Officer involved in strip search of Child Q says search 'should have never happened'
Speaking at the hearing on Monday 16 June, PC Wray, was questioned about the training she had received in regards to police searches.
She told the panel that she had received training on police stop and search. Though this included how to conduct a strip search, this itself was not practical.
During this line of questioning it was revealed that PC Wray had never completed her Search Powers and Procedures Course, which covers the legal framework for police searches.
When asked why this course hadn't been completed, PC Wray told the panel: 'I was never made aware that I missed that course'.
She went on to tell the panel that she'd never received any training on what to do if someone you are searching is menstruating - as was the case for Child Q.
PC Wray also told the panel that there was no training on how to minimise the embarrassment nor was she provided any training on how to search children.
Concluding her response to training, PC Wray told the panel that prior to searching Child Q, she had not familiarised herself on how stop and search policies had changed; nor had she read the full guidance laid out in the Authorised Professional Practice - which is the official professional practice for policing.
The hearing heard that on the day of Child Q's search, PC Wray was on shift at a response officer when she received a radio call for a 'female officer to assist with a search'.
PC Wray told the hearing that she understood that to mean a strip search was going to be taking place.
Prior to this, she had never attended a school but had carried out two strip searches - both of which were in a custody cell, none of which involved a child.
She arrived at Child Q's school at around 11am and was taken to the room where the child was.
PC Wray told the panel that she believed this to be a 'very serious incident' and that she had smelt cannabis when she entered the school's medical room.
One of the requirements for a strip search is authorisation from a officer with the rank of sergeant or higher.
However, the hearing today heard no such authorisation was given for the search of Child Q.
PC Wray accepted that she should've checked if the search was authorised and believed that it had been authorised prior to her arrival.
When asked about Child Q's behaviour prior to the removal of her clothes, she said the student appeared 'completely calm' and 'answered all the questions directed at her.'
Rules also require an appropriate adult to be present during this kind of search - this was not the case for Child Q's search.PC Wray said that she assumed Child Q's PE teacher was the designated appropriate adult - even though she was not in the room while the search was taking place.
PC Wray's evidence was followed by a series of apologies.
She told the panel that the strip search of Child Q "should have never happened" and that "she should have spoken to a sergeant", and "phoned Child Q's mother".
She said she never intended the for the search to be "degrading" or "humiliating".
With tears in her eyes she said unconscious bias played no part in her decision to proceed with the search of Child Q.
When asked why no notes or records were made about her involvement in the search, she told the panel that she 'didn't know' she had to make a record of it in her pocket book - despite Metropolitan Police policy requiring a contemporaneous record being made in the event of a strip search.
PC Wray marks the last witness in this case.
The panel will now decide whether she and her other colleagues involved in the search - detective constable Kristina Linge, PC Victoria Wray and PC Rafal Szmydynski - committed gross misconduct and whether they should remain officers in the Metropolitan Police Service.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
10-07-2025
- Daily Mail
Met police officers who strip-searched black schoolgirl, 15, while she was on her period are guilty of gross misconduct
Two Metropolitan Police officers who strip-searched a 15-year-old black schoolgirl while she was on her period have been found guilty of gross misconduct. The incident, which took place at a school in Hackney, east London, in 2020, saw the girl, known as Child Q, searched by officers who believed she was carrying cannabis. A misconduct panel concluded that the strip search, which involved the exposure of her intimate parts, was 'disproportionate, inappropriate and unnecessary.' No drugs were found on the child. The hearing also heard how the ordeal left the schoolgirl feeling 'humiliated' and 'degraded.' Trainee Detective Constable Kristina Linge and Police Constable Rafal Szmydynski were criticised for their handling of the situation and now could face being sacked from the force. It was concluded that they failed to ensure that an appropriate adult was present during the strip search - as is required when a minor is involved - and for not seeking senior officer authorisation beforehand. They also failed to provide the girl with a copy of the search record, in direct breach of police policy and training. The misconduct panel concluded the officers did not respect the girl's rights as a child and failed to give her the protection she was entitled to under the law. A third officer, PC Victoria Wray, was also found to have committed misconduct for not questioning whether the search was proportionate or checking whether it had been properly authorised. She too breached police standards relating to duties and responsibilities, authority, respect and courtesy, and following orders and instructions. However, the panel did not find that any of the officers had breached standards relating to equality and diversity, or honesty and integrity. Crucially, it concluded there was no evidence that race was a factor in their decisions, nor that the girl had been 'adultified.' The four-week disciplinary hearing was led by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) and chaired by Met Commander Jason Prins. In 2022 the incident sparked protests on the streets where they were heard chanting 'no justice, no peace, abolish the police' and 'racist cops, out of schools'. They also held up signs reading 'no to racist police, justice for Child Q' and 'we say no to police in schools', as well as Black Lives Matter banners. They also chanted 'shame on you' at officers outside the station, footage on social media showed. A protester from Catcalls of London, an Instagram-based awareness group, wrote messages in multi-coloured chalk on the pavement, with one reading: 'Dearest Child Q, the systems designed to protect you failed you. 'We see you. We stand here for you. We are with you.' Commander Kevin Southworth said: 'The experience of Child Q should never have happened and was truly regrettable. 'We have sincerely apologised to Child Q since this incident happened. Again, I am deeply sorry to Child Q and her family for the trauma that we caused her, and the damage this incident caused to the trust and confidence black communities across London have in our officers. 'While the officers involved did not act correctly, we acknowledge there were organisational failings. Training to our officers around strip search and the type of search carried out on Child Q was inadequate, and our oversight of the power was also severely lacking. 'This left officers, often young in service or junior in rank, making difficult decisions in complex situations with little information, support or clear resources to help their decision-making. 'What happened to Child Q was a catalyst for change both for the Met and for policing nationally. 'While we should not have needed an incident such as Child Q to check our approach, it has absolutely led us to improving our processes and significantly reducing the number of these types of searches carried out. 'It's crucial we get this right to ensure the impact on young people is minimised as far as possible. 'Sadly, we know there are children in London being exploited to carry drugs and weapons for others as well as involved in criminality, so these types of searches have to remain within police powers. The work we have done since Child Q means we now have the right safeguards in place.'
The Sun
09-07-2025
- The Sun
Girl injured in Southport attack asks ‘how will I be normal again?' as parents reveal torment at inquiry into tragedy
A YOUNG girl injured in the Southport attack still asks "how will I ever be normal again", her heartbroken mum told a public inquiry today. Triple killer Axel Rudakubana launched into a savage knife attack at a Taylor Swift dance class last summer. 5 5 The 18-year-old murdered Bebe King, six, Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, and Alice Dasilva Aguiar, nine, and injured other children in the horror. A public inquiry will now look at whether the attack could or should have been prevented given what was known about the killer. Today, the parents of children injured in the July 29 massacre opened up on their torment almost a year on. One mum whose daughter was attacked said her daughter became "very withdrawn, emotional and had so many worries" after witnessing the horror. She asks still: "How will I ever be normal again?" Her mum said arriving to collect her daughter on that day and seeing screaming children from the building was "the most horrific experience of my life". She told how the girl, referred to only as Child Q, is now anxious about not being with her parents and is still scared when she hears a siren. She continued: "She is still unable to sleep alone and struggles with falling asleep. She always asks for doors to be closed when we enter or leave a room, this helps her to feel safe. "Changes have also been made at school; she now sits where she can see the door so she can always be aware of who is entering the classroom. "On a few occasions she has been unable to attend school due to her anxiety, explaining this as her tummy feels funny and hiding under the dining table at home.' The dad of one of the girls, named as C3, told Liverpool Town Hall it was "patently clear that lessons need to be learned from what happened, and processes need to be changed". 5 5 5 Sitting beside the girl's mother in the witness box, he said: "Our nine-year-old daughter was stabbed three times in the back by a coward she didn't even see. "Although she didn't know what was happening - she knew she had to run." Describing his daughter as his "hero", the father said she remained "the positive, caring, funny, enthusiastic, courageous girl she always was". He said: "She wears her scars with a dignity and defiance that is remarkable." One mum, whose seven-year-old daughter C8 was injured, said she was at work when she received a "panicked phone call" from her friend's mum. She told how she rushed to the scene and saw "something no parent should ever see". The mum said her daughter, who suffered injuries to her arm and face, could not be left alone any more and only felt safe with a small number of people. She continued: "I am grateful beyond words that she survived. But what she went through, what she saw and what she continues to carry has changed everything." Another mum sobbed as she told how her daughter and the girls involved deserve the truth, accountability, an apology and the promise changes will be made. She revealed she is "terrified" for her daughter to learn what the inquiry finds as it will be "earth-shattering for her and we will have to begin her recovery again". The mum added: "We are trying to shield her as much as possible whilst we understand this ourselves. "She has every right to ask these questions. This inquiry must answer them." Retired senior judge Sir Adrian Fulford is leading the review, which has now been formally postponed until September. He has made the decision not to name the killer and instead refer to him as AR. In his opening statement, the chairman said Rudakubana's actions were 'almost unimaginable but nonetheless mercilessly calculated'. The inquiry has been split into two phases, with the first focusing on the circumstances leading to the attack and AR's contact with Prevent. Sir Adrian will now examine how young people are "drawn into extreme violence" during the second phase. Following the horror, it emerged the killer had a "sickening interest in death" and had made chilling searches for school massacres before carrying out the rampage. His morbid fascination saw him flagged three times to anti-terror programme Prevent but no further action was taken. What happened in Southport? THE horror unfolded last summer as 26 excited children gathered for the dance class to kick off the summer holidays. The two-hour event had been organised by instructors Leanne Lucas and Heidi Liddle at The Hart Space. Just three miles away, Rudakubana had armed himself with a 20cm knife. Chilling footage showed the killer pacing outside his home before being picked up in a taxi. Just 30 minutes later, he arrived at the community centre as the children sang Taylor Swift songs and made friendship bracelets. Leanne opened a window due to the summer heat and saw the masked teen outside but thought nothing of it. But seconds later, the door opened and Rudakubana stormed into the class and began attacking children and adults at random. Screams rang out as the killer teen systematically made his way through the room stabbing his victims with the black-handled Cerbera kitchen knife. Hero dance teacher Leanne was stabbed in the arms, neck and back as she used her body to shield young girls from the knifeman. She screamed at the children to "run away" Her colleague Heidi Liddle escaped uninjured after bravely locking some of the children inside a toilet. Businessman Jonathan Hayes, who was working in the office next door, was attacked after he ran inside and tried to stop the carnage. At 11.57am - 12 minutes after the rampage began - police stormed the scene. Officers found Rudakubana holding the large, bloodied kitchen knife and he was arrested. After the horror attack, the teen said "I'm glad they're dead" as he was held in a custody suite. As a result, the killer was free to storm the Hart Space community centre and begin senselessly knifing terrified children and adults. A rapid review into his contact with Prevent found his case should have been kept open. It also concluded Rudakubana should have been referred to Channel, another anti-terror scheme. The killer pleaded guilty to three counts of murder and ten of attempted murder. He also admitted two terror offences after police found ricin and an Al-Qaeda manual at his home. Despite this, cops are still not treating the attack as terror-related. He was jailed for life with a minimum of 52 years following the horrific triple murder but will likely never be released.
The Guardian
02-07-2025
- The Guardian
Children should not be strip-searched or detained unless a last resort, say MPs
Children should not be detained in custody unless arrested for a serious crime and strip-searched only under truly exceptional circumstances, two parliamentary reports have said. Harrowing testimonies of children in England and Wales who were strip-searched and who accused police of racism and making damaging, disrespectful comments are included in the research for the all-party parliamentary group (APPG) on children in police custody. The reports – the culmination of a year's research involving children, police forces and parents – were released days after the sacking of two Metropolitan police officers who were involved in the strip-search of a schoolgirl who become known as Child Q. While a police misconduct hearing found that racism was not a factor in that incident, the research gives voice to young people who said that racism was a factor in their strip-searches. Children as young as 10 in England and Wales are currently subject to the same processes and have essentially the same protections as adults when they are detained in police custody. Instead, the MPs on the group say that police detention should be the last resort for a child and that any initial detention period should be limited to 12 hours – half of the time that adults can be held before they must be charged or released. Dr Miranda Bevan, a law lecturer at King's College London who led an inquiry for the APPG, said that children who were detained were disproportionately likely to have special educational or communication needs, to have been exploited or suffered victimisation, and to have been known to mental health authorities. 'Yet these children – some as young as 10 – are being left alone in a police cell, with very limited adult support, for up to 24 hours,' she said. 'They are expected to decide whether or not they want to accept legal representation; a decision that they should not be asked to make in those circumstances. 'We must reshape police custody into a space that recognises and responds to the unique needs of children. Reform must be rooted in evidence, and that evidence starts with listening to children and examining their experiences.' The APPG puts forward 10 recommendations, including a ban on strip-searching children unless under truly exceptional circumstances and making it a requirement that legal advice be provided for all children detained in police custody. Evidence was taken from police forces volunteers and experts in the field while first-hand accounts were given to the APPG by 10 children who had been strip-searched. 'They took all my clothes off me … They didn't give me a chance to suggest anything else they could do instead,' said one. Making an allegation about a cavity search, they said: 'She didn't say nothing about it. I just felt it. I know that's not meant to happen … There wasn't no appropriate adult. I had to wait til the next day to have one. While this was happening, I was saying bad words. They charged me for that. 'I get flashbacks of it for sure … My dignity has just been taken.' Another whose testimony was cited, and who said that there had been a racist dimension to their treatment, said: 'I felt a hatred. I actually was very angry because I felt like I could do nothing about it … Racial slurs or whatever else I've been called when I've been grabbed in searches and whatever else. 'I've been called a 'spear chucking N-word' and I've been called the Middle Eastern racial slur for Pakistanis.' Alex Carlile, a barrister and officer of the APPG, said: 'Children are not miniature adults – they are vulnerable, developing individuals who must be treated as such when they come into contact with the criminal justice system.'
