Tiffany Henyard skips final regular meeting during tenure as Thornton Township supervisor
The Township Board voted to settle a lawsuit with employee Kathryn Granberry and to spend $3,000 for an 'employee luncheon.' The board also paid bills with the exception of several reoccurring services Henyard previously pushed.
Meeting attendees, including newly elected trustees Mary Avent and Valeria Stubbs who take office Monday, expressed gratitude for board members Chris Gonzalez, Carmen Carlisle and Stephanie Wiedeman for their leadership during Henyard's three-year tenure as supervisor.
'I'll be forever grateful for all three of you,' Stubbs said.
'You came in, you did what we needed you to do,' Avent said, addressing Wiedeman. 'For that we say thank you, although I know we'll see you again.'
Wiedeman, who residents voted onto the board in January to replace Gerald Jones who resigned three months prior, shed tears as she and other board members received bouquets of flowers. Neither she nor Carlisle sought another term, while Gonzalez was reelected as part of the slate that includes state Sen. Napoleon Harris, who will replace Henyard next week as supervisor.
Also honored were Highway Commissioner Gary DePue and Clerk Loretta Wells, who tended to stay mum during clashes between Henyard and trustees. Neither official sought reelection this year, with Antwon D. Russell and Casey A. Nesbit, respectively, succeed them.
'This is bittersweet,' Wells said, choking up while noting she has worked with the township for 40 years. 'It was tough. I had to stay neutral … I'm just wishing nothing but love to the next administration and the next clerk.'
Trustee Darlene Gray Everett, who has frequently voted alongside Henyard despite other board members' opposition to her, was absent. Henyard was unable to secure a spot on the ballot despite seeking reelection after losing the Democratic nomination to Harris during a caucus in December.
In the historically Democratic voting region, Harris received 75% of the vote for supervisor. Independent candidate Nate Fields trailed with 11% of the vote, followed by Republican Richard Nolan with 10% and Harvey Mayor Christopher Clark, who had withdrawn from the race, with 5%.
Henyard, who until recently was also mayor of Dolton, lost her bid for reelection in the village as well. Jason House and members of his slate were sworn in earlier this month.
The new Thornton Township Board will be sworn in during a ceremony scheduled from 1 to 4 p.m. on Monday at the Tiwnship Hall, 333 E. 162nd St. Gonzalez announced a short meeting will take place ahead of the inauguration at 12:30 p.m.
Trustees didn't mention Henyard be name, but alluded to their issues with her that ranged from name calling to general lack of communication surrounding policies and meeting structure.
Federal investigators have at least twice before visited Dolton and Thornton Township in search of documents, including expense reimbursements and other payments made to Henyard. No charges have been filed.
'This hasn't been an easy journey, but when you rally together, there is strength in numbers,' Carlisle said during the meeting. 'I just want to say thank you to you all for all your kindness that you've shown during this time, and just all the love and support … I think it's so important for people to see what's going on in these small communities, because there are so many changes that are needed.'
ostevens@chicagotribune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
9 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Trump
NEW YORK — An appeals court has thrown out the massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump, ruling Thursday in New York state's lawsuit accusing him of exaggerating his wealth. The decision came seven months after the Republican returned to the White House. A panel of five judges in New York's mid-level Appellate Division said the verdict, which stood to cost Trump more than $515 million and rock his real estate empire, was 'excessive.' After finding that Trump engaged in fraud by flagrantly padding financial statements that went to lenders and insurers, Judge Arthur Engoron ordered him last year to pay $355 million in penalties. With interest, the sum has topped $515 million. The total — combined with penalties levied on some other Trump Organization executives, including Trump's sons Eric and Donald Jr. — now exceeds $527 million, with interest. 'While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' Judges Dianne T. Renwick and Peter H. Moulton wrote in one of several opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling. Engoron also imposed other punishments, such as banning Trump and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Those provisions have been on pause during Trump's appeal, and he was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a $175 million bond. The court, which was split on the merits of the lawsuit and the lower court's fraud finding, dismissed the penalty Engoron imposed in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for further appeals to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. The appeals court, the Appellate Division of the state's trial court, took an unusually long time to rule, weighing Trump's appeal for nearly 11 months after oral arguments last fall. Normally, appeals are decided in a matter of weeks or a few months. New York Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the suit on the state's behalf, has said the businessman-turned-politician engaged in 'lying, cheating, and staggering fraud.' Her office had no immediate comment after Thursday's decision. Trump and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. In a six-minute summation of sorts after a monthslong trial, Trump proclaimed in January 2024 that he was 'an innocent man' and the case was a 'fraud on me.' He has repeatedly maintained that the case and verdict were political moves by James and Engoron, who are both Democrats. Trump's Justice Department has subpoenaed James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. James' personal attorney, Abbe D. Lowell, has said that investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.' Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren't deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren't audited. The defense also noted that bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, lowball estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing in September, Trump's lawyers argued that many of the case's allegations were too old, an assertion they made unsuccessfully before trial. The defense also contends that James misused a consumer-protection law to sue Trump and improperly policed private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved. State attorneys said the law in question applies to fraudulent or illegal business conduct, whether it targets everyday consumers or big corporations. Though Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, the state contends that the numbers led lenders to make riskier loans than they knew, and that honest borrowers lose out when others game their net-worth numbers. The state has argued that the verdict rests on ample evidence and that the scale of the penalty comports with Trump's gains, including his profits on properties financed with the loans and the interest he saved by getting favorable terms offered to wealthy borrowers. The civil fraud case was just one of several legal obstacles for Trump as he campaigned, won and segued to a second term as president. On Jan. 10, he was sentenced in his criminal hush money case to what's known as an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction on the books but sparing him jail, probation, a fine or other punishment. He is appealing the conviction. And in December, a federal appeals court upheld a jury's finding that Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her, affirming a $5 million judgment against him. The appeals court declined in June to reconsider; he still can try to get the Supreme Court to hear his appeal. He's also appealing a subsequent verdict that requires him to pay Carroll $83.3 million for additional defamation claims. Peltz and Sisak write for the Associated Press.
Newsweek
11 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Student Loan Update: Some Borrowers Facing Major Change Within Months
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Some MOHELA student loan borrowers will be transferred to other servicers by the end of the year, according to Forbes. In discussions between Massachusetts' Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren and Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, the Department of Education confirmed they would be transferring borrowers from MOHELA, which previously managed the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. Newsweek spoke with experts about what this means for borrowers. Why It Matters More than 40 million Americans carry federal student loan debt, and the outstanding nationwide balance exceeds $1.7 trillion. The Department of Education has been experiencing major changes since President Donald Trump took office, with many borrowers seeing higher monthly payments as a result of the updates. A sign marks the location of the U.S. Department of Education headquarters building on June 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. A sign marks the location of the U.S. Department of Education headquarters building on June 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. To Know The Department of Education uses contractors to manage the federal student loan portfolio, with MOHELA, Nelnet, Aidvantage and EdFinancial taking up the bulk of the student loan accounts. The transfer of borrowers under MOHELA could have major disruptions, but the Department of Education confirmed the change last month. "FSA is prioritizing efforts to improve customer service to students and parent borrowers," said Sarah Ursprung, acting assistant secretary for Legislation and Congressional Affairs at the Department of Education, in a letter to Senator Warren last month. "FSA is collaborating with MOHELA to help the servicer manage the multiple strains on its portfolio to help drive overall improvement. As part of these efforts, FSA intends to transfer a portion of MOHELA's PSLF portfolio to other servicers later this year." Newsweek reached out to the Department of Education and MOHELA for comment via email. It is so far unclear how many accounts will be transferred from MOHELA to other student loan servicers or when the transfers will take place. In the past, MOHELA received intense criticism for sending late or incorrect billing statements to borrowers, and the loan servicer also sent out notices to borrowers with misleading information about interest accrual. "It's not just punishment, more like load‑balancing," Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of told Newsweek. "MOHELA's average wait times were 7 times longer than the next worst servicer in late 2024. The portfolio is mismatched to their capacity. Once PSLF tracking shifted to there's no reason to keep PSLF heavy borrowers at MOHELA." Many borrowers also complained about long call hold times and difficulties reaching customer service agents. "The 'call deflection' scheme diverts borrowers away from customer service representatives—often to non-operative parts of the MOHELA website—even though many servicing functions can only be performed by a customer service representative," the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the Student Borrower Protection Center (SBPC) said in a statement last year. Senator Warren has also been vocal in her criticism of MOHELA, expressing concerns over how MOHELA has impacted student loan borrowers on a national scale. "MOHELA has consistently exhibited atrocious customer service, even compared to all other federal student loan servicers," Warren said previously. "For example, in the fourth quarter of 2024, MOHELA took roughly seven times as long to answer phone calls from borrowers compared to the servicer with the second-worst average wait time." What People Are Saying Senator Warren said in a letter to Secretary McMahon: "You also disclosed that ED will be moving some of the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority's (MOHELA's) federal student loan portfolio to other servicers later this year, a process that the Biden Administration set into motion given MOHELA's abysmal performance. You admitted that you were doing so to improve MOHELA's performance, and I appreciate your acknowledgement and action—to my knowledge, the first such admission from the Trump Administration—in response to MOHELA's failures to adequately serve borrowers." A MOHELA spokesperson previously told Forbes in response to the SBPC and AFT report: "Any claims that MOHELA does not act in the best interest of the borrowers we serve as a federal contractor is simply not true. MOHELA's priority has always been on helping the student borrowers that we are here to serve while they navigate the often complex and overwhelming federal repayment process, and that is what we remain proudly committed to doing." Ryan told Newsweek: "People don't like change, transfers create friction. Autopay can break. Due dates can slip. Payment counts for PSLF/IDR can display wrong, even if they're later corrected." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "The reasoning behind this move is still unclear, but it's important to understand this isn't solely a bad thing. Given the recent slew of changes to student loans at the federal level, borrowers may take this news with concern. However, there are many borrowers who have had poor experiences with MOHELA, citing poor customer service as the primary reason." What Happens Next Borrowers who may undergo student loan servicing transfers are urged to monitor any changes and make sure their contact details with both their loan servicer and are up to date. "Transfers are rarely smooth. If the records at the current servicer are inaccurate, then the receiving servicer will be working off bad information from the start. The more times loans change hands, the greater the chance of errors," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. "That's why it's critical for borrowers to keep their own documentation- PDFs or hard copies- of statements, balances, and interest calculations. If there's a discrepancy down the line, you'll have what you need to push back and ensure your loan data is accurate." Ryan echoed this sentiment. "A better borrower experience is possible, but only if data quality becomes the metric that pays," Ryan said. "Otherwise, they'll just play musical chairs with your loan file."
NBC News
11 minutes ago
- NBC News
New York appeals court throws out Trump's $500 million fraud judgment
A New York appeals court on Thursday dismissed a $500 million civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump and his companies for routinely over-valuing their properties in financial statements. Some judges of the state Appellate Division's First Department agreed that Trump and his companies had engaged in fraud, but agreed with their colleagues the award was an "excessive fine." "[W]hile harm certainly occurred, it was not the cataclysmic harm that can justify a nearly half billion-dollar award to the State," two of the judges wrote. Eric Trump celebrated the ruling in a phone interview with NBC News. "This is the biggest victory in the world. We always knew this was going to happen. The case is totally won and it's a big day for us,' the president's son said. A spokesperson for the New York A.G.'s office did not immediately comment. The 323-page ruling by the mid-level appeals court is comprised of three separate opinions from the five judges on the panel, and showed they were deeply divided. Two of the judges were in favor of upholding the fraud finding but dismissing the financial penalties, two of the judges were in favor of ordering a new trial, and one of the judges would have dismissed the case. Some members of the panel had expressed concern with the size of the judgment at a hearing on the appeal in September of last year, with one calling it 'troubling.' Trump's attorneys had contended he shouldn't have to pay anything in damages, and that the businesses he was accused of defrauding were ' delighted with these transactions' and 'benefited enormously' from them. They faulted the judge for not relying on their client's expertise in valuing properties, and alleged that some of the discrepancies the judge pointed to were outside of the statute of limitations for the case and should not be used. The mid-level appeals court ruling can be challenged at the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. Judge Arthur Engoron handed down his judgment against Trump in early 2024 after finding he and his companies had engaged in 'repeated and persistent fraud.' The award came after a months-long trial that included testimony from the then-former and now current president. The case centered on allegations from New York Attorney General Letitia James' office that Trump lied to banks and insurers by both overvaluing and undervaluing his assets when it was to his benefit ,exaggerating his net worth to the tune of billions of dollars. The scheme enabled Trump to obtain bank loans and insurance policies at rates that he otherwise wouldn't have been entitled to, and as a result he 'reaped hundreds of millions of dollars in ill-gotten gains,' James' office said. Trump maintained his financial statements were conservative, and he repeatedly alleged the Democratic attorney general's case was politically motivated. Engoron summarized Trump's defense as claiming that 'the documents do not say what they say; that there is no such thing as 'objective' value; and that, essentially, the Court should not believe its own eyes.' He also chided Trump and his companies for not taking any responsibility for their actions. 'Their complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological," Engoron wrote in his decision on the case. "They are accused only of inflating asset values to make more money. The documents prove this over and over again. This is a venial sin, not a mortal sin. Defendants did not commit murder or arson. They did not rob a bank at gunpoint. Donald Trump is not Bernard Madoff. Yet, defendants are incapable of admitting the error of their ways.' The award was initially entered as a $464 million judgment, but it has continued to grow in the months since because of interest. Trump is responsible for the vast majority of the judgment, and the amount he'd been ordered to pay has been increasing by over $100,000 a day. By mid-June, Trump was on the hook for $507 million while his co-defendants owed over $11 million. To secure the judgment while he appealed, Trump had been expected to have to post a bond for about $550 million — the full amount of the judgment plus interest. Trump's attorneys argued that coming up with that much cash was a 'practical impossibility,' and the Appellate Division reduced the size of the bond to $175 million. Trump posted the bond in March of last year. Trump is also appealing two other judgments totaling about $90 million after writer E. Jean Carroll successfully sued him for allegedly sexually abusing and defaming her. Trump has denied the allegations in both of her lawsuits.
