Sceptism from opposition but the budget gets a nod from GNU partners
Finance minister Enoch Godongwana received a nod from the GNU partners but sceptism from opposition benches when he presented his third-time-lucky budget speech.
With a visibly relaxed and confident demeanour, Godongwana presented a budget wrapped in comic anecdotes — with nodding and clapping from the DA benches indicating success for the minister.
The DA, as a GNU partner with whom the ANC shares 60% of the seats in the National Assembly, said it 'cautiously welcomes the revenue and expenditure proposals'.
The DA rejected the previous budget's proposal to increase VAT and challenged it in the courts.
However, the decision to drop the VAT increase carved a pathway to gaining the DA's support, a move which the party believes is 'manifestation of coalition politics in action'.
The DA's spokesperson on finance, Mark Burke, described the budget as a workable outcome in the context of trying economic times.
' The DA was not prepared to get behind a budget that maintained unsustainable government expenditure on the back of raising VAT, making struggling South Africans pay for inefficiencies and waste in government — but today's version from minister Godongwana has gone some way to undo this.
'It is a victory for all South Africans that the mooted VAT hike has now finally been removed from the minister's revenue proposals, after the DA court action in this regard. We see this budget speech as a turning of the tide toward growth and investment. It is turning away from unchecked government spending funded by South African taxpayers.'
The party welcomed the R1-trillion investment in infrastructure over the next three years, the snub on bailouts to state-owned entities, a national spending review which must eliminate all wasteful spending, and ending low-priority projects.
' The DA realises our economy desperately needs to grow and government must budget for this, creating the environment that enables this growth in the private sector. We also note that more realistic economic growth forecasts have been used to model revenue in this version of the budget.'
Despite Godongwana's U-turn on the proposed VAT hike, the EFF, which was vocal and opposed to the proposed VAT hike in the previous tabling of the budget, rejected Wednesday's presentation.
Calling it weak, misguided and disconnected from the lived reality of South Africans, the EFF says the absence of President Cyril Ramaphosa and his deputy Paul Mashatile is a further indicator of how disconnected the executive is from the economic realities facing the poor and the working class.
'We note the deliberate silencing of public discourse around this budget, with mainstream media choosing to focus obsessively on political coalitions and cabinet appointments, while ignoring one of the most consequential events in South Africa's governance calendar. This is not accidental — it forms part of a broader campaign to depoliticise the budget and shield the National Treasury from democratic scrutiny and public accountability.'
Party spokesperson Sinawo Tambo criticised Godongwana for reportedly ignoring proposals from stakeholders and the majority of parties in parliament who claimed that the scrapping of the VAT hike was a product of consultation.
'Not a single alternative revenue-generation mechanism proposed by any political party is present in this third budget, proving once again that the VAT increases were scrapped solely due to the court intervention which was initiated by the EFF. The VAT increases have simply been substituted with austerity.'
Action SA, which played a crucial role in helping the ANC pass its first fiscal framework in the budgeting process, said it was in two minds over Godongwana's proposed expenditure and revenue plans. Herman Mashaba's party welcomed the additional R7.5bn allocated to Sars over the medium term, a move the party had long insisted on.
However, they disagreed with the suite of taxes and levies in the absence of what they described to be meaningful action to curb government wastage.
In a statement, the party said while South Africans are still being forced to carry the burden of an extra R22bn through income tax bracket creep, an increase in the fuel levy, and duty hikes, the funding boost to Sars marks a critical step in the right direction.
'In his speech today, the finance minister confirmed that Sars' performance will be monitored monthly, with the potential for R20bn in tax relief to be granted in the 2026 budget if revenue collection exceeds targets. ActionSA is confident Sars will deliver on this promise, helping to ease the financial pressure on struggling South Africans.'
Rise Mzansi said it was content that the budget baseline remained the same, however they would have wanted additional allocations to things that matter to South Africans — such as health, safety, education and economic infrastructure.
The party believes the country will get out of its financial rut only by making smart, yet tough, decisions.
'Over the past few months, the people of South Africa have made it clear that they do not want to give the government any more money, and that with the existing money, elected representatives must make the country work. This is a fair demand, which has placed us in the difficult position we are now in, notwithstanding an almost 15-year period of poor policy decisions and wanton corruption.
'This is particularly about arresting corruption, how we spend money, and what we spend that money on. Especially, when we are told that the GDP growth outlook has been revised down from 1.9% to 1.4% for 2025, with projections also revised downwards over the medium-term. The consequence of this is also muted revenue collection.'
P arty leader and Scopa chair Songezo Zibi said it is important to ensure that the debt-servicing costs and interest which costs the fiscus about R1.2bn a day, must not be placed at the feet of future generations as a burden.
'Any further borrowing must be about igniting economic growth and a jobs boom. Borrowing to plaster over poor decisions is something Rise Mzansi will fight against. In this context, it is of the utmost importance that we focus on making the right policy choices that may not bear fruit today but are for the future, which means investing in skills and education that will contribute to the building of a modern and resilient economy.
'Furthermore, we must aggressively invest in infrastructure and health. We must invest in the things we need, not the things we want.'
Zibi vowed to use his position at Scopa to advance accountability, ensuring that every rand is spent properly and accounted for, and that savings are cemented.
'We will work with the National Treasury to claw back on wasted and recklessly spent public funds. The next few years will tough, particularly for poor, working-class and middle-class South Africans, but with mature leadership, which often means making politically unpopular decisions, we will be able to get out of this mess, and truly build a prosperous South Africa.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
‘Declare Limpopo a GBV disaster zone'
Thohoyandou police station registered the most number of rapes and sexual offences in the country. Limpopo must be declared a gender-based violence disaster zone, says the ANC Women's League. This is after a large number of contact crimes such as rape, murder and sexual harassment were registered in different police stations across the province in the fourth quarter of 2024/25. The province's Thohoyandou police station has been branded the rape capital of South Africa after it registered the most number of rapes and sexual offences in the country. Despite the fourth quarter crime statistics revealing a decrease in contact crimes, Limpopo recorded 105 cases including murder, assault GBH, rape, robbery and theft. The second biggest political party in the Limpopo provincial legislature, the DA, said Thohoyandou was in the top 30 stations for all contact crimes, where it ranked 15th. The station also appeared in the top 30 stations for various crimes 13 times. 'Thohoyandou is most often against the downward trend of a specific crime category in Limpopo, with increases in assault with intent to cause grievous bodily harm [GBH], common assault and common robbery. 'Urgent high-level intervention is required as the SA Police Service (Saps) is losing the battle against crime in Thohoyandou,' DA provincial spokesperson for transport and community safety Marie Helm said. GBV crisis Helm, who doubles up as a member of the Limpopo legislature in Lebowakgomo, said Thohoyandou ranked first nationally for reported sexual offences and rape, Seshego police station 13th and Mankweng 18th in the top 30 stations for sexual offences. She said the per capita chances of being raped in Limpopo was above the national average and was indicative of persistent misguided efforts to instil a lack of zero tolerance for gender-based violence and femicide (GBV+F) in the society, as well as a lack of resources and experienced investigating officers. Provincial deputy speaker for the Limpopo legislature and secretary of the ANC Women's League in the province, Tebogo Mamorobela, pleaded with Premier Dr Phophi Ramathuba to declare Limpopo a gender-based violence disaster zone. She said defenceless women and children were abused on a daily basis. Mamorobela added that the level of crime in Limpopo has reached a boiling point and the government and communities must join forces to win the war against it. No place for criminals Transport and community safety MEC Violet Mathye said there was no place for criminals, especially those who prey on defenceless women and children in her government. The MEC was speaking during a visit to the family of slain Ndzalamo Mlondobozi, who died after her live-in lover allegedly ran over her with a car. No arrests have been made and police spokesperson Colonel Malesela Ledwaba said investigations were still underway. ALSO READ: Alleged GBV victim laid to rest but still no arrest 'We have launched a war against crime, especially against the terrorists who lash out at our innocent women and children,' Mathye said. 'That is why our government, under the stewardship of our premier, Dr Phophi Ramathuba is here today. We are here to provide support and pay our condolences to the family. 'We promise that no one is above the law and we will do everything and anything in our power to ensure that justice is served and that the perpetrator in this case is made to face the law, come high or low water.' On the rape and murder heightened statistics, Matye said Thohoyandou police station was the entry and exit of all African people from the Southern African Development Community countries into South Africa through the Beit Bridge border post. Without revealing the budget, Mathye said funds had been allocated and set aside to build more police stations and satellite police stations in the Vhembe region this financial year. 'We believe the more police stations we have in that region, the lower the statistics will be,' Mathye said. NOW READ: Senior NPA official denied bail in Limpopo case involving repeated child rape
The Herald
2 hours ago
- The Herald
R200m of taxpayers' money spent on GNU ministers' travel since taking office
'South Africans deserve leadership that puts people before perks and not a R200m travel spree by the world's largest cabinet.' The sport, arts and culture department's travel expenses have also raised concern. Minister Gayton McKenzie said he and his staff undertook 11 international trips costing more than R2m, adding that R164,556 was paid for a trip to Burkina Faso that never took place. 'Not only is this spending exorbitant but it is riddled with red flags, gaps and inconsistencies. The public paid for flights and accommodation for an event that was abandoned, a textbook case of wasteful expenditure, as defined by the Public Finance Management Act,' said Beesley. 'Unless the minister can demonstrate that this loss was unavoidable and efforts were made to recover the funds, this reflects a serious failure of financial oversight and internal control.' ActionSA has introduced the Enhanced Cut Cabinet Perks Bill to address unchecked government spending. 'This bill seeks to slash ministerial perks and restore much-needed fiscal discipline.' TimesLIVE
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Put an end to four centuries of corporate plundering of Africa
Cecil John Rhodes epitomised the consolidation and expansion of white supremacy, corporate interests and state power. For the past four centuries, corporations have exploited — butchered — the African continent, leaving behind scars, open wounds and entrails which can be seen from space. The history of the continent could be told as one of corporate rule briefly interrupted by colonialism or, as the late novelist and scholar Ngugi wa Thiong'o put it, of 'corpolonialism'. South Africa's past and present exemplifies this. The Cape was colonised by a corporation, which then imported enslaved people to provide labour and enable the Dutch East India Company to lay the material and symbolic foundations for the regime of white supremacy and racial domination that culminated in apartheid. When slavery was no longer profitable, and so the British decided to 'abolish' it, the empire 'expropriated' enslaved people across it colonies and formally freed them — but not before paying £20 million pounds in compensation to white slaveholders and their creditors in the name of 'justice and equity'. These 'reparations', paid to white people for the end of slavery, were then reinvested through the new corporate vehicle of the joint-stock company. They were used to finance further colonial expansion and consolidate white domination over land, labour and lives, globally. In the Cape colony, for example, white compensation for black 'emancipation' quintupled the money in circulation in the economy; more than doubled imports and exports; financed the violent settler expansion on the colony's eastern 'frontier' and led to the establishment of its first private bank in 1837. The number of joint-stock companies in the Cape doubled, as white beneficiaries of 'emancipation' pooled their compensation to generate more wealth. White former slaveholders leveraged their land, capital and credit to re-subordinate the newly freed 'apprentice' labourers and become rent-seeking slumlords. The greatest beneficiary of the trade in compensation claims — the London-based merchant house of Phillips, King & Co. — financed the exploration of copper in Namaqualand, drawing a line from 'compensated emancipation' to the mining and extractive monopolies that emerged after the discovery of diamonds and gold. The consolidation and expansion of this three-headed hydra of white supremacy, corporate interests and state power throughout the latter half of the 19th century is epitomised in the figure of Cecil John Rhodes. This race-state-company nexus was also central to the system of colonial apartheid that emerged over the course of the 20th century. Rhodes's successors — who controlled as much of the economy as the apartheid state — were joined by the various corporations established under the volkskapitalisme, many of which dominate the continent today. As the Truth and Reconciliation Commission concluded: 'Business was central to the economy that sustained the South African state during the apartheid years. Certain businesses … were involved in helping to design and implement apartheid policies … Most businesses benefited from operations in a racially structured context.' This unholy trinity of white supremacy, corporate interest and state power is not unique to South Africa. Its global articulation was on full display in the White House two weeks ago as the world's most powerful statesman, the world's wealthiest man and rich white men who chase white balls around for a living put on a spectacular performance of ignorance, entitlement and victimhood. One after another, US President Donald Trump invited each of these unelected white men to roll back the years and weigh in on the present conditions and future prospects of the majority of people in South Africa, who were once again being held hostage to the delusions of a white minority. The ball-hitters obliged, literally speaking over Cyril Ramaphosa, the democratically elected president of South Africa, and Zingiswa Losi, the leader of the country's largest trade union federation, Cosatu. It was all too much for golfer Ernie Els, who momentarily forgot which side he was on and thanked the US for its support in maintaining apartheid. It was the most honest moment of the whole spectacle. President Trump's corporate handler, Elon Musk, loomed large but said nothing. Rather, his ransom was delivered by South Africa's second richest man, Johann Rupert, who declared that he had opposed apartheid from birth — as long as he had benefited from it. He said South Africa must abandon its insistence that corporations operating in South Africa — which for centuries have worked hand-in-glove with colonial apartheid to advance the interests of a white minority — should include a mere 30% ownership stake for the majority of South Africans. This would allow Musk's Starlink — a central part of the US military-industrial complex — to not only colonise space but recolonise the continent. Another demand, made explicit in Trump's recent executive order, is that white beneficiaries of centuries of racial domination who have amassed an absurdly disproportionate amount of the privately owned land (and wealth) should — like their slave-owning forebearers — once more be compensated in the name of 'justice and equity', regardless of whether the land was 'justly' acquired and is being 'equitably' used, or even used at all. Social movements, activists and affected communities have been working to hold corporations to account for their depredations on the continent since the 1900s. An early and instructive example is the work of South Africa's own Alice Kinloch, a pathbreaking pan-Africanist and pioneer of the field of business and human rights, who was born in the Cape in 1863 and moved to Kimberley in the 1870s. In the final years of the 19 th century, Kinloch pointed out that: 'The handsome dividends that a certain company pays are earned at the price of blood and souls of … black men. Shareholders may be in happy ignorance of this, so we would remind them that there are several thousands of fellow-men kept under lock and key for their sole benefit, and that the gems on their wives' hands, and the finery bought by their 'profits' are, to 'seeing' eyes, bespattered with human gore.' Kinloch proceeded to set out 'the state of affairs in South Africa, for which the bloody, brutal and inconsiderate hands of avarice and might are answerable', where '[f]or more than a quarter of a century Kimberley has been the stage for the worst forms of undisguised inhumanity' at the hands of 'their master the Company'. In doing so she pointed to the race-corporation-state nexus, noting that De Beers was 'a company as ostentatiously 'colour-hating' as its chief, Cecil Rhodes'. Kinloch established the African Association in 1897, which organised the first Pan African Conference in 1900. The resolutions of that conference included a call for direct action in respect of 'the situation of the native races in South Africa', including the 'degrading and illegal compound system of native labour in vogue in Kimberley'. The work of Alice Kinloch and her fellow pan-Africans should serve not only to inspire us but instruct us. Last week, social movements, activists and affected communities met in Johannesburg for the 7 th African Regional Indaba on a Binding Treaty on Business and Human Rights organised by the Centre for Applied Legal Studies, the Alternative Information & Development Centre and Lawyers for Human Rights. The treaty negotiation process began in 2014 following a resolution by the Human Rights Council — co-sponsored by South Africa — to 'elaborate an international legally binding instrument to regulate, in international human rights law, the activities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises'. The future of the treaty is uncertain, as efforts towards corporate accountability more generally are backsliding everywhere. Both the US and the EU are rolling back what little controls they had in place to regulate the actions of corporations. Countries of the Global South are being put under immense pressure to ease regulations to facilitate the second 'scramble for Africa' under the banner of a 'green transition' that relies on minerals the West has declared 'critical'. In South Africa, the Competition Commission is appealing a decision of the competition appeal court which effectively neutered the commission's capacity to hold companies operating beyond our borders accountable for the negative impact of illegal activities in the republic. The appeal arises from the commission's efforts to prosecute the largest banks in the world — whose market capitalisation exceeds $2 trillion, some of which were founded with the compensation paid to white slaveholders — for the coordinated manipulation of the rand. The competition appeal court's 2024 decision threw out the case against 17 of the 28 banks before they had even responded to the allegations. When the Centre for Applied Legal Studies requested permission to intervene as an amicus curiae to place the banks' conduct within the framework of domestic and international human rights law, the constitutional court refused our application. In the face of these challenges, we must continue to hold the line on corporate accountability for what Kinloch rightly described 'handsome dividends … earned at the price of blood and souls', including through defending the treaty process, which has been led from the outset by the Global South. Like Kinloch, we must also insist on a continental response, including by supporting the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights' efforts to draft an African regional treaty to regulate the activities of transnational corporations. Four centuries of impunity for corpolonialism is enough. Professor Christopher Gevers is the director of the Centre for Applied Legal Studies and an associate professor at the School of Law, Wits University.
