Texas had second lowest 2024 voter turnout in nation
Texas saw the country's second lowest turnout in the 2024 presidential election, per new Census Bureau estimates.
Why it matters: Texas' consistently low turnout could mean voters don't think it's competitive to cast a ballot in the state, University of Houston political science professor Brandon Rottinghaus tells Axios.
What they're saying: "We wanna think that Texas is the best at everything — in barbecue, in football — but the reality is that we fall significantly behind when it comes to voter turnout," Rottinghaus says.
Flashback: GOP turnout last year far outstripped Democratic turnout in Texas.
The big picture: About 65% of voting-age Americans cast a ballot in last November's elections, down from nearly 67% in 2020, per the Census Bureau.
Arkansas (52.8%), Texas (57.9%) and Louisiana (58%) had the lowest shares of voting-age citizens participating.
By the numbers: A higher percentage of Texas women (59.9%) voted than men (55.9%), mirroring national trends.
Turnout was highest among white non-Hispanic voters (66.6%) in Texas and lower among Black (57.7%), Asian (52.3%) and Hispanic (44.5%) voters.
Reality check: Texas is one of the youngest states in the U.S. by median age, and data shows that older people are often more likely to vote than younger people.
Plus, Hispanic Texans make up the highest share of the state's population. They are historically less likely to vote than other groups, per Rottinghaus.
Between the lines: Lack of participation doesn't necessarily imply voter apathy. Some want to vote but are unable to.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
7 senators to watch as Republicans make changes to Trump's big bill
WASHINGTON — As Senate Republican leaders push to a massive bill for President Donald Trump's agenda by July 4, they are juggling a host of competing demands. Some senators are genuine threats to vote against the legislation, while others are expected to support it in the end after using their demands to shape it. Several of them have complicated political considerations. The Republicans who are speaking out most loudly point to a variety of ways the House-passed bill may change in the Senate, as party leaders seek to ease enough of their concerns. With all Democrats expected to vote against the package, Republicans will need at least 50 votes to pass it, as Vice President JD Vance could break a tie. Here are seven key senators to watch. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., is the only Republican senator who has voted against this legislation every step of the way. He has blasted the spike in military spending, the huge increase in deficits and, in particular, the $5 trillion debt limit hike. Paul does support a key part of the package — an extension of the Trump's 2017 tax cuts — but he wants to offset it with trillions of dollars in additional spending cuts, which the GOP has no hope of finding consensus on. Paul typically doesn't play games with his red lines. Barring an uncharacteristic about face, expect him to vote against the bill. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, is the sole surviving GOP senator to represent a state that Democrats consistently win at the presidential level. And she faces re-election this year. Her trajectory has been revealing, from supporting the initial budget resolution to voting against the revised version. A key reason for her opposition? Concerns that the Medicaid cuts would harm low-income and elderly constituents. She also expressed reservations about going after waste and fraud in Medicare, as GOP leaders have begun to consider. In addition, Collins and others like Sen. John Curtis, R-Utah, would firmly oppose overruling the parliamentarian, the Senate's in-house referee who settles rule disputes, if she disqualifies some policies. Collins voted for the party's 2017 tax law, but she has been willing to vote against major GOP bills in the past. Party leaders will need to take her demands seriously in order to win her vote. When Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, voted for the budget blueprint in April that kickstarted the process of writing the legislation, she quickly followed it up with a broad set of grievances that will need to be addressed, or she'll be 'unable to support' the final product. Among other things, she took issue with Medicaid cuts and an accounting trick her party is using to obscure the cost of the tax cuts. Two months later, her concerns persist. Asked Thursday by NBC News what she wants to change in the emerging bill, Murkowski replied dryly, 'Oh, I'll give you a list.' Murkowski has criticized the phaseout and repeal of clean energy tax credits that benefit her state, writing a letter in April with three of her colleagues — Sens. Jerry Moran, R-Kansas, Thom Tillis, R-N.C., and Curtis — highlighting the importance of America's energy independence, which they argued could be weakened as a result of this bill. Murkowski has shown an independent streak and a willingness to take political arrows when standing her ground. Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, is the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and will help craft some of the biggest and most contentious pieces of the bill — including the tax cuts and Medicaid cuts. Despite his soft-spoken and non-confrontational style, Crapo won't be able to make everybody happy. And any changes he makes in the Senate would have to be palatable to the wafer-thin House Republican majority, which engaged in painstaking negotiations before passing its version of the bill by a one-vote margin. One example of the disconnect is the expanded $40,000 cap on state and local tax deductions, to placate a group of blue-state House Republicans. But there are no GOP senators representing blue states where that is a big issue. Crapo said "there's not a strong mood in the Senate Republican caucus right now" to expand SALT. The bill represents his biggest test since taking the powerful gavel. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he wants to adjust the phaseouts of the clean energy tax credits with a more 'targeted' approach to protect U.S. businesses that are already invested in existing projects. He said there's 'general consensus that the House proposed language will be modified.' Senate Environment and Public Works Chair Shelley Moore Capito, agreed, telling NBC News some phaseouts will likely be pushed back. A member of the Finance Committee, Tillis has sounded generally positive about the direction of the bill, making him a likely 'yes' vote. But he's skeptical that the Senate will meet the Independence Day deadline: 'There's a lot of things that have to go perfectly right to get all that done and be out by July 4.' Tillis faces a tough political balancing act: He's up for re-election next year in a state that Democrats will be targeting; but first he needs to get through a Republican primary, which means staying on Trump's good side. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., has railed against the bill and its estimated $2.4 trillion contribution to the deficit, insisting he can't vote for it as written. He has slammed the idea of a mega-bill, calling for breaking it up and limiting the debt ceiling hike. Trump asked him to be 'less negative' during a meeting at the White House on Wednesday, Johnson said. 'I think we had a good, lively discussion between the two of us,' Johnson told NBC News. 'He obviously would like me to be a little less negative, a little more positive, which I'm happy to do.' Johnson said he isn't trying to make Trump and GOP leaders' jobs harder. And the senator zig-zagged his way to 'yes' on the 2017 tax law after initially coming out against it, so party leaders have reason to be optimistic that he won't sink this legislation. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., has been the Senate GOP's most vocal opponent of cutting Medicaid "benefits' — and he's been specific about which parts of the House bill he's worried about, citing the Medicaid provider tax and cost-sharing provisions. Notably, Hawley said he's fine with coverage losses resulting from Medicaid work requirements and expanded proof-of-eligibility provisions. Those make up the bulk of the House bill's savings. Hawley has also expressed reservations about including any provisions in the bill related to Medicare, which Republicans recently said they would discuss related to savings connected to so-called 'waste, fraud, and abuse.' Hawley called that 'a terrible idea,' telling reporters Thursday, 'If you don't ever want to win an election again, just go fiddle around with people's Medicare that they've worked hard for, paid into.' This article was originally published on
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Every Popcorn Moment on the Day Musk-Trump Exploded
President Donald Trump's relationship with former 'First Buddy' Elon Musk has devolved from well-wishes to war of the roses on the heels of the Tesla billionaire's blitzkrieg against the MAGA president. Yet according to corrosive comments shared by the two polarizing political figures, their bad blood has been brewing before they officially bid adieu in a strained May 30 press conference at the White House. In a June 1 CBS Sunday Morning interview, Musk soft launched the civil war, claiming that he was 'disappointed' by Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' and alleging it 'undermines' his DOGE work by adding an estimated $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit. After ripping the bill as a 'pork-filled,' 'disgusting abomination' in a June 3 tweet, Musk followed with a tweet at 2:07 a.m. on June 4, commenting that the bill 'defeats all the cost savings achieved by the @DOGE.' By 9 a.m. Thursday morning, Musk's gloves were off and he was ready to wage war on X. He retweeted a post from the fake news parody account Babylon Bee that quipped, 'Congress Warns Failure To Pass Spending Bill Might Delay Destruction Of The Country.' At 10:41 a.m., he retweeted his Fox interview discussing fears that the government will 'go bankrupt' from overspending. He captioned the post: 'That's what it comes down to.' At 10:52 a.m., Musk retweeted a post by angel investor and entrepreneur Jason Calacanis, claiming that, 'The majority of republican *voters* strongly agree with Elon and want the BBB trimmed down.' The tweet added, '@elonmusk left the Democratic Party and sacrificed much in his relentlessly supported the GOP. The GOP leadership should give his counsel serious consideration. 🫡' Musk captioned the post with a 'yes' as he shared it. At 11:20 a.m., Musk appeared to be hoping to get Trump's attention by turning the president's previous statements against his current actions. He shared a 2013 post in which Trump said he was 'embarrassed' by Republicans under former President Barack Obama's tenure because they 'are extending the debt ceiling.' Musk quipped on X, 'wise words.' At 11:46 a.m., Musk followed with another old Trump tweet in which he declared 'no member of Congress should be eligible for re-election if our country's budget is not balanced---deficits not allowed!' To which Musk responded on X, 'I couldn't agree more! 🇺🇸🇺🇸' At 12:10 p.m., Musk tweeted, 'Slim Beautiful Bill for the win 🥇' At 12:13 p.m., Musk continued taking shots at Trump and even tagging the president's X account, urging him to 'keep the good, remove the bad' in his mega bill. Around 12:10 p.m., Musk and Trump came to blows in real time as Trump was forced to answer questions about Musk's attacks in front of his Oval Office guest, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. 'Elon is upset because we took the EV mandate which was a lot of money for electric vehicles,' Trump told reporters. 'They're having a hard time the electric vehicles, and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy. Elon knew this from the beginning.' At 12:19 p.m., Musk began to respond on X to Trump's comment with, 'Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' At 12:25 p.m., Musk responded to Trump's comment that he 'knew' the 'inner workings of the bill' with, 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' A minute later, at 12:26 p.m., Musk retweeted comments from Tennessee Rep. Andy Ogles in which he declared that the bill is 'not beautiful yet.' Ogles told host Matt Gaetz, 'The Senate's job is to make the bill better before sending it back to us. The House's job is to pass DOGE rescissions and EO codification bills that are collecting dust.' Musk seemed to like the comments with an American flag emojii. At 12:44 p.m., Musk doubled down on sharing Trump's old tweets on X, writing on X, 'Where is this guy today?? At 1:38 p.m., Musk added on X, 'Remember this?@realDonaldTrump,' sharing the video of Trump shilling for Tesla outside the White House. A minute later, at 1:39 p.m., Musk was attacking Trump's 'beautiful' bill as an 'ugly spending bill will make things much worse' for Americans paying interest rates to federal creditors. At 2:23 p.m., Musk claimed in a tweet, 'Not even those in Congress who had to vote on the Big Ugly Spending Bill had time to read it!' At 2:37 p.m., Trump entered the ring with Musk via Truth Social, hitting back against his posts with a claim that Musk was 'wearing thin' in the White House so he 'asked him to leave.' 'I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy his Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' wrote Trump in the post. In the same minute, Trump wrote that the easiest way for the government to save money would be to cancel Musk's 'billions and billions of dollars' in 'government subsidies and contracts.' He added, 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' At 2:45 p.m., Musk seemed to address a report that the nucleus of his rift with Trump began because he rejected billionaire astronaut Jared Isaacman from a top federal position. Musk wrote: 'This is what he said about Jared,' sharing a post of Trump's 2024 nomination of Isaacman. At 2:48 pm., Musk moved to countering Trump's Truth Social posts. About the 'wearing thin' claims, Musk wrote on X, 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.' At 3:10 p.m., Musk went scorched earth. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' he tweeted. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' He added, 'Have a nice day, DJT!' At 3:20 p.m., he doubled down in a tweet, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' At 4:06 p.m., Musk called Trumps bluff about government contracts, announcing on X: 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' At the same time, Trump added on Truth Social, 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago.' He added, 'This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given.' Trump concluded, 'I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness.' At 4:11 p.m., Musk began responding to comments around calls for Trump to be impeached again. To a tweet urging that 'Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him,' Musk replied on X, 'Yes.' At 4:14 p.m., Musk began antagonizing Trump more by retweeting posts claiming that he shared a very close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Musk responded with a skeptical emoji to a post that said Trump's relationship with Epstein is 'well established.' At 4:26, Musk hammered Trump over the economy in an X post, writing, 'The Trump tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year.' After what appears to have been a short break, Musk came back with a tweet backing up his fears that America could go 'broke.' Although Musk's social media melee seemed to be helping him expel some much-needed gripes off his chest, Bloomberg reported that the Tesla billionaire's very public feud had sent its stock plummeting by 14% on Thursday, with a graph correlating Musk's comments with stock slumps. At 9:21 p.m., Musk resumed pressuring Trump, doubling down on his claims of fiscal concern by tweeting, 'If America goes broke, nothing else matters,' resharing an interview he conducted at CPAC in which he talked about the national debt. In the interview, Musk added, 'If the country goes insolvent, if all the money is just spent on paying interest on debt, there's no money left for anything. A country is no different from a person. Country overspends, country goes bankrupt, same as a person who overspends goes bankrupt.'
Fox News
31 minutes ago
- Fox News
Biden book author reveals how White House staff truly felt about Karine Jean-Pierre as press secretary
CHICAGO - One of the authors of the new bombshell Joe Biden book pulled back the curtain Thursday on how White House staffers truly felt about former White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre. During their book tour in Chicago, "Original Sin" authors Alex Thompson and Jake Tapper were asked about the announcement of Jean-Pierre's new book promising to shed light on the "broken White House" she worked in and that she left the Democratic Party to become an independent. "Someone just texted me before I got on stage, a former Biden person, which is, 'It is quite the ballet move to say that you're leaving the Democratic Party because they were disloyal to Joe Biden.' But that is what she's saying," Thompson told the Windy City audience Thursday at The Vic Theatre. Thompson noted that despite "mass bad reviews" within the Biden administration of Jean-Pierre's job performance as White House press secretary, she was seen as "untouchable" due to her allyship with top Jill Biden aide Anthony Bernal. "I think what's really provoking anger from former Biden people… there was mass frustration on how she went about the job, felt that she was not good at it, was not aware she was not good at it, she did not try hard to get better at it. And there's more focus on elevating her own profile than not," Thompson said. "And now for her to then go out after the Democratic Party elevated her to the top spokesperson job in the country and then for her to then try to sell books by leaving the party, they say that simmering resentment just exploded instantly," the Axios reporter added. Tapper speculated that there would have been less "scorn" aimed at Jean-Pierre if she didn't announce she had become an independent, something the CNN anchor made little sense to him. The event moderator, NPR media correspondent David Folkenflik, asked Tapper and Thompson why former Biden staffers by and large "aren't using their names" as they criticize Jean-Pierre. "I totally wonder that too," Tapper reacted. "Because, like, what are you afraid of?" Thompson responded by insisting many of them don't want to speak publicly because they have since landed new jobs and don't want their employers to be associated with the mudslinging. "I'd also say that the Biden culture was to punish and try to destroy people who spoke out," Thompson said. "And yes, they don't have power anymore, but they are watching very closely. I think some people still fear retaliation." Tapper added that since Jean-Pierre was a trailblazer" as the first Black woman and LGBTQ press secretary, that was another reason why her former colleagues aren't speaking out. Both authors took turns scrutinizing Jean-Pierre's credibility following her loyal defense of Biden before and after his disastrous debate performance. Tapper recalled a 2023 private fundraiser Biden attended in which he didn't have a teleprompter and how he told donors his canned remarks about how the events of Charlottesville inspired his presidential run in 2020 twice in the span of a few minutes, and how at the following press briefing, Jean-Pierre told reporters, "Well, that's how strongly he feels about that moment." "In her defense, she rarely saw him," Tapper quipped.
