After the space race, China wants to win in humanoid robots
But this isn't a factory floor… yet.
It's a data lab run by Chinese startup AgiBot – and it's part of China's race to lead the global humanoid revolution and transform the way we live, work and play.
Yao Maoqing is a partner at the company.
:: Yao Maoqing, President of AgiBot
'We want to use general purpose robots to create unlimited productivity. Just imagine that one day in our own robot factory, our robots are assembling themselves.'
Chinese humanoids are already performing increasingly complex feats like somersaults and running a half-marathon.
President Xi Jinping recently inspected Agibot's products at a lab in Shanghai.
And his visit highlights Beijing's long-term strategy – using humanoids to counter U.S. tariffs, an aging population and slowing economic growth.
For the first time, Reuters is reporting details about how China's technological advances are allowing already impressive hardware to be paired with the software needed to make these robots economically viable.
Here, the prowess of homegrown artificial intelligence platforms like DeepSeek is being combined with abundant government support.
Reuters spoke to more than a dozen people - from robot makers and investors to analysts and users - who say the breakthroughs are moving robots from spectacle to solution.
And could revolutionize China's manufacturing supremacy as it competes with the U.S.
The Chinese government plans to build its edge by focusing on data training and the sophistication of its AI models.
And authorities are handing out generous subsidies or free office space for humanoid firms.
Over $20 billion has been allocated to the sector over the past year.
The government is also a key buyer, according to a Reuters review of tender documents.
State procurement of humanoid robots and related tech jumped to 214 million yuan in 2024 from 4.7 million the year before.
The Chinese government didn't respond to questions about its role in supporting the development of humanoid robots.
There has also been an explosion of new firms in the sector.
In 2024 alone, 31 Chinese companies unveiled 36 competing humanoid models.
U.S. companies presented eight – according to Morgan Stanley.
The nation's clearest advantage though is its domination of humanoid hardware.
Up to 90% of robot parts can be made locally – so Chinese firms can scale quickly.
Current units can cost around $35,000 but three manufacturers told Reuters they predict costs to halve, perhaps within a year.
Rui Ma is a tech analyst.
:: Rui Ma, China tech analyst
"The way the Chinese government looks at it is that human robotics can be the next EV industry where by investing in the entire manufacturing supply chain, you can come up with a product that is better, cheaper and globally exportable from China."
But the rise of humanoids has sparked concerns for the current workforce.
One expert warned up to 70% of China's manufacturing jobs could be at risk…
And that could lead to a steep decline in social security contributions.
The chairman of domestic AI firm iFlytek has suggested creating an unemployment insurance program for workers replaced by robots.
While one industry professional told Reuters that its prototypes were targeting the boring, repetitive or dangerous jobs that humans don't want to do.
Beijing though sees the technology as key to plugging labor shortages in areas such as elderly care. Demand is only increasing as China's 1.4 billion population ages.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Why Can't the U.S. Build 5-Minute E.V. Chargers?
China is dominating the electric vehicle market globally, accounting for more than 70 percent of global manufacturing in 2024, according to the International Energy Agency. Its E.V. makers have pulled ahead of U.S. car companies on both price and technology. Case in point: the five-minute charger. This past spring, two major Chinese companies announced breakthroughs in battery technology that will enable electric vehicles to drive hundreds of miles on a five-minute charge. After traveling to China to test drive new fast-charging cars sold by BYD, Patrick George, the editor in chief of InsideEVs, said Chinese models were 'pretty much a generation or two ahead of the rest of the world.' It's easy to imagine how five-minute charging might transform U.S. drivers' attitudes toward electric vehicles. Widely available power sources and a charge time roughly the same length as a stop to fill up a gas tank would go a long way to alleviate the range anxiety many cite as a hurdle to going electric. But car buyers in the U.S. aren't likely to get access to five-minute charging any time soon, analysts say. Here's why. BYD's fast-charging system depends on two things: a vehicle capable of charging quickly, and a charger that can deliver power from the grid to match. BYD, which is now the world's largest producer of electric vehicles, has developed a battery that has a peak charging capacity of 1,000 kilowatts, also known as a megawatt. This peak rate can add enough charge in five minutes to drive for about 250 miles. Most E.V.s on the market in the U.S. can charge at peak rates of 400 kilowatts or less. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


CNBC
a few seconds ago
- CNBC
Americans fear AI permanently displacing workers, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
Americans are deeply concerned over the prospect that advances in artificial intelligence could put swaths of the country out of work permanently, according to a new Reuters/Ipsos poll. The six-day poll, which concluded on Monday, showed 71% of respondents said they were concerned that AI will be "putting too many people out of work permanently." The new technology burst into the national conversation in late 2022 when OpenAI's ChatGPT chatbot launched and became the fastest-growing application of all time, with tech heavyweights like Facebook owner Meta Platforms, Google owner Alphabet and Microsoft offering their own AI products. While at present there are few signs of mass unemployment - the U.S. jobless rate was just 4.2% in July - artificial intelligence is stirring concerns as it reshapes jobs, industries and day-to-day life. Some 77% of respondents to the Reuters/Ipsos poll said they worried the technology could be used to stir up political chaos, a sign of unease over the now-common use of AI technology to create realistic videos of imaginary events. President Donald Trump last month posted on social media an AI-generated video of former Democratic president Barack Obama being arrested, an event that never happened. Americans are also leery about military applications for AI, the Reuters/Ipsos poll showed. Some 48% of respondents said the government should never use AI to determine the target of a military strike, compared with 24% who said the government should allow that sort of use of the technology. Another 28% said they were not sure. The general enthusiasm for AI shown by many people and companies has fueled further investments, such as Foxconn and SoftBank's planned data center equipment factory in Ohio. It has also upended national security policies as the United States and China vie for AI dominance. More than half of Americans - some 61% - said they were concerned about the amount of electricity needed to power the fast-growing technology. Google said earlier this month it had signed agreements with two U.S. electric utilities to reduce its AI data center power consumption during times of surging demand on the grid, as energy-intensive AI use outpaces power supplies. The new technology has also come under criticism for applications that have let AI bots hold romantic conversations with children, generate false medical information and help people make racist arguments. Two-thirds of respondents in the Reuters/Ipsos poll said they worried that people would ditch relationships with other people in favor of AI companions. People were split on whether AI technology will improve education. Some 36% of respondents thought it would help, while 40% disagreed and the rest were not sure. The Reuters/Ipsos survey gathered responses online from 4,446 U.S. adults nationwide and had a margin of error of about 2 percentage points.


Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
Anti‑corruption protests hit European nation as calls for new elections grow
Anti-corruption protests rocked the Serbian capital of Belgrade as student-led demonstrators clashed with supporters of President Aleksandar Vucic and his political party, demanding new elections. Violent clashes between anti-government protesters and Serbian security forces have intensified over the last week, with protesters setting fire to an office building belonging to the ruling party in Novi Sad. "You will see the full determination of the Serbian state. We will use everything at our disposal to restore law, peace and order," President Vucic said in an address to the nation Saturday night. Tens of thousands of college students have been marching and protesting since December, demanding justice and accountability after the deaths of 16 people in the collapse of a railway station in the Serbian town of Novi Sad. The canopy at the railway station collapsed Nov. 1 after renovations led by two Chinese companies. The government is accused of not implementing student demands, including the release of all documentation related to the reconstruction of the train station. In his speech, Vucic said that justice must be served for all those responsible for the 16 victims of the Novi Sad rail station collapse. Critics have called out the heavy-handed response used against protesters. Alan Berset, Secretary General of the Council of Europe, said in a post on X that he was concerned with the rising violence. "I call for calm and respect of the right to peaceful assembly. Serbian authorities must uphold Council of Europe standards. The rule of law and respect for human rights must prevail," Berset said. Serbia's foreign minister, Marko Djuric, responded to the criticism in a statement to Fox News Digital. "We respect and protect peaceful protest—it is part of our democratic fabric. But when demonstrations turn into physical attacks and attempts to destabilize the country, the government has both the right and the duty to respond." "This is by far the biggest threat Vucic has faced in the last 13 years, and it is very unlikely that Vucic will weather the storm without elections," Helena Ivanov, senior fellow at the Henry Jackson Society, told Fox News Digital. "The country is not functioning, and the situation is dangerously escalating. The only way out of the problem is to hold free and fair elections as soon as possible. "Everything else will further destabilize the situation, which could have devastating consequences," Ivanov added. The government is accused of not fulfilling one of the original student demands, including the release of all documentation related to the reconstruction of the train station. What originally started as spontaneous protests voicing dissatisfaction with the government's failed response to the railway catastrophe transformed into a movement opposing widespread corruption and the erosion of the rule of law under Vucic. One of the largest protests in Serbia's history took place on March 15, with nearly 350,000 people gathered in Slavija Square in central Belgrade. Serbia's then-Prime Minister Milos Vucevic announced his resignation in January amid the nationwide protests, making him the most senior government member to step down. "Serbian students put forward several demands, the first and most important being the release of documentation regarding the reconstruction of the Novi Sad train station, where the collapse of the canopy killed 16 people. To this day, no one has been held accountable," Filip Ubović, a student from the University of Belgrade and protest participant on the ground in Belgrade, told Fox News Digital. Ubovic said the protests were originally aimed at influencing the institutions responsible for upholding the rule of law, and not directly against the ruling party. As the government failed to hold any officials accountable for the tragedy or release any information on the canopy collapse, the protesters realized that it was time to demand elections.