Spain asks for break on NATO contribution: Report
Leaders in Madrid urged NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte to exempt them from a proposed defense spending goal set at 5 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) ahead of next week's summit at The Hague.
'Committing to a 5% target would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive, as it would move Spain further away from optimal spending and would hinder the EU's ongoing efforts to strengthen its security and defence ecosystem,' Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez wrote in a letter to Rutte, according to a copy reviewed by Reuters.
'It is the legitimate right of every government to decide whether or not they are willing to make those sacrifices. As a sovereign Ally, we choose not to,' he added.
Spain currently has the lowest military spending among member nations, devoting 1.3 percent of its GDP to defense spending last year, according to reports from Politico EU.
Member nations agreed to commit 2 percent of their GDP to defense spending in 2014, with the hope of ensuring NATO can sustain continued military readiness.
The Russia-Ukraine conflict has sparked concerns about the possibility of a wider war involving Europe amid Russian President Vladimir Putin's push to obtain more land. Spain said the Kremlin poses no current threat to its borders but did not oppose heightened security for other NATO member nations.
'Of course, it is not our intention to limit the spending ambitions of other allies or to obstruct the outcome of the upcoming summit,' Sánchez wrote in the letter.
Rutte has suggested that an increase in defense spending levels should ensure 3.5 percent of GDP is allocated to military expenditures, while 1.5 percent is allocated for defense-related items, such as military mobility and cybersecurity, Politico EU reported.
However, Sánchez said the policy would force Spain to purchase off-the-shelf equipment instead of cultivating its own industrial base, as recorded in his letter.
President Trump has encouraged Rutte's push for growth, citing a mounting concern about the United States's dominant support of the war in Ukraine, a nonmember nation designated as a NATO partner country.
Although his administration signed a minerals agreement with the country to recoup the financial commitment for weapons packages and the purchase of military equipment, the president has urged other nations to help back the Eastern European ally.
'I didn't see Spain's comments, I'll make sure the president sees them and I can assure you he wants to see all European countries pay their fair share and meet that 5 percent threshold,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said during Thursday's press briefing.
'It's only fair considering the American taxpayers have given a significant chunk of money to the tune of billions of dollars to support our mutual interests and our assured defense.'
The NATO summit is set to take place June 24-25 and would require all 32 member nations to approve the increase in defense spending to solidify the objective.
'The NATO Summit is coming at a very precarious moment for the transatlantic relationship, marked by uncertainty about the US commitment to Europe, a relative stalemate in peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine and ongoing tensions over transatlantic trade,' Lauren Speranza, a fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis, said in a statement.
'As the first NATO summit of President Trump's second term, I do think the meeting will offer us some insight into how the administration will approach the Alliance going forward, following some of the previous criticisms we've heard of NATO and calls for Europe to do more to take greater responsibility for its own defense.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
29 minutes ago
- Washington Post
With no end to war in sight, Ukraine's economy teeters on the edge
KYIV — At the NATO summit, this week President Donald Trump expressed a degree of puzzlement that the war between Ukraine and Russia is still going on, admitting that Russian President Vladimir Putin had been 'difficult.' 'I'm surprised with him; I thought we would have that settled easy,' Trump said at a news conference Wednesday, adding that the Ukraine-Russia conflict has 'been more difficult than other wars.'
Associated Press
30 minutes ago
- Associated Press
India rejects signing Shanghai Cooperation Organization statement seen as pro-Pakistan
NEW DELHI (AP) — Beijing's bid for enhanced regional leadership suffered a setback Thursday when India rejected signing a joint statement put before members of the China-backed Shanghai Cooperation Organization, saying it was pro-Pakistan in not mentioning April's terror attack on Indian tourists. Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh said the statement diluted India's position on critical issues such as terrorism and regional security, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak to the media. India blames Pakistan for backing the gunmen behind the April 22 killing of 26 people, most of them Indian Hindu tourists, in India-controlled Kashmir, and has described it as a terror attack. Islamabad denies the charge. Singh alleged that the joint statement 'suited Pakistan's narrative' because it did not include that attack but mentioned militant activities in Balochistan, the person said. Pakistan has repeatedly accused India of backing Balochistan freedom movement, allegations that India denies. The signing ceremony came during a meeting of defense ministers of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a regional grouping formed by China and Russia to counter U.S. influence in Asia. China has largely taken over running the SCO, staging joint drills and holding summits, while Russia is embroiled in its full-scale invasion of Ukraine and international isolation. While little known globally, the SCO has become one of China's main instruments to expand its political and economic reach into areas traditionally neutral, such as India, or closely linked to Russia such as Central Asia. Thursday's meeting took place in the east China city of Qingdao, home to China's northern fleet. Singh, without explicitly naming Pakistan, urged the SCO to criticize countries that use 'cross-border terrorism as an instrument of policy and provide shelter to terrorists.' He said members should unite in eliminating terrorism and ensure accountability for those who aid such activities. 'Peace and prosperity cannot co-exist with terrorism and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in the hands of non-state actors and terror groups. Dealing with these challenges requires decisive action,' said Singh, according to a defense ministry statement. The April 22 killings embroiled the two nuclear-armed nations in the most serious military confrontation in decades. After days of exchanging fire, they agreed to end all military actions under a U.S.-brokered ceasefire. On Wednesday, Chinese Defense Minister Dong Jun held one-on-one meetings with his counterparts from Belarus, Iran, Pakistan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia. India, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan are also members. 'Unilateralism and protectionism are surging, while hegemonic, high-handed, and bullying acts severely undermine the international order, making these practices the biggest sources of chaos and harm,' Dong said according to the official Xinhua News Agency, in a swipe at the U.S. and its allies. China and India have decades-old border disputes and Beijing has become one of Pakistan's closest allies. ___ Associated Press writer Christopher Bodeen contributed to this story from Taipei, Taiwan.
Newsweek
32 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Just Undid Decades of Nuclear Diplomacy
The first nuclear weapon was tested just under 80 years ago, and the fact that the size of the nuclear club remains in the single digits is a testament to decades of careful diplomacy through the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). President Donald Trump's reckless and illegal strikes on Iranian nuclear sites now threaten to blow up the results of that painstaking work. Trump's aggression is more likely to lead to what scholars call a "proliferation cascade" than it is to stop Tehran's nuclear program. The NPT has two main components. First, it requires signatories without nuclear weapons to promise not to build them, and to allow inspections and monitoring of peaceful civilian nuclear activities. Compliance can unlock technical assistance, financial backing, and information sharing to help countries harness the power of nuclear energy and other applications for the benefit of their citizens. The second, much less discussed, component required the five signatories already in possession of nuclear weapons at the time the treaty was signed (the U.S., USSR, U.K., France, and China) to work towards abolition of these terrible weapons. They were to "pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race" with the ultimate goal of "general and complete disarmament." Nuclear-armed countries, of which there are now nine, have basically abandoned this central feature of the treaty, much to the consternation of the other signatories. According to Jon Wolfsthal, the director of Global Risk at the Federation of American Scientists and a former staffer on the National Security Council, "perhaps 40 additional states are technically advanced enough to build nuclear weapons if they chose to do so." These include American allies like Japan, Germany, and South Korea. That neither they nor rich autocracies like Saudi Arabia have moved to join the nuclear club is due to the trust built via presidency-spanning U.S. leadership, which created the sense that the NPT's provisions would be applied fairly, and that countries which submit to inspections and negotiations won't be arbitrarily attacked by states with nukes. Because the nuclear-armed countries have now gone decades without serious disarmament efforts, that trust was already wobbly. And Trump has basically just destroyed it. US President Donald Trump leaves at the end of a press conference during the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) summit in The Hague on June 25, 2025. US President Donald Trump leaves at the end of a press conference during the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) summit in The Hague on June 25, 2025. JOHN THYS / AFP/Getty Images You'll find no apologies for the odious Iranian regime here. It has destabilized the Middle East with pointless adventurism and provocation while engaging in some of the worst domestic political repression in the world. But this is now twice that the U.S. has pulled the rug out from under Tehran. First, the U.S. under Trump arbitrarily reneged on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in 2018, obliterating years of diplomacy and sending us down the path we find ourselves on today. This is to say nothing of the ongoing hypocrisy about Israel's undeclared and growing nuclear arsenal. Perhaps even more egregiously, President Trump hoodwinked Iran into a negotiation process only to bow to Israeli pressure and conduct airstrikes against Iranian nuclear facilities. Even as he was offering Tehran a two-week window to reach an agreement and leaving the door open for fresh talks, the president had already made the decision to launch a surprise attack. Israeli airstrikes even wounded one of Iran's lead nuclear negotiators. Even if you think those talks would have failed due to Iranian intransigence, it is hard to imagine anything more damaging to the future of nuclear diplomacy than a nuclear-armed country using purposeful misdirection to leave an NPT signatory defenseless against a sneak attack and targeting negotiators. Why would any country considering building these weapons ever trust the United States again? Why would they put their faith in the procedures of the NPT if they can simply be discarded by the world's military hegemon whenever it likes? Without the incentives of the NPT, fear and coercion are the only things keeping countries from building nuclear weapons. That simply won't be enough if leaders decide they have more to gain from building nuclear weapons than they have to lose from the political fallout. They will ask whether they want to be North Korea, which is effectively insulated from U.S. attack by its nuclear arsenal, or Iran, which is now virtually defenseless against American coercion. At least a few are likely to conclude that they will be safer and more secure in the long run by joining the nuclear club, which could in turn lead their rivals to make the same calculation. A world with a growing number of nuclear powers is less safe and more prone to almost unimaginable catastrophe. That has been the driving principle of America's successful nuclear policy for decades, and with one capricious order, President Trump has inadvertently made the nightmare of a proliferation cascade much more likely. David Faris is an associate professor of political science at Roosevelt University and the author of It's Time to Fight Dirty: How Democrats Can Build a Lasting Majority in American Politics. His writing has appeared in Slate, The Week, The Washington Post, The New Republic, Washington Monthly and more. You can find him on Twitter @davidmfaris and Bluesky @ The views expressed in this article are the writer's own
