Oil rises 1% on signs of strong demand, Russia-Ukraine peace uncertainty
Brent crude futures were close to a two-week high and up 64 cents, or around 1%, to $67.48 a barrel at 1012 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures were up 65 cents, or 1%, to $63.36 a barrel.
Both contracts climbed over 1% in the prior session.
Russia said on Wednesday that attempts to resolve security issues relating to Ukraine over the war without Moscow's participation were a "road to nowhere".
"If the White House's efforts do result in a halt to hostilities in Ukraine, and Russia gradually coming back into the international fold, it will be bearish for the crude market. But for now the Brent price floor to watch out for remains at $65 a barrel," said independent analyst Gaurav Sharma.
U.S. President Donald Trump has announced an additional tariff of 25% on Indian goods from August 27 because of India's Russian crude purchases, which make up nearly 35% of its overall oil imports.
Russian embassy officials in New Delhi said on Wednesday that Moscow expects to continue supplying oil to India despite warnings from the United States.
Given uncertainty over progress towards ending the war in Ukraine, the possibility of tighter sanctions on Russia has resurfaced, which led to bullish sentiment among traders, said Tamas Varga, an analyst at PVM Oil Associates.
Meanwhile, U.S. crude inventories fell by 6 million barrels last week to 420.7 million barrels, the U.S. Energy Information Administration said on Wednesday, against expectations in a Reuters poll for a 1.8 million-barrel draw.
While the large draw indicates increased demand, the rise in crude levels at Cushing suggest underlying demand may be softer and that the draw was higher in part due to higher refinery runs and increased exports, Panmure Liberum's Ashley Kelty said.
(Reporting by Katya Golubkova in Tokyo and Siyi Liu in Singapore. Editing by Emelia Sithole-Matarise and Mark Potter)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
5 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
Global oil markets face rising supply glut amid weak demand
The global oil market is bracing for what the International Energy Agency (IEA) warns could be the biggest supply glut since the pandemic, with crude inventories projected to swell through late 2025 and early 2026. On Thursday, Brent crude futures were close to a two-week high and up 43 cents, or around 0.6 per cent, at $67.27 a barrel at 1203 GMT. US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures were up 45 cents, or 0.7 per cent, at $63.16 a barrel. Both contracts climbed over 1 per cent in the prior session. The draw signals resilient demand, yet gains remain limited as geopolitical tensions cloud the outlook. Energy traders weigh the prospect of shifting global supply flows, including stronger Russian exports and higher Opec+ output, which have pressured crude to a three-month low, down over 10 per cent this month. Demand growth continues to underperform expectations, while production — both from Opec+ and non-Opec+ suppliers — is surging to multi-year highs. In its August oil market report, the IEA once again cut demand growth forecasts, marking the sixth downgrade this year. Global oil demand is now expected to rise by just 680,000 barrels per day (bpd) in 2025 and by 700,000 bpd in 2026. Since the start of the year, the agency has lowered its growth outlook by a combined 350,000 bpd. Weak consumption across major economies and softer-than-expected demand from emerging markets such as China, Brazil, Egypt and India underpin the downward revisions. While jet fuel demand is enjoying a summer boost of over 2 per cent in the US and Europe, it has not been sufficient to offset wider demand weakness. At the same time, global supply is on the rise. The IEA has lifted its projection for supply growth this year to 2.5 million bpd, an upward revision of 370,000 bpd from July. The eight Opec+ members, including Saudi Arabia, Russia, the UAE and Iraq, agreed earlier this month to add 547,000 bpd in September, fully unwinding the 2.2 million bpd in cuts first introduced in November 2023. By the end of September, the entire cutback programme will be rolled back. Yet the bulk of new barrels are expected from non-Opec+ producers. The US, Brazil, Canada and Guyana are all lifting production, with American natural gas liquids (NGLs) and offshore fields in South America and the Atlantic basin leading the growth. Non-Opec+ supply is expected to rise by 1.3 million bpd in 2025 and a further 1 million bpd in 2026. According to the IEA, Brazil will surpass the US as the single largest contributor to non-Opec+ growth in 2026, with an increase of 160,000 bpd compared to America's 130,000 bpd. The mismatch between supply and demand is beginning to show in inventories. Global observed oil stocks increased by 1.5 million bpd in the second quarter, with Chinese crude inventories swelling by 900,000 bpd and US gas liquids adding another 900,000 bpd. The IEA forecasts that inventories will build at a record pace of nearly 3 million bpd next year — surpassing even the glut of 2020, when the Covid-19 pandemic crushed demand. Saxo Bank strategist Ole Hansen described the outlook as 'the most bloated market balances in years.' The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) shares this view. In its latest short-term outlook, the EIA projected inventory builds averaging more than 2 million bpd in the fourth quarter of 2025 and the first quarter of 2026, up 800,000 bpd from last month's forecast. Reflecting the weaker balance, the EIA cut its Brent crude price forecast for 2026 to $51 per barrel, down from $58 previously. It expects low prices to eventually force supply adjustments from both Opec+ and some non-Opec producers by mid-2026. The divide between the IEA and Opec on demand outlooks remains stark. The IEA expects global demand in 2026 to reach just 104.4 million bpd, while Opec forecasts consumption of 106.5 million bpd. For this year, Opec has kept its estimate unchanged at 1.29 million bpd in demand growth, nearly double the IEA's forecast. The cartel also sees non-Opec supply growth at just 800,000 bpd in 2025 and 600,000 bpd in 2026, well below the IEA's projections. This divergence underscores the uncertainty hanging over the market: Opec paints a more bullish picture of resilient consumption and tighter balances, while the IEA is firmly bearish. Adding to the bearish sentiment, geopolitical developments are weighing on market psychology. Oil prices fell by nearly a dollar on Friday, with Brent closing at $65.85 and West Texas Intermediate at $62.80, ahead of the Alaska summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump said the two leaders agreed to push directly for a peace settlement in Ukraine rather than a temporary ceasefire, signalling that Russian oil exports would continue largely undisturbed. He also indicated that sanctions on countries buying Russian oil, including China and India, would be held off for now. Analysts noted that uninterrupted Russian flows are bearish for prices, though markets may see only a limited near-term reaction until further clarity emerges from follow-up talks in Washington with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders. Despite the looming supply glut, crude prices have not yet fully reflected the weaker fundamentals. Stocks at pricing hubs remain below historical averages, while record refinery runs this summer helped absorb extra barrels. Traders are cautious, with many awaiting signals on sanctions policy and geopolitical negotiations before adjusting positions. Market watchers are of the view that overall outlook for oil markets remains fragile. Demand is stagnating, supply is accelerating, and inventories are swelling at rates not seen since the pandemic. Unless demand surprises on the upside or Opec+ undertakes fresh coordinated cuts, the imbalance could persist deep into 2026, they argued. Prices are likely to remain under pressure, testing the ability of producers — particularly those with higher costs — to weather an extended period of subdued revenues. For consuming nations, however, the prospect of lower energy prices could provide some relief at a time of sluggish global economic growth, they said.
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
Jordan: Safadi, Lavrov reiterate strong ties, expanding multi-sector cooperation
AMMAN— Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi on Wednesday held extensive talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Moscow, focusing on advancing bilateral cooperation and addressing key regional developments. At a joint press conference, the two ministers reaffirmed the commitment of His Majesty King Abdullah and President Vladimir Putin to strengthening Jordanian-Russian ties across economic, trade, tourism, and cultural sectors, according to a Foreign Ministry statement. Lavrov expressed Russia's interest in deepening its partnership with Jordan, noting that His Majesty King Abdullah will participate in the first Russia-Arab Summit in October and meet with Putin. He also noted that Moscow would host the seventh session of the Russian-Jordanian Joint Committee for Trade, Economic, Scientific, and Technical Cooperation before the end of the year, and underscore ongoing cooperation in education, including scholarships for Jordanian students. The Russian minister also pointed to the mutual visa exemption agreement, describing it as an important step to boost tourism and business ties. He said more than 1,500 Jordanian students are currently studying in Russia and praised the visits of Russian Orthodox pilgrims to Jordan's holy sites, especially the Baptism Site of Jesus Christ. On regional developments, Lavrov stressed that Jordan and Russia share aligned positions, particularly regarding Gaza and the West Bank. He called for a comprehensive and lasting ceasefire in Gaza, the implementation of prisoner exchange agreements, and intensified efforts to deliver humanitarian aid through UN agencies operating in the Strip. He also underlined Russia's commitment to advancing international recognition of an independent Palestinian state in line with UN resolutions as a path to regional stability. Safadi expressed Jordan's appreciation for Russia's position, saying: 'We appreciate Russia's call for an immediate and lasting ceasefire and the delivery of aid to Gaza.' He stressed that Israel must end its aggression and lift the blockade. Safadi warned of the catastrophic repercussions of Israel's 'aggressive and expansionist' policies in Gaza, the destruction of prospects for peace in the occupied West Bank, and its violations in Syria and Lebanon. He also reiterated Jordan's efforts, under His Majesty's leadership, to stop the massacres and alleviate the worsening humanitarian crisis. The foreign minister voiced Jordan's support for mediation efforts by Egypt, Qatar, and the US to secure a prisoner exchange deal that could pave the way for a permanent ceasefire, facilitate humanitarian access, and revive prospects for a political solution. He stressed that the establishment of an independent Palestinian state on the pre-1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, remains the only viable path to peace. Safadi reiterated that the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative offers the most comprehensive framework for lasting peace, in contrast with what he described as Israel's 'destructive policies' of war and settlement expansion. He urged the international community to choose between supporting the initiative, which secures peace and stability, or allowing Israel's policies to fuel further conflict and instability. 'The obvious choice, one that safeguards regional security and international peace, is to support the Arab Peace Initiative. It protects the rights of all parties, upholds international law, and lays the foundation for a secure and stable future,' Safadi said. He warned that Israel's rhetoric of a so-called 'greater Israel' only fuels hatred and will lead to greater destruction. 'This agenda deepens the crisis, violates international law, and infringes on state sovereignty. It remains a fantasy for extremists, as all countries in the region, including Jordan, will resist any attempt to impose further conflict or domination,' he added. Safadi condemned the humanitarian toll of the war. 'It is unacceptable for Palestinian children to starve or for mothers to be unable to feed their children. The world bears a moral, humanitarian, and legal responsibility to put an end to these massacres and this starvation,' he said. Responding to questions on Israel's threats to expand the war, Safadi said such policies are intended to prolong conflict and advance expansionist agendas in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, and Syria. He urged the international community to take a clear stance: 'Does it work towards security, peace and stability for all, or towards further conflict and destruction that threaten regional and global security?' Safadi cautioned against Israel's declared intention to impose full military control over Gaza, warning of catastrophic consequences. 'What Israel is talking about is the displacement of one million Palestinians from Gaza City to the south, where over a million already live in camps lacking the basics of life,' he said. He added that a ceasefire proposal currently on the table 'must be accepted,' urging international pressure to end the catastrophe, stop the killings, and guarantee the entry of food, water, and medicine, while creating the political space needed to advance lasting solutions. Safadi also stressed the importance of allowing journalists into Gaza to report on starvation, massacres, and human suffering. He drew attention to deteriorating conditions in the West Bank, where settlement expansion, land confiscation, and assaults on Islamic and Christian holy sites threaten the prospects for peace. He said Israel is also exerting pressure on the Orthodox Church in an attempt to seize its properties. Safadi also welcomed the growing recognition of the State of Palestine, calling it an essential step toward translating political support for the two-state solution into concrete action. He urged other countries to follow suit, arguing that recognition of Palestine is a necessary expression of international consensus. 'If the world agrees that the two-state solution is the only path to peace, then recognition of Palestine is the practical embodiment of that position,' he said. He highlighted the recent Saudi-French initiative at the UN, where 125 countries reaffirmed their support for the two-state solution. 'This would not only guarantee Palestinian statehood but also ensure Israel's security and open the door to normal relations in the region,' he said. He stressed that such international consensus must be translated into practical measures that prevent actions obstructing peace, particularly settlement expansion and land confiscation. 'If the world views settlement expansion as a violation of international law and an obstacle to peace, then there must be practical measures to stop it,' Safadi added. Turning to Syria, Safadi reiterated Jordan's support for efforts to restore the country's security, stability, sovereignty, and unity, and to safeguard the rights of its citizens. He underlined that Jordan stands fully with Syria in reconstruction efforts aimed at ensuring stability and the safety of its people. 'We once again caution against the consequences of Israeli aggression on Syrian soil, which push the country towards instability. Syria's success is the region's success, and its stability is the region's stability,' he said. Safadi emphasised that stability in southern Syria is vital to Jordan's own security, recalling that the Kingdom recently hosted several meetings to address the tragic events in Sweida. He noted that Jordan is working with the Syrian government and the US to reach a solution that preserves Syria's territorial unity and guarantees the rights of Sweida's residents as integral citizens. He pointed to practical steps outlined in the Amman Statement following the Jordanian-Syrian-US tripartite meeting, including Damascus' commitment to cooperate with UN bodies, hold perpetrators accountable, deliver aid, and reintegrate Sweida into the state. He announced that a tripartite committee will be established to maintain the ceasefire and move toward a lasting solution. Preserving Syria's unity, he stressed, is 'a red line.' Safadi also warned that Israeli interference has fueled crises in Syria, urging respect for its sovereignty and unity. He noted that Damascus has reaffirmed it poses no threat to any party, abides by the 1974 disengagement agreement, and is willing to address Israel's security concerns. 'But occupation and intervention are not security for Israel,' he said. 'They threaten Syria's stability and fuel chaos that we will all pay for.' Safadi reaffirmed Jordan's continued cooperation with Syria, the US, regional partners, and the international community to deliver aid and restore stability, stressing that the Amman meeting marked the beginning of a process to overcome the tragic events in Sweida and ensure that Syrians live as equal citizens, free from threats to their safety. Safadi welcomed the conference between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin on Ukraine, underlining Jordan's support for a political solution that safeguards the rights of all parties and adheres to international law and legitimacy. © Copyright The Jordan Times. All rights reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
Fed's expansive experiment in strategy to get a reboot at Jackson Hole
The U.S. Federal Reserve's pivot toward the labor market in 2020 will get a reboot on Friday when Fed Chair Jerome Powell is expected to release a new framework for the central bank that accounts for a half-decade in which inflation surged, jobs were plentiful, and uncertainty became the watchword. The new document may not completely discard the language rolled out when the Fed, in the midst of the pandemic and a burgeoning social justice movement, pledged not to short-circuit labor market gains on the mere threat of inflation in hopes of achieving "broad-based and inclusive" levels of employment. But Powell has flagged that a recalibration is coming, potentially emphasizing stable inflation as a foundation for the best labor market results, and relegating some ideas to times when the economy is abnormally weak or inflation is abnormally low, as occurred in the decade before the pandemic. In those years, as the Fed organized a nationwide series of community listening tours, staffers would ask about inflation and "people would look at us like we had two heads. It was not the topic" when employment and growth concerns were more paramount, said Duke University professor Ellen Meade, who helped organize the 2020 framework review as a top Fed adviser. "The world looks very different today." Powell has already acknowledged that the language adopted in 2020 had been overtaken by the surge of inflation during the COVID-19 pandemic and was likely on its way out. He is expected to detail the new strategy document when he addresses an annual Fed research conference on Friday. Minutes of the Fed's July 29-30 meeting released on Wednesday said the committee was close to finalizing changes to its statement of principles and reiterated that it "would be designed to be robust across a wide range of economic conditions." The current approach has been criticized for introducing complexities that may have slowed the Fed's response to emerging inflation in 2021 and proved irrelevant to how the economy evolved during the pandemic. Much of what was introduced in 2020, especially a controversial promise to allow periods of high inflation to offset low ones so it averages 2% over time, grew out of the Fed's experience trying to lift interest rates from near-zero where they had been mired after the 2007-to-2009 recession. That approach may remain appropriate during prolonged economic weakness, said former Fed Vice Chair Richard Clarida, who helped oversee the last framework revisions. But the approach for normal times may revert to the more straightforward inflation-targeting the Fed previously used. "A verbatim reading of the 2020 statement holds up pretty well operating in the environment the Fed had been operating in for a dozen years. Inflation below target. Secular stagnation," said Clarida, now global economic adviser for Pimco. But "2025 is not 2020. We have policy space." The Fed's current benchmark rate is set between 4.25% and 4.50%, but had been a full percentage point higher last year, a level more in line with prior decades. From around March 2008 to September 2022 it was never above 2.5%. RETHINKING TRADEOFFS The challenge for Powell and the Fed now will be to avoid the appearance of giving up on the labor market in favor of an inflation-first approach. The job market recovered slowly from the 2007-to-2009 crisis, but the unemployment rate eventually fell well below the level Fed officials regard as consistent with stable inflation. Yet inflation remained tame, sparking a small revolution in thinking. Rather than seeing an inevitable tradeoff between inflation and jobs, policymakers decided they no longer needed to view a low unemployment rate as a sign of inflation to come. Job gains could continue until there were more obvious signs of rising prices. As the pandemic threw millions out of work, Powell at the Jackson Hole forum in 2020 spoke about the Fed's "appreciation for the benefits of a strong labor market, particularly for many in low- and moderate-income communities," and described a new strategy that "reflects our view that a robust job market can be sustained without causing an outbreak of inflation." The approach added to an emerging Republican critique of a "woke" Fed that downgraded price control to address income inequality. But it also was true to what the data suggested in the 2010s, and again more recently when the unemployment rate fell to very low levels even as inflation declined, defying many mainstream economists' predictions that high unemployment would be needed to lower inflation from its peak in 2022. Though the Fed's two congressionally mandated goals of stable inflation and maximum employment are considered equally important, Powell has begun using a formulation in which stable inflation is described as necessary for the job market to reach its potential - an approach that would let the Fed justify steps to fight inflation as still consistent with its employment goals. "Without price stability, we cannot achieve the long periods of strong labor market conditions that benefit all Americans," Powell said at the press conference following the Fed's July meeting. Meade said that harkens back to an approach former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan used to try to balance the two sometimes conflicting priorities, even if the understanding of how low unemployment does or does not influence inflation has changed. "You achieve price stability and that lays the groundwork for maximum employment...I do think Powell found his way back to that framing," Meade said. "You have to get to price stability first and that is in the front part of their brains." (Reporting by Howard Schneider; Editing by Dan Burns and Andrea Ricci)
