Couple from Ahmedabad killed in AI 171 crash was on errand to update Aadhaar card
The couple was riding an electric two-wheeler near the Atulyam complex to sort out a correction in Chetnaba's Aadhaar card when the aircraft came down, crashing into a nearby building. The sudden, violent impact proved fatal for the couple.
The last rites of the couple, residents of Kubernagar, were performed on Wednesday after their DNA matched with their 11-year-old son, Mandip. The couple is also survived by a 20-year-old daughter, Krupa.
Chetansinh Chavda, a family friend, says Ranveersinh, who worked in the hospitality sector, and Chetnaba were happy as their 20-year-old daughter, Krupa had got married in March. "On Thursday, Ranveersinh took a two-hour break from his office, to get an affidavit."
Ranveersinh and Chetnaba went to the IG compound, where several advocates have their offices. "There was an error in Chetnaba's Aadhaar card, and the two went to get an affidavit so that they could get the changes made," said Chavda.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
USDJPY đang đi lên không?
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
As they passed through the crash site, fate intervened.
Burnt remnants of the hotel's scooter and half-charred documents, including the Aadhaar card, were recovered from the scene. The family received the mortal remains only on Wednesday, after forensic identification. Their final rites were performed the same day, with councillors from both the BJP and Congress in attendance.
Chavda said that Mandip, who is a Class 5 student, is yet to realise that his parents have left. "Had they postponed the visit by even a few minutes, they might still be alive. But destiny had other plans."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- Indian Express
You can ride the bus, but do you belong? The hidden cost of Delhi's Pink Passes
Written by Afsheen Rizvi The Delhi government's recent decision to replace pink tickets with Aadhaar-linked pink passes (Saheli Smart Card), restricting free bus travel to 'residents of Delhi', is a bureaucratic tweak that betrays the very idea of public mobility as a right. For migrant women, students, informal workers, and those without formal residency proofs, this move erects yet another barrier in a city that already gatekeeps its spaces along class, caste, and communal lines. As a research scholar who relied on these pink tickets to explore, loiter, and claim my place in Delhi's public sphere, I know firsthand how this policy will shrink the city for thousands of women like me. The term 'resident' is a slippery one. Are students living in hostels residents? What about the domestic worker from another state who lives with her employer? Or take the case of the Muslim woman. Many scholars have shown the discrimination that exists in the rental house market, so is she now doubly excluded because she lacks a Delhi Aadhaar? The government's logic mirrors the insidious 'son of the soil' politics that ties rights to paperwork, ignoring how migrants — students, labourers, artists — sustain this city's economy and culture. The gradual erosion of public transit services and the constriction of accessible urban spaces stand in stark contrast to the unchecked proliferation of privatised, gated enclaves within Delhi's urban fabric. Buses, particularly for women, transcend their utilitarian function as mere vehicles of mobility; they constitute a critical site of provisional belonging — a mobile public sphere where the act of commuting itself becomes an assertion of spatial claim. The DTC free bus travel scheme for women, prior to its residency-based restructuring, functioned as both a logistical and symbolic safeguard, offering not just affordability but a sanctioned presence in transit spaces historically fraught with gendered risk. This distinction is crucial when contextualised against Delhi's long-standing anxieties around women's mobility, epitomised by the December 2012 gang rape case — a tragedy that unfolded in a private bus, underscoring the differential perceptions of safety between regulated public transit and unaccountable private transport. The revocation of universally accessible pink tickets, therefore, represents more than a fiscal recalibration; it signals a regression in the discursive and material struggle to reimagine cities as spaces where women's right to move freely is inseparable from their right to inhabit. Free bus travel was never a 'perk'. It was a lifeline. For working women, it meant savings; for students, independence; for slum dwellers, a rare respite from the humiliation of proving they 'deserve' basic services. Now, women in informal settlements — often without land records — will be further marginalised. Lack of documentation haunts the city's temporary settlers, slum dwellers, squatters, residents of shanty settlements, who are pushed everyday to the periphery of exponentially expanding, increasingly privatised boundaries of the city. And now it's not just housing, their means to travel across the city will also be put in question. Delhi has never been a city of neat borders or orderly belonging. It thrums with the chaos of a thousand contradictions, a place where rickshaws scrape past Audis, where Delhi Sultanate ruins shadow glass towers, where home isn't just an address but the smell of winter smog and shared laughter on a crowded bus. It is a city beyond the documented papers, fixed address on Aadhaar card, it's a city where Muzaffar Hanfi reminded us 'yun bhi Dilli mai log rehte hain, jaise divan-e-mir chaak shuda.' Mere documents cannot contain the life that is Delhi. The writer is a research scholar of Sociology working in Delhi
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Samajwadi Party is like a frog in well': UP CM Yogi Adityanath criticizes party; says world is moving ahead but they remain confined to themselves
NEW DELHI: During a 24-hour discussion on the 'Vision Document 2047', Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath on Thursday criticized the Samajwadi Party , saying the party is like a frog in a well — while the world moves ahead, they remain confined to themselves. He remarked, "Your (Samajwadi Party) family development authority is also an example of this, they only know how to remain limited to themselves. Swami Vivekananda had said about this in his stories." "The condition of Samajwadi Party is like that of a frog in a well. The world is moving ahead, but you only know how to remain confined to your families. And you want to do the same to Uttar Pradesh, " Yogi added. CM Yogi further elaborated on his observations while discussing the Vision Document: "When we were holding discussions on this Vision Document, I observed 2-3 things. Every Assembly constituency should benefit from government schemes and witness development. A developed Uttar Pradesh can realize the dream of a developed nation. I observed that some were talking less about development and more about power." The remarks underline the CM's focus on development over political interests and highlight his vision for inclusive growth across all constituencies in the state. Earlier today, Yogi Adityanath also criticized the Congress on Partition Horrors Remembrance Day, calling the 1947 Partition a "dark chapter" resulting from appeasement politics that broke the unity of Sanatan Bharat and left deep scars on the nation, according to a press release. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice Grammarly Install Now Undo He credited Prime Minister Narendra Modi with reviving this forgotten history by declaring the day in 2021. "Today, the entire country mourns, remembering the horrors of August 14, 1947," he said. He further accused the then Congress government of showing complete apathy towards the displaced. "No memorials were built, no museums established for Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, and Christians who were forced to leave their ancestral homes. Their suffering was erased from public memory," he said. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. "Get the latest news updates on Times of India, including reviews of the movie Coolie and War 2 ."
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Why did this PhD student from Tamil Nadu refuse to receive her degree from Governor RN Ravi at MSU convocation?
A bold act of protest at Manonmaniam Sundaranar University's 32nd convocation has become a talking point across Tamil Nadu. Jean Joseph, a PhD graduate in Human Resource Management, chose not to receive her degree from Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi, challenging the long-standing tradition of students collecting degrees directly from the Governor, who is also the university's chancellor. Convocation ceremony in focus The convocation, held at V.O.C. Auditorium, conferred degrees to 37,376 students from 104 affiliated colleges and the university, spanning bachelor's, master's, MPhil, and PhD programmes. 759 graduates were present to receive their degrees in person, including 650 PhD scholars, and 109 medallists were honoured for academic excellence. The ceremony featured a convocation address by A P Dimri, Director of the Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, under the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India. Traditionally, students pose for photographs with the Governor after receiving their certificates. In a surprising move, Joseph accepted her degree from Vice-Chancellor N Chandrasekar instead, bypassing Governor Ravi entirely. A stand for choice and Tamil identity During the convocation, Joseph bypassed Governor R N Ravi and chose to receive her degree from Vice-Chancellor N Chandrasekar, breaking with the traditional practice of posing with the Governor. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Most Expensive Ocean Cruise Tours & Trips Undo Explaining her decision to TNN, she said she acted 'only as a way to register protest against the governor, who has not contributed anything to the development of the state and has shown he is against the welfare of the people of Tamil Nadu. ' Adding to this, she mentioned that she 'believes in the 'Dravidian' model of governance.' She added further in a statement to ANI, highlighting her perspective on student choice and respect for Tamil culture: 'I believe the Governor has done nothing for Tamil Nadu or the Tamil language. Many others, such as the Chief Minister or the Education Minister, are more qualified to present degrees. It should be the student's choice. My fellow students appreciated my decision. If it were wrong, no one would have congratulated me. I don't want to take my degree from someone who does not respect our land, language, and identity.' Joseph emphasised that her protest was political in principle, not personal, and many students reportedly supported her for taking a stand for Tamil identity, language, and governance. Academic journey Jean Joseph has an impressive academic background. She completed her at Hindu College, Nagercoil, followed by an MCA at Mepco College, Sivakasi, before earning her PhD in Human Resource Management from MSU. Her research focused on human resource strategies and organisational development, preparing her for a career in academia and organisational consulting. Reactions and wider debate The incident has sparked discussions across campuses about student autonomy, ceremonial traditions, and political expression. As reported by TNN, BJP's Tamil Nadu president, K Annamalai, criticised the move as 'unnecessary and useless drama' aimed at political gain. Joseph's husband, Rajan, serves as the district student wing secretary of the DMK, adding a political dimension to her action. Many educators and students see her decision as an example of how ceremonial traditions can intersect with political awareness and personal principles, particularly in a state like Tamil Nadu, where student activism and regional pride have long been influential. Joseph's stand has become a reference point for discussions on whether students should have the freedom to choose from whom they receive their degrees, a debate that could shape convocation practices in the years to come. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
