logo
Big 12 ending media poll all about distrust of College Football Playoff system

Big 12 ending media poll all about distrust of College Football Playoff system

USA Today5 days ago
When the Big 12 sent word in June that it would not release a preseason poll this year in conjunction with its media days, it didn't seem like a huge deal. The Big 12, after all, is just copying what the Big Ten did last year, and everyone who follows college football knows that a projection of how good teams will be from year-to-year is mostly guess work given the amount of roster turnover across the sport.
On the surface, it's a sensible trend.
Back in the day, preseason polls were considered crucial in generating interest and getting the public back up to speed on college football after an eight-month hiatus. But now, given the intense year-round coverage of the sport, expansion of the College Football Playoff and the automatic bids that go to conference champions, you can make a solid case that preseason polls have outlived their usefulness and simply exist as fodder for the content machine.
Many fans will say, 'Good riddance.'
But the Big 12's decision is also part of a different trend, which we've seen across all the power conferences this summer and is actively harming college football: Distrust of the postseason system they built.
The brass-knuckle truth about why the Big 12's coaches and athletics directors voted to eliminate their preseason poll is that that last year, their conference champion Arizona State was picked last by the media. Meanwhile, preseason favorite Utah struggled to a 5-7 record.
Inside the Big 12, there's a belief that the upside-down nature of last year's conference title race – which, admittedly, the voters got very, very, very wrong – created a perception that the league wasn't very good. As a result, Arizona State did not get enough respect from the CFP committee and, more problematically, Brigham Young got even less.
TOP 25: Ranking the best college football quarterbacks
Though Alabama's exclusion (and the SEC's subsequent hissy fit) has driven almost all the offseason dialogue over last year's CFP selection process, there's an argument to be made that BYU had more of a gripe.
Without doing a full autopsy, the Cougars were 10-2 with a pair of losses by a combined nine points and a head-to-head win over SMU, the team that got the final at-large spot. We can debate whether that made BYU more playoff-worthy than Alabama, but it's more than fair to say BYU didn't get nearly as much consideration as it should have – either by the committee or the media, which ranked the Cougars 17th.
Did the Big 12 get the short end of the stick last year because Arizona State was ranked 16th in a preseason poll and BYU was 13th? I'm skeptical.
But people in the Big 12 believe that. Just like people in the SEC now believe that they're not getting credit from the committee for their strength of schedule. And just like people in the Big Ten now believe that they need four automatic bids in the proposed 16-team iteration of the CFP because they believe it's harder to play nine conference games than the SEC's eight.
See where this is heading?
At the SEC's spring meetings this year, we actually had an athletics director – Florida's Scott Stricklin – suggest in an interview with Yahoo! Sports that a committee might not be the right vehicle for choosing the postseason field.
'I question whether it's appropriate for college football,' said Stricklin, who – wait for it – served on the committee from 2018-21.
Explaining his position further, Stricklin claimed that football was different from other college sports because there's a longer season in basketball or volleyball, so the committees that put together those postseason tournaments have more available data to consider.
But Stricklin has this completely backwards. The relative lack of data available in a 12-game college football, and thus the need for human interpretation, is the very reason why a committee is the best way to choose the CFP.
Pretty much everyone in the sport agreed with that notion more than a dozen years ago when the CFP was formed and the commissioners flatly rejected using statistical models or computer rankings to pick the teams.
In fact, the opaque use of computers in the Bowl Championship Series formula was one of the big complaints of the pre-College Football Playoff era. Nobody wanted decimal points on someone's hard drive deciding a national championship. The entire idea behind a committee was that actual people were best suited to look at a season and judge which teams were most qualified.
Has it been perfect? Of course not.
But there is simply no way to boil a college football season down to one number or even one point of emphasis when every conference schedules differently and there are even significant disparities within a conference now that they all have 16-plus teams.
As long as that scheduling model exists, the only way to effectively run the sport is for the conferences to empower a set of impartial human eyes to make decisions and then accept their work regardless of which league it favors in a given year.
College football has brazenly moved away from that ethos this summer. The SEC's strength-of-schedule propaganda campaign has felt unnecessary and desperate, arguably one of the most embarrassing moments for the league in the last two decades. The Big Ten trying to strong-arm its colleague conferences into four automatic playoff bids cuts against the very idea of competition and threatens to make college football's postseason look more like WrestleMania. And now the Big 12 thinks its issue is a perception problem, not a football problem, so they're going to get rid of a preseason poll – as if the committee ever cared about that in the first place.
Expanding the CFP from four to 12 was a no-brainer. But moving the arguments for or against teams into the margins has come with an unintended consequence. Nobody believes in the system they built, so instead they'll attempt to game it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Are 'High-Volatility' Bengals A Good Bet To Make AFC Title Game?
Are 'High-Volatility' Bengals A Good Bet To Make AFC Title Game?

Fox Sports

time4 hours ago

  • Fox Sports

Are 'High-Volatility' Bengals A Good Bet To Make AFC Title Game?

The Cincinnati Bengals were an NFL enigma in 2024. Star quarterback Joe Burrow played at an MVP level and the offense scored the fifth-most touchdowns in football, but a lousy defense and miserable record in one-score games kept Cincinnati out of the postseason at 9-8. Trouble greeted the Bengals right away with a Week 1 home loss to the four-win New England Patriots, and they proceeded to lose seven of their first eight one-score games. They also lost four times when scoring 30 points. That's almost an impossible feat. So now what? Well, Cincinnati is running it back on offense with Burrow, receivers Ja'Marr Chase and Tee Higgins, and running back Chase Brown. Burrow and Chase are the most lethal QB to WR combo in the league and that's a good place to start. Last year, Burrow threw for 4,918 yards with 49 touchdowns and seven interceptions, while Chase exploded for 1,708 yards and 17 scores. Assuming health, the offense will be fine. If the Bengals miss the playoffs for the third straight season, the brunt of the responsibility will undoubtedly fall on the shoulders of the defense. The true hope is that the new defensive coordinator, Al Golden, can solve some of the issues that betrayed the team last year. Golden was the architect of a Notre Dame defense that made it all the way to the National Championship Game of the College Football Playoff. I'm a little more "glass half full" on Cincy's D because I like the interior guys on the defensive line, and I'm optimistic the team reaches a contract compromise with top pass rusher Trey Hendrickson, at least for 2025. If rookie defensive end Shemar Stewart plays, that's a bonus. "They're such a high-volatility team," one professional bettor told me. "The quarterback and skill players give them a high ceiling. If they suffer a crucial injury or two on offense and the defense is worse, they can win five games. "The big issue is the way they start [under head coach Zac Taylor]. How do you go 0-2 almost every year in the first two games? It's alarming. "I've still got 'em favored in 11 games." A quick fact check confirms Cincinnati's early-season woes. Since Taylor took over in 2019, the Bengals are 1-11 in their first two games. The only win came back in 2021, a 27-24 overtime victory over the Minnesota Vikings. 2019: 0-22020: 0-22021: 1-12022: 0-22023: 0-2 2024: 0-2 This year's schedule starts with Cleveland and Jacksonville. At the end of the day, I believe Cincinnati has too much offensive ammo to ignore and odds are good the defense regresses in the right direction. It's also highly improbable the Bengals are that "unlucky" in one-score games. I'm not crazy enough to pedestal them over the Baltimore Ravens, Buffalo Bills or Kansas City Chiefs, but it's silly to think they can't make the playoffs and go on a run at the right time with Burrow à la 2021. My favorite move re: Cincinnati is to take them Over 9.5 wins and place a small wager on them to lose on Championship Weekend. It's a 10-1 bet that'll put you in a tremendous position if there's chaos in the AFC bracket. PICK: Bengals Over 9.5 wins (-140) PICK: Bengals lose in AFC title game (+1000) Sam Panayotovich is a sports betting analyst for FOX Sports and the BetMGM Network. He previously worked for WGN Radio, NBC Sports and VSiN. Follow him on Twitter @spshoot. Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily! recommended Item 1 of 3 Get more from the National Football League Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more

Paul Finebaum thinks Georgia football is likely to miss the playoff
Paul Finebaum thinks Georgia football is likely to miss the playoff

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Paul Finebaum thinks Georgia football is likely to miss the playoff

ESPN college football expert Paul Finebaum is skeptical of the Georgia Bulldogs ahead of the 2025 college football season. When asked if it is more likely for Georgia to be contenders or fighting to be in the College Football Playoff, Finebaum made it clear that he thinks Georgia has lost too much talent recently to be one of the top national title contenders. "I believe they'll be fighting to be in the playoffs," said Finebaum. "And we all respect Kirby Smart. I think he's the best coach in college football, but that does not mean anything if you lose players like they have lost over the last couple of years.""Three years ago, that draft in Vegas, everyone remembers. I mean, it was one Georgia player after another. I mean, I have never seen anything quite like that."Georgia had a record-breaking 15 players selected in the 2022 NFL draft including five first-round picks. No college football team has ever had more players selected in one NFL draft. Georgia was able to reload with quarterback Stetson Bennett and company in 2022 en route to a second straight national championship. "But they haven't quite been able to fill those needs. And I know the point was made earlier about Stetson Bennett winning two national championships, but he had one of the all-time defenses. And I don't think Georgia has that. That Alabama game is problematic in September and so are a number of other games that Georgia is going to have to deal with including a visit from Arch Manning (and Texas) late in the season."Georgia certainly has a challenging schedule in 2025, but the Bulldogs play most of their toughest games at home. Georgia has a lot of question marks this season surrounding redshirt junior quarterback Gunner Stockton. The Bulldogs' defense fell off a bit statistically last season and still had three first-round NFL draft picks. Georgia's offensive game and running game are looking to bounce back after allowing 25 sacks, which ranked No. 57 (tied) in the nation. Georgia previously allowed just 13 sacks in 2023, which was No. 8 (tied) in the Dawgs also finished second-to-last in the SEC in rushing yards per game (124.4 yards per game) in 2024. Follow UGAWire on Instagram or Threads for more Georgia coverage! This article originally appeared on UGA Wire: Paul Finebaum not confident in Georgia's national championship hopes

Paul Finebaum thinks Georgia football is likely to miss the playoff
Paul Finebaum thinks Georgia football is likely to miss the playoff

USA Today

time6 hours ago

  • USA Today

Paul Finebaum thinks Georgia football is likely to miss the playoff

ESPN college football expert Paul Finebaum is skeptical of the Georgia Bulldogs ahead of the 2025 college football season. When asked if it is more likely for Georgia to be contenders or fighting to be in the College Football Playoff, Finebaum made it clear that he thinks Georgia has lost too much talent recently to be one of the top national title contenders. "I believe they'll be fighting to be in the playoffs," said Finebaum. "And we all respect Kirby Smart. I think he's the best coach in college football, but that does not mean anything if you lose players like they have lost over the last couple of years.""Three years ago, that draft in Vegas, everyone remembers. I mean, it was one Georgia player after another. I mean, I have never seen anything quite like that."Georgia had a record-breaking 15 players selected in the 2022 NFL draft including five first-round picks. No college football team has ever had more players selected in one NFL draft. Georgia was able to reload with quarterback Stetson Bennett and company in 2022 en route to a second straight national championship. "But they haven't quite been able to fill those needs. And I know the point was made earlier about Stetson Bennett winning two national championships, but he had one of the all-time defenses. And I don't think Georgia has that. That Alabama game is problematic in September and so are a number of other games that Georgia is going to have to deal with including a visit from Arch Manning (and Texas) late in the season."Georgia certainly has a challenging schedule in 2025, but the Bulldogs play most of their toughest games at home. Georgia has a lot of question marks this season surrounding redshirt junior quarterback Gunner Stockton. The Bulldogs' defense fell off a bit statistically last season and still had three first-round NFL draft picks. Georgia's offensive game and running game are looking to bounce back after allowing 25 sacks, which ranked No. 57 (tied) in the nation. Georgia previously allowed just 13 sacks in 2023, which was No. 8 (tied) in the Dawgs also finished second-to-last in the SEC in rushing yards per game (124.4 yards per game) in 2024. Follow UGAWire on Instagram or Threads for more Georgia coverage!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store