Politicians seem reluctant to take necessary action over sea level rise
There seems to be an inability among politicians to take in what scientists are telling us about the consequences of the climate crisis. Perhaps the most glaring example relates to the Guardian's latest report on sea level rise, which said that whatever we do now, the rise will have devastating consequences for coastal communities, causing millions of people to migrate to higher ground. Greenland and the west Antarctic ice caps are doomed to melt.
Even in countries that do take cutting carbon emissions seriously, such as the UK, governments do not seem to have accepted that the prediction about sea level rise means policies must adapt to damage that has already been done. The coastline of the North Sea is a classic example. Stretches of England's east coast both in and south of Yorkshire are eroding, and large areas are close to or at sea level already. A storm surge coinciding with a high tide, like the one that killed hundreds in 1953, may be a rarity, but each year a similar event becomes more likely to overwhelm the existing sea defences. And yet the government is still talking about building nuclear power stations with a 150-year lifespan on this coast, notably Sizewell C, and small modular reactors on other sites. Future generations may wonder why scientists' warnings were so easily ignored.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
14 minutes ago
- BBC News
Great Exhibition Road Festival: What is the weirdest thing in the universe?
London's Exhibition Road will close to traffic this weekend as the famous museums and institutions of South Kensington combine for the Great Exhibition Road the series of free events taking place along the street, three researchers affiliated with Imperial College London (ICL) will take to the stage to try to answer one small question - what's the weirdest thing in the universe? For ICL research fellow Mariana Carrillo Gonzalez, the answer is to be found far away from our own planet."My object is black holes," she holes are regions of space where matter has collapsed in on itself, meaning they have such strong gravity that not even light can escape there's a key problem with them for scientists, explains Mariana."We still have no clue how they work."We can't observe them, we just observe the effects of a black hole. We observe the light that goes around the black hole and we observe how it deforms space and how things move... but we really can't see it because there's nothing that can escape from a black hole."We can prove they are there, we just have no idea what's inside," she adds."I think that's just a very weird thing." Nevertheless, Rita Ahmadi argues her research specialism is even more bizarre - "Quantum physics, by which I mean the physics of subatomic particles."They have behaviours that are different from the classical physics that you see around yourself, so the rules are different," the postdoctoral researcher rules include that "they can be observed in two different states at the same time, which is called superposition", while they also have an unusual problem when trying to observe them as "any interaction with a quantum system changes the state of the quantum system".Rita says such peculiarities mean "we know that the mathematics of quantum mechanics work properly so we know that the model works... but still we cannot make sense of that".Even so, quantum science is still seen as hugely important for the future."My research is quantum computing and I'm building devices out of that even without understanding if it makes sense." The other researcher taking part is Fernando Ernesto Rosas De Andraca whose area of expertise is another one full of conundrums."I took human consciousness as the weirdest thing I can think of," he says."Our best guess is that consciousness is somehow generated by the brain but most people would argue that single neurons are not conscious."So you have these little parts that are not conscious, you put them together and they are conscious and that's very strange."He also points to other arguments such as "the only thing you cannot doubt is your consciousness, but at the same time consciousness is this thing that nobody else can see so everybody else can doubt it".Elaborating further, Fernando brings up artificial intelligence (AI), declaring it as something he has become "completely obsessed" with."Most people believe that current AI systems are not conscious... but I think most people agree that there is no fundamental limits to say it will never be conscious so then the question is at one point it might become so," he says."We then get into a different arena that we have to be concerned about things like creating a system that can suffer." The reason for such existential arguments is the festival, which seeks to celebrate science and the arts for people of all ages through activities like insect yoga, quantum discos and robotics."We're always trying to find different and creative ways of exploring some of the topics that we study at Imperial," says James Romero, who is one of the festival organisers for the university."In this case it's challenging the researchers to tweak the public lecture format into a different format and introducing a competitive element into it."Once the three researchers have presented their arguments, a vote will be held with those in the crowd deciding which phenomena should be considered the weirdest in the universe."We thought that the researchers might be too polite to be competitive but clearly that's not necessarily the case," says James, having listened to their arguments."I came from Oxford," replies Rita. "I take debates very seriously."The Weirdest Object in the Universe debate is free to attend and will take place in the Sir Alexander Fleming Building at Imperial College London at 15:30 BST on Saturday.
The Herald Scotland
21 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Supreme Court lets DOGE access Social Security data for now
The court's three liberal justices - Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson - disagreed with that decision. "The Government wants to give DOGE unfettered access to this personal, non-anonymized information right now --before the courts have time to assess whether DOGE's access is lawful," Jackson wrote in a dissent joined by Sotomayor. In March, U.S. District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander of Maryland said DOGE was intruding on "the personal affairs of millions of Americans" in a fishing expedition that's based on little more than suspicion." Hollander limited DOGE's access to the information while the courts assess the legality of the Trump administration's actions. The administration argued the judge overstepped, viewing DOGE staffers as the equivalent of intruders breaking into hotel rooms rather than as employees trying to modernize the agency's technology and root out waste - as DOGE officials said they intended to do. "District courts should not be able to wield the Privacy Act to substitute their own view of the government's 'needs' for that of the President and agency heads," Solicitor General John Sauer told the Supreme Court in an emergency appeal. DOGE has sought access to multiple agencies as part of its mission to hunt for wasteful spending and dramatically overhaul the federal government. Musk has falsely claimed that millions of Americans who are deceased are still receiving Social Security checks. Two labor unions and an advocacy group sued the SSA after DOGE began digging into personal data. They told the Supreme Court justices they shouldn't intervene because the administration hadn't shown an emergency need to access data beyond what the district judge allowed. In addition to overseeing Social Security benefits for retirees and disabled people, the Social Security Administration helps administer programs run by other agencies, including Medicare and Medicaid. A divided federal appeals court on April 30 rejected the Trump administration's request to block the district judge's order. U.S. Circuit Judge Robert King of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia, said the government hadn't shown a need for unfettered access to the highly sensitive personal information that the American people had every reason to believe would be "fiercely protected." DOGE's mission can be largely accomplished through anonymized and redacted data, which is the usual way the agency has handled technology upgrades and fraud detection, he wrote.
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Birmingham prehistoric giants exhibition set for summer opening
An exhibition featuring life-sized 3D models and partial skeletons of giant prehistoric animals will open this developed by the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, will display animals that roamed the Earth after the extinction of the dinosaurs 66m years them will be the Otodus megalodon, known as the mightiest shark of all time, the woolly mammoth, and the Gigantopithecus blacki – an Asian primate the size of about three exhibition will open at Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery on 2 August before travelling to the National Museum of Scotland in Edinburgh in January. Visitors will be able to learn about the processes behind palaeontology, including the methods around fossil discovery and said there would also be immersive projections to transport audiences the natural habitat of the colossal lifeforms. 'Inspiring installation' They said the exhibition served as a "poignant reminder of nature's fragility" and the urgent need to protect Mensah and Sara Wajid, co-chief executives of Birmingham Museums Trust, said the "inspiring installation" captured the imagination with its "monumental scale" and delivered a vital message about Nick Fraser, keeper of natural sciences at National Museums Scotland, said the exhibition helped to shine a light on creatures which existed in the "relatively neglected" period since the dinosaurs' extinction. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
