African state accuses Western powers of destabilization campaign
Niger's interim president, Abdourahamane Tchiani, has accused Western powers, particularly France, of fueling terrorist violence in the African country in an attempt to impose a 'new model of governance' against the will of the Nigerien people.
In an interview with state broadcaster RTN over the weekend, General Tchiani claimed that 'several plots' have been launched against Niger from neighboring countries, including Nigeria and Benin, with the backing of Western governments expelled after the July 2023 military takeover.
He said Western-backed operatives have held meetings in Nigeria and the Lake Chad Basin to coordinate efforts, including smuggling weapons to terrorist groups.
'France has used several means to destabilize us… France has also infiltrated all the movements that were initially called independentist movements, then, the jihadist movement, and finally, terrorist movements,' he stated.
He said Paris has established 'French cells' in the region, one led by Jean-Marie Bockel, President Emmanuel Macron's personal envoy for Africa, tasked with countering 'Sahelian influence.'
According to Tchiani, the so-called 'Sahel cell of the Elysee' is mobilizing the French secret service (DGSE), diplomats, and the Francophonie agency, backed by 'unlimited funds,' to carry out all 'subversive operations' aimed at destabilizing the Alliance of Sahel States (AES).
'This Sahel cell will also have a mission to do everything by all means to demonize the relations between the states of the [AES] and the Federation of Russia,' he added.
The Nigerien leader made similar accusations in December, alleging that France was funding militants operating in Nigeria's Sokoto, Zamfara, and Kebbi states, as well as in Benin, to undermine Niger's sovereignty. He accused former Nigerian intelligence chief Ahmed Abubakar Rufai of supporting the groups with training and equipment.
In January, Nigerien Interior Minister Mohamed Toumba also accused France of using 'Trojan horses' to weaken the military government in Niamey. Toumba warned of subversive tactics and claimed French military cooperation had left the country in 'desolation.'
The accusations come amid heightened regional tensions and a wave of anti-French sentiment across the Sahel, which has been devastated by more than a decade of deadly jihadist insurgency. Niger, along with its AES allies – Mali and Burkina Faso – has cut ties with Paris and expelled French troops, accusing the former colonial power of prolonging instability under the pretense of counterterrorism.
On Saturday, Tchiani claimed that Nigeria is providing logistical support to French troops expelled from Niger. Abuja has previously denied the allegations.
Russia, which Niamey, Bamako, and Ouagadougou have turned to for security cooperation in recent months, has echoed similar claims that certain Western states are attempting to undermine the troubled Sahel region. Last week, Russian Foreign Ministry official Tatyana Dovgalenko accused Ukraine of funneling Western-supplied weapons to militants operating across Africa and training terrorist networks in the Sahel as part of 'systematic efforts to destabilize the continent.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Kiev regime ‘not interested in peace,' turning to terror, suffering ‘huge losses' on battlefield: Key points from Putin's speech
Russian President Vladimir Putin has accused Ukraine's leadership of carrying out terrorist attacks on Russian territory in order to derail peace efforts, which he said threaten the Kiev regime's grip on power. Speaking at a government meeting on Wednesday, Putin said the recent sabotage of railway infrastructure in Russia's Bryansk and Kursk Regions was a deliberate strike on civilians intended to disrupt the negotiations. Kiev's backers have become 'accomplices to terrorists' Putin said the attacks were the result of decisions made by Ukraine's top political leadership, calling them 'undoubtedly a terrorist act.' 'This only confirms our concern that the already illegitimate regime in Kiev, which once seized power, is gradually turning into a terrorist organization, and its sponsors are becoming accomplices to terrorists,' he said. The two incidents occurred on Saturday evening and Sunday morning. In Bryansk Region, a bridge collapsed in front of a moving passenger train. In Kursk Region, a freight train derailed when a railway bridge gave way. In total, seven people died and over 120 were injured. 'Under all international norms, such actions are called terrorism,' Putin said. Ukraine's battlefield losses The Russian president accused Kiev and its Western backers of previously aiming to inflict a strategic defeat of Russia on the battlefield. Now, he said, the country's leadership is shifting tactics amid mounting losses and as Ukrainian forces retreat along the front line. 'Today, amid heavy losses and retreating along the entire line of contact, the Kiev leadership has turned to organizing terrorist acts in an attempt to intimidate Russia,' Putin said. He questioned the competence of Ukraine's leadership, under whose orders the Ukrainian armed forces have suffered 'senseless and enormous losses' – including during their now-repulsed incursion in Kursk Region – and continue to face defeat on the battlefield. 'What kind of authority can the leaders of a thoroughly rotten and completely corrupt regime possess?' Putin added. Deliberate strikes to disrupt talks Putin called Kiev's railway sabotage an 'intentional strike on the [Russian] civilian population.' He said the 'crimes' committed against Russian civilians – including women and children – were timed to disrupt the peace process. Both attacks came shortly before the second round of Russia-Ukraine talks in Istanbul and amid a surge in Kiev's drone raids into Russia, which Moscow says are aimed at derailing attempts to reach a settlement in the conflict. Speaking about Kiev's apparent attempts to undermine the peace efforts, Putin noted that Ukrainian officials simultaneously requested a ceasefire lasting 30 to 60 days, along with a top-level meeting. 'But how can such meetings be held under these conditions?' he said. 'What is there to talk about? Who conducts negotiations with those who rely on terror – with terrorists?' He warned that any pause would only allow the Ukrainian forces to regroup, receive more Western arms, and prepare for renewed hostilities. Kiev regime not interested in peace Ukraine has repeatedly rejected Russia's proposals for a short-term ceasefire on humanitarian grounds, Putin said. 'It does not surprise us and only convinces us further that today's Kiev regime does not want peace at all,' he stated. 'For them, peace most likely means a loss of power.' Putin emphasized that 'power, for the [Kiev] regime, is apparently more important than peace, more important than human lives.' Kiev's lack of political culture Putin also accused the Ukrainian leadership of lacking basic political culture, pointing to recent public remarks. This week, Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky referred to Russia's negotiators as 'idiots' after Moscow proposed a brief truce to recover fallen soldiers' bodies. 'Apparently, we are dealing with people who not only have no real competence in anything but also lack even a basic political culture if they allow themselves to make certain statements – including direct insults – against those they claim to want to negotiate with,' Putin said.
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
Top French robotics firm goes into liquidation
Aldebaran, a French company that blazed the trail in the field of 'empathetic' humanoid robots in the late 2000s, has been put into liquidation, local media has reported. The tech pioneer was placed into bankruptcy proceedings in January, and then in receivership the following month. On Monday, the receiver, along with the auctioneer, announced the 'immediate cessation of activity' and termination of their contracts to the company's remaining 106 employees, according to Othman Meslouh, deputy secretary of Aldebaran's social and economic committee (CSE). The Paris Commercial Court passed the verdict earlier in the day. The receiver is now expected to start selling off the company's profitable assets, including its patents, to settle Aldebaran's outstanding debts that have exceeded €60 million ($68 million). In recent months, two takeover contenders, Franco-Swiss businessman Jean-Marie Van Appelghem and Canadian investor Malik Bachouchi, had made bids for the company. However, the former's overture was not backed by the receiver and Aldebaran's management, while the latter was rejected by the court, as Bachouchi earlier told Le Monde. From 2012 to 2022 – considered the company's heyday – it was owned by Japan's Softbank Robotics Group. Some time after it was acquired by the German company United Robotics Group (URG), a subsidiary of the RAG-Stiftung, the situation began to deteriorate, according to Meslouh. He told AFP that the new owner 'no longer wanted to invest in the company.' This claim was echoed by another anonymous employee cited by Le Monde, who said URG 'asked us to be profitable within two years' even though development 'cycles take five to seven years.' The unnamed engineer also lamented that the owner had underinvested in Aldebaran's research and development. In the late 2000s, the company rolled out Nao, its first humanoid robot, touted as a 'versatile educational companion, widely used in classrooms and research labs for its ability to teach programming, foster social learning, and support research projects.' The model was followed by Plato, designed to support healthcare and hospitality environments, and Pepper, capable of recognizing and responding to human emotions and specifically tailored for customer-facing roles. According to the company's website, its robots have found application in more than 70 countries over the years. However, the total number of units sold was a mere 30,000, L'Express estimated.
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
As India and Pakistan eye each other, this superpower eyes the whole map
The recent terrorist attack in India's Pahalgam on April 22, 2025, which originated in Pakistan and resulted in the death of 26, mostly Hindu, civilians, has triggered another wave of heightened tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad. While public discourse has focused on terrorism and hostilities between the two nuclear-powered nations, a deeper analysis reveals the unmistakable imprint of another key actor – China's strategic calculus in the region. The relationship between Islamabad and New Delhi has evolved significantly in recent decades. Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar travelled to Beijing days after the military standoff with Delhi and met his counterpart Wang Yi. The Chinese Foreign Minister called Pakistan an 'iron-clad friend' and 'all-weather strategic partner.' China is pursuing a strategy that aligns with its regional interests — including economic engagement, defense cooperation, and influence-building. This strategy, logically, includes efforts to slow down India's rise. Pahalgam incident thus cannot be seen an isolated terrorist attack, but as a signal within a larger geostrategic landscape that is shaping Asia's future. The flareup in South Asia has come at a time of major geopolitical developments. With the mass shift of Western companies like Apple away from China to India, India is poised to become the next big manufacturing hub. As global businesses explore alternatives to rising operational costs and geopolitical uncertainties in China, India is increasingly seen as a competitive option. Additionally, the proposed US tariffs may add pressure to China's manufacturing sector, which is already adapting to evolving global supply chains. For the strongman leader, Xi Jinping, sustaining economic growth and employment remains a top priority. Any escalation involving India could introduce uncertainty that might affect investor sentiment and infrastructure momentum. Regional instability could redirect global attention away from India's growth narrative toward internal and border-related concerns. China's close political, economic and defence ties with Pakistan – an economically vulnerable partner – gives Beijing a certain level of influence on the way Islamabad deals with India. New Delhi was compelled to act militarily, risking escalation and economic fallout. To India's credit, it managed to negotiate a ceasefire after achieving its key objectives of affecting 11 Pakistani air bases and nine terrorist camps and other strategic terrorist infrastructures against the popular sentiment against de-escalation. Pakistan has been struggling with near to bankruptcy. Its foreign exchange reserves have fallen to $4.3bn, its lowest levels since February 2014. Despite a $2.4 billion bailout from the IMF – approved on May 9, when Islamabad and New Delhi were firing missiles at each other – the Pakistani economy is still in tatters. China's offer of financial and military aid to Islamabad at such times comes in more than handy. China's support for Pakistan is not circumstantial. It is also institutional and deeply entrenched. Between 2014 to 2024, China sold over $9 billion worth of advanced weaponry to Pakistan, accounting for around 80% of imported weapons, including J-10CE fighter jets, Wing Loong drones, LY-80 air defence systems, and naval assets. The operational use of these systems in the recent conflict, including Pakistani claims of downing Rafales using Chinese PL-15 missiles, has allowed Beijing to showcase its weapons systems in live combat. Beyond India, China's motivation also ties into its long-term strategic objectives in the Persian Gulf. Pakistan provides China access to the Arabian Sea via Gwadar port, a linchpin in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and part of the broader Belt and Road Initiative. This maritime access offers China two significant advantages: a strategic military presence near key Middle Eastern shipping lanes and an alternative route for oil imports in case of a US-China maritime standoff in the South China Sea. China's defence industry is another big beneficiary of the escalation. Claims by the Pakistan Air Force that Chinese-made jets outmanoeuvred India's French-built Rafales, regardless of their authenticity, have created a nationalist fervour in Chinese social media and boosted investor confidence. Stocks in Chinese defence manufacturers surged as hashtags like 'J-10 shot down Indian warplanes' trended online, and praise for the PL-15 missile system flooded Weibo. Indeed, Beijing wants to use this as an inflexion point for its arms export ambitions. With Western suppliers often constrained by political alignments or human rights concerns, China's relatively unrestricted military exports offer an attractive alternative, especially in conflict-prone or authoritarian regimes across Africa, the Middle East, and parts of Asia. A perceived successful battlefield performance strengthens China's pitch as a reliable arms supplier. From shaping regional dynamics to advancing its defense exports and maintaining strategic interests in West Asia, China may perceive certain advantages in the current situation in the region. While the Pahalgam attack was carried out by terrorist actors, it may also reflect broader regional undercurrents in which multiple stakeholders play complex and calculated roles. Through India-Pakistan rivalry, China is executing a proxy strategy that would halt India's rise, safeguard its own economic interests and bolster its defence exports and regional clout. Beijing has much to gain and little to lose from this rivalry — as long as it stays just below the threshold of full-scale war.
