Indian broadcasters staring at crores in unpaid license fees from Nepal, Bangladesh
Many Indian channels are popular in Nepal and Bangladesh, so much so that broadcasters give distributors in that country a 'clean feed,' a stripped-down live broadcast without Indian ads. In Nepal, which has had issues in the last few years of withheld payments to telecom companies like Airtel, the dues exceeded ₹100 crore in the last few weeks. Nepalese Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli is due to visit India in September, and Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri visited Kathmandu on Sunday for a two day official trip. Bangladeshi broadcasters also owe over ₹250 crore, one executive said.
The Nepalese embassy and the High Commission of Bangladesh did not respond to queries by The Hindu. The Ministry of External Affairs did not immediately respond to a query on the dues.
In Airtel's case in 2023, the telecom company cut off its link to Nepal briefly, before turning it back on in a few hours, underlining the stakes if payments didn't come through. One executive speaking to The Hindu said that the major Indian broadcasters are hesitating to do the same, as broadcasters in both countries could simply pirate an Indian retail feed, ending any hope of recovering due license fees, and posing enormous challenges in reentering the market.
In Nepal, Indian channels have been facing issues with the government since April 2023, when the country's Ministry of Communication and Information Technology (MoCIT) gave every broadcaster just two days to implement an 'à la carte' pricing system, practically identical to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India's New Tariff Order. Unlike the NTO regime, which was implemented — with much resistance — after several months of consultations, the notice given was so short that Indian broadcasters only came to know of the requirement days after the deadline.
In Bangladesh, Beximcom, the country's largest conglomerate with over $1 billion in assets, has not received remittance clearance from the Bank of Bangladesh to pay Indian broadcasters, and the political situation in the country has left diplomats and politicians with little interest to deal with the commercial concerns of broadcasters, one executive said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
26 minutes ago
- India.com
Trump will be unhappy with this 200 number as India makes things easier for China, takes this big step to...
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump has invited trouble without any effort. His move to put pressure on India seems to be backfiring. The whole game has suddenly changed with India and China coming closer in the tariff war. Now India has done something that can hurt Trump a lot. The government is making it easier for China to invest money in India. This is a big sign of improvement in the relations between the two countries. All this is happening at a time when Trump has imposed an additional tariff of 25% on India. This will increase the tariff on Indian goods in America to 50% from August 27. Trump has imposed this tariff due to buying Russian oil. What is the government doing to settle the Chinese FDI? The government is preparing to quickly settle the FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) proposals coming from Chinese companies. For this, the government has given instructions to simplify the approval process. According to sources, the Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC) headed by the Home Secretary will now work on these proposals expeditiously. A meeting of the IMC was also held last week. A senior official said, 'We have clear instructions. Reduce the time taken to process applications.' According to sources, proposals from non-critical sectors like renewable energy, manufacturing and electronics are still being considered. Dixon Technologies' FDI proposal is also under review. It includes two Chinese partners. 200 FDI proposals are awaiting approval Under Press Note 3, about 200 FDI proposals from China are pending. According to this rule, approval has to be taken from the government before investing in countries sharing a land border with India. The government can dispose of them quickly after getting approval from the IMC and the Cabinet Secretariat. Many Chinese companies have been waiting for their proposals to be approved for a long time. However, officials have also made it clear that this move should not be seen as India's soft stance towards China. A source said, 'India's engagement with Chinese FDI should not be seen through the prism of its relations with the US.'
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Back-to-back arrest of MSC vessels poses challenge to Vizhinjam port
The back-to-back arrest of around four vessels of Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) following the shipwreck of its vessel, MSC Elsa III, off the coast of Kerala after calling at Vizhinjam International Seaport, and the associated litigations have cast a shadow on the prospects of the newly commissioned deep-water and container transshipment port. This comes at a time when the Vizhinjam port, where MSC is the anchor client, has been witnessing a decline in container discharge since May. The volume of containers handled dropped from 1.2 lakh TEU in May, to 99,976 TEU in June, although there was a slight uptick in July with 1.05 lakh TEU. Only 24 ships called at the port until August 17, against a record number of 51 ships in March. Speaking to The Hindu, a senior government source said multiple factors, including adverse weather conditions, affect cargo volume at the port. For instance, the world's largest container ship, MSC IRINA, had to wait for nearly a week at outer anchorage to get a berthing slot at Vizhinjam port on July 9 as there were around five to six ships in the queue then. Now, there is hardly any queue of ships. Moreover, after the docking of MSC IRINA, no ultra-large vessels called at the port, said the officer. Initially, Akiteta II, a sister ship of the MSC Elsa III that capsized off the coast of Kerala on May 25 causing widespread environmental damage, was arrested in the second week of July. Since then, the ship has been idling at the outer anchorage of the port after the shipping company challenged the admiralty suit filed by the Kerala government demanding ₹9,531 crore in compensation for the environmental and economic damage caused by the shipwreck. In the latest incident, the High Court ordered the arrest of MV MSC Palermo, berthed at Vizhinjam port, until the claim amount is deposited as security, in response to a compensation suit filed by four fishing-boat owners. Earlier, MV MSC Manasa F and MSC Polo II were conditionally arrested following similar suits by cargo owners to secure their claims ranging to several crores. 'Wrong signal' According to Vizhinjam port sources, the arrest of MSC vessels specifically at the Vizhinjam port sends a wrong signal to the world regarding the port, even as there is scope for recording such arrest of vessels at other ports in the country, including the Cochin port, said the officials. S.N. Raghuchandran Nair, president, Trivandrum Chamber of Commerce and Industry (TCCI), echoed the sentiment. 'We invited companies to Kerala after holding Vizhinjam conclave. This pattern of arresting vessels following one accident will dissuade investors,' said Mr. Nair. However, maritime law expert V.J. Mathew countered the argument, saying that the vessels can be arrested anywhere under the jurisdiction of the Kerala High Court. Since more vessels of the MSC call at Vizhinjam on a daily basis, it is the ideal destination to record the arrest and hold them responsible for the loss inflicted on the State, fishermen, and other stakeholders. There is no merit in the argument 'why it is Vizhinjam', he said. On the other hand, the greens, including Greenpeace India, demanded that MSC be held responsible and made to pay for environmental damage and livelihood loss. Meanwhile, the Vizhinjam port authorities maintained that, irrespective of the setbacks, the port is poised to achieve 1 million TEU cargo target by August itself.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Peter Navarro to India: Act like a US partner or pay the price
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump's trade adviser Peter Navarro on Monday criticised India's crude oil imports from Russia, calling the move "opportunistic" and warning that if India "wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one". In an opinion piece in the Financial Times, Navarro alleged that India was "now cosying up to both Russia and China" and argued that New Delhi's Russian crude purchases must stop as they were financing Moscow's war in Ukraine. His comments come ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping later this month, even as Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi visits New Delhi for talks on the disputed border. "This two-pronged policy will hit India where it hurts-its access to US markets - even as it seeks to cut off the financial lifeline it has extended to Russia's war effort," Navarro wrote. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Crossout 2.0: Supercharged Crossout Play Now Undo He said India's reliance on Russian crude was "opportunistic and deeply corrosive of global efforts to isolate Putin's war economy". The remarks assume significance as US trade negotiators have postponed their planned August 25-29 visit for the sixth round of Bilateral Trade Agreement talks , the first tranche of which is targeted for conclusion by autumn. Live Events Trump has already imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, including a 25% penal levy for continued purchases of Russian oil, despite the external affairs ministry's assertion that India is being unfairly singled out while the US and EU continue to source energy from Moscow. While the 25% tariff on Indian goods entering the US took effect on August 7, the additional 25%, announced as penalty for crude and defence imports from Russia, will kick in on August 27. "India acts as a global clearing house for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs," Navarro wrote, adding that it was risky to transfer cutting-edge US military capabilities to a country "cosying up to both Russia and China".
