when the Congress of African States was held for the first time, a historic gathering where representatives from various countries across the continent came together with an unwavering determination: to free themselves once and for all from colonial rule.
During this pioneering conference, African leaders proposed the creation of an "African Freedom Day", laying the foundations for what would later become a continental tradition. The meetings continued to take place year after year, strengthening ties between African nations and consolidating a common vision of independence and development.
The high point came on 25 May 1963, when the Organisation of African Unity (OAU), later transformed into today's African Union, was officially born. This date was marked in history as Africa Day, symbolising not only the continent's political unity, but also its shared commitment to social, economic and cultural progress.
The African continent of the 21st century presents a radically different picture from that of previous decades. Economic transformations have been particularly remarkable, with sustained growth that has placed several African nations among the fastest developing economies in the world. Countries such as Ghana, Rwanda, Ethiopia and Côte d'Ivoire have experienced growth rates that exceed the global average, demonstrating the continent's economic potential.
Women's participation in the economy represents one of the most significant developments in recent decades. African women have taken leading roles in business development, from small local entrepreneurs to executives of large corporations. In countries such as Rwanda, women hold more than 60% of parliamentary seats, setting a global example in terms of women's political representation.
In the area of gender equality, Africa has seen revolutionary advances. African women now occupy leadership positions in politics, science, technology and culture. Figures such as Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Liberia's first female president and Nobel Peace Prize winner, or Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, director general of the World Trade Organisation, exemplify the growing role of African women on the international stage.
The decolonisation process, significantly supported by the United Nations, culminated in the successful independence of all African nations. This historic achievement not only represented political liberation, but also opened the door for each country to shape its own destiny and develop its natural and human resources according to its own visions and needs.
The seventh art has served as an invaluable cultural bridge to bring African realities to the rest of the world. Film productions have captured both the continent's natural beauty and its complex social and historical realities.
Remains an iconic film work that transports viewers to the Kenyan landscape through Karen Blixen's experience. This commercially successful adaptation not only showcased the majesty of African landscapes, but also explored universal themes such as love, loss and the search for identity in distant lands.
It dealt with the conflicts that ravaged Sierra Leone during the 1990s with rawness and honesty. The film exposed to the world the devastating consequences of the civil war, including the plight of child soldiers and the exploitation of natural resources, contributing significantly to international awareness of these issues.
Immortalised as one of the most inspiring moments in modern South African history, the film masterfully recreated how Nelson Mandela used the 1995 Rugby World Cup as a tool for national reconciliation, demonstrating the power of sport to unite a society divided by decades of apartheid.
Other notable productions include 'Hotel Rwanda' (2004), which chronicled the Rwandan genocide with extraordinary sensitivity, 'The Last King of Scotland' (2006), which portrayed Idi Amin's regime in Uganda, and 'Beasts of No Nation' (2015), which explored the impact of civil war on African children. More recently, 'Black Panther' (2018) presented a futuristic and hopeful vision of Africa, inspiring millions of people around the world.
The commemoration of Africa Day has evolved with the times, adapting to new forms of communication and citizen participation. African countries organise annual cultural events, academic conferences, art exhibitions and food festivals that celebrate the continent's diversity.
Citizen participation through social media has democratised this celebration, allowing people from all over the world to come together using hashtags such as #AfricaDay to share experiences, knowledge and reflections on the continent. This digital connectivity has facilitated cultural exchange and has contributed to demystifying stereotypes, presenting a more complete and nuanced image of contemporary African reality.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
Elon Musk calls Trump's flagship tax bill a 'disgusting abomination'
Elon Musk has slammed US President Donald Trump's plan to cut taxes and spending, marking a sharp break from the president he helped re-elect in 2024. The bill allows the US government to borrow more money and extends tax breaks approved during Trump's first term at the White House, along with new ones he campaigned on. The budget — which includes a massive buildup of $350 (€307) billion for border security, deportations and national security — was narrowly passed by the House of Representatives last month. "Shame on those who voted for it," Musk said of the bill. In a series of posts on his social media platform X, Musk said the "outrageous, pork-filled" spending bill will "massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America [sic] citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt". In its current form the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) exects that the bill's tax policies alone will add nearly $3.8tn (€3.3) to the federal deficit. The South-African born billionaire recently left his role in the Trump administration, where he oversaw Doge, the body responsible for reducing US government spending and cutting federal jobs. His comments are his strongest rebuke yet of Trump's policies. He previously called the bill "disapointing." The legislation — which Trump calls his "big, beautiful bill" — would slash funding for electric vehicles and related technologies, including Musk's Tesla and SpaceX, the latter of which holds major defence contracts. Musk followed his criticism by issuing a warning to Republicans. "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people," he wrote on X. His threat is a sharp shift in tone for Musk, who previously pledged to help defeat Republicans deemed disloyal to Trump. Musk, the world's richest person, spent at least $250 million (€219) supporting Trump's campaign last year. When stepping back from Doge, Musk announced he would be spending "a lot less" on political campaigns, dedicating his time to his companies and his role as CEO of Tesla and SpaceX. He left the door open to political involvement "if I see a reason." Some Republican lawmakers echoed Musk's concerns, with Kentucky Senator Rand Paul writing on X: 'We can and must do better." Utah Senator Mike Lee said, "federal spending has become excessive,' adding that it causes inflation and 'weaponises government.' Others suggested that Musk's endorsement had minimal impact on their decision to vote the legislation forward. 'No matter what Elon Musk or anybody else says — and I don't want to diminish him because I don't think that's fair — it's still going to be second fiddle to President Trump,' Republican West Virginia Senator Shelley Moore Capito said. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt downplayed Musk's criticism. "The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill,' Leavitt said, and Musk's post 'doesn't change the president's opinion.' Democrats, meanwhile, welcomed Musk's criticism of the bill, which Trump in May called 'arguably the most significant piece of Legislation that will ever be signed in the History of our Country.' 'We're in complete agreement,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said of Musk, standing alongside a poster-sized printout of Musk's post during a Capitol news conference. South Korea's liberal opposition candidate Lee Jae-myung was elected president early on Wednesday in a victory that would cap months of political turmoil triggered by the stunning but brief imposition of martial law by now-ousted conservative President Yoon Suk Yeol. With over 99% of votes counted, Jae-myung obtained 49.3% of the votes cast in Tuesday's early election, while main conservative contender Kim Moon Soo trailed with 41.3%. Nearly 80% of the country's 44.4 million eligible voters cast ballots, according to an interim tally. That's one of the highest turnouts for a presidential election in South Korea, reflecting public eagerness to move past the political turmoil. Preelection surveys have long suggested Lee appeared headed for an easy win, riding on deep public frustration over the conservatives in the wake of Yoon's martial law debacle. Even before Lee's win was formally declared, Kim conceded, telling journalists that he 'humbly accepts the people's choice,' and congratulated Lee. Lee Jae-myung delivered a speech to his supporters in the capital, Seoul, after exit polls projected his victory. "The first duty you have entrusted me with, I will overcome the rebellion (referring to former President Yoon declaring martial law) and I will make sure there is no more military coup d'état, in which the power entrusted by the people would never be used to intimidate people,' said Jae-myung. Lee, 60, will be taking office for a five-year term. The president-elect rose from childhood poverty to become South Korea's leading liberal politician. His campaign saw him pledge to fight against poverty and corruption. It's not immediately clear what Jae-myung's election would mean for Seoul's foreign policy. The new leader has previously been accused by critics of tilting towards China and North Korea, and distancing from the US and Japan. The president-elect has however stressed that South Korea's alliance with the United States will continue to be the foundation of foreign policy. The most formidable external challenges facing Jae-myung are US President Donald Trump's tariff policy and Pyongyang's advancing nuclear programme. However, experts have previously indicated that regardless of who assumes the presidency, securing major progress in favour of Seoul on these matters remains unlikely. He's vowed to pursue pragmatic diplomacy in his foreign policy approach. He's promised to develop the alliance with the US and solidify a trilateral Seoul-Washington-Tokyo alliance – a stance that isn't much different from the position held by South Korea's conservatives. Jae-myung also said that he'll work on pursuing better ties with North Korea, but acknowledged that it would be 'very difficult' to hold a summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un anytime soon, signalling that there likely won't be any drastic steps taken to improve ties with their neighbours on the Korean peninsula. Lee Jae-myung, who held the position of governor of Gyeonggi province and mayor of Seongnam city, has been a contentious figure in the political arena for many years. As a former child labourer, known for his inspirational 'rags-to-riches' story, he gained prominence by sharply criticising the conservative establishment of the nation and advocating for a more proactive South Korea in its foreign policy. This rhetoric has shaped his reputation as a reformer capable of implementing significant changes to address the country's deeply-rooted economic disparities and corruption. His critics view him as a dangerous populist who relies on political division and backpedals on promises too easily.


France 24
a day ago
- France 24
High-cost loans, Trump turmoil hurting Africa, says G20 panel chief
Seasoned politician and anti-apartheid activist Trevor Manuel chairs the panel of experts working on proposals to address issues affecting Africa, including high debt, to be presented at a summit of the Group of 20 leading economies in November. African nations are not necessarily more indebted than major economies but they face higher debt servicing costs, Manuel told AFP in an interview. The "unbelievably expensive and prohibitive" cost of capital for African nations has hobbled their development, said Manuel, who served as finance minister in post-apartheid South Africa for more than a decade. "We know that the risk premiums in general on Africa are much higher than they need to be, and that impacts them on the debt service costs," he added. More than half of Africa's 1.3 billion people live in countries with debt interest payments higher than social spending on health, education and infrastructure, according to the South African government. South Africa is the only African nation in the G20 and has made debt sustainability for developing countries one of the priorities of its presidency of the group of 19 countries, the African Union and European Union. African countries will pay close to $89 billion in external debt service alone this year, with 20 low-income countries at risk of debt distress, it says. Manuel said the panel will seek to persuade the entire G20 to engage with multilateral development banks, in particular the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, to address the issue of borrowing costs. 'Unbelievably difficult' Abrupt changes in global order since US President Donald Trump took office in January, such as sweeping aid cuts and trade tariffs, will have long-lasting ramifications for the continent, Manuel said. Trump's "capricious" announcement in April of major trade tariffs effectively did away with the African Growth and Opportunity Act, a major US-African trade deal that had helped to build some African economies, he said. He cited as examples the tiny kingdom of Lesotho, which faces 50 percent tariffs on exports to the United States, including jeans and golf shirts, and Madagascar, which sends vanilla pods and is threatened with 47 percent tariffs. "It becomes unbelievably difficult for small countries that try and develop export markets, for their products to be struck by these sudden announcements," Manuel said. "There's no time for adjustment." Adding to the pressure is the termination of USAID programmes and a push for NATO countries to increase defence spending, which restricts what they have available for overseas development assistance. "The impact on the African continent is going to be very severe," said Manuel. "We can't abstract Africa from the rest of the globe." "The realm of policymaking requires a greater degree of predictability and certainty than what we see at the moment," he said. "The fact that there are these occasional outbursts that aren't informed by reality as I see it... makes it even more complex." Intra-Africa Manuel said his panel's work on better understanding the African economy and developing solutions was likely to continue beyond this year's G20, for example, via the UN Economic Commission for Africa and the African Union. This included looking at "intra-African dynamics" such as the role of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) launched in 2019. Conflicts also cost the continent, he said, citing the war in Sudan and unrest that has held back a major gas project in impoverished northern Mozambique. "When countries spend more on war than what they do on the upliftment of people, then we face profound consequences," Manuel said. He said a strong United Nations and African Union were important in "persuading countries to do the right things" in the long term, beyond the sometimes disruptive short electoral cycles that usher in new leadership and policy changes. "If you don't have those kinds of objectives, which frequently will not be completed within a particular electoral cycle, I think we run ourselves into the ground." © 2025 AFP


Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
At least five killed in attack on aid convoy in Sudan, UN says
At least five people have been killed and several others wounded in an attack on an aid convoy in Sudan's Darfur region on Tuesday, the United Nations has said, with the warring parties in the northeast African nation trading blame for the attack. The attack on the 15-truck convoy carrying desperately needed food and nutrition supplies happened on Monday night near the Rapid Support Forces (RSF)-controlled town of Koma in North Dafur province. It was trying to reach besieged el-Fasher city, according to a joint statement from the World Food Programme and UNICEF. Both agencies called for an investigation into the attack. "This was the first UN humanitarian convoy that was going to make it to el-Fasher in over one year," UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric told reporters at in New York. Monday night's attack burned many trucks and damaged the aid they were carrying, the statement said. It didn't say who was responsible for the attack. The WFP and UNICEF said they were negotiating to complete the trip to el-Fasher from the eastern city of Port Sudan on the Red Sea, which serves as an interim seat for the country's military-allied government. "It is devastating that the supplies have not reached the vulnerable children and families they were intended to," the statement said. Dujarric said all those killed and injured were Sudanese contractors working for the WFP and UNICEF. "They were 80 kilometres from el-Fasher, after having travelled 1,800 kilometres for days in incredibly difficult terrain, incredibly dangerous terrain," he said. "They were parked on the side of the road waiting for clearances and they were attacked." "It was an air attack, most likely drones. But we don't know who the perpetrators were." The RSF said in a statement the convoy was hit by a military aircraft in a "pre-planned attack." Footage shared by the RSF showed burned vehicles carrying what appeared to be flour bags. The military-led government, however, rejected the accusation and said in a statement that aid trucks were 'treacherously attacked by assault drones operated by the rebel Rapid Support Forces (RSF) militia.' The Resistance Committees in el-Fasher tracked the fighting in and around the city and blamed the paramilitaries for the attack, saying the RSF statement aimed to "mislead public opinion and evade accountability." The UN demanded a halt to attacks on humanitarian personnel, facilities and vehicles. El-Fasher, more than 800 kilometres southwest of the capital Khartoum, is one of the last strongholds of the Sudanese military in Darfur. The region has been under RSF siege since May 2024. Sudan was plunged into a war more than two years ago, when tensions between the army and its rival paramilitary RSF exploded with street battles in the capital of Khartoum that quickly spread across the country. The war has created the world's worst humanitarian crisis. It has driven about 13 million people from their homes, including over four million who crossed into neighbouring countries. Parts of Sudan have been pushed into famine. The fighting has been marked by atrocities including mass rape and ethnically motivated killings that amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity, especially in Darfur, according to the UN and international rights groups. Kai-Uwe Steck, a key figure in a massive tax fraud scheme that plagued Germany until 2012, has been convicted for his role in the scandal. Steck, who has cooperated with the authorities in recent years, received a suspended jail sentence of one year and 10 months, far less than the three years and eight months demanded by the prosecution. The former lawyer was also ordered to repay €24 million, €11 million of which has already been returned. As a "central figure" in the fraud scheme Steck contributed to losses of more than €428 million to the German tax authorities, according to the presiding judge in the case at Bonn Regional Court. The 53-year-old was a tax lawyer who worked alongside Hanno Berger, the so-called "mastermind" of the scandal that became known in Germany as "Cum-Ex". Like Berger, Steck was accused of designing and implementing complex share transactions that allowed multiple parties to claim illegitimate tax refunds on dividend payments. Despite the significant role he played in the scandal between 2007 and 2011, Steck's cooperation with authorities and his role as a whistleblower in the case meant he avoided a stricter sentence. His former colleague Berger was convicted to eight years in prison in 2022. The "Cum-Ex" scandal — considered to be the biggest tax fraud case in German history — prompted an avalanche of lawsuits and cast a shadow on politicians, including former German Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Scholz was accused of protecting a local bank — during his time as the mayor of Hamburg — that was found guilty of participating in the scheme. The former German leader has always denied any wrongdoing, with prosecutors deciding to drop the case against him due to insufficient evidence. German authorities have so far recovered approximately €3.4 billion through several convictions and court cases. However, tens of billions of euros are still missing. Other investigations into the remaining lost funds are ongoing.