KRQE Newsfeed: DWI lawsuit, Musk lawsuit, Stormy day, City communication, New equipment
Suspect charged with fatal stabbing on Albuquerque city bus
Leaders to consider Guaranteed Income program for some ABQ families
Young boy honored for donating organs following death in Santa Fe mobile home fire
City of Albuquerque using goats to mitigate fire risk in the Bosque
UNM, City of Albuquerque working to expand university's presence downtown
What's happening around New Mexico February 14-20
[1] Victims of DWI scheme file class action lawsuit – Victims of the DWI corruption scandal involving officers from multiple law enforcement agencies are joining forces in a class action lawsuit. A group of local attorneys are calling the scheme a widespread issue of systemic corruption. Since the feds started charging key players in the scheme, more victims have come forward.
[2] NMDOJ joins other states to sue Elon Musk, DOGE – New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez and 13 other attorney general's are taking legal action against DOGE and Elon Musk. Recently, Musk, who was granted access to sensitive government data, played a role in cutting the federal workforce and pushed to eliminate entire agencies. Torrez argued that President Trump violated the appointments clause of the U.S. Constitution by creating a new federal department without congressional approval and by granting Musk over federal agencies without the consent of the Senate. In their lawsuit, the plaintiffs are asking the courts to invalidate Musk's work and bar him from issuing any orders to anyone in the executive branch outside of DOGE.
[3] Snow, rain, & wind in New Mexico on Valentine's Day – Mountain snow is moving into northwest and northern New Mexico and southwest Colorado. Some of this snow will be heavy at times, especially in southwest Colorado and in the northern mountains. Lower elevations will see a break in the precipitation before a line of rain and mountain snow moves in from the west early Friday afternoon. For Albuquerque, we will likely stay dry most of the day, with increasing rain chances by Friday evening. It will fizzle out by late Friday night, but some mountain snow showers will continue through the overnight hours. Quieter weather returns late Friday night into early Saturday morning.
[4] ABQ City Council President calls for better communication with Mayor's Administration – Albuquerque's city council president calls it a major breakdown in communication between councilors and Mayor Tim Keller's administration. The conflict comes after the Keller administration told councilors they need to start emailing their questions for department heads ahead of council meetings to ensure accurate answers. Thursday, Councilor Brook Bassan released a letter saying she is now considering not putting the mayor's items on council agendas. In response to Bassan's letter, the Chief Administrative Officer says she's 'always happy to discuss whatever challenges individual councilors are having.'
[5] New weather station on the Zuni Pueblo expected to save lives – A key piece of equipment that could save lives is up and running on the Zuni Pueblo. The new weather station at the Andrew Othello Airport is now the official weather station for the Zuni Pueblo area, providing real time updates to pilots and meteorologists. Community leaders says this will be a game changer for them and for the critical patient care that is needed in the area, an issue that was highlighted when hundreds of emergency calls couldn't be answered during bad weather.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
31 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Now that Musk has turned his chainsaw on Trump, what happens to all the government data he accessed?
For anyone who's seen the quintessential slasher classic 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre,' the destructive power of a man wielding a chainsaw is the indisputable stuff of nightmares. But the same could easily be said about this year's remake featuring Elon Musk, where the dancing chainsaw slasher reenacted, for Conservative Political Action Conference theatergoers, a scene eerily reminiscent of the original. I'm thinking, specifically, of that unforgettable final scene, where Leatherface fades to black swinging his gas-powered murder weapon wildly through the air as he helplessly watches his last potential victim make her last-minute daring escape, dangling from the back of a stranger's pickup truck. Social Security? Gutted. Veterans programs? Gutted. Alzheimer's, cancer and climate research? Gutted. School lunches, Head Start, the entire Department of Education? All gutted. Air safety, food safety, consumer protections? Gutted. Gutted. Gutted. Museums, libraries, hospitals, childcare? You get the drift. And what about all those thousands of federal workers whose jobs were cut? It'll take us years to recover from these self-inflicted wounds. Not to mention the generational damage wrought to our standing in the global community by what is possibly Musk's proudest personal achievement: the decimation of America's foreign assistance programs feeding starving children, combating human trafficking, fighting malaria and reducing the transmission of HIV. All summarized, of course, by the heartless tweet: 'We spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper.' While the long-term consequences of these actions may be difficult to gauge, conservative estimates are measured in the tens of thousands. But now, apparently, our modern-day Leatherface has turned his power tool on the guy who gave him the chainsaw in the first place. Even implying that his former boss was involved in the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking conspiracy, and has since conspired to bury the evidence that would expose Trump's connections to Epstein's decades-long criminal activities — sort of hard to put that toothpaste back into the tube, wouldn't you say? At first glance, this appears to have all the makings of an Ultimate Fighting Championship bout, fought in the middle of a monster truck rally. This calls to mind the 1990s Claymation TV show 'Celebrity Deathmatch,' where preposterously paired big-name personalities (Hillary vs. Monica? Prince Charles vs. Prince?) fought to the death. Promises to be one hell of a show! What America may be in danger of losing sight of in the ensuing spectacle is the real threat to our national security posed by the world's richest man, who, until quite recently, enjoyed unfettered access to everything the government knows about you. Never before has the data your federal government collects about every American been consolidated into a single database. It has always, religiously, been 'siloed' into disconnected data systems — some at the Treasury Department, some at the Education Department, some at the Veterans Affairs and the Social Security Administration, among other agencies — but always carefully stored and guarded by the separate entities collecting the data. The New York Times, for example, recently published a comprehensive story detailing 314 specific personal details your government potentially knows about you. I suggest giving that a read. A week ago, this casual observer would have assumed these two men, Trump and Musk, were acting with a single motive. Assembling the master data that could make possible Trump's ambitions for sweeping dictatorial powers, and for Musk's ambitions. The sheer volume of data, of course, far outstrips anything that social media titans like Mark Zuckerberg or Musk could legally monetize. And, in any event, certainly not the quid pro quo one might expect for a $288 million campaign contribution. Musk seemed, instead, to be carving himself a unique role in a near-future authoritarian oligarchy, as the undisputed Richelieu to Trump's Louis XIII. But, alas, that was not to be. What is to be, is the shocking revelation that a man who just days ago was given the ceremonial key to the White House — and in the weeks prior, the key to just about every federal government data base — has now cut all ties, and who we know talks regularly with Vladimir Putin, with whom he enjoys a reportedly friendly relationship, is now a free agent. Did Musk take the data with him? To me, the answer seems obvious. The way his pot-smoking 'college dropouts' sauntered into agency after rarified government agency, enjoying open access to virtually anything they wanted — and then they were called out by a whistleblower for uploading huge troves of data to an unsecured server. Within minutes, after Russian hackers had apparently been tipped off, they tried to download it using the correct passwords. We are told that in the end, the Russians were unable to access the data. Whether or not that denial is accurate and truthful, however, again, what should be obvious is that Musk's team successfully spirited your personal information from secure government databases to god knows where. That is the reality to which we wake today, and now every day. Let's hope that after those two Claymation figures have beaten the clay out of each other, someone comes up with a plan to clean up the mess they made. Before it's too late. Brett Wagner, now retired, served as professor of national security decision making for the U.S. Naval War College and adjunct fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Questions about tornado warnings, Republican supermajority and "beautiful" bill
While the late afternoon tornado came through Norman on June 3, I followed my tornado protocols that I'd honed over my 40 years in Norman. I grabbed my NOAA weather radio, flashlights, iPads, phones, dogs, neighbors and myself and hunkered down in my tornado shelter. I turned on my NOAA weather radio to get specific information about the Norman tornado up top. This is the transmission that I got. 'This NOAA weather station is temporarily off the air. Please tune to an alternate weather radio broadcast or visit for the latest weather information.' My NOAA weather radio also did not sound the loud alarm about the approaching tornado. Two hours after the tornado, the NOAA radio was still transmitting that same broken message. My NOAA radios have always worked to broadcast very specific locational information relating to weather events. I can only wonder if other Oklahomans, in the line of (June 3's) tornadoes, found that they could not rely on NOAA for their weather my 40 years in Norman, NOAA, under 20 years of Republican presidents and 20 years of Democratic presidents has become a finely tuned set of federal agencies with work forces composed of educated, motivated and dedicated federal employees with missions to protect Americans' lives against extreme and dangerous weather events. This president has decided to tip this scientific agency on its head and break it. So I send 'no thanks' to President Trump, Elon Musk, DOGE, Congressman Tom Cole and (Sens. James) Lankford and (Markwayne) Mullin for breaking NOAA. I bid good luck to the people in the American hurricane states. They are likely to find that they cannot rely on NOAA for weather information that can save lives. And like me, they will know who they can blame for it. ― Lani Malysa — Norman More: Oklahoma's weather scientists are ready for tornado season despite threat of DOGE cuts Reference William C. Wertz's opinion piece of May 30. He is exactly correct about the purposeful and shameful diminution of citizens ability to circulate the initiative petition. The Republican supermajority is both careless and crass as they conduct the people's business showing no regard to fundamental rights given to us in our state Constitution and subsequent statutes. Having served in both the House and Senate, I cannot believe the current leadership in the Legislature and Gov. Kevin Stitt so blithely and arrogantly misstate what various bills do. This behavior was especially grievous as SB 1027 ― the theft of our initiative petition rights ― moved from the Senate to the House. Even when confronted by knowledgeable lawmakers, especially Rep. Andy Fugate, who asked well-researched and important questions, the authors chose to distort and double talk into deeper and deeper holes of deception. In doing so they shame themselves, their party and bring derision and disbelief from others around our country. No wonder progressive, forward-looking companies and individuals routinely mark off our state for location or investment. After all, it's bad enough to have to deal with politicians in the first place and it's downright disgusting when they are provably habitual liars. ― Cal Hobson — Lexington More: The 'big beautiful bill' is not compassionate conservatism but cruelty codified | Letter The House bill that all of Oklahoma's congressmen voted for is now before the Senate. Branded a growth package, this legislation could add up to $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. This is dangerous fiscal policy. Our debt already exceeds $35 trillion, and in 2025 alone, the U.S. could spend over $1.1 trillion just on interest payments despite historically low interest rates. That is more than the $880 billion we spend on the Department of Defense. By 2032, interest payments could easily double to over $2 trillion annually from growing deficits and rising interest rates. The recent downgrade of our AAA credit rating by Moody's — the first since 1917 — was in part based on projections of the long-term impact of this bill. Interest rates on government bonds rose the day of the downgrade and rates Oklahomans pay for mortgages and auto loans increased. These policies in this bill are nothing new — they're a rerun of failed Republican 'trickle-down' tax cuts enacted in 1981, 2001, and 2017. To pay for part of the cuts, Reagan taxed Social Security for the first time and Republicans continue to shift the tax burden. Each time, tax cuts failed to pay for themselves. Instead of boosting wages, they fueled corporate stock buybacks that before Reagan were illegal because they did not lead to productive investments in our economy. Ordinary families were left behind and income inequality grew. The lost revenue from the cuts in this bill moves us much closer to the 'doom loop' where we must borrow more every year just to pay interest. And when the federal budgets tighten, it's always working families who Republicans ask to sacrifice, not the people who most benefited. Expect to hear calls to raise the retirement age, cut Medicare and food programs, and eliminate more funding for education and housing not reversing their failed tax policy. Cutting services for our citizens is not fiscal responsible. It's shifting the burden from the wealthy to those least able to carry it ― 'Shift and Shaft.' The wealthiest 10% keep their tax breaks while working families face longer hours, higher prices, and fewer public services. Most Oklahomans did not demand more tax cuts for billionaires. Yet we'll be the ones paying the price. Let this sink in: The U.S. now has one of the most unequal income distributions among developed countries, ranking 42nd globally in upward mobility. Life expectancy has fallen to 48th in the world at 78.4 years. Oklahoma's is 72.7 years, 48th in the nation. These aren't just statistics — they're signs of policies that are leaving everyday Oklahomans behind. Senators Lankford and Mullin still have time to do the right thing. Ask them to oppose this bill and push for tax policies that protect our future — by investing in the well-being of every Oklahoman, not giveaways for the top 10 % who already hold 67.3% of total household wealth. — William Langdon, Tulsa More: Oklahoma's schoolteachers need more education on how to deal with trauma | Opinion Eight years ago, I attended a parenting class to become a certified foster parent, and I was shocked to learn about Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs). Why was I surprised to learn about childhood trauma at a DHS training? I was struck by the absence of this vital information from my own education and training. I was a certified public school teacher and administrator. I had taught hundreds of students, so I couldn't help but think, 'Why have I never heard this before?! Educators need to know about the impacts of trauma.' ACEs indicate a traumatic experience has occurred before age 18 which threatens a child's development. ACEs include various types of abuse, neglect and household dysfunction. These experiences cause developmental impacts that are profound and often long-lasting. ACEs may cause cognitive, physical, social, emotional or behavioral deficits which become evident in the classroom as trauma impacts student behavior and learning. Since that DHS training, I have learned that Oklahoma has a particularly high prevalence of ACEs, especially compared to other states. In 2019, a requirement in state statute was added for pre-service teachers to be trained in trauma-informed responsive instruction. Disturbingly, though, there is still no requirement for certified teachers or school administrators to receive this essential training. And with the dramatic rise of alternative teacher certification in Oklahoma, a significant number of new teachers are entering classrooms unprepared. To better support our students, Oklahoma law must be changed to require trauma-informed training for all educators. This training is critical for understanding and responding to the impacts of trauma on students creating more effective and supportive learning environments across the state. — Annie Keehn, Tecumseh Re: Fed cuts to impact NPR, PBS in state, Friday, May 30, page A1: Anyone with any intelligent awareness who listens to NPR knows NPR is a liberal Democrat mouthpiece. — Greg Clift, Anadarko I agree with guest columnist Matthew Curtis Fleischer concerning the church welcoming 'anyone sincerely interested in learning more about God ... including LGBTQ+ people,' since they need Jesus just like the rest of us sinners. However, I must take issue with his concluding homosexuality is not an essential issue since Jesus never mentioned it. Jesus also never mentioned rape, pedophilia or necrophilia. How many of these would Fleischer consider not an essential issue? Any argument that proves too much proves nothing. Besides his Jesus never mentioned it argument, Fleischer also dismisses homosexuality as an issue that 'the entire New Testament mentions fewer than five times.' My question is, how many times does God have to address a topic to make it an essential issue? God has spoken unambiguously on the issue in the New Testament. See Rom. 1:26-32; 1 Cor. 6:9-11; 1 Tim. 1:8-10. While Jesus never spoke directly about homosexual behavior, He addressed it by emphasizing the only sexual union approved by God in Matt. 19:4-6. In John 16:12-13 Jesus told His apostles He still had many things to say to them that they could not then bear, but when the Holy Spirit came He would 'guide them into all truth.' So anyone basing their doctrine only on the words spoken by Jesus is not following all truth. — Dean Cave, Antlers This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Concerns about tornado warnings, citizens' rights and Trump | Letters
Washington Post
44 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Inside the battles that shattered Trump and Musk's alliance
President Donald Trump was dejected, processing his very public split with the world's richest man. Rattled in the wake of Elon Musk's public attacks and apparent call for his impeachment, Trump worked the phones, debriefing close confidants and casual acquaintances alike. His former ally was 'a big-time drug addict,' Trump said at one point as he tried to make sense of Musk's behavior, according to a person with knowledge of the call, who like others interviewed for this story spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters.
