Chicago commuters in limbo as Union Pacific fights Metra's bid for trackage rights
Thousands of Chicago-area commuters may be caught in a bureaucratic tug-of-war between Metra and Union Pacific, with both sides digging in over who controls access to the city's vital commuter rail lines. With summer approaching and Metra's current contract set to expire on June 30, regular riders are growing anxious about the potential fallout.
At the center of the dispute is Metra's request for terminal trackage rights on Union Pacific lines, a move Metra says is necessary to maintain uninterrupted service. But Union Pacific fired back this week, asking the Surface Transportation Board (STB) to dismiss the request, citing a lack of jurisdiction.
Also read:
Passenger rail revival gains steam as Amtrak Borealis and Virginia services break ridership records
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
New Container Houses Vietnam (Prices May Surprise You)
Container House | Search Ads
Search Now
For many Chicagoans, the prospect of legal delays and stalled negotiations is more than just paperwork, it could mean disrupted commutes, missed shifts, and added stress in a city already struggling with transit challenges.
Union Pacific pushes for dismissal based on jurisdiction
In a motion filed today, May 23, Union Pacific argued that the STB cannot rule on Metra's petition because Metra operates mostly within state lines. Citing a decades-old regulatory debate, UP contends Metra cannot now claim interstate status after previously maintaining it was not subject to such oversight under the now-defunct Interstate Commerce Commission.
Live Events
Union Pacific notes that Metra serves one out-of-state station in Kenosha, Wisconsin, that accounts for just 0.01 per cent of its passengers, a figure it calls 'de minimus.' As such, UP asserts that the STB should have no say over the operations on the fully intrastate UP Northwest and UP West lines.
'The request suffers a fatal jurisdictional defect,' the railroad claims in its filing, arguing that the dispute should be resolved through direct commercial negotiations rather than regulatory intervention.
Also read:
Trump accelerates campaign to remake federal bureaucracy
Metra's push to protect service continuity
Metra initially submitted its trackage rights request in March, warning that without it, the expiration of the current access agreement could put continued service in jeopardy. The agency says it is seeking to ensure service stability for the millions of people who rely on commuter rail across the Chicago region.
Union Pacific, however, is pushing back hard. Included in its filing is a May 21 letter from UP's CEO to Metra Executive Director Jim Derwinski, stating, 'We will not be stopping service to the millions of people who use Metra daily.' Still, the company maintains that commercial talks should determine the outcome, not legal rulings.
The situation escalated after UP publicly urged Metra to accept a new access offer, one it says is modeled after arrangements in Illinois, Colorado, and California. Metra has responded by saying it is currently reviewing the proposal.
STB dispute highlights bigger questions for regional rail
The back-and-forth has spotlighted larger questions about the governance and funding of regional commuter rail in major US cities. At a time when cities like Chicago are working to rebuild ridership and expand access post-pandemic, disputes like this can undermine public confidence in transit reliability.
Also read:
'DOGEfather' Elon Musk swings 'Chainsaw for Bureaucracy' at CPAC, hints at more cuts
For daily riders, this isn't just about contracts or regulatory jurisdiction, it's about whether their train will still show up come July.
As both parties brace for further proceedings and possible negotiations, the uncertainty continues to mount. And while UP has stated it has no plans to stop service, the lack of a long-term agreement keeps commuters and local officials on edge.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump signs order to double steel, aluminium import tariffs to 50%
New Delhi: A 50% tariff on steel and aluminium imports into the United States went into effect on Wednesday, doubling the previous rate as President Donald Trump cited national security concerns for the dramatic escalation in trade protections. The new tariff rates, increased from an earlier 25% rate, were announced by Trump in a statement on Tuesday. The president claimed legal authority to impose the tariffs through Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows the president to address national security risks arising from imports. 'In my judgement, the increased tariffs will more effectively counter foreign countries that continue to offload low-priced, excess steel and aluminium in the United States market and thereby undercut the competitiveness of the United States steel and aluminium industries,' read Trump's statement released by the White House. Trump said the earlier 25% tariff rates, first announced in February and implemented on March 12, had helped America's steel industry but had not enabled companies to maintain the capacity needed to meet national defence needs. 'I have determined that increasing the previously imposed tariffs will provide greater support to these industries and reduce or eliminate the national security threat posed by imports of steel and aluminium articles and their derivative articles,' Trump said. The tariff increase comes amid broader trade disputes at the World Trade Organisation. Several countries, including India, have formally challenged the US measures, characterising them as 'safeguard measures' that violate WTO rules and threaten retaliatory action. In May, India formally notified the WTO that it viewed America's tariffs on steel and aluminium as safeguard measures and indicated it could suspend 'concessions and other obligations' given to the US and that it retains the right to enforce retaliatory measures. On May 22, America rejected India's characterisation of the tariffs as safeguard measures and refused to engage in talks on the matter. The introduction of tariffs has proven controversial within the US. The America Iron and Steel Institute, an industry group, has welcomed the increased tariffs as a necessary measure to protect domestic producers from cheaper foreign competition. However, manufacturers using steel as input for production have publicly raised concerns that more expensive steel will impact competitiveness across other domestic industries. For India specifically, the consequences are direct and substantial. According to the Global Trade Research Institute (GTRI), a New Delhi-based research group, India exported $4.56 billion worth of iron, steel, and aluminium products to the US in FY2025, with key categories including $587.5 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion in articles of iron or steel, and $860 million in aluminium and related articles. 'These exports are now exposed to sharply higher US tariffs, threatening the profitability of Indian producers and exporters,' the GTRI said in a brief.
Economic Times
37 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Jobs in USA: Massive lay offs could happen soon in USA, warn experts
Job lay offs threat is getting more prominent even as analysts are keeping a close eye on US economic data this week. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs Fear of possible lay offs is back as experts have cautioned that American companies could take drastic decision of downsizing the staff if they find President Donald Trump's global tariffs are not fruitful enough. Apprehensions have been raised after US private sector hiring hit its slowest pace since 2023 in May, according to data released by payroll firm ADP on Wednesday, as per a are keeping a close eye on US economic data this week, with official employment figures due Friday. While ADP figures may diverge from the government numbers, experts are monitoring the effects of Trump's global tariffs as they sweep through the world's biggest economy, AFP reported."This may be the tip of an iceberg, but it also could be a false start," said Carl Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics. "Whether this report is accurate or not, traders and investors will read today's number as a dark result for trading," he also cautioned that as companies get more clarity about tariffs, they could respond to the increased chance of tariff-induced cost hikes by becoming more aggressive about trimming their workforces."Manufacturing employment is suffering from higher input costs and disruptions to supply chains. At least one vehicle producer was forced to idle production during the first half of May; that is reminiscent of the pandemic," warned KPMG chief economist Diane Swonk in a recent now, US services sector activity shrank in May for the first time since mid-2024 too, according to the Institute for Supply Management, as Trump's tariffs fueled prices and sectors like leisure and hospitality, as well as financial activities, still logged gains, according to the ADP industries saw a net loss in jobs last month, with employment declining in mining and manufacturing. Some service sectors also saw job losses, including trade and transportation, as well as business services and education or health growth for those who remained in their jobs was little changed at 4.5 per cent. For those who switched jobs, pay growth was 7.0 per cent.A1. Federal Reserve Chair is Jerome Powell.A2. President of USA is Donald Trump.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
37 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US inflation data collection hurt by Trump-era hiring freeze: Report
Federal government staffing shortages from Trump administration hiring freezes have forced the Labor Department's economic statistics arm to curtail the breadth of its data collection for one of the main measures of US inflation, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday. The paper said the Bureau of Labor Statistics beginning in April reduced the number of businesses at which it checks prices for the benchmark Consumer Price Index report, citing the hiring freeze that President Donald Trump imposed on his first day back in office, January 20. The CPI temporarily reduced the number of outlets and quotes it attempted to collect due to a staffing shortage in certain CPI cities, beginning in April, a BLS email to private economists and shared with the Journal read. These procedures will be kept in place until the hiring freeze is lifted, and additional staff can be hired and trained. The Labor Department and BLS did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Reuters. CPI is among the most closely watched economic datasets published by the US government, relied upon by economists, investors and policymakers for near-real-time estimates of the state of inflation. It provides a monthly snapshot of changes both to prices overall and among hundreds of separate products and services ranging from eggs to eyeglasses and airline tickets to automobiles.
