logo
With US Sen. Dick Durbin retiring, Illinois' tradition of upstate-downstate senators is in peril

With US Sen. Dick Durbin retiring, Illinois' tradition of upstate-downstate senators is in peril

Chicago Tribune27-04-2025

Ever since Illinois voters gained the right to directly elect their U.S. senators in 1913, they have largely embraced — whether by choice or chance — an unofficial tradition of splitting the state's two Senate seats geographically with one coming from the Chicago area and the other from downstate, regardless of party.
For the past 28 years, it has been Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin of Springfield who has served as the downstate senator alongside a string of Chicago-area counterparts: Democrat Carol Moseley Braun of Chicago, Republican Sen. Peter Fitzgerald of Inverness, Democratic senator and future President Barack Obama of Chicago, appointed Democratic Sen. Roland Burris of Chicago, Republican Sen. Mark Kirk of Highland Park and current Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworth of northwest suburban Hoffman Estates.
But with Durbin's announcement Wednesday that he will retire following the 2026 election, the issue of geographic balance of Illinois' Senate representation appears to be at serious risk of coming to an end, at least based on the candidates that so far have shown interest in succeeding him. If that remains the case, it could further the cultural, political and ideological divide between upstate and downstate Illinois.
'I'm very concerned about that,' said Robin Johnson, a governmental relations, public policy and political consultant who also is an adjunct professor of political science at Monmouth College in far west-central Illinois.
'Durbin's staff was very responsive and understood the needs of downstate Illinois. That's important, that you didn't have to explain things to them. They understood,' he said. 'And I just worry, and I think a lot of people are, based on the conversations I'm having, worried that we're going to lose that.'
A day after announcing he would retire at the end of his term, Durbin acknowledged to reporters outside his Springfield home that as a downstate Democrat, he was 'kind of a vanishing breed,' a reflection of the political evolution of the region that has grown staunchly Republican due i n part to the loss of union coal mine and manufacturing jobs over the decades.
'My message to everyone interested in running for office statewide: Run in the entire state from one corner to the next. Don't assume a damn thing. These are voters who want to hear from you and want to know if you're going to make their lives any better,' the 80-year-old senator said.
Saying he was not concerned about downstate getting shortchanged by a Chicago-area successor, Durbin said, 'I think the person who is successful in running for this office is going to understand that they've got to not only represent the entire state, they've got to work the entire state.'
Among the list of Democratic contenders interested in Durbin's seat are Lt. Gov Juliana Stratton of Chicago, who has formally announced her candidacy, U.S. Reps. Raja Krishnamoorthi of Schaumburg, Robin Kelly of Matteson, Lauren Underwood of Naperville and state Treasurer Michael Frerichs of Chicago.
Some have downstate connections. Stratton's office leads the governor's Rural Affairs Council. The five-term Krishnamoorthi was raised in Peoria. Kelly, in her 12th year in Congress, got her bachelor's and master's degree at Bradley University in Peoria and her congressional district stretches from Chicago to Danville. Frerichs, who held Champaign County office before being elected to the legislature and then three terms as treasurer, had lived in Champaign until moving to Chicago not long ago.
'They've all got little boxes they can check,' Johnson said. 'The bottom line is going to be, how well do they really understand the needs down here and come down and be able to really understand it, other than just checking a box.'
Though he did not announce his candidacy last week, Krishnamoorthi appeared Thursday at a wholesale food distributor in Chicago's New City neighborhood where he addressed the geographic tradition by touting his downstate personal history.
'I think that we need a senator for sure who is going to fight for every region of the state. I happen to be from Peoria, I'm a son of downstate, so I have deep roots and ties to Peoria and central Illinois and downstate Illinois,' he said. 'I think that it's important that we, at the same time, deal with the issues that affect the Chicago area, that we remember that the rest of the state needs an essential voice wherever the person, he or she, is fighting for their values.'
Republican U.S. Rep. Darin LaHood of Peoria, who has served 10 years in the House, has acknowledged considering a Senate bid and would be a bona fide downstate candidate.
But there are questions about whether LaHood would give up a solid GOP congressional seat and how an ally of President Donald Trump would fare in the increasingly Democratic and vote-rich Chicago area, concerns amplified in an off-presidential year election that normally favors out-of-power candidates.
Illinois' history is replete with examples of the downstate-upstate Senate split. In the 1940s, there was powerful downstate Democratic Sen. Scott Lucas from Mason County, who served with Chicago Republican C. Wayland Brooks and Democrat James Slattery. In the 1950s and 1960s, there was liberal University of Chicago economist Paul Douglas and Senate Republican leader Everett McKinley Dirksen of Pekin.
Douglas' successor, Republican Sen. Charles Percy of Kenilworth, served with Democratic Sen. Alan J. Dixon of Belleville in the early 1980s. Percy's successor, Democratic Sen. Paul Simon of Makanda in southern Illinois, served with Dixon and then Moseley Braun in the early to mid-1990s.
John Jackson, visiting professor at the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University, said he thought it was 'highly likely' the next senator would come from the Chicago area. But he also said it pointed to how politically polarized the state has become.
'While the Democrats do extremely well statewide, it is also extremely narrow in its geographical base that they're able to do that well. And of course, northeastern Illinois is the key to that,' Jackson said of the vast political split between the Chicago metropolitan area and the rest of the state. Jackson also said the upstate-downstate splitting of Senate seats was more representative of a time when 'downstate was a bigger part of the equation' in statewide elections.
Durbin, who succeeded Simon after the senator's retirement in 1997, was successful as a downstate politician in embracing the entirety of Illinois and its needs. He helped deliver billions of dollars in federal assistance, ranging from O'Hare International Airport to a massive rail relocation project in Springfield as well as helping to deliver grants to health care initiatives in both the city and rural areas.
'Dick Durbin has an office in the Paul Simon federal office building in downtown Carbondale, and he has had it the whole time, and that symbolic presence is worth a lot,' Jackson said.
'Just be sensitive to those things and help downstate Democrats not get shut out,' he said in offering a downstate strategy for the potential Democratic Senate candidates. 'It seems to me, and it is clear to anyone, we're one big state. We're not going to let anybody secede. And so let's start talking about things that unify us.'
Johnson said the candidates will have to 'put together a message based on what's really going on down here, and understand people's lives as they exist and not as what pundits, consultants say they do through polls and social media. It's coming down here and spending some time.'
But can the state's geographic political divide be bridged?
'You're one good leader away from making it happen, somebody that can speak to how the state is really tied together, our fortunes are tied together, and we don't get there by threatening to secede and go to Indiana or Iowa,' Johnson said. 'We get there by taking an honest appraisal of what interests we've got in common. And I think that's the challenge before candidates running for the Senate from both parties.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Secret Service Followed Protocol in Padilla Incident
Secret Service Followed Protocol in Padilla Incident

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Secret Service Followed Protocol in Padilla Incident

California Sen. Alex Padilla is getting plenty of mileage out of his scuffle with the Secret Service and federal authorities in Los Angeles Thursday. Padillas Senate and campaign accounts posted a total of seven outraged videos in the first 24 hours after the altercation. Viral videos of the incident show a Secret Service agent dragging a fuming Padilla out of a press conference with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and he identifies himself as a senator only as hes being pushed out the door. The agent then forces Padilla to the ground, while two agents handcuff him. Padilla, however, wasnt arrested. Within the hour, agents released him with no charges. Dozens of Democratic members of Congress then jumped to Padillas defense, denouncing the action while casting the Secret Service and FBI agents involved as an extension of what they labeled as President Trumps totalitarian police state. Sen. Schumer called the Secret Services use of force "cruel and unacceptable." "This was a deliberate attempt to intimidate an elected official whose only offense is standing up for the voiceless," Schumer said. "But its not just about Sen. Padilla, its about every person who dares to speak truth to power." Republicans and conservative commentators countered that it was all a big publicity stunt and noted that a Padilla staffer filmed the tussle and then quickly distributed it to the media in the room. "Sen. Padilla didnt want answers - he wanted airtime," Rep. Byron Donalds said on Fox News Thursday night. "Shoving past security for a viral moment is a stunt, not leadership. If he cared about solutions, hed have asked for a meeting. But like most Democrats, he just wants the spotlight." "Alex Padilla is an embarrassment to California," said Steve Hilton, who is running for governor in California as a Republican. "Hes a complete nonentity. Thats why they didnt recognize him … [he has] zero accomplishments and now this pathetic stunt as his only claim to fame." Yet, one Republican, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, an ardent Trump critic, condemned Padillas treatment as "shocking at every level" and "not the America I know." Secret Service experts argue nothing could be further from the truth - that the agent was simply following normal protocol. Padilla, they said, actually received preferential treatment by not being arrested and jailed for his menacing display. The Secret Service agent warned Padilla, whom agents did not recognize as a senator and who wasnt wearing his Senate pin, to back away from Noem and then forcibly removed him when he ignored their entreaties. "They can represent this however they want, but those agents made the right decision to get him out of the room," Charles Marino, a former Secret Service agent told RealClearPolitics. "He did not have a congressional pin on, he was yelling and closing distance very quickly to make it to the front of the room to confront Noem." "Look, hes not above the law. Anyone taking those actions would been treated far worse - they would have been arrested and been forced to spend some time in jail," Marino said. "Who was escalating the situation? When you look at Padillas action, taken in totality, the agents had no other choice." Instead of dragging him to a cell, federal agents released the senator after the incident. Then Noem met with Padilla for 15 minutes and gave him her cell phone number to discuss matters further. "We probably disagree on 90% of the topics, but we agreed to exchange phone numbers and continue to talk - that is the way it should be in this country," Noem told Fox News Thursday afternoon. The Homeland Security Department issued a statement Thursday defending the federal agents actions, arguing that Padilla chose "disrespectful political theater" over constructive congressional oversight. Padilla, the agency said, "interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on as he lunged toward Secretary Noem." "Mr. Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers repeated commands," the department added. "@Secret Service thought he was an attacker and officers acted appropriately." Several other Secret Service sources backed up Marinos account. "Any sudden movement towards a protectee that feels threatening, especially when that person has not been identified, the policy is 100% to prevent further escalation or movement toward Noem," said a source in the Secret Service community. "We would have done the same thing for anyone threatening [former DHS Secretary] Mayorkas." Even though the situation escalated very quickly, the agent still followed the basic rules of engagement for law enforcement, the source asserted. Agents and officers first ask a person to move away from the protectee, then they tell them firmly to move away, and if those warnings arent abided, then they can use physical force to move the threatening person away. "Its a pretty common law enforcement way of relaying information and taking action, because emotions can get the best of people, and agents are forced to err on the side of protection," the source added. After the two assassination attempts against Trump, agents are highly attuned to aggressive behavior and working to ensure theyre not involved in any security lapses. "In this day and age, you can see what a split-second hesitate could result in," one former agent remarked. "Could you imagine if the agent didnt respond, and Padilla got on the stage and hit [Noem]?" The agency has been knocked around for months for the egregious security failures in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13 and then nearly two months later during another close call against Trump at his West Palm Beach golf course. And just because its Padilla who was attending a press conference doesnt mean assaults against a Cabinet secretary or president are unlikely to occur. During a December 2008 press conference in Iraq, an Iraqi journalist threw both of his shoes at former President George W. Bush in a pique of outrage. Secret Service agents with their zero-fail mission have to be poised to respond to all types of unexpected threats, which sometimes come with no warning at all. Back in 2005, during Bushs visit to the country of Georgia, a man attempted to assassinate Bush and then-Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili by throwing a hand grenade at both of them. "Listen, we dont always know who you are if youre not wearing your [congressional] pin," the source said. "Youre coming at [Noem] in an aggressive manner, and you didnt heed our warnings to stop. If you get into the buffer zone, we have to take you down. All public officials should know, and I would hope understand, that." Susan Crabtree is RealClearPolitics' national political correspondent.

Senator Nicole Mitchell's trial for 2024 burglary charge starts Monday
Senator Nicole Mitchell's trial for 2024 burglary charge starts Monday

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senator Nicole Mitchell's trial for 2024 burglary charge starts Monday

The Brief Minnesota Senator Nicole Mitchell's trial for a burglary charge starts Monday morning in Becker County. Mitchell, a DFL lawmaker representing Woodbury, is accused of breaking into her stepmother's home in Detroit Lakes in April of 2024. She said her father had just died, and wanted some of his personal belongings her stepmother wouldn't give her. Mitchell was supposed to go to trial in January, but it got pushed back so she could finish her work with the Minnesota Legislature. BECKER CO., Minn. (FOX 9) - A Minnesota senator accused of breaking into her stepmother's Detroit Lakes home in April 2024 heads to trial on Monday. What we know Nicole Mitchell, a DFL Senator who represents Woodbury, pleaded not guilty to one count of burglary after she was arrested inside her stepmother's Detroit Lakes home back in April 2024. On Feb. 6. 2025, an additional charge for possession of burglary or theft tools was added. Mitchell was originally scheduled for trial in January, but got it pushed back so she could finish out the legislative session. That ended earlier this week in a special session. The trial starts Monday morning at 8:30 a.m. in Becker County, and cameras are being allowed in the courtroom. That means you can see daily clips of the trial on and on FOX 9's YouTube page. Timeline A criminal complaint states Detroit Lakes police responded to a reported burglary at a home around 4:45 a.m. on April 22, 2024. At the scene, police found Mitchell in the home's basement dressed in all black. Officers say they also found a flashlight covered with a black sock on Mitchell. Officers searched for a black backpack that was stuck in a window at the scene and recovered two laptops, a cellphone, a driver's license, Senate identification and miscellaneous Tupperware, according to the complaint. Mitchell reportedly told investigators she was "just trying to get some of my dad's things" and added "clearly, I'm not good at this." The complaint states that Mitchell explained to police that her father had just died, and she wanted sentimental items her stepmother refused to give to her. Mitchell said those include her father's ashes, pictures, clothes and other sentimental items. What they're saying In May of 2024, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and democratic leaders called for Mitchell to resign after she was charged with the burglary. She appeared before the Senate's Ethical Conduct Subcommittee in May of 2024 as members considered whether the lawmaker adhered to the highest standards of ethical conduct required of a state senator. However, she refused to answer questions and invoked her 5th Amendment rights. While Democrats have previously argued to allow for due process before taking action, the Minnesota DFL Chairman Ken Martin released a statement Thursday morning calling for her resignation. "The Minnesota DFL believes that all elected officials should be held accountable, including members of our own party. While Sen. Mitchell is entitled to her day in court, her continued refusal to take responsibility for her actions is beneath her office and has become a distraction for her district and the Legislature. Now that her constituents have had full representation through the end of the legislative session, it is time for her to resign to focus on the personal and legal challenges she faces," said Martin.

Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest
Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest

A new national poll indicates that Americans are divided over President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard and U.S. Marines to the nation's second most populous city. Aiming to extinguish escalating protests in Los Angeles sparked by immigration raids carried out by ICE at his administration's direction, Trump sent in National Guard troops and even mobilized Marines. The unrest and the moves by the president have dominated national headlines for a week. Forty-one percent of adults nationwide questioned in a Washington Post/George Mason University Schar School poll said they support the president's move, with 44% opposed and 15% unsure. The survey was conducted on Tuesday and questioned over 1,000 adults nationwide, including roughly 200 in blue-state California. First On Fox: Immigrant Voters Abandon Democrats On Immigration Issue Support for the president's actions among the California respondents stood at 32%, with 58% opposed. Read On The Fox News App The poll also highlighted an expected massive partisan divide. Click Here For The Latest Fox News Polling Eight-six percent of Republicans surveyed supported the president's deployment of the National Guard and Marines to the streets of LA, with more than three-quarters of Democrats giving a thumbs down on Trump's move. A third of independents approved of the sending of the troops, with nearly half opposed and nearly one in five unsure. Trump took control of California's National Guard without the permission of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, the first time in 60 years that a president has federalized National Guard troops without a governor's request. Newsom, leading the resistance to Trump's moves, took legal action to try and reverse the order. Trump Deployment Of Troops To Quell La Rioters Latest Page In President's Political Playbook A federal district court judge this week ruled that Trump's moves were illegal and ordered him to return control of the National Guard troops to Newsom. But a federal appeals court quickly temporarily blocked the lower court judge's ruling. The survey also indicates Americans are divided over whether they support (39%) or oppose (40%) the protests. Just over one in five (21%) were unsure of their support or opposition. Seventy percent of Democrats — but just 39% of independents and only 6% of Republicans — support the aims of the protesters. According to the poll, Americans are also divided over whether the protests have been mostly peaceful (35%) or mostly violent (37%).Original article source: Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store