
Student loan debt may be tougher to pay off and expand the wealth divide after passage of Trump's big bill
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
German Roman is one of the
Advertisement
Recent efforts by the Trump administration and Republican-led Congress to restrict access to federal student loans may further deepen these disparities. By limiting funds historically under-represented communities have relied on, students of color and women may be pushed toward private lending, or skip higher education altogether.
As part of the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' signed by President Trump on July 4, federal loans for medical and law students will be capped at $200,000, below
Advertisement
The bill also limits repayment options, with fewer flexibilities, restricted pathways to debt forgiveness, and faster repayment requirements.
According to the Student Borrower Protection Center, an advocacy and research group, all students, regardless of income or whether they've completed their degree, will face higher monthly payments as a result of these changes.
Outside of the legislation, the Trump administration
The Student Debt Crisis Center, a separate advocacy group, estimates these fees will amount to about $300 a month. Already 5 million Americans have defaulted on their student loans, with another 2 million projected to default this month. Natalie Abrams, president and founder of the debt crisis center, now expects these numbers to grow.
Advertisement
'This is a bad bill for borrowers,' she said.
Advocates who have been raising alarm bells for years about rising student debt are now stuck in a strange position: Advocating for federal loans to continue, while also calling for major changes to the system through debt cancellation and lowered tuition.
On its face, the Republican-led changes seem to acknowledge concerns about the country's
But critics counter that in the face of federal loan caps, borrowers will rely on higher-priced, more risky private loans, or skip school altogether.
Borrowers of color, who have less family wealth to tap into and are therefore more reliant on student loans, will be hurt the most.
Student debt diminishes the ability of historically under-represented communities to build generational wealth, diverting money that could go toward savings, retirement, or investing in big-ticket items that traditionally fuel family wealth, such as homes.
Advertisement
'Generations of systemic racism have forced Black and brown folks — especially Black women — to borrow at higher rates than our white peers and bear an enormous financial burden, denying us the opportunity to succeed and build generational wealth,' Representative Ayanna Pressley told the Globe
in an emailed statement.
Changes by the Trump administration,
while reducing a reliance on federal student loans, could actually
worsen the divide. Lending limits 'means fewer people who are not already rich will be able to go to college, and the people who still need to get education and training that are not already rich are going to be targeted for predatory private loan projects,' said Eileen Connor,
executive director
of the Project on Predatory Student Lending, a legal and policy organization focused on predatory for-profit colleges and lenders that started at Harvard Law School.
'There's been a fair amount of talk about Trump policies leading to resegregation,' Persis Yu, deputy executive director and managing council at the Student Borrower Protection Center, an advocacy group that aims to improve the student loan system, said. 'And I think this is part of that project.'
Amina Khamsi will be starting her third year at Boston University School of Medicine this fall. Originally from El Paso, Texas, Khamsi, who is a first-generation immigrant with Moroccan and Colombian roots, has already taken out nearly $120,000 in federal student debt, which has accrued nearly $10,000 in interest.
She's already considering whether she can afford to stay in Boston for residency, and worries doctors will have to reconsider whether they can work in underserved communities, where positions pay less, if they have to take on more private debt.
Advertisement
'You are forcing people to make decisions not based on ethical practices or how they want to practice medicine, but 'how am I going to cope with this.' I fear in the long run we're going to have less doctors who look like me, who look like a lot of patients across America, and that could have detrimental effects to health care.'
Private lenders seem primed for the potential influx. In the weeks leading up to the legislation's passage, Sallie Mae
calling for caps on federal student lending. The CEO of Navient, a major private student lender,
As students consider their now whittled-down options, German Roman encourages
them to be informed.
She doesn't regret going to college, but she does regret taking on debt, even as she feels she should consider herself lucky, since the $20,000 she owes is half
tuition-free college.
'No one is arguing for the status quo,' said Yu. 'But until there is a real investment in higher education, both on the federal and state level,' millions of students and their families will continue to rely on federal debt, with now-tightened conditions.
'These proposals,' Yu said, 'are going to make the crisis worse, not better.'
Advertisement
This story was produced by the Globe's
team, which covers the racial wealth gap in Greater Boston. You can sign up for the newsletter
.
Mara Kardas-Nelson can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
5 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
L.A. Times owner intends to take newspaper public in coming year
The owner of the Los Angeles Times said Monday he would 'take the paper public' in the next year. In an interview on 'The Daily Show With Jon Stewart,' Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong said the move would allow The Times 'to be democratized and allow the public to have ownership of this paper.' He did not provide specifics about how the deal would work or whether it would involve an initial public offer to sell shares of the company or some other type of investment arrangement. 'Whether you're right, left, Democrat, Republican, you're an American. So the opportunity for us to provide a paper that is the voices of the people, truly the voices of the people' in important, Soon-Shiong told Stewart. 'We think over the next year we will. I'm working through [that] with an organization that's putting that together right now,' he added. Soon-Shiong built his fortune through pioneering pharmaceutical and biotech ventures, including cancer treatments. In 2018, he purchased the L.A. Times, the San Diego Union-Tribune and several community newspapers in a $500-million deal. The sale returned The Times to local control after a turbulent 18 years of ownership by Chicago-based Tronc. In 2023, he sold the San Diego Union-Tribune to MediaNews Group.

Business Insider
6 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Jon Stewart defended his friend, Stephen Colbert, in an f-bomb filled monologue against CBS and the Trump administration
Jon Stewart says CBS's cancellation of "The Late Show With Stephen Colbert" has less to do with the show's financials and more to do with getting into the Trump administration's good books. Stewart slammed CBS and its decision during his expletive-filled monologue on "The Daily Show" which aired on Monday night. Both Stewart's and Colbert's shows share the same parent company, Paramount Global. "Now, obviously, I am certainly not the most objective to comment on this matter," Stewart said of his longtime friendship with Colbert. Stewart acknowledged the financial challenges that come with trying to run a late night television show like Colbert's. Stewart said in his monologue that "late night TV is a struggling financial model" and is akin to "operating a Blockbuster kiosk inside of a Tower Records." "But when your industry is faced with changes, you don't just call it a day. My god, when CDs stopped selling, they didn't just go, 'Oh well, music, it's been a good run,'" Stewart said. Stewart said the cancellation of Colbert's show by CBS raised questions over whether it was "purely financial" or the "path of least resistance" for Paramount's proposed merger with Skydance Media. "I believe CBS lost the benefit of the doubt two weeks prior when they sold out their flagship news program to pay an extortion fee to said president," Stewart said. Earlier this month, Paramount said it had agreed to pay President Donald Trump a $16 million settlement. Trump had filed a lawsuit against CBS which accused the network of "deceptive editing" of an interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris on "60 Minutes." "Look, I understand the corporate fear. I understand the fear that you and your advertisers have with $8 billion at stake," Stewart said. "But understand this, truly, the shows that you now seek to cancel, censor, and control. A not insignificant portion of that $8 billion value came from those fucking shows. That's what made you that money," he added. Stewart said that capitulating to Trump would not play out the way Paramount expects. He referenced the president's recent lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal after it reported on a "bawdy" birthday letter Trump sent to Jeffrey Epstein on the latter's 50th birthday. "Donald Trump is suing Rupert Murdoch. The owner of Fox News, the man other than Biden may be most responsible for getting Trump elected," Stewart said. "Fox spends 24 hours a day blowing Trump and it's not enough. Imagine suing someone mid blow. How could you? 'Finish up. Finish up down there and I'll see you in court,'" he added. Stewart added that the reason Colbert's show was ending was not because of its financial health but the "fear and pre-compliance that is gripping all of America's institutions." "This is not the moment to give in. I'm not giving in," Stewart said. Jon Stewart reacts to CBS cancelling "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" and tells corporations and advertisers to "sack up" — The Daily Show (@TheDailyShow) July 22, 2025 During his half-hour monologue, Stewart said versions of the word "fuck" over two dozen times. CBS said in a statement on July 18 that the cancellation of Colbert's show was "purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night." It added that the decision was "not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount." Last week, Puck's Matt Belloni reported that Colbert's show had been losing more than $40 million a year. This is in spite of Colbert's popularity with viewers. His show was the only late-night show to gain viewers this year, per ratings from the American audience measurement company, Nielsen. Advertising revenue across late-night shows like Colbert's has been dropping, too. Ad revenue for late-night fell from $439 million in 2018 to $220 million in 2024, The New York Times reported, citing data it had obtained from advertising data firm, Guideline. Representatives for Stewart, Colbert, CBS, and the White House did not respond to requests for comment from Business Insider.
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trade war: Is August escalation on - or will Trump chicken out?
Donald Trump is clearly seething over the term 'TACO' (Trump always chickens out) - a phrase that has characterised financial market trading over the past few months.