Bannon: Graham giving Ukrainians ‘false hope'
Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, a key MAGA insider, doubled down late Monday on his criticism of Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and the lawmaker's vocal support for Ukraine amid its war with Russia.
In an interview on NewsNation's 'CUOMO,' Bannon said Graham was giving Ukrainians 'false hope' by meeting with the country's president, Volodymyr Zelensky, and by suggesting the U.S. support Kyiv's stunning drone attack on Russia's strategic bombing fleet.
'We can't have Lindsey Graham, and particularly Zelensky, leading us into a third world war with a deep strike into Russia,' Bannon told host Chris Cuomo.
The comments come after the former Trump adviser called for the South Carolina Republican to be jailed for his pro-Ukraine stance. Cuomo repeatedly challenged Bannon to back up that request.
'I don't understand how you could want to jail a U.S. senator because he's saying something you don't like,' the NewsNation host said, adding, 'That sounds like the worst of the deep state and lawfare.'
Bannon responded, 'No, it's absolutely — what he's doing over there right now is stirring it up. He's giving the Ukrainians false hope.'
Cuomo cut in, 'But it's not illegal.'
The Trumpy ally continued, 'He's giving Ukrainians false hope that we're there to support them on engaging Russia in a kinetic conflict. And we are not.'
The host continued to press Bannon about why he thinks Graham should be detained.
'So maybe he's wrong, but why do you say throw him in jail?' he said.
'Two things ought to happen: Either cancel his passport and don't let him back in the country, or put him in jail if he comes back,' Bannon responded, adding, 'The attack was audacious.'
'It was brilliant. But the problem is it gets us involved in a conflict that no one in the United States wants to be part of,' he added.
Cuomo noted that he didn't necessarily disagree with the former strategist's opinion.
'I'm just saying you can't be throwing people in jail because you don't like what they say. That's my only point,' he told Bannon. 'I'm not saying that you're wrong about where this might lead and how dangerous it is.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump orders an investigation into Biden and his alleged use of the autopen
President Donald Trump on Wednesday directed a wide-ranging investigation into former President Joe Biden and officials in his administration, accusing his aides of using 'autopen' signatures to cover up his "cognitive decline" and assert presidential power. Trump frequently uses Biden as a political foil and has sought to undo a number of policies from his predecessor's administration since he returned to office. The announcement Wednesday directs the White House counsel and Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate whether anyone "conspired to deceive the public about Biden's mental state and unconstitutionally exercise the authorities and responsibilities of the President." It is an escalation of an issue that Trump and his allies have frequently raised, possibly paving the way for Republicans to argue that many of Biden's actions as president were invalid. "This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history," Trump wrote in a memo. "The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts." Trump has acknowledged using the autopen himself in office. In March, he said he turned to it 'only for very unimportant papers,' such as responses to letters. 'But to use them for — for what they've used them for is terrible,' he added, referring to the Biden administration. In Wednesday's memo, Trump further contended that if Biden's aides 'secretly' used the pen to conceal his alleged decline while they were taking executive actions in his stead, 'that would constitute an unconstitutional wielding of the power of the Presidency, a circumstance that would have implications for the legality and validity of numerous executive actions undertaken in Biden's name.' Biden defended his record in a statement Wednesday, arguing that the probe was a 'distraction' from Trump and Republican lawmakers. 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false,' Biden said. Trump has previously claimed without evidence that Biden used an autopen to sign pre-emptive pardons for the members of Congress who investigated the events surrounding the Jan. 6, 2021, attack at the U.S. Capitol, rendering them 'void.' Autopens have long been a mechanical tool to reproduce signatures in the White House, with Barack Obama being the first president to use it to sign legislation, according to The Associated Press. Previous administrations have pointed to a 2005 Office of Legal Counsel memo stating that the president 'need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law.' Biden has frequently defended himself against claims about his mental fitness and memory. Former special counsel Robert Hur said in a report last year that Biden would probably present to a jury as a "sympathetic, well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory" in explaining his decision not to prosecute Biden after an investigation of his handling of classified documents. Biden rejected Hur's claims about his memory shortly after the report was released last year, saying, "My memory's fine." In an interview with ABC's 'The View' in May, Biden again denied having suffered from mental decline when he was president. 'They are wrong,' he said of the allegations. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., is also investigating Biden and has asked several former White House aides to appear for transcribed interviews. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Marjorie Taylor Greene Now ‘Proud' She Voted for Bill She Bashed a Day Ago
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene is tying herself in knots over Donald Trump's spending bill. On Tuesday, the Georgia Republican admitted she hadn't read some of the bill's contents before voting for it, and she didn't like them. She specifically called out a section of the bill that would stop states from regulating artificial intelligence for the next decade. Greene said she was 'adamantly OPPOSED' to this 'potentially dangerous' measure and 'would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.' She later added to her criticism on the House floor, saying 'we must always limit federal power and protect state power,' and urged the Senate to strip the clause. But on Wednesday, when pressed during a congressional hearing, she flip-flopped on her flip-flop, insisting she was 'proud' to have voted for the legislation. Rep. Robert Garcia, a California Democrat, brought it up during a DOGE subcommittee hearing as he highlighted Elon Musk's vicious opposition to the GOP bill. 'It's also interesting, because Chairwoman Greene, I understand, now regrets voting for this bill, as she mentioned yesterday,' Garcia said to the congresswoman, who leads the subcommittee. 'Is that correct, Chairwoman Greene?' Greene replied, 'The bill actually destroys what you guys voted for for the past four years, and I'm proud to have voted for that bill to fund border security to deport all of those illegals you guys let in.' It's a curious departure from her remarks just a day earlier, when she called the AI provisions she unwittingly voted for 'pretty terrifying.' Attempting to justify her oversight on NewsNation Tuesday, she had explained, 'We don't get the full bill text until very close to the time to vote for it, and so that was one section that was two pages that I didn't see.' It marked a rare crack in Greene's reliable loyalty to the president and his agenda. Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' has exposed deep Republican divisions after passing the House by just one vote last month. Musk set off a firestorm this week when he declared it an 'outrageous, pork-filled ... disgusting abomination' and excoriated Republicans who voted for it. The infighting has erupted over several flashpoints, including the $2.4 trillion it's estimated to add to the national debt over the next decade. Sen. Rand Paul has been a leading GOP critic of the bill, blasting it for ballooning the deficit and lifting the debt ceiling. He's drawn heated rebukes from Trump, who claims the bill will drive 'tremendous GROWTH.' Democrats broadly oppose the legislation, arguing it gives tax breaks to the rich while hurting the low-income Americans. The budget package would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts and introduce new ones, including no taxes on tips, while imposing work requirements for Medicaid, cutting food stamp access, and directing billions toward immigration measures to boost border security and fast-track deportations.
Washington Post
23 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Russian strike kills 5, including 1 year old, hours after Trump calls Putin
KYIV, Ukraine — At least five people, including a one-year-old child, were killed in a Russian drone strike on the northern Ukrainian city of Pryluky overnight, regional governor Viacheslav Chaus said Thursday. The attack came just hours after Donald Trump spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin . According to Trump, Putin 'very strongly' said that Russia will retaliate for Ukraine's weekend drone attacks on Russian military airfields . Six more people were wounded in the attack and have been hospitalized, Chaus said. According to him, six Shahed-type drones struck residential areas of Pryluky early Thursday morning, causing severe damage to residential buildings. Hours later, seventeen people were wounded in a Russian drone strike on the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv early Thursday, including children, a pregnant woman, and a 93-year-old woman, regional head Oleh Syniehubov wrote on Telegram. At around 1:05 a.m., Shahed-type drones struck two apartment buildings in the city's Slobidskyi district, causing fires and destroying several private vehicles. 'By launching attacks while people sleep in their homes, the enemy once again confirms its tactic of insidious terror,' Syniehubov wrote on Telegram.
