
‘My wife and I have £700k pensions written in trust – can we dodge Labour's inheritance tax grab?'
Dear Charlene,
My wife and I both have Sipps (self-invested personal pensions) with a combined value of around £700,000.
When they were set up over 20 years ago, the documents referred to how they are 'written in trust'. I understand that changes are because of inheritance tax rules from April 5 2027, but I'm now worried as our other assets already take us up to the inheritance tax allowances.
We've given the pension providers details of who our preferred beneficiaries are upon death. But if we die after the changes in 2027, will both of our Sipp funds be subject to inheritance tax at 40pc? Or does the 'written in trust' have any relevance to the tax payable? We don't have a financial adviser.
Many thanks,
– Don
Dear Don,
Thank you for writing in. Your question is very timely, as the Government has just provided an update and the draft rules for how pensions and inheritance tax will work.
At present, pensions are generally not included in the value of your estate when you die. For pensions written under trust (like your Sipps), the trustees and/or the scheme administrators have full discretion as to whom any death benefits are paid.
It's very rare that nominations are not followed, but this discretion is currently what helps to keep pensions outside of estates and out of the clutches of inheritance tax.
Unfortunately, the Government has confirmed its plans to include unused pensions in the value of an estate. As you've mentioned, the new rules would apply for deaths on or after April 6 2027.
This is despite receiving hundreds of responses highlighting problems with the proposals and alternative ways to raise the same amount of tax revenue from pensions on death in a more straightforward way.
Although your Sipps will continue to be trust-based pension schemes, and trustees should retain discretion over who can be paid death benefits, I'm afraid this will no longer exempt them from inheritance tax.
The Government did announce an important change to the proposals – the executors or personal representatives of an estate will now be responsible in the first place for handling the reporting and payment of any inheritance tax on unused pensions, not the pension provider.
This is consistent with non-pension assets, and could mean the tax can be settled from other accounts, but still undoubtedly adds to the burden on the bereaved.
What will be included?
The changes don't mean that all pensions suddenly get hit with 40pc tax. Whether any tax applies will depend on the value of your pension when you die, your other assets, and who you plan to leave them to.
There will still be exemptions for dependents' pensions provided by defined benefit schemes (like those enjoyed by the public sector), survivors' pensions paid under an annuity and eligible lump sums paid to charities from unused pensions, including Sipps.
Anything left to a surviving spouse or civil partner will also be exempt from inheritance tax, but this could mean potential tax is stored up until the date they pass away if they don't spend the funds in their lifetime.
If you both plan to leave your respective assets (including Sipps) to each other, there will usually be no inheritance tax to pay on the first death. When the survivor passes away, their estate will be able to use both of your standard nil-rate bands (£325,000 each), and potentially both of your residence nil-rates bands (up to £175,000 each).
This extra band is available to set against a residential property left to your direct descendants, but starts to be tapered away for estates worth more than £2m.
Inheritance tax will apply above allowances and reliefs, usually at a rate of 40pc. This could be taken from the pension assets, or from other cash or assets held in the estate. It will be for the personal representatives of the estate and the beneficiaries to decide who pays and from where.
What can I do if I'm concerned about inheritance tax?
You've told me you don't have a financial adviser, but estate planning and tax can get very complex. A good financial planner will be able to talk you through possible strategies for making the most of your pensions and other savings in your lifetime and plans for when you are gone. They can also help you avoid costly mistakes of getting it wrong.
It's likely that we will see more people spend more of their pensions on themselves in their lifetimes. But people often also ask me about giving money to others from their pensions. While you cannot directly gift your pension to another person, you can use withdrawals from it to fund gifts to loved ones.
If it doesn't leave you short of funding your own retirement plans (or any care you might require), taking regular extra income to fund gifts could be a way of reducing your taxable estate and bringing forward some of the legacy gifts you might have in mind.
After any tax-free cash allowance you have left, you'll pay income tax on the withdrawals and that might tip you into a higher income tax bracket.
I've outlined the rules that can apply to making gifts in a previous letter, and explained how to make pension contributions now to your intended beneficiaries.
The proposals will feel particularly unfair to older pensioners, who perhaps do not have as long left to reorganise their finances to minimise tax. It's unlikely they will be able to get insurance to help their loved ones meet the increased cost of any inheritance tax bill at a reasonable price either, although it might be an option for some people to consider.
I'm afraid this is unlikely to be the positive answer you were hoping for, but I do hope it can help give you clarity and perhaps some next steps towards any plans or changes you might be considering.
Best wishes,
– Charlene
Charlene Young is a pensions and savings expert at online investment platform AJ Bell. Her columns should not be taken as advice or as a personal recommendation, but as a starting point for readers to undertake their own further research.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
19 minutes ago
- Metro
UK firm introduces new model for collecting fine spirits in the US
Decant Group, the company behind the Decant Index platform, has launched in the United States. Known in the United Kingdom for simplifying fine wine and spirits collecting, the company is bringing its digital-first model to a growing but still fragmented American market. Over 44,000 UK users already rely on the platform, which has facilitated 1,618 exits and returned more than £4.6 million to clients. Decant Index is not only a marketplace. It provides tools for collectors to build and manage portfolios with transparency and ease. Focusing on bonded storage, real-time tracking, and education, it offers an alternative to traditional, opaque collecting practices. The move signals a push to introduce American collectors to a structured way of owning and understanding premium assets. Decant Index provides users with full legal ownership of their purchases. Each bottle or cask is sold whole, without fractional schemes or pooled investments. Ownership documentation is available through the platform, offering buyers full control and clear asset verification. Assets are stored under bond in regulated warehouses. These UK-based facilities store goods without triggering import taxes, which are deferred until the goods are withdrawn. This bonded model helps maintain product condition and supports long-term value preservation. Although well-established in the UK, the concept remains relatively unfamiliar to many in the US. All features are integrated into a digital dashboard, enabling users to track portfolio performance, access valuation data, and receive curated recommendations based on their portfolio behaviour. The platform combines functionality with transparency, allowing collectors to navigate the market with enhanced insight. Education is central to Decant's approach. The company offers detailed content on valuation, market behaviour, distillery heritage, and the fundamentals of collecting. Tools are designed to help users understand what makes certain bottles or casks collectable, rather than encouraging impulsive purchases. Decant has launched a series of webinars for new users. These online sessions explore topics such as how bonded storage works and what separates a collectable cask from a standard commercial product. In-person events are also being planned to engage collectors in the US more directly. Chief Executive Alistair Moncrieff said the goal is to support informed decision-making. 'We will be heavily focused on educating the market on the pros and cons of purchasing fine wine and spirits under bond in the UK and how that can help retain value,' he said. The platform removes much of the guesswork traditionally associated with collectables. Each asset is traceable, securely stored, and updated with valuation data. Collectors can follow market trends, monitor asset appreciation, and adjust strategies without relying on third-party interpretations. Decant Index users also benefit from bonded storage in Alloa, Scotland. These facilities are HMRC-audited and provide insurance coverage for every cask. Clients receive routine updates about their holdings, and real-time access to their asset history helps reduce the risks often tied to alternative investments. Decant Index recently expanded to include fine wine and premium rum. One new offering, the Wine Cellar Plan, is a subscription service that starts at $330 per month. It includes curated wine portfolios, bonded storage, and digital management tools. This move broadens the platform's appeal and aligns with demand for diverse collectable assets. Decant Group is also building relationships in the US. These include partnerships with local distilleries, compliance consultants, and logistics providers. These efforts aim to ensure that US-based collectors receive relevant support and information tailored to their region. Moncrieff explained that product design is based on listening to what users want. 'We have invested seven figures in technology, ensuring our customer experience is at the forefront of what we do,' he said. 'We believe our success has come from understanding what the customer expects to see and how they want to be spoken to.' By combining education, clear ownership, and warehouse-backed security, Decant Index presents a collecting model built on clarity. It is not centred on quick sales or speculative flips. Instead, it offers a complete system for acquiring, managing, and understanding spirits as assets. Expansion into the US reflects the company's intention to standardise fine spirits collecting for a wider audience. The platform will continue to evolve, with plans to enhance production guides, offer valuation trend insights, and deliver more educational material. Its long-term goal is to help users navigate collecting with more confidence and less confusion. Decant Index is positioned not only as a trading platform but as a system built for collectors who want reliable access, structured management, and real-time data. For those serious about fine spirits, it offers a way to participate in a category where culture, history, and tangible value meet. Decant Group is preparing to launch House of Decant, an e-commerce channel for collectable bottles. The online store will offer premium selections, fast delivery, and concierge-style customer service. It is designed to complement the firm's investment platform while also reaching a broader audience. Chris Seddon, managing director at Decant Group, said the company is focused on adapting to evolving consumer expectations. 'We are building a platform that changes how premium wine and spirits are discovered, purchased and enjoyed—designed for what today's luxury consumer expects.' Learn more about what House of Decant has to offer here. As with all alternative asset purchases, the value of fine spirits can go down as well as up. These assets are not regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and may be illiquid.


The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Fears of rise in uninsured drivers as insurance tax receipts soar
Consumers paid a total of nearly 9% more in a tax on insurance premiums last year, leading to fears of drivers becoming priced out of policies. The AA, which conducted the research, urged the Treasury to cut the rate of insurance premium tax (IPT) on motor policies by a quarter, with a 50% reduction for newly qualified drivers. The standard rate of IPT – which applies to premiums such as motor insurance – has been 12.0% since 2017. It was 2.5% when it was first introduced in 1994. Premiums being more expensive mean receipts from standard rate IPT totalled £692 million last year, up 8.6% from the previous 12 months. HM Revenue and Customs said the increase was partly caused by 'rising car and property insurance premiums'. AA president Edmund King told the PA news agency: 'Insurance premium tax on motor insurance is a tax on responsible ownership – protecting yourself and third parties from the financial damage of incidents and injuries. 'Surges in the cost of insurance over recent years have ratcheted up the pain for those most prone to paying high premiums. 'Many of those are people least able to afford it, such as young and newly qualified drivers with higher risk as well as low-income policyholders. 'That not only threatens to price them out of cover but tempts more to drive without insurance.' Drivers caught behind the wheel of a vehicle without insurance face a £300 fine and six penalty points. The most serious cases are taken to court, and offenders can receive an unlimited fine and disqualification from driving. A spokesperson for the Association of British Insurers (ABI) said: 'While we appreciate fiscal headroom is limited given pressures on public spending, we continue to believe that insurance premium tax is an unfair levy on a responsible purchase. 'Those who purchase insurance should not be penalised for trying to protect themselves, their loved ones and their property. 'We continue to call for IPT to be frozen until fiscal and financial conditions allow for the standard rate to be cut.' ABI figures show the average cost of motor cover last year was £622, representing a 15% (£78) jump from 2023. This followed a 25% (£109) annual rise from 2022 to 2023. The ABI said total claims payouts rose by 17% in 2024, and stressed that 'work must continue' to tackle the cost of insurance. It wants the Government to focus on issues such as reducing vehicle theft and insurance fraud, and boosting recruitment in the vehicle repair sector. It noted the average cost of policies in the first three months of 2025 was 7% lower than a year earlier. A taskforce led by the Treasury and the Department for Transport focused on the rising cost of car insurance was established in October last year. The body, which brings together industry and consumer groups, is expected to publish its final report in the autumn. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'The overall cost of insurance is determined only in part by insurance premium tax, which contributes over £8 billion a year towards vital public services. 'Our cross-Government taskforce on motor insurance will deliver on our commitment to support drivers by finding ways to tackle the high cost of motor insurance.'


The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves should exempt defence pledge from budget rules, says Gordon Brown
Gordon Brown has said Chancellor Rachel Reeves should exempt the Government's defence spending pledge from her borrowing rules to help free up economic headroom. The former prime minister said the commitment to spend 5% of GDP on national security by 2035 should be dealt with jointly as a ' Nato initiative', with costs shared across Europe. Leading economists have warned the Chancellor will likely have to raise taxes in the autumn budget to plug a £51 billion black hole in the public finances. Ms Reeves is currently on track to miss one of her borrowing rules by £41.2 billion and needs to rebuild a fiscal buffer of nearly £10 billion that has been wiped out, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Niesr). Mr Brown, who served as chancellor for a decade in Sir Tony Blair's Labour administration, said on Thursday that the rise in defence spending should be treated as 'exceptional', as it has been in Germany. 'When you come to the fiscal position, look, there's one thing that's happened over the last few months that has been quite unprecedented – to spend 5% on defence expenditure as we want to spend by the 2030s,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. 'But this is a Nato initiative, this is a European initiative. We should be doing this jointly. 'We should have either jointly issued bonds or a Nato defence fund, and we should be sharing the cost across the continent, and that should be regarded as something extraordinary and exceptional, outside the fiscal rules. 'That would create the kind of headroom that Rachel Reeves needs.' Germany has exempted some defence spending from its strict borrowing rules – the so-called 'debt brake' – to allow an increase in expenditure. When she entered the Treasury, Ms Reeves set out two key fiscal restrictions which she has said are 'non-negotiable'. The first rule is to ensure that day-to-day spending is matched by tax revenues so the Government only borrows to invest, and the second is to reduce net financial debt as a share of the economy. Ministers have already announced a cut to overseas aid to fund a boost in defence spending but economists have said the new Nato target of 5% by 2035 could increase expenditure by a further £38.6 billion. The Treasury has been contacted for comment.