Untouchability is being practised in the country in myriad ways, says Madras High Court
Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy denounced caste system and wrote: 'In this country, untouchability is practised in various ways. Not accepting the donation from a person perceived to be an inferior human being is another form.' The judge made the observations while disposing of a writ petition filed by Ela Pandiyarajan of Ambedkar Makkal Neethi Iyakkam against the management of Kamatchi Amman Udanurai Tirunageswarar Temple at Kunrathur in Chennai.
The petitioner had complained of the temple administration permitting only those belonging to Senguntha Mudaliyar caste to be the Ubayadarar (donors) for the Brahmotsavam (annual festival) and not accepting donations from others. He questioned the propriety behind such a discrimination despite the temple falling under the control of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) Department and contended that it was against the fundamental right to equality.
After recording his submissions, Justice Chakravarthy recalled one of his recent judgements wherein he had observed that caste was a social evil, and a casteless society, the goal envisaged by the framers of the Constitution. 'In view thereof, if a person belonging to a Scheduled Caste community is not permitted to be the Ubayadarar in a temple, then, that would also be a violation of Article 17 (abolishment of untouchability) of the Constitution,' the judge observed.
He directed the HR&CE department to dispose of a representation made by the writ petitioner for accepting donations from all willing donors, and said that the department's decision would apply to all festivals in the future and not just to this year's festival.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Emergency by Indira was undemocratic: Joshi
Dharwad: Union minister Pralhad Joshi said the 50th year of the dark days of Emergency in India is being observed throughout the country to inform the younger generation about how the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi imposed the Emergency and ruled for 21 months without constitutional and moral authority. Speaking at the Viksit Bharat Sankalp Sabha and the inauguration of the 50th year of remembrance of the struggle during the Emergency, organised by the BJP at Karnataka Vidyavardhaka Sangha here, he said Emergency was imposed on June 25, 1975 and during that time, protests were suppressed, many protesters including all the leaders of opposition parties were imprisoned, and several people lost their lives, he explained. "Indira Gandhi was accused of misusing her power during the elections by Raj Narain, who took the matter to court. Justice HR Khanna of the Allahabad High Court had delivered the verdict in favour of Raj Narain and had declared Indira's election null and void. That judgement copy is not available anymore," he added. "Jawaharlal Nehru made the first constitutional amendment. Later, Indira Gandhi made several amendments including to Articles 38, 39, and 42. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ford&Go. Extra Bonus di € 1.500 e prima rata a ottobre. Ford Italia Scopri di più Undo After imposing the Emergency and causing hardships to the people, the Congress is now claiming that the Constitution is in danger. They are lecturing the nation while keeping the copy of the Constitution in their pockets," he remarked. Joshi stated that under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the country has developed immensely in the last 11 years. India has now emerged as the fourth largest economic power in the world, he claimed. Retired judge SH Mittalkod presided over the function. Mayor Jyoti Patil, former MLAs Amrut Desai, Seema Masuti, Lakshman Uppar, Sanjay Kapatkar, Vijayanand Shetty, Shankar Kumbi, Shankar Shelke, Raju Topannavar and others were present.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Mizoram: Governor's rule imposed in Chakma Autonomous District Council
AIZAWL: Mizoram Governor V K Singh on Monday imposed governor's rule in the Chakma Autonomous District Council (CADC) following prolonged political instability and frequent leadership changes. Mizoram Governor General (retired) VK Singh. (File Photo) A notification issued by the Department of District Council and Minority Affairs stated that the Governor has, under constitutional provisions, assumed all powers and functions vested in or exercisable by the CADC. The move follows the ousting of chief executive member (CEM) Molin Kumar Chakma through a no-confidence motion on June 16. Subsequently, Lakkhan Chakma staked claim to become the third CEM of the 11th CADC, backed by eight BJP members who defected to the ruling Zoram People's Movement (ZPM) on June 2. The notification cited 'constant political instability' as a key reason behind the decision, stating that such a situation is 'extremely detrimental for the CADC' and contrary to the objectives of the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, which mandates effective administration of tribal areas. The Governor has authorised the deputy commissioner of Lawngtlai district to exercise the council's powers on his behalf with immediate effect, for a period of six months or until further orders.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Asaduddin Owaisi meets poll panel, raises concerns over Bihar roll revision
AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi met the Election Commission of India Monday and raised concerns over the Special Intensive Revision being carried out in Bihar. He told the panel the exercise was being carried out without consultations with political parties and that it was also a violation of Article 14 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to equality. 'The first point we made was that political parties were not consulted for the SIR being conducted,' Owaisi told reporters after his meeting at Nirvachan Sadan. 'We have asked the EC why they don't consider the 2024 voter list as the qualifying one. We have voted in 2024, and now, in 2025, you are asking for documents… You are creating two classes of voters which is a violation of Article 14. You can't give a reasonable justification.' In a statement, the EC said that CEC Gyanesh Kumar and Election Commissioner Vivek Joshi had an interaction with an AIMIM delegation led by Owaisi and received their suggestions. Flagging concerns he shared with the poll panel, Owaisi told reporters the SIR exercise was being conducted in a very short span of time: 'If someone's name is removed from the voter list, it's not just about losing the right to vote, it affects their livelihood as well.' 'Our main concern is how the Election Commission plans to carry out such an exercise in such a short time. This will directly impact the people. We have presented these issues to the Election Commission, emphasising the practical challenges and the potential hardship it could cause for citizens,' he said. 'There is migration too. Those who change their address. You are asking for birth certificates,' Owaisi said. 'If in a hurry, if names of 15-20 per cent are missed. Then, it will become a citizenship issue. It will be like Assam D-voter (Doubtful voter). This is an apprehension and it is genuine.'
