'Irreparable harm': Canada court blocks deportation of Indian man, wife has ADHD
A Canadian court has blocked the deportation of Jagjit Singh, an Indian-origin man, citing that his separation from his wife, who has ADHD (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder), will cause "irreparable harm" to the wife.
According to the court filing, Singh came to Canada in 2021 on a temporary resident visa and made a refugee claim. Then he got married in Canada and his wife applied to sponsor his permanent resident application, and Jagjit Singh withdrew his refugee claim this year.
But his removal process already began while his resident application was under review and the Canada Border Services Agency finally ordered him to be deported.
Singh appealed to Canada's federal court against the deportation order and claimed that he would be in danger if he were sent back to India.
Singh also claimed that his removal would cause "serious prejudices to his spouse due to her health conditions".
Federal Judge Avvy Yao-Yao Go said she has evidence in front of her that Singh's wife, referred to as LB in court documents, suffers from ADHD which impairs her ability to manage time and everyday responsibilities.
"In the case before me, there is evidence that L.B. suffers from ADHD which impairs her ability to manage time, stress focus and everyday responsibilities and that [Singh] provides her with support by, among other things, helping her maintain daily structure and reminders for medications and appointments, and providing her with emotional stability and mental health support," Go said.
The ruling drew backlash on social media, with many users pointing out that ADHD is not that serious.
"The judge who halted an Indian man's deportation order because his wife has ADHD was an activist before being appointed to the bench," one wrote. Many social media users said his wife should also go to India with him.
"I wonder how his wife survived before she met him?" one person said. "This is beyond insulting. Not only to people with ADHD, but to our country. So pathetic," another wrote.
Go immigrated to Canada from Hong Kong in the 1980s and worked as Clinic Director of the Chinese and Southeast Asian Legal Clinic before becoming a judge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump advisor criticises India over Russian oil, says tariff to hit where it hurts
WASHINGTON: White House trade advisor Peter Navarro sharply criticised India for purchasing Russian energy and defence equipment, pledging to 'hit India where it hurts' in order to change New Delhi's policy. In an opinion piece for the Financial Times, Navarro termed India's oil trade with Russia 'opportunistic' and 'corrosive' to global efforts being made to isolate the Russian economy. White House trade counselor Peter Navarro walks outside the White House after a television interview, on July 31, 2025, in Washington. (AP FILE) A former economics professor who emerged as a major trade adviser to US President Donald Trump in his first administration, Navarro is seen as a major force behind the US's retaliatory tariffs on trading partners. In his article, Navarro sought to link what he termed as India's 'high' trade tariffs and 'financial support' for Russia's war in Ukraine. 'As Russia continues to hammer Ukraine, helped by India's financial support, American (and European) taxpayers are then forced to spend tens of billions more to help Ukraine's defence. Meanwhile, India keeps slamming the door on American exports through high tariffs and trade barriers. More than 300,000 soldiers and civilians have been killed, while Nato's eastern flank grows more exposed and the west foots the bill for India's oil laundering,' wrote Navarro. In negotiations with the US for a Free Trade Agreement, India has refused to budge on protections for its agriculture, dairy and micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME) sectors from unfettered American imports. Trump on July 30 announced punitive tariffs of 25% on Indian goods shipped to America. He subsequently added another 25% levy, which is scheduled to come into effect next week, for purchasing Russian oil. India's foreign ministry has termed the tariffs as 'unreasonable' and 'extremely unfortunate'. Navarro also attacked Indian refiners for 'profiteering' by purchasing Russian discounted oil and exporting the processed petroleum products to Europe, Africa and Asia, stating that the surge in crude oil imports from Russia after 2022 was not for meeting domestic consumption. 'The Biden administration largely looked the other way at this strategic and geopolitical madness. The Trump administration is confronting it,' Navarro said of Trump's tariffs on India that have left the country's exports to the US at a significant disadvantage with those from competing nations. 'This two-pronged policy will hit India where it hurts — its access to US markets — even as it seeks to cut off the financial lifeline it has extended to Russia's war effort,' Navarro said. 'If India wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one.' Navarro's criticism marks the latest recrimination of India's ties with Russia from a senior member of the Trump administration. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller have also taken issue with New Delhi's relationship with Moscow. Navarro also added to earlier criticisms of India in a new direction, by taking aim at defence technology transfers from US firms to India. In his view, building factories in India and transferring sensitive technologies does not help improve Washington's trade balance with New Delhi. Navarro also charged India with 'cozying up to both Russia and China'. Former US officials have questioned Navarro's assertions about the India-Russia relationship. 'The larger issue is that the secretary of State and other principals authorized this piece. So those who know better and are supposed to balance American interests either agree with it, don't agree with it but authorized it anyway, or just don't care,' says Evan Feigenbaum, a former diplomat who served as deputy assistant secretary of state for South Asia under George W Bush. 'This completes a strange narrative arc from Washington and has finally shifted U.S. policy from a trade war and strategic friction with China to a trade war and strategic friction with India instead. I'll say it flatly: that is just strategic malpractice,' adds Feigenbaum, who helped negotiate the India-US civilian nuclear deal during the mid-2000s.
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Indian broadcasters staring at crores in unpaid license fees from Nepal, Bangladesh
TV broadcasters in India are due hundreds of crores in overdue license fee payments from distributors in Nepal and Bangladesh, a problem that has been getting worse over the last year, two executives with knowledge of the payment issues told The Hindu. The problem has been particularly acute in Bangladesh, where after the ouster of former President Sheikh Hasina, TV distributors have stopped paying Indian broadcasters the fees they are due for transmitting their channels. Many Indian channels are popular in Nepal and Bangladesh, so much so that broadcasters give distributors in that country a 'clean feed,' a stripped-down live broadcast without Indian ads. In Nepal, which has had issues in the last few years of withheld payments to telecom companies like Airtel, the dues exceeded ₹100 crore in the last few weeks. Nepalese Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli is due to visit India in September, and Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri visited Kathmandu on Sunday for a two day official trip. Bangladeshi broadcasters also owe over ₹250 crore, one executive said. The Nepalese embassy and the High Commission of Bangladesh did not respond to queries by The Hindu. The Ministry of External Affairs did not immediately respond to a query on the dues. In Airtel's case in 2023, the telecom company cut off its link to Nepal briefly, before turning it back on in a few hours, underlining the stakes if payments didn't come through. One executive speaking to The Hindu said that the major Indian broadcasters are hesitating to do the same, as broadcasters in both countries could simply pirate an Indian retail feed, ending any hope of recovering due license fees, and posing enormous challenges in reentering the market. In Nepal, Indian channels have been facing issues with the government since April 2023, when the country's Ministry of Communication and Information Technology (MoCIT) gave every broadcaster just two days to implement an 'à la carte' pricing system, practically identical to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India's New Tariff Order. Unlike the NTO regime, which was implemented — with much resistance — after several months of consultations, the notice given was so short that Indian broadcasters only came to know of the requirement days after the deadline. In Bangladesh, Beximcom, the country's largest conglomerate with over $1 billion in assets, has not received remittance clearance from the Bank of Bangladesh to pay Indian broadcasters, and the political situation in the country has left diplomats and politicians with little interest to deal with the commercial concerns of broadcasters, one executive said.
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India recommends import tariffs for three years on some steel products
India has recommended a three-year import tariff of 11%-12% on some steel products to curb shipments from top producer China. The levy, if imposed, will start at 12%. It will be eased to 11.5% in the second year and to 11% in the third year, the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR) said in a notification dated August 16. "The Authority concludes that there is a recent, sudden, sharp and significant increase in imports," the notification said, adding that this could cause serious injury to the domestic steel sector. The DGTR also said that due to 50% tariffs on steel imports into the U.S., coupled with similar measures by other countries, a bulk of steel volumes are lying with manufacturers across the world. "Therefore, the safeguard duty must address, not only the serious injury suffered by the domestic also the threat of serious injury that is likely to arise in the future." The final recommendation follows preliminary findings, after which the Indian government in April imposed a 12% temporary tariff for 200 days Earlier on Monday, Japanese steel lobby groups said they have requested the early introduction of measures to prevent the evasion of anti-dumping tariffs aimed at protecting their domestic sector from unfair imports. U.S. President Donald Trump's import tariffs on steel have fuelled a wave of trade frictions against Chinese steel, with countries including South Korea and Vietnam imposing anti-dumping levy.
