Bill would upend Colorado's 80-year-old Labor Peace Act
The state legislature in Colorado is on the verge of passing a bill that upends the 80-year-old Colorado Labor Peace Act. It's unclear if Gov. Jared Polis will sign it into law.
Andy Cross/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images
The bill makes it easier for a union to collect fees from non-union workers. Right now, organizers need to hold two elections. The first election determines whether employees want to unionize. It takes a simple majority to pass that. The second election determines whether non-union workers need to pay fees, and that needs 75% support in order to pass.
The bill passed through Colorado's Senate and got initial approval in the state House today.
"There is nothing in this bill that is requiring anything other than to be allowed to collectively bargain. And that is a decision and a choice that employees can make and then that is a decision and choice that everyone in that workplace can bargain over," said state Rep. Jennifer Bacon, a Democrat from Denver.
"I don't think 25% of any group should make the determination for the other 75%. I don't believe that is democratic. I don't believe that is necessarily representative. I think the other individuals should have opportunity to weigh in," said state Rep. Ken DeGraaf, a Republican from Colorado Springs.
A spokesperson for the governor says his office tried to bridge the gap on the issue and, "hopes both sides find a way forward in the future that reflects our shared goals of prosperity, fairness, and opportunities for workers."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
40 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Former Minnesota House speaker and husband killed in politically motivated shooting, Gov. Walz says
CHAMPLIN, Minn. — Former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were killed Saturday in a politically motivated shooting, Gov. Tim Walz said. A second state legislator and his wife were wounded in a separate attack. Both targeted lawmakers are Democrats. Officials say the suspect in the shootings was still at large. Mayor Ryan Sabas of the town of Champlin earlier announced that state Sen. John Hoffman and state Rep. Hortman had been shot, and that Hoffman's wife was also shot. Walz and other authorities said at a news conference that the assailant was posing as a law enforcement officer. Investigators were working to establish motive for the attacks, officials said. Walz said the shootings were targeted. Hortman was the top House Democratic leader in the state Legislature and a former House speaker. She was first elected in 2004. Hortman, a lawyer, was married with two children. Hoffman, also Democrat, was first elected in 2012. He runs Hoffman Strategic Advisors, a consulting firm. He previously served as vice chair of the Anoka Hennepin School Board, which manages the largest school district in Minnesota. Hoffman is married and has one daughter. Both Hoffman and Hortman represent districts located north of Minneapolis. The shootings happened at a time when political leaders nationwide have been attacked, harassed and intimidated during a time of deep political divisions. Former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, leader of Giffords, a national gun violence prevention group, said in a statement: 'I am horrified and heartbroken by last night's attack on two patriotic public servants. My family and I know the horror of a targeted shooting all too well. An attack against lawmakers is an attack on American democracy itself. Leaders must speak out and condemn the fomenting violent extremism that threatens everything this country stands for.' Giffords was shot in the head in 2011 by a gunman who killed six people and injured 12 others. She stepped down from Congress in January 2012 to focus on her recovery.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
The decline of coal isn't a conspiracy — it's the market reality
A core misunderstanding fuels a recent lawsuit that has made headlines. The Republican attorneys general of Texas and 10 other states have accused some of the nation's largest asset managers of 'colluding' to harm coal companies, claiming falsely that the decline of coal is the result of some coordinated political vendetta rather than simple, demonstrable market economics. With the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission joining the conversation, it is important to delve into the details and consider market trends over the past few decades. Coal's decline in the U.S. did not start with asset managers or so-called 'environmental, social and governance' or ESG investment policies. It started decades ago, with the shale gas revolution, when fracking technology unleashed an abundant, cheap and cleaner-burning alternative. U.S. Energy Information Administration data show that U.S. coal production was 1.13 trillion short tons in 2001, but by 2020 that number had declined to 535 billion short tons — its lowest level since 1965. Natural gas outcompeted coal because it made economic sense. It has lower operating costs, fewer regulatory burdens and, perhaps most importantly, reduced environmental impact. Add in the drop in the cost of renewables, and coal's decline was predictable. Asset managers saw the writing on the wall and adjusted their investments, as their fiduciary duty to their clients demands. This is about economics, not ideology — business decisions, not politics. Power utilities, manufacturers and even global markets have made decisions based on price, efficiency and reliability. We know this because coal's decline happened in both public and private coal companies. Coal companies themselves have noted the decline in prior Securities and Exchange Commission annual reports. Capital flows based on competitive advantage, not political talking points. What these attorneys general attempt to frame as 'coal collusion' is, in fact, a textbook example of fiduciary responsibility and following industry direction. Asset managers have a legal duty to evaluate long-term risks and returns for their clients. When coal projects increasingly face uncertain demand, regulatory headwinds and operational volatility, it is prudent investing to limit exposure. The lawsuit itself notes that coal production increased (incrementally) in 2021, the first year of the supposed 'conspiracy.' This further shows the inconsistency of the argument, raising questions about whether the lawsuit is really about coal or about weaponizing an economic trend — a dangerous precedent to set. We must be honest about what's happening to coal, and to energy more broadly. Rather than distort reality for short-term political gain, let's focus on developing solutions that respect our economic system, support innovation and ensure energy security. The real conversation we should be having is about ensuring energy abundance through all means. Let's talk about how to accelerate nuclear energy, streamline permitting for cleaner domestic production, invest in resilient grid infrastructure, and maintain American leadership in next-generation energy technologies. Allowing for a truly 'all of the above' energy strategy enables investments in diverse, dependable and secure energy sources. Climate, energy and market decisions are complex and intertwined. They deserve meticulous debate. It's time to refocus the conversation on pragmatism and opportunity — not partisan politicking. We should all care about America's energy future, and to best do so, we have to stop pretending market evolution is sabotage. The decline of coal in the U.S. is simply capitalism doing exactly what conservatives have always trusted it to do: adapt and allocate capital where it best serves growth, stability and prosperity. Benji Backer is the Founder and CEO of Nature Is Nonpartisan. He also serves as the executive chairman of the American Conservation Coalition and is the best-selling author of 'The Conservative Environmentalist: Common Sense Solutions for a Sustainable Future.'
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Two Minnesota lawmakers were shot in their homes in a targeted attack, officials say
Gov. Tim Walz said the shooting was targeted. Hoffman, a Democrat, was first elected in 2012. He runs Hoffman Strategic Advisors, a consulting firm. He previously served as vice chair of the Anoka Hennepin School Board, which manages the largest school district in Minnesota. Advertisement Hoffman is married and has one daughter. Hortman is the top House Democratic leader in the state Legislature and a former House speaker. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up She was first elected in 2004. Hortman, a lawyer, is married and has two children. Brooklyn Park Police Lieutenant Hjelm set up a perimeter with police tape near the scene of a shooting in Brooklyn Park, Minn. on Saturday. Alex Kormann/Associated Press Both Hoffman and Hortman represent districts located north of Minneapolis. The shootings happened at a time when political leaders nationwide have been attacked, harassed and intimidated during a time of deep political divisions. GIFFORDS, the national gun violence prevention organization led by former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, released the following statement. 'I am horrified and heartbroken by last night's attack on two patriotic public servants,' Giffords said. 'My family and I know the horror of a targeted shooting all too well. An attack against lawmakers is an attack on American democracy itself. Leaders must speak out and condemn the fomenting violent extremism that threatens everything this country stands for.' Advertisement Giffords was shot in the head in 2011 by a gunman who killed six people and injured 12 others. She stepped down from Congress in January 2012 to focus on her recovery.
