What TSMC's April chips sales tell us about Nvidia and the AI investment trade
Every weekday, the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer releases the Homestretch — an actionable afternoon update, just in time for the last hour of trading on Wall Street. Market update: The S & P 500 was slightly lower on Friday. The muted action wraps up a week filled with major headlines: corporate earnings, Apple is exploring AI search and what that could mean for Google, a Federal Reserve meeting, a U.S. trade deal with the UK, and upcoming talks with China. Despite the flurry of news, the index ended the week pretty much at the same level as where it started, a sign that the market needed some time to digest its historic comeback over the past few weeks. We continue to point to the S & P Oscillator as the signal that indicated the recent rally was due for a pause. On the bright side, the market is going out the week less overbought than where it entered. TSMC's read-through to Nvidia : Shares of the world's largest semiconductor manufacturer Taiwan Semi were higher Friday after the company reported better-than-expected sales April sales — up 22.2% month over month and 48.1% year over year. These strong results suggest that the AI infrastructure ramp remains in full swing, though it's unclear if some of April's growth was driven by customers accelerating purchases to avoid tariffs or changes in trade policy. Taiwan Semi is Nvidia's primary chip supplier, so an increase in its sales is generally seen as a positive indicator for Nvidia as well. Nvidia traded lower on Friday, but is on pace for a positive week. On Friday, Reuters reported that Nvidia plans to release a downgraded version of its H20 AI chips for China in the next two months that are compliant with U.S. export restrictions. The stock probably isn't moving on this report because a similar story was reported by The Information last week. It also remains unclear how these dumb-downed chips for China stack up against local competition from Huawei, but our inclination is to say that customers will always take as many Nvidia chips as they can get. Other tariff and trade restrictions remain an overhang . A spokesperson for Nvidia declined to comment to the Club on the Reuters report. Next week : Earnings slow down next week with only about 9 companies in the S & P 500 scheduled to report and zero in the portfolio. The two most notable companies are Cisco and Walmart . Cisco's results will give us a view into the state of enterprise spending, while Walmart results will tell us how consumer spending is holding up. On the data side, it's inflation week with both the consumer price index (CPI) and producer price index (PPI) reports. We'll also see April retail sales and University of Michigan consumer sentiment and inflation expectations. (See here for a full list of the stocks in Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang speaks during the Hill & Valley Forum at the US Capitol Visitor Center Auditorium in Washington, DC, on April 30, 2025.
Every weekday, the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer releases the Homestretch — an actionable afternoon update, just in time for the last hour of trading on Wall Street.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market
Dario Amodei, CEO of the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, published a guest essay in The New York Times Thursday arguing against a proposed 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation. Amodei argues that a patchwork of regulations would be better than no regulation whatsoever. Skepticism is warranted whenever the head of an incumbent firm calls for more regulation, and this case is no different. If Amodei gets his way, Anthropic would face less competition—to the detriment of AI innovation, AI security, and the consumer. Amodei's op-ed came in a response to a provision of the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which would prevent any states, cities, and counties from enforcing any regulation that specifically targets AI models, AI systems, or automated decision systems for 10 years. Senate Republicans have amended the clause from a simple requirement to a condition for receiving federal broadband funds, in order to comply with the Byrd Rule, which in Politico's words "blocks anything but budgetary issues from inclusion in reconciliation." Amodei begins by describing how, in a recent stress test conducted at his company, a chatbot threatened an experimenter to forward evidence of his adultery to his wife unless he withdrew plans to shut the AI down. The CEO also raises more tangible concerns, such as reports that a version of Google's Gemini model is "approaching a point where it could help people carry out cyberattacks." Matthew Mittelsteadt, a technology fellow at the Cato Institute, tells Reason that the stress test was "very contrived" and that "there are no AI systems where you must prompt it to turn it off." You can just turn it off. He also acknowledges that, while there is "a real cybersecurity danger [of] AI being used to spot and exploit cyber-vulnerabilities, it can also be used to spot and patch" them. Outside of cyberspace and in, well, actual space, Amodei sounds the alarm that AI could acquire the ability "to produce biological and other weapons." But there's nothing new about that: Knowledge and reasoning, organic or artificial—ultimately wielded by people in either case—can be used to cause problems as well as to solve them. An AI that can model three-dimensional protein structures to create cures for previously untreatable diseases can also create virulent, lethal pathogens. Amodei recognizes the double-edged nature of AI and says voluntary model evaluation and publication are insufficient to ensure that benefits outweigh costs. Instead of a 10-year moratorium, Amodei calls on the White House and Congress to work together on a transparency standard for AI companies. In lieu of federal testing standards, Amodei says state laws should pick up the slack without being "overly prescriptive or burdensome." But that caveat is exactly the kind of wishful thinking Amodei indicts proponents of the moratorium for: Not only would 50 state transparency laws be burdensome, says Mittelsteadt, but they could "actually make models less legible." Neil Chilson of the Abundance Institute also inveighed against Amodei's call for state-level regulation, which is much more onerous than Amodei suggests. "The leading state proposals…include audit requirements, algorithmic assessments, consumer disclosures, and some even have criminal penalties," Chilson tweeted, so "the real debate isn't 'transparency vs. nothing,' but 'transparency-only federal floor vs. intrusive state regimes with audits, liability, and even criminal sanctions.'" Mittelsteadt thinks national transparency regulation is "absolutely the way to go." But how the U.S. chooses to regulate AI might not have much bearing on Skynet-doomsday scenarios, because, while America leads the way in AI, it's not the only player in the game. "If bad actors abroad create Amodei's theoretical 'kill everyone bot,' no [American] law will matter," says Mittelsteadt. But such a law can "stand in the way of good actors using these tools for defense." Amodei is not the only CEO of a leading AI company to call for regulation. In 2023, Sam Altman, co-founder and then-CEO of Open AI, called on lawmakers to consider "intergovernmental oversight mechanisms and standard-setting" of AI. In both cases and in any others that come along, the public should beware of calls for AI regulation that will foreclose market entry, protect incumbent firms' profits from being bid away by competitors, and reduce the incentives to maintain market share the benign way: through innovation and product differentiation. The post This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market appeared first on
E&E News
33 minutes ago
- E&E News
Committee explores nuclear solutions to AI demand
House Science, Space and Technology Committee lawmakers will meet this week to discuss how nuclear energy could help meet a projected surge in demand from artificial intelligence operations. The Energy Subcommittee hearing — to be led by Chair Randy Weber (R-Texas) — continues Republicans' early focus and significant concern regarding supply and demand in the 119th Congress. They believe baseload energy sources, such as nuclear and fossil fuels, need to be built at a rapid pace to offset a surge in intermittent, renewable energy generation that could put grid reliability at risk. Indeed, transmission providers are forecasting an 8.2 percent growth in electricity load over the next five years primarily due to AI data center proliferation. That's equivalent to hooking up nearly 50 million homes to the grid by 2029. Advertisement But whether nuclear energy can actually meet that demand remains a point of debate among energy and policy experts.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Warner Bros. Discovery Stock Surges Pre-Market, Planning Two-Way Split
Warner Bros Discovery (NASDAQ:WBD) is popping in early trading Monday, jumping nearly 8% to $10.60 as of 9:11 a.m. ET after unveiling a tax-free split into two pure-play businessesStreaming & Studios and Global Networksaiming to unlock shareholder value by mid-2026. In the newly branded Streaming & Studios arm, Warner Bros. Television, Motion Picture Group, DC Studios, HBO and HBO Max will sit alongside TV and film libraries under CEO David Zaslav's leadership. The standalone Global Networks entity, led by CFO Gunnar Wiedenfels, will encompass CNN, TNT Sports, Discovery's free-to-air channels across Europe, Discovery+, Bleacher Report and other premier entertainment, sports and news brands. The mid-2026 separation, structured as a tax-free distribution, follows mounting investor pressure for simpler, focused operations and echoes similar media breakups this year. Monday's announcement pushed WBD shares to their highest close since April, outperforming the S&P 500's flat session. Analysts at Bank of America had flagged a potential split as upside for WBD, reiterating a Buy rating and $14 price targetimplying roughly 43% upsidewhile Jefferies in a separate note highlighted that streamlined cost structures and clearer growth trajectories for each unit could drive multiple expansion. Trading volume spiked 35% above the 30-day average, underscoring renewed investor interest. In its press release, Warner Bros. Discovery said the carve-out will enhance strategic flexibility, accelerate capital allocation and sharpen each business's competitive edge, pointing to improved decision-making and tailored investment in content and distribution. Why It Matters: By separating capital-intensive streaming operations from higher-margin networks, Warner Bros. Discovery aims to give investors direct exposure to distinct growth drivers and profit pools. This move could set a template for other legacy media companies wrestling with digital transition strains. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
