
Why Cyber Specialists Thrive During Economic Downturns
Cary, NC, May 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- While tech giants have eliminated 300,000+ jobs over two years, cybersecurity professionals face a different reality. Organizations desperately need cybersecurity talent, yet many positions remain unfilled -- not from lack of demand, but because employers won't settle for candidates without specialized skills. This creates a unique opportunity: professionals who invest in targeted cybersecurity education and security certifications can build recession-proof careers while others struggle.
INE Security, a leading provider of cybersecurity training and certifications, analyzed this market dynamic and found that specialization doesn't just improve job prospects, it multiplies career value exponentially.
'Specialization in cybersecurity creates a career insurance policy that generalists simply can't match,' explains Dara Warn, CEO of INE Security. 'While general IT professionals compete on price and availability, specialists compete on unique value. When you're one of the few professionals in your region who can architect zero-trust implementations or perform advanced mobile pentesting, you're not just employed – you're essential.'
The Math That Matters: Why Specialization Pays
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects 33% growth for information security analysts through 2033, which is ten times faster than the average occupation. But despite 87% of companies reporting cybersecurity skill gaps (McKinsey & Company), many are willing to wait for the right candidates rather than hire generalists.
This creates a mathematical advantage for specialists. When hundreds apply for general IT roles, specialized positions like mobile security pentester or cloud architect often struggle to find even five qualified candidates. That scarcity translates directly into negotiating power and compensation opportunities.
The $4.88 Million Question
With the average cybersecurity breach spiking 10% over the last year to $4.88 million (IBM Ponemon Institute), organizations can't afford mediocre security. They need specialists who can prevent, detect, and respond to threats immediately. Since 68% of breaches involve human elements like social engineering, according to Verizon's 2024 Data Breach Investigations Report, employers seek professionals who understand both technical vulnerabilities and human behavior patterns.
This urgency explains why 91% of hiring managers prefer certified candidates (Fortinet) and why specialized roles command premium rates:
The Certification Advantage: Real Numbers
Professional certifications create measurable career advantages beyond just knowledge validation. Gallup research shows 81% of Americans with professional certifications are employed versus 68% without them. In cybersecurity, this advantage amplifies because security certifications prove competency in high-stakes scenarios.
From foundational credentials like Sec+ to advanced pentester certifications, the progression path is clear. Career advancement opportunities expand dramatically with specialized certifications. This motivation helps combat feelings of career stagnation that contribute to burnout, an increasingly critical problem within the cybersecurity industry. But certifications alone aren't enough—employers increasingly demand proven practical experience.
Beyond Paper: Why Hands-On Training Multiplies Value
The business case is compelling: well-trained cybersecurity teams generate $70,000 in annual savings and 10% productivity increases (IBM). Organizations recognize this ROI, which explains why 67% prefer team members with certifications - they validate both knowledge and practical capability (Fortinet).
Modern cybersecurity education leverages cyber ranges and virtual labs that simulate real attack scenarios. This allows professionals to practice incident response, penetration testing, and threat analysis without risking production systems. The result? Professionals who can demonstrate actual competency rather than just theoretical knowledge.
Real-World Application: The eMAPT Example
INE Security's enhanced Mobile Application Penetration Tester (eMAPT) certification exemplifies this integrated approach. Beyond advanced mobile security methodologies, the program includes extensive hands-on exercises in dedicated cyber ranges that replicate real mobile application infrastructures. Through June 24, 2025, learners can save $200 on the eMAPT certification and gain access to INE Security's updated Mobile Application Penetration Testing Learning Path.
Learners practice iOS and Android security assessment against actual vulnerabilities in controlled environments. This combination of security certifications and practical lab experience addresses the core employer demand: verifiable expertise backed by demonstrated capability.
The Ultimate Career Insurance Policy
The cybersecurity profession rewards those who invest in continuous learning through specialized training. The combination of recognized security certifications, hands-on laboratory experience, and practical skill application creates professionals who thrive regardless of economic conditions.
While traditional IT training paths may offer broader options, cybersecurity education provides something more valuable: career resilience in an increasingly uncertain world. As threats evolve and breach costs climb, organizations will continue prioritizing specialists who can deliver immediate value.
About INE Security:
INE Security is the premier provider of online networking and cybersecurity training and cybersecurity certifications. Harnessing a powerful hands-on lab platform, cutting-edge technology, a global video distribution network, and world-class instructors, INE Security is the top training choice for Fortune 500 companies worldwide for cybersecurity training in business and for IT professionals looking to advance their careers. INE Security's suite of learning paths offers an incomparable depth of expertise across cybersecurity and is committed to delivering advanced technical training while also lowering the barriers worldwide for those looking to enter and excel in an IT career.
Kathryn Brown INE [email protected]
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Tesla shareholders thankful to have Musk back after his time with DOGE
Americans should be thankful that Elon Musk devoted his time to DOGE and shining a spotlight on government waste. Tesla shareholders have less reason to cheer. I say this not as a Musk hater, but an admirer of his brilliance and patriotism to his adopted country. Yet in announcing last week he's totally done with the aforementioned Department of Government Efficiency, Musk did underscore a blind spot in his day job running Tesla, the world's preeminent electric vehicle company. It is mostly Tesla that makes him the world's richest man, with an estimated net worth of $425 billion, according to Forbes. It is Tesla and the stock he holds that made him an opinion leader, using the currency to buy Twitter, rename it X and establish the platform as maybe the most important news operation in the world. SpaceX is revolutionary, as is Starlink, and maybe soon, his AI application, xAI, but Tesla is at the heart of Musk Inc. for now and maybe forever. And there's good evidence that Musk has taken Tesla for granted, including disregarding its many critics, the short sellers who have been warning for years about holes in the company's business model and his erratic management style. Musk outlasted most of the shorts, many of whom (like the renowned James Chanos) long ago threw in the proverbial towel on their bet the stock would plummet to reflect their version — maybe the most accurate version — of Tesla's operating reality and the weirdish ways Musk has at times run things. This is a company with a stock that is tremendously overvalued by traditional metrics, yet its CEO took a sabbatical to hang out in the White House while things were starting to go sideways back at the office. Tesla has so-so profits of just around $7 billion in 2024, but eked out just $400 million in the first quarter of 2025, a significant two-year low. Herd on the Street Investors are the ultimate herd animal. The Musk is brilliant meme (and forget everything else like Tesla's sometimes weak operating performance), and his odd, very un-CEO-type quirks have been in the herds' collective head for years now, propelling the stock ever higher no matter what Musk says or does. With that attitude, investors largely ignored Musk's antics, like the time he oddly blurted out that he had a buyer for Tesla at a significant premium and none emerged. Or when he (over)paid $44 billion for Twitter (it was worth closer to $4 billion), and also how he tried to wiggle out of the deal after realizing he screwed up. The herd thought it was brilliant when Musk turned politically right, endorsed Donald Trump for president, and then became a key adviser. Shares of Tesla exploded on the bet that fanboying Trump would make Tesla invulnerable to the anti-EV strains in the MAGA movement and the GOP in general, and of course, a rebellion from Tesla's lefty, tree-hugging, anti-MAGA customers. The optimism ebbed when reality set in as business slipped while Musk was spending all his waking hours in the White House and tweeting about politics (or whatever they call it now on X), not exactly habits that CEOs worried about production metrics indulge in. The costs to shareholders are adding up. EV deliveries dropped sharply in Q1. A sometimes violent consumer backlash of Elon haters ensued with boycotts and vandalism. Shares have recovered more recently as Musk signaled he was moving away from Trump and DOGE, and back to Tesla, but the underlying issues with the company remain. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Consider Tesla's China conundrum. Tesla builds a lot of its cars in China, approaching nearly half its units sold by some estimates, as it seeks to tap into the massive Chinese consumer base. At first the thinking was that Musk could soften Trump's anti-China trade position. Ditto for the general GOP disposition to end Biden-era tax breaks for EVs. Let's just say Trump is as much of a China trade hawk as ever (in response, Mainland consumers are now opting for EVs from China's BYD), and the GOP is still looking to zero out Biden's clean-energy tax credits that include breaks for EVs. Gordon Johnson, a longtime Musk and Tesla critic, sees other headwinds for Tesla and its shareholders. 'Tesla has objectively lost its product edge, with many competing cars now offering better' range, interiors and faster charges, Johnson said, basing his criticism on consumer surveys. He also noted that Tesla for years hyped the proprietary nature of its battery technology, which may be true only in the most narrow sense, because it sources its battery parts elsewhere. Sure, the nasty political backlash of tree-hugging progressive EV buyers who hate that Elon worked with Trump hurt sales, but losing the product edge has also hurt. Johnson said China sales — again, a big part of Tesla's revenues — are now declining sharply because of Trump's trade war with the Mainland that will likely persist through any framework that is reached. Tesla bulls out there like my good pal Dan Ives say it's the future we all should be looking at when it comes to Tesla, not the past. And that future is a potentially transformative technology in autonomous vehicles that will meld all the stuff Muskis really good at, like AI and robotics. Musk himself said in 2022 that the company is 'worth basically zero' without a functioning self-driving car. He says he's been testing them for June delivery and they look like they're functioning well. Ives said it could add $1 trillion to Tesla's market value. Johnson isn't so sure. One problem, according to Johnson, is that even though Musk is done with DOGE, he 'continues to spend far more time on Twitter than he does on Tesla.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Poll: How tariffs are tanking Trump's approval rating
In 1992, Democratic political strategist James Carville famously distilled the presidential election down to one blunt catchphrase: 'It's the economy, stupid.' The results of a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll suggest that, more than three decades later, the start of President Trump's second term could be summed up the same way — particularly when it comes to tariffs and trade. The survey of 1,560 U.S. adults was conducted from May 22 to May 27, following months of global economic upheaval — all of it triggered by Trump. On-again off-again tariffs as high as 145%. Retaliatory measures from major allies and trading partners. Headlines about trade wars. Market nosedives. Market recoveries. Legal confusion. Stress among small-business owners. And rising prices for ordinary American consumers. At the same time, Trump's approval rating has steadily deteriorated. Before last November's election, a majority of Americans (51%) told Yahoo News and YouGov that they approved of the way Trump had handled his first term in office; fewer (43%) said they disapproved. But when asked again in March how they felt about the president's performance since returning to office, those numbers had flipped: more respondents now said they disapproved (50%) than said they approved (44%) of the job Trump had done during the first two months of his second term. A few weeks later, in April, the gap between Trump's disapproval (53%) and approval (42%) ratings had grown even wider (to 11 percentage points). And the latest Yahoo News/YouGov poll shows that gap is continuing to expand. Today only 41% of Americans approve of Trump's job performance, while 54% disapprove, putting him 13 points underwater. Those are some of the president's worst numbers since the latter stages of his first term. Digging deeper, more Americans disapprove than approve of how Trump is handling each major issue included in the survey: immigration (by a two-point margin); government spending (by an eight-point margin); the war between Russia and Ukraine (by an eight-point margin); diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI (by a nine-point margin); and democracy (by a 13-point margin). But the biggest gaps between Trump's approval and disapproval ratings emerge when Americans are asked about economic issues. According to the new Yahoo News/YouGov poll, the president is now 19 points underwater on the economy in general (37% approve to 56% disapprove); 22 points underwater on trade and tariffs (35% approve to 57% disapprove); and 27 points underwater on the cost of living (32% approve to 59% disapprove). To put those numbers in perspective, Trump's average approval rating on the economy was 49% in the middle of 2020 — at the height of the COVID-19 crash. His average disapproval rating was 45%. Similarly, a full 57% of Americans think Trump has 'gone too far 'in "raising tariffs on imported goods' — significantly more than the share who think he's gone too far in 'cutting the federal workforce" (51%), 'arresting and deporting immigrants' (49%) or "investigating his political opponents" (45%). Just 4% of Americans say Trump's approach to raising tariffs has 'not gone far enough.' As a result, 40% of U.S. adults now rate the economy as 'poor' — a five-point increase since April. Among independents, that same number has jumped a full 10 points — from 35% to 45% — over the last month. All told, nearly three quarters of Americans (72%) now say the economy is either fair or poor. Just 25% consider it excellent or good. Earlier this month, House Republicans passed Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill' — a package of tax cuts, social safety net reductions and increased border and military spending meant to deliver the bulk of his legislative agenda. But assuming that some version of the bill survives the Senate — a big if at this point — it is unlikely to reverse the president's economic standing. In the new Yahoo News/YouGov poll, half of respondents were asked whether they 'approve or disapprove of the federal budget just passed by the U.S. House of Representatives' — with no additional information provided. Twenty-eight percent said they approved, 41% said they disapproved and 31% said they weren't sure. That's hardly a ringing endorsement. But what happens when Americans learn more about Trump's budget bill? To test this dynamic, the other half of respondents read a detailed description of the legislation before answering the same question: The U.S. House of Representatives just passed a federal budget that extends and expands the 2017 tax cuts for Americans of all incomes, at a cost of $3.8 trillion, while partially paying for those cuts by reducing Medicaid and food stamp benefits for lower-income Americans and ending some clean energy programs. The House budget also increases military and border spending and raises the debt ceiling from $36 trillion to $40 trillion. Among this second, more informed group of respondents, approval of Trump's budget bill stayed roughly the same (31%). But uncertainty fell by 17 points (to 14%) — and disapproval shot up by nearly as much (to 55%). __________________ The Yahoo News survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,560 U.S. adults interviewed online from May 22 to May 27, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 2.9%.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump pulls nomination for NASA administrator
The White House on Saturday said it will pull the nomination of tech entrepreneur Jared Isaacman as NASA administrator. 'It's essential that the next leader of NASA is in complete alignment with President Trump's America First agenda and a replacement will be announced directly by President Trump soon,' a White House spokesperson told The Hill. The Senate was slated to vote on his nomination in the coming days. Isaacman worked alongside tech billionaire Elon Musk at SpaceX to fund the company's first private spacewalk, and he was one of four astronauts aboard the Polaris Dawn flight this fall. He is also the founder and CEO of Shift4, a payment processing company. President Trump announced Isaacman as his pick to lead the space administration in December, describing him as 'ideally suited to lead NASA into a bold new Era.' Isaacman testified before the Senate in April as a part of the confirmation process. He advanced out of committee in a 19-9 vote. Senate Majority Leader John Thune filed for cloture to vote on Isaacman's nomination on May 22. It is not immediately clear why the president pulled his nomination on Saturday. The move was first reported by Semafor. In early April, Isaacman contradicted Musk about space travel priorities. The commercial astronaut told senators he would focus on returning people to the moon, rather than Mars, which has been a priority of Musk's for some time. 'I'd like nothing more than to see … Americans walking on the moon,' he said during the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation hearing. This is the latest of a number of nominations Trump has pulled since returning to the White House. He pulled his original nominee for surgeon general earlier this month. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), who was nominated to serve as U.N. ambassador, was withdrawn from consideration in April amid tight margins in the GOP-controlled House. Trump eventually tapped Mike Waltz to be the country's U.N. ambassador after taking him out of the national security advisor role, now filled by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. At least one Republican lawmaker has already opposed pulling Isaacman's nomination. 'Astronaut and successful businessman @RookIsaacman was a strong choice by President Trump to lead NASA. I was proud to introduce Jared at his hearing and strongly oppose efforts to derail his nomination,' first-term Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) wrote in a Saturday post on social media platform X. Earlier on Saturday, far-right influencer Laura Loomer had reported that 'deep state operatives' were attempting to prevent Isaacman from serving at the helm of NASA.