
Carlos Ghosn speaks on Japan's ‘corrupt' justice system and his daring escape
Interviewer (Sukagawa): Thank you for joining us today. Beirut's weather is quite pleasant compared to Japan.
Carlos Ghosn: Yes, about 30°C — nothing compared to Japan's heat. Much more comfortable here.
Interviewer: We're not here for a personal profile, but to examine in depth what happened on the day of your escape from Japan, and your views on Nissan. You're known as the legendary CEO who turned Nissan from billions in debt into a profitable company. How do you view Nissan today, and how do you respond to being called a fugitive and the drama of your escape?
Ghosn: Many questions there. Let's start with November 2018. My arrest was planned. It's absurd for the head of a major global company, also representing a major French corporation, to be arrested over unreported compensation—amounts neither decided, paid, nor finalized. In normal corporate governance, issues are handled internally with prosecutors, correcting problems without damaging the company. Hurting Nissan damages Japan—its employees, shareholders, and reputation. Even former Prime Minister Abe said I shouldn't have been involved in this. The board could have dealt with it internally, but they couldn't remove me via the board or shareholders, so they used legal means.
If a CEO is suspected of abusing systems, the proper course is to suspend them. But here, the aim was to completely neutralize me, remove me from the system, and eliminate the risk that Nissan might fall under Renault and the French government's influence. Anyone can see the charges were not the real reason for my arrest.
After my arrest I investigated and found it was orchestrated. Prosecutors in Japan have a 99.4 percent conviction rate, not because of plea deals, but because they coerce confessions. Once indicted, it's essentially over—lawyers and judges are irrelevant. They pressured me: confess and things will be easier; we won't go after your wife, children, or friends. That's recorded, but the tapes are withheld 'for containing sensitive information.' The system is corrupt.
They split charges to extend detention — 21 days for one charge, then another 21 days for new charges, threatening more if I didn't confess. I never confessed, so they re-arrested me. International pressure finally forced them to grant bail—at $15 million, the highest in Japan. Yet I was under extreme restrictions, surveilled by cameras Nissan paid for, which was likely illegal. This convinced me I'd never get a fair trial. Staying meant 10–15 years in legal limbo, possibly re-arrested. At 64, that meant dying in that process. So I planned my escape—something prosecutors would never expect, as no one had done it before.
For a year, prosecutors controlled the narrative: 'Ghosn is greedy, loves money, committed major crimes.' I couldn't speak to any media. When I reached Lebanon, I was free to respond. People call me a fugitive; I say I fled injustice. I'm not hiding—everyone knows where I live — but Japan issued Interpol notices for me and my wife, on absurd charges, purely to pressure me.
Interviewer: You've said there were 'rotten apples' inside Nissan. Why did they want you out?
Ghosn: They feared that if I finalized the holding company structure for Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi, it would cement the alliance and prevent Japan from ever undoing it. I opposed a full merger—politicians liked it, but I preferred a fair holding company with no single controlling party. The French government wanted a merger, which worried some in Japan. Removing me was the way to collapse the alliance—which indeed happened.
Now Nissan and Mitsubishi are in trouble. They even tried talks with Honda, which I predicted would fail—no synergies. Both have the same strengths and weaknesses; mergers work when they're complementary.
Renault's then-chairman, Jean-Dominique Senard, failed in his role. He sat on Nissan's board, knew the issues, approved budgets, and oversaw decisions that led to seven plant closures, including Oppama. Poor leadership caused job losses and a 70 percent drop in Nissan's value—from over 1,000 yen per share to about 300 yen.
Interviewer: Japanese authorities say arrests are only made with strong evidence.
Ghosn: Nonsense. I was arrested on one charge (unreported compensation) without a finalized or paid amount. Other charges came after raids. This was about neutralizing me and dismantling the alliance. France reverted to its pre-1999 position in the auto industry, with Nissan and Mitsubishi weakened and withdrawing from markets.
Japanese prosecutors even staged events for TV — claiming to arrest me on the plane, which was false since it was at the airport). They also showed boxes taken from my home post-escape as if they contained incriminating documents, which they didn't.
I destroyed any documents they could twist into accusations—not because I was guilty, but because I knew their malice. Japan's hostage justice system is medieval; long interrogations without counsel, 'monitored' interpreters, recordings kept only by prosecutors, no fairness.
Interviewer: Did France also act against you?
Ghosn: Yes, after Japan requested it. In France, a mere complaint freezes assets automatically as a 'precaution.' This has dragged on for five years without real progress—France is following Japan's lead.
Interviewer: About the Versailles controversy—
Ghosn: It wasn't my wedding; it was our 10th anniversary, and part of the Renault-Nissan alliance's 15th anniversary celebrations, attended by 250 guests, paid by the alliance, not by public funds. Two weeks later we held a similar event in Japan. The narrative was manipulated while I couldn't speak.
Interviewer: Let's discuss the escape plan.
Ghosn: I decided to escape 3–4 months earlier, after realizing a fair trial was impossible. I tested multiple methods before settling on the instrument case plan. It was year-end; airport staff were temporary and less alert. My advantage was no one expected me to try.
I avoided using my monitored phone—used unmonitored ones and spoke under running showers to mask sound. I disguised myself in jeans, cheap coat, casual shoes, cheap watch, glasses—things I never wore normally. In December, masks and hats weren't suspicious. I stayed silent to avoid voice recognition.
The box was brought to an airport hotel, not my house. I walked there, entered naturally, then in the room entered the case. It was about 1.5 hours inside before boarding. I emerged only after takeoff. From Kansai Airport to Turkey, then quickly transferred in bad weather to a flight to Beirut. Landing in Lebanon at dawn felt like a rebirth.
Interviewer: What was the first thing you did after getting out of the case?
Ghosn: Drank coffee and water—needed to calm down. Then to my wife's mother's house; she cried when she saw me.
Interviewer: You've since been Red Notice-listed.
Ghosn: Interpol is just a tool, following any member state's request. But there's always a way around obstacles.
Interviewer: What do you do now?
Ghosn: I teach crisis management, leadership, and strategy at a private university here—sharing real experience, not theory. I also support lawsuits against Japan's hostage justice system.
Interviewer: Will you return to Japan to stand trial?
Ghosn: Never, unless the system changes completely and the damage done to me is recognized. In France I'm fighting the charges; if I win there, Japan's case will look absurd.
Final message to Japan: For a year after my arrest, the public only heard the prosecutors' version, supported by Nissan and the Ministry of Economy. Even if I had done something wrong, the way they handled it was wrong. In reality, I did nothing wrong—this was a setup, prepared for months. Look at Nissan today—factories closed, communities hurt, thousands losing jobs. Would this have happened if I were still leading? That's my question to you.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Today
21 hours ago
- Japan Today
Trump threatens 'severe consequences' if Putin blocks Ukraine peace
rench President Emmanuel Macron, Antonio Costa, President of the European Council, French Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs Jean-Noel Barrot, and France's Minister of Armed Forces Sebastien Lecornu attend a video conference with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz to discuss the ongoing war in Ukraine, at Fort de Bregancon in Bormes-les-Mimosas, France, 13 August 2025. PHILIPPE MAGONI/Pool via Reuters By Andrea Shalal, Thomas Escritt and Tom Balmforth U.S. President Donald Trump threatened "severe consequences" if Russia's Vladimir Putin blocked peace in Ukraine but also said on Wednesday that a meeting between the pair could swiftly be followed by a second that included the leader of Ukraine. Trump did not specify what the consequences could be, but he has warned of economic sanctions if a meeting between himself and President Putin in Alaska on Friday proved fruitless. The comments by Trump and the mood music after a virtual meeting of Trump, European leaders and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy could provide some hope for Kyiv after fears the Alaska meet could sell out Ukraine and carve up its territory. However, Russia is likely to resist Ukraine and Europe's demands strongly and previously said its stance had not changed since it was set out by Putin in June 2024. When asked if Russia would face any consequences if Putin does not agree to stop the war after Friday's meeting, Trump responded: 'Yes, they will.' Asked if those consequences would be sanctions or tariffs, Trump told reporters: 'I don't have to say, there will be very severe consequences." But the president also described the aim of the meeting between the pair in Alaska as "setting the table" for a quick follow-up that would include Zelenskyy. "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," he said. "I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelenskyy and myself, if they'd like to have me there." Trump did not provide a time frame for a second meeting. RED LINES European leaders and Zelenskyy had earlier spoken with Trump in a last-ditch call hosted by Germany to lay out red lines ahead of the Alaska meeting. "We had a very good call. He was on the call. President Zelenskyy was on the call. I would rate it a 10, very friendly," Trump said. French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump agreed that Ukraine must be involved in any discussions about ceding land while Zelenskyy said Trump had supported the idea of security guarantees in a post-war settlement. "President Trump was very clear that the United States wanted to achieve a ceasefire at this meeting in Alaska," Macron said. "The second point on which things were very clear, as expressed by President Trump, is that territories belonging to Ukraine cannot be negotiated and will only be negotiated by the Ukrainian president." German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who hosted the virtual meeting, said the principle that borders could not be changed by force must continue to apply. "If there is no movement on the Russian side in Alaska, then the United States and we Europeans should ... increase the pressure," he said. "President Trump knows this position, he shares it very extensively and therefore I can say: We have had a really exceptionally constructive and good conversation with each other." Trump and Putin are due to discuss how to end the three-and-a-half-year-old conflict, the biggest in Europe since World War Two. Trump has previously said both sides will have to swap land to end fighting that has cost tens of thousands of lives and displaced millions. RUSSIA MAKES SHARP ADVANCE INTO UKRAINE On a day of intense diplomacy, Zelenskyy flew into Berlin for virtual meetings with European leaders and then with Trump. He and the Europeans worry that a land swap could leave Russia with almost a fifth of Ukraine, rewarding it for almost 11 years of efforts to seize Ukrainian land, the last three in all-out war, and embolden Putin to expand further west in the future. Russian forces have made a sharp thrust into eastern Ukraine in recent days in what may be an attempt to increase the pressure on Kyiv to give up land. "I told the U.S. president and all our European colleagues that Putin is bluffing (about his stated wish to end the war)," Zelenskyy said. "He is trying to apply pressure before the meeting in Alaska along all parts of the Ukrainian front. Russia is trying to show that it can occupy all of Ukraine ..." A source familiar with the matter said the call with Trump discussed possible cities that could host a three-way meeting, depending on the outcome of the talks in Alaska. Wary of angering Trump, European leaders have repeatedly said they welcome his efforts, while stressing that there should be no deal about Ukraine without Ukraine's participation. Trump's agreement last week to the summit was an abrupt shift after weeks of voicing frustration with Putin for resisting the U.S. peace initiative. Trump said his envoy had made "great progress" at talks in Moscow. A Gallup poll released last week found that 69% of Ukrainians favour a negotiated end to the war as soon as possible. But polls also indicate Ukrainians do not want peace at any cost if that means crushing concessions. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Alexei Fadeev earlier said Moscow's stance had not changed since last year. As conditions for a ceasefire and the start of talks, the Kremlin leader had demanded that Ukraine withdraw its forces from four regions that Russia has claimed as its own but does not fully control, and formally renounce its plans to join NATO. Kyiv swiftly rejected the conditions as tantamount to surrender. © Thomson Reuters 2025.


The Mainichi
3 days ago
- The Mainichi
Why is Nissan closing its Oppama plant, and what comes next?
The Mainichi Shimbun answers some common questions readers may have about Nissan Motor Co.'s planned closure of a major car factory in Japan, and what's next for the troubled company. Question: I heard Nissan is reducing the number of car factories it operates in Japan. Is that true? Answer: Yes, that's correct. Nissan has decided to close its Oppama plant in Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture -- where it began making cars in 1961 -- at the end of fiscal 2027, shifting production to its factory in Kanda, Fukuoka Prefecture. The Oppama plant produced iconic models like the Bluebird and now the Leaf electric vehicle (EV). Q: Why is the plant being closed? A: Recently, Nissan has struggled to develop new models that sell well, and sales have stagnated in major markets like the United States and China. As a result, the company's performance has declined, and in fiscal 2024, it posted a net loss of 670.8 billion yen (approx. $4.54 billion) -- its third-largest ever. To address this, Nissan plans to consolidate its global manufacturing network from 17 plants to 10 by fiscal 2027, cutting about 20,000 jobs, or roughly 15% of its workforce. Production at the Shonan plant in Hiratsuka, Kanagawa Prefecture, will also end in fiscal 2026. Q: What will happen to the Oppama site after the closure? A: Nissan will keep its research center and test course there to continue developing new technologies. The company aims to minimize the impact on the roughly 2,400 plant workers by transferring them to other factories or departments. However, since Oppama has long been known as "Nissan town," the loss of so many jobs is expected to negatively affect the local economy. Yokosuka's mayor and residents are worried about the town's future. Q: How does Nissan plan to recover from this? A: President Ivan Espinosa says the company needs painful reforms centered on plant restructuring to achieve renewed growth. Nissan is also seeking new partners to help drive its recovery, and is in talks with several companies. In the electric vehicle sector, Nissan is collaborating with Honda Motor Co. and Mitsubishi Motors Corp. on technology development, and is also considering working with Taiwan's Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. (Foxconn). Many fans are hoping for the day when "Nissan, the company of technology," will make a strong comeback.


Tokyo Reported
5 days ago
- Tokyo Reported
Carlos Ghosn speaks on Japan's ‘corrupt' justice system and his daring escape
Former Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn sits down with journalist Hiroshi Sukagawa in Beirut, Lebanon to discuss Japan's 'corrupt' justice system and his escape. A summarized version is below. Interviewer (Sukagawa): Thank you for joining us today. Beirut's weather is quite pleasant compared to Japan. Carlos Ghosn: Yes, about 30°C — nothing compared to Japan's heat. Much more comfortable here. Interviewer: We're not here for a personal profile, but to examine in depth what happened on the day of your escape from Japan, and your views on Nissan. You're known as the legendary CEO who turned Nissan from billions in debt into a profitable company. How do you view Nissan today, and how do you respond to being called a fugitive and the drama of your escape? Ghosn: Many questions there. Let's start with November 2018. My arrest was planned. It's absurd for the head of a major global company, also representing a major French corporation, to be arrested over unreported compensation—amounts neither decided, paid, nor finalized. In normal corporate governance, issues are handled internally with prosecutors, correcting problems without damaging the company. Hurting Nissan damages Japan—its employees, shareholders, and reputation. Even former Prime Minister Abe said I shouldn't have been involved in this. The board could have dealt with it internally, but they couldn't remove me via the board or shareholders, so they used legal means. If a CEO is suspected of abusing systems, the proper course is to suspend them. But here, the aim was to completely neutralize me, remove me from the system, and eliminate the risk that Nissan might fall under Renault and the French government's influence. Anyone can see the charges were not the real reason for my arrest. After my arrest I investigated and found it was orchestrated. Prosecutors in Japan have a 99.4 percent conviction rate, not because of plea deals, but because they coerce confessions. Once indicted, it's essentially over—lawyers and judges are irrelevant. They pressured me: confess and things will be easier; we won't go after your wife, children, or friends. That's recorded, but the tapes are withheld 'for containing sensitive information.' The system is corrupt. They split charges to extend detention — 21 days for one charge, then another 21 days for new charges, threatening more if I didn't confess. I never confessed, so they re-arrested me. International pressure finally forced them to grant bail—at $15 million, the highest in Japan. Yet I was under extreme restrictions, surveilled by cameras Nissan paid for, which was likely illegal. This convinced me I'd never get a fair trial. Staying meant 10–15 years in legal limbo, possibly re-arrested. At 64, that meant dying in that process. So I planned my escape—something prosecutors would never expect, as no one had done it before. For a year, prosecutors controlled the narrative: 'Ghosn is greedy, loves money, committed major crimes.' I couldn't speak to any media. When I reached Lebanon, I was free to respond. People call me a fugitive; I say I fled injustice. I'm not hiding—everyone knows where I live — but Japan issued Interpol notices for me and my wife, on absurd charges, purely to pressure me. Interviewer: You've said there were 'rotten apples' inside Nissan. Why did they want you out? Ghosn: They feared that if I finalized the holding company structure for Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi, it would cement the alliance and prevent Japan from ever undoing it. I opposed a full merger—politicians liked it, but I preferred a fair holding company with no single controlling party. The French government wanted a merger, which worried some in Japan. Removing me was the way to collapse the alliance—which indeed happened. Now Nissan and Mitsubishi are in trouble. They even tried talks with Honda, which I predicted would fail—no synergies. Both have the same strengths and weaknesses; mergers work when they're complementary. Renault's then-chairman, Jean-Dominique Senard, failed in his role. He sat on Nissan's board, knew the issues, approved budgets, and oversaw decisions that led to seven plant closures, including Oppama. Poor leadership caused job losses and a 70 percent drop in Nissan's value—from over 1,000 yen per share to about 300 yen. Interviewer: Japanese authorities say arrests are only made with strong evidence. Ghosn: Nonsense. I was arrested on one charge (unreported compensation) without a finalized or paid amount. Other charges came after raids. This was about neutralizing me and dismantling the alliance. France reverted to its pre-1999 position in the auto industry, with Nissan and Mitsubishi weakened and withdrawing from markets. Japanese prosecutors even staged events for TV — claiming to arrest me on the plane, which was false since it was at the airport). They also showed boxes taken from my home post-escape as if they contained incriminating documents, which they didn't. I destroyed any documents they could twist into accusations—not because I was guilty, but because I knew their malice. Japan's hostage justice system is medieval; long interrogations without counsel, 'monitored' interpreters, recordings kept only by prosecutors, no fairness. Interviewer: Did France also act against you? Ghosn: Yes, after Japan requested it. In France, a mere complaint freezes assets automatically as a 'precaution.' This has dragged on for five years without real progress—France is following Japan's lead. Interviewer: About the Versailles controversy— Ghosn: It wasn't my wedding; it was our 10th anniversary, and part of the Renault-Nissan alliance's 15th anniversary celebrations, attended by 250 guests, paid by the alliance, not by public funds. Two weeks later we held a similar event in Japan. The narrative was manipulated while I couldn't speak. Interviewer: Let's discuss the escape plan. Ghosn: I decided to escape 3–4 months earlier, after realizing a fair trial was impossible. I tested multiple methods before settling on the instrument case plan. It was year-end; airport staff were temporary and less alert. My advantage was no one expected me to try. I avoided using my monitored phone—used unmonitored ones and spoke under running showers to mask sound. I disguised myself in jeans, cheap coat, casual shoes, cheap watch, glasses—things I never wore normally. In December, masks and hats weren't suspicious. I stayed silent to avoid voice recognition. The box was brought to an airport hotel, not my house. I walked there, entered naturally, then in the room entered the case. It was about 1.5 hours inside before boarding. I emerged only after takeoff. From Kansai Airport to Turkey, then quickly transferred in bad weather to a flight to Beirut. Landing in Lebanon at dawn felt like a rebirth. Interviewer: What was the first thing you did after getting out of the case? Ghosn: Drank coffee and water—needed to calm down. Then to my wife's mother's house; she cried when she saw me. Interviewer: You've since been Red Notice-listed. Ghosn: Interpol is just a tool, following any member state's request. But there's always a way around obstacles. Interviewer: What do you do now? Ghosn: I teach crisis management, leadership, and strategy at a private university here—sharing real experience, not theory. I also support lawsuits against Japan's hostage justice system. Interviewer: Will you return to Japan to stand trial? Ghosn: Never, unless the system changes completely and the damage done to me is recognized. In France I'm fighting the charges; if I win there, Japan's case will look absurd. Final message to Japan: For a year after my arrest, the public only heard the prosecutors' version, supported by Nissan and the Ministry of Economy. Even if I had done something wrong, the way they handled it was wrong. In reality, I did nothing wrong—this was a setup, prepared for months. Look at Nissan today—factories closed, communities hurt, thousands losing jobs. Would this have happened if I were still leading? That's my question to you.