Larry Krasner unlikely to do a televised debate ahead of May primary
Why it matters: A TV debate would put the biggest spotlight on the most significant local race this election year.
Driving the news: District Attorney Larry Krasner and challenger Pat Dugan have yet to agree to a televised debate ahead of the May 20 primary.
So far, Krasner and Dugan have only done candidate forums together.
Meanwhile, Dugan began airing television ads yesterday, which are appearing on CNN and MSNBC in the city.
The big picture: The May Democratic primary will likely determine who will become the city's next top prosecutor.
No Republican candidates are running in the primary. And even if a third-party candidate enters the race later this summer, the Democrat would be heavily favored to win in deep-blue Philly.
State of play: Krasner is planning to attend an in-person candidate forum on Tuesday, hosted by WHYY, Committee of Seventy and the Philadelphia Bar Association.
The forum will be livestreamed on WHYY's YouTube and Facebook pages, but won't be aired live on the NPR affiliate's television channel, WHYY spokesperson Tory Harris tells Axios.
And Krasner won't take part in a live debate on CBS3 that was proposed for next week, campaign spokesperson Anthony Campisi tells Axios.
The other side: Dugan's campaign won't commit to the WHYY forum unless Krasner also takes part in the CBS3 debate, campaign manager Daniel Kalai told Axios.
A CBS3 spokesperson declined to comment.
But the spokesperson forwarded Axios a statement from the Philadelphia Association of Black Journalists, which was partnering with the station on the event, that said the debate was canceled.
The intrigue: Krasner is planning on showing up to next week's candidate forum even if Dugan doesn't, Campisi says.
Spokespeople for WHYY and the Bar Association tell Axios the forum remains on schedule.
Campisi says the Krasner campaign was never going to take part in three debates and preferred the WHYY forum for several reasons, including its moderators, timing and format.
What we're watching: FOX29 also proposed to host a pre-taped debate between Krasner and Dugan, Campisi says.
Context: Debates are a hallmark of the election process but not a guarantee in Philly.
Krasner, who is seeking a third consecutive term, refused to debate his GOP challenger in the 2021 general election.
Mayor Cherelle Parker took part in only one televised debate in the general election against her Republican opponent.
By the numbers: With five weeks to go until the primary, Krasner was trailing Dugan in campaign cash, per the city's campaign finance reports.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
5 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Signing Bonuses, Loan Forgiveness and More: Americans Flock to Join ICE
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Some 100,000 people have already applied to join the Trump administration's immigration enforcement push, after a huge boost in funding made room for thousands of new roles, even as the agency reportedly struggles with wading through the crush of new applicants to find those both qualified and willing to live in parts of the country where ICE intends to step up enforcement. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said Tuesday that it had seen a rapid increase in interest in roles at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) since its recruitment campaign began in July, but some experts have raised concerns around vetting and training. Why It Matters Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem has promised to deliver on President Donald Trump's plan to deport millions of illegal immigrants over the next four years, with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act providing billions in extra funding to ICE, including for recruitment of 10,000 new agents. Opponents have warned that ICE is already overstepping its role, leading to mistaken or unnecessary arrests of undocumented immigrants and U.S. citizens. Federal agents patrol the halls of immigration court at the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on August 05, 2025 in New York City. Federal agents patrol the halls of immigration court at the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on August 05, 2025 in New York To Know ICE began its recruitment push shortly after Trump signed the $45 billion tax and spending bill into law, which sends $75 billion to ICE over four years, $30 billion of which is specifically earmarked for hiring. The agency is offering signing bonuses up to $50,000, student loan payments, tuition reimbursement and starting salaries that can approach $90,000. Those incentives appear to have worked, along with the removal of age caps that followed feedback from supporters on social media, who said they would join up if they had not aged out. But whether the flood of applicants are qualified for the jobs ICE is hiring for is another question. Time reported Tuesday that DHS was struggling to find people who can meet even the relatively minimal qualifications for entry-level enforcement roles. Officials were also said to be having trouble finding enough applicants who live in areas where agents are most needed, such as in Democrat-majority sanctuary cities. Despite the apparent enthusiasm, the Trump administration has also asked former ICE and border agents who retired over the past few years to return to work if they are willing, likely because they would need minimal training and be ready to work sooner. The Trump administration has said that thousands of additional agents are needed to deliver on its promise of mass deportations, along with increasing detention capacity from around 47,000 beds to around 100,000. ICE is also struggling with its current staffing and resources to meet the White House's lofty goal of 3,000 immigrant arrests per day. During the surge in new immigrant arrivals during the Biden administration, both ICE and its counterpart U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) were stretched thin, with DHS deploying agents from elsewhere in the interior to help at the border. Now that the number of new arrivals at the border has slowed to a trickle, removal efforts are focused far more within the U.S. The last big push for immigration enforcement recruitment came during former President Goerge W. Bush's administration when 8,000 new Border Patrol agents were hired between 2006 and 2009, per the American Immigration Council (AIC), while the number of ICE agents also rapidly grew after the agency was formed in 2003. During that same period, corruption allegations rose. Between 2007 and 2012, the number of employees arrested for misconduct spiked 44 percent, AIC found. Some were allegedly linked to cartels and criminal gangs which had looked to infiltrate CBP and ICE. Federal agents block people protesting an ICE immigration raid at a nearby licensed cannabis farm on July 10, 2025 near Camarillo, California. Federal agents block people protesting an ICE immigration raid at a nearby licensed cannabis farm on July 10, 2025 near Camarillo, California. Getty Images While changes have been made to recruitment and anti-corruption measures in the years since, the sharp inrease in immigration enforcement since January 2025 has raised concerns among immigration advocates and civil rights attorneys. Agents have consistently been seen wearing face coverings and have faced allegations of excessive force. DHS has repeatedly denounced these concerns, saying its officers have faced a rapid rise in assaults from members of the public. The Trump administration told Newsweek that all ICE recruits are required to go through medical screening, drug screening and complete a physical fitness test. What People Are Saying Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, told Newsweek: "While ICE touts significant application numbers, many questions remain about whether those applications will result in job offers. There are also concerns about candidate quality at a time when the agency is waiving normal recruitment rules. "During a previous hiring binge at DHS under the Bush administration, the Border Patrol also relaxed standards to hire nearly 10,000 new agents in four years, leading to multiple cartel double agents being hired due to reduced vetting." Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, in a statement shared with Newsweek: "In the wake of the Biden administration's failed immigration policies, your country needs dedicated men and women of ICE to get the worst of the worst criminals out of our country. This is a defining moment in our nation's history. Your skills, your experience, and your courage have never been more essential. Together, we must defend the homeland." What's Next With billions in new funding now pouring in, ICE has stepped up its visibility at job fairs, college campuses and other recruiting events. The agency has also embarked on a social-media-driven hiring strategy that leans heavily on American nostalgia and wartime propaganda.
Axios
5 minutes ago
- Axios
How Trump is making pot a MAGA issue
President Trump is opening the door to reclassifying marijuana, potentially allowing the GOP to claim another health issue that's long been associated with Democrats. Why it matters: The administration has already flipped the political script when it comes to banning food dyes, calling for an end to animal lab testing and embracing psychedelics for mental health. Rescheduling marijuana could be a big step toward establishing an interstate cannabis trade — and turning a policy long sought by congressional Democrats and promoted by the Biden administration into reality. Driving the news: Trump brought up the subject during a recent event with donors at his Bedminster, New Jersey, country club after marijuana companies contributed millions of dollars to his political organizations, the Wall Street Journal first reported. While falling short of legalization, designating pot to have medical value and less dangerous than its Schedule I designation would be a major jolt to cannabis companies that run on thin margins, per Axios' Dan Primack. It would allow them to deduct business expenses on their taxes and also reduce restrictions on cannabis research. The industry has mounted"a very powerful PR effort," Kevin Sabet, founder of Smart Approaches to Marijuana who served in the White House Office of Drug Control Policy under three administrations, told Axios. "They've spent hundreds of millions of dollars in total to influence the president from Florida onward, whether it's inauguration, whether it's million-dollar-plate fundraisers in New Jersey. They are going all out because they want this tax break." Catch up quick: Polling from the Pew Research Center and others have shown increasing support for marijuana legalization across the political spectrum, with 88% favoring medical or recreational use. "Cannabis has become a less partisan [issue] over time, and this has been accelerated by the proliferation of intoxicating hemp products," Beau Kilmer, co-director of the RAND Drug Policy Research Center, told Axios. "Heck, I was just in Indiana where someone could buy THC drinks in grocery stores and bars — I don't even see that here in California." While much of Trump's orbit has been more circumspect about making such a change, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a notable exception, Sabet said. Kennedy supported legalization of marijuana during his presidential campaign and said it could open up more research into risks and benefits, although he has also warned about potential "catastrophic impacts" on users. There's still a big difference between rescheduling a drug and federal legalization, which demonstrates the political winds of change are moving slowly. Multiple state ballot initiatives seeking to legalize recreational pot have failed over the last several years. Trump, like Biden, is a teetotaler, and neither has expressed great enthusiasm for legalization over the years, said Jonathan Caulkins, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University. "The way to think about it is some people wanted Biden to legalize. Biden didn't want to do that, so he said, 'Well, I'll suggest rescheduling, which will make some people think that we've made a big change, but it isn't really,'" Caulkins said. Friction point: The rescheduling of marijuana means the government would be officially recognizing its medicinal uses. That's difficult when the quality and consistency of the botanical version of the drug isn't like more conventional pharmaceuticals, Caulkins said. The move also would transfer cannabis to the purview of the Food and Drug Administration, which could create headaches for the agency. The FDA would be "between a rock and a hard place," Caulkins said. "They either have to ignore their own rules and regulations and say, we're just going to let the cannabis happen without the usual standards for medicine, or we're going to bite the bullet and crack down on a multibillion-dollar industry that's been operating for years now." The big picture: A rescheduling would be further evidence of the MAGA world's ability to take the reins on issues once associated with the progressive movement. "For the left, it's been much more about sort of social justice and righting the wrongs of the drug war," Sabet said. On the other hand: "You have part of the MAGA wing that has embraced this," he said. "It's about business, it's about money." Yes, but: This is already stirring up some disagreement among Trump's base. "I hope this doesn't happen," Turning Point USA founder and key MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk posted on X. "Everything already smells like weed, which is ridiculous. Let's make it harder to ruin public spaces, not easier." Relaxing marijuana rules also is stirring concern among state GOP lawmakers in states like Ohio, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. Even administration officials such as FDA commissioner Marty Makary have posted warnings about health risks from cannabis use. Reality check: Trump was vague on the timing of any move when he confirmed the WSJ's reporting on Monday, saying: "We're only looking at that. It's early."
USA Today
35 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump is a bully. He's using the National Guard to conquer DC as a test run.
The District of Columbia should be allowed statehood, not forced to endure deployment of the National Guard to stop an imagined crime wave. President Donald Trump's activation of the National Guard in Washington, DC, has less to do with an imagined 'out of control' crime wave and more to do with conquest. It is more misguided bullying by the president. To facilitate this racialized farce, he dehumanized the capital district's citizens by labeling them 'bloodthirsty criminals' and 'roving mobs of wild youth.' Let there be no mistake: This rhetoric portends violence against Black, Brown and poor citizens and complete disdain for the unhoused. This action and whatever else might follow is deeply personal to the 700,000 people who call the District of Columbia home and who are tired of the meddling from the administration and Capitol Hill politicians who treat our city like a play toy, likely because of our history as a majority Black jurisdiction. Home to a federal government that offers well-paying positions, Washington has attracted Black professionals and blue-collar workers, creating one of the largest Black middle-class populations in the country. We've innovated with affordable housing, invested flush tax revenue in education and implemented a slew of smart labor and justice policies. There's a real city beyond what the tourists know Many Americans don't know this story. They think Washington starts and ends with memorials, museums and monuments. The residential and commercial city is often invisible as a thriving metropolis in its own right, with a deep history and a vibrant culture. Share your opinion: In the wake of Trump's federal DC takeover, are you worried about crime? Tell us. | Opinion Forum Not only have we outshined many of our peer cities, but states, too. DC has a population comparable to Vermont, Alaska and North Dakota, but a budget larger than Arizona's. Residents pay the equivalent of state taxes. DC balances its budget every year, manages a highly functioning mass transit system and employs thousands in jobs that DC residents do with great pride. Still, the way congressional politicians treat us would have our red state friends up in arms if it were done to them. This summer, as the result of a so-called error, Congress withheld more than $1 billion from our approved budget, and that money remains out of our reach − instead of providing the services that our citizens voted and paid for. Opinion: Trump ushers in new DC tourist event − 'A Live Re-creation of Authoritarianism!' The Republican budget proposal for the next fiscal year includes all kinds of culture war initiatives in an attempt to impose conservative values on the more sensible and moderate residents of DC. We're tired of being the punching bag for politicians who wouldn't last a week living under the policies they impose on us. It's as dishonest as it is insulting. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. So much of what this administration and Congress do is informed by their stated orthodoxy around local control and 'rights.' That somehow doesn't apply to us. DC needs statehood, not a federal takeover Fortunately, the president and Congress can't truly 'take over' Washington without ending home rule, which would be difficult to do with the Senate filibuster blocking them. But the president can fearmonger through state-sanctioned violence. And he can use Washington as the test run for the federal takeover of Black and Brown cities daring to oppose this administration's death-dealing politics. We will not accept death. Washington, DC, has proved our right to self-governance and, indeed, statehood. Instead of forcing us to manage a manufactured crisis, elected officials who believe in democracy in earnest should let DC leaders spend our energy on building a more successful and safe city that must become the 51st state. William H. Lamar IV is the pastor at the Metropolitan AME Church in Washington, DC. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
