'Syria will be back': Veteran war reporter sends message of hope during Dubai summit
'There are so many stories that were never told, not because they weren't lived, but because social media platforms silenced them,' said Syrian war correspondent Mohamed Belaas during a moving session at the Arab Media Summit. 'We were not only at war with regimes. We were at war with platforms that actively fought our cause.'
For Belaas, the battle to report the truth extended far beyond frontline danger. It was also a daily struggle against digital suppression, where footage and testimonies were lost to algorithmic filters and political censorship.
But Belaas never stopped reporting. For over 14 years, he braved bombardments, displacement, and personal loss to ensure the voices of the besieged, the grieving, and the forgotten were heard.
'Imagine a camp where tents are one meter apart, and ten people sleep in each one. Neighbours hear each other's tears through thin canvas,' he said. 'In one of those tents, I met an 11-year-old boy, the eldest among his siblings. He cried because he couldn't feed them. He cried because his dream was just a tent that could protect them from the rain.'
That encounter, he said, remained etched in his mind. 'That child had to grow up faster than any child should. And as journalists, we are witnesses to that grief. We don't just report on war, we live inside it.'
Belaas spoke candidly about the emotional toll that comes with telling these stories. He recalled a moment during a Russian-Iranian advance on Idlib, where he was certain he would die. 'Twelve or thirteen jets were bombing the area outside Hama Town. Our car was destroyed. All my colleagues were killed. I remember fasting, it was Ramadan, and thinking, I will die a martyr while still fasting.'
In a moment of raw vulnerability, he revealed how he recorded a farewell video to his mother. 'She had begged me not to join the revolution. But I believed in the cause. I told her, 'Forgive me. God chose this path for me.'' He also addressed his young daughter, Asala, named after the Syrian singer Asala Nasri. 'I couldn't say goodbye to her. It was too hard. I just told her: 'I'm going far away, but I'll come back.''
Miraculously, he survived. A man watching from afar saw him crawl out of rubble, covered in white dust. 'He looked at me in disbelief. He said, 'You were in there? It's impossible you survived.' I said, 'It's God's will.''
Even after such close brushes with death, Belaas never considered leaving. He rejected multiple offers for refuge abroad. 'Every time I had a chance to leave, I remembered the mother who once pleaded with me: 'Don't forget us.' That voice kept me going.'
He spoke of journalists who endured similar risks, driven by the belief that their people's suffering must be known. 'You cannot survive 14 years in a war zone unless you are convinced the people are oppressed, and that your duty is to be their voice.'
Despite the trauma, Belaas concluded with a message of hope for journalism, for Syria, and for the Arab world. 'When I see the beauty of cities like Dubai, I wonder how Syria reached this state. But I believe, deeply, that Syria will be back. Stronger...A thousand times stronger.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
23 minutes ago
- The National
Israel set to wage methodical destruction of Iran's nuclear facilities
The Middle East can expect days of Israeli attacks on Iran as it conducts a 'brutal and methodical' assault to ensure it sets back the nuclear programme by many years, military experts have told The National. Iranians can't afford to wait a week to respond because they're going to be attrited now at a very high rate Frank Ledwidge After Iran's military leadership has been largely decapitated in surgical air strikes it currently appears toothless in its ability to respond to the unprecedented attack on the six-decade-old theocracy. But if it is to retaliate it needs to do so almost immediately as its military infrastructure was 'being [eliminated] at such rate that there will soon be little left,' said former British military intelligence officer, Frank Ledwidge. A defence source added that the Israelis were going through 'an enormous bank of targets that they've started with the highest level' and would now 'go through them in an orderly fashion'. It is also becoming evident that Iran's apparently strong air defences have proven ineffective and could very soon be wiped out by Israeli attacks. 'We are taking out their aerial defence system so we can operate more freely against their nuclear programme and against their military targets,' the Israeli military official added. 'Dozens of radars and surface to air missile launchers have been destroyed.' Nuclear dark ages The key focus of attack will be Iran's nuclear facilities with Israeli intelligence stating that Tehran now had enough enriched uranium to rapidly make 15 nuclear bombs. While Israel does not have America's GBU-57 13,600kg bunker buster bombs it does possess large but smaller GBU-28 1,800kg bombs thought to have been used in the assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in September. With his command bunker buried deep below a Beirut apartment block, Israel deployed a number of the large bombs creating geometric patterns to penetrate deep. Without US bombers, that could be the tactic Israel uses against Iran's key nuclear sites such as Natanz and Fordow in order to eradicate its nuclear bomb making capability. That will be the bombing campaign's priority, said Richard Pater, director of the Anglo-Israeli Bicom think tank. 'The key question is that now embarked on this campaign, how many years are you going to be set be setting back Iran's nuclear programme back as it had better be a long time,' he said. 'Everyone understands that the Iranian desire for revenge is going to be peaked so Israel had better do this thoroughly.' Israel remains silent about whether its action will result in regime change but it is likely that it will want to remove the leadership that has sacrificed so much in search of its nuclear goal. Retaliation options Following Israel's 18 months of fighting since October 7 attacks, Iran's biggest deterrent against a backlash, Hezbollah, has been severely depleted and on Friday was only able to issue a benign statement that made no reference to military action. Other proxies are unlikely to mount serious attacks, although there are concerns that that Houthis in Yemen might be able to up their near daily rocket attack with ballistic missiles, one of which came close to hitting Ben Gurion airport last month. It now will take a few days for Iran to re-establish command and control over its armed forces after senior commanders were killed and once achieved, they may well have a limited revenge arsenal. While 100 drones were fired towards Israel soon after Friday's operation began, it appears that few made the eight or nine hour journey to their destination with most shot down. That is because Israel now has a triple-layered air defence system that can take out drones, cruise as well as ballistic missiles. Iran's massed missile and drone attack last October only managed to kill a single Palestinian and damage an airfield. That leaves the regime's only other option of asymmetric warfare of using specialist teams such as Unit 840 to conduct terror attacks at Israeli establishments overseas. But that will require direction and planning from the top, and Iran's leadership appears under the unprecedented stress of having many of its generals removed from the battlefield. Ineffectual Iran? Defence analysts believe the air campaign could continue for a week, perhaps two to 'degrade every aspect of the Iranian military command, control and executive function,' said Mr Ledwidge. 'Today is just a start.' 'But the Iranians can't afford to wait a week to respond because they're going to be attrited now at a very high rate,' he added. Subsequently Iran's internal communications have been seriously disrupted with the deaths the equivalent of Britain's PJHQ (permanent joint headquarters), Ministry of Defence and head of military all being wiped out on one day, he said. 'Our mission is very clear, to remove an existential threat,' an Israeli military official told The National. With Iran possessing a considerable stock of ballistic missiles – although their effectiveness is in question – Israel has made a point of attacking its launchers, including inserting a Mossad team, that was potentially local recruited, into Iran for direct strikes. 'We know they have hundreds of ballistic missiles ready to fire towards Israel,' the military official said. 'We were able to in our actions this morning to weaken their chain of command, and carry out pre-emptive strikes against ballistic missiles.' Ultimately the bombing campaign could see a 'new Middle East' in the long term, said Dr Efrat Sopher, an Iranian foreign policy analyst. 'The immediate future is very worrying with the Iranian regime causing so much instability with all its tentacles but now removing the head of the octopus I believe will bring about a more a more stable international system and peace through prosperity,' she added.
Zawya
42 minutes ago
- Zawya
Trump tells Iran to make deal after Israel blasts nuclear and military targets
Israel launched a barrage of strikes across Iran on Friday, saying it had attacked nuclear facilities and missile factories and killed a swathe of military commanders in what could be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran building an atomic weapon. U.S. President Donald Trump, Israel's main ally, suggested that Iran had brought the attack on itself by resisting a U.S. ultimatum in talks to restrict its nuclear programme. "I think it's been excellent. We gave them a chance and they didn't take it ... They got hit about as hard as you're going to get hit. And there's more to come. A lot more," he was quoted as saying in a recorded interview by an ABC reporter on X. "Two months ago I gave Iran a 60-day ultimatum to 'make a deal'," Trump added in a post on Truth Social. "They should have done it! Today is day 61 ... Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!" Washington said it had no part in the operation, however. Iran promised a harsh response to the overnight onslaught, which killed the heads of both its armed forces and the powerful Revolutionary Guards, and Israel said about 100 drones had been launched towards Israeli territory in retaliation. But around 0800 GMT, an order to Israeli citizens to remain near protected areas had been lifted, suggesting that most or all of the drones had been intercepted. In a televised message, President Masoud Pezeshkian urged Iranians to stand by their leaders and said a powerful response "will make Israel regret its foolish act". The price of crude leapt around 8% on fears of wider retaliatory attacks across a major oil-producing region. But the national Iranian oil company said refining and storage facilities had not been damaged and continued to operate. An Israeli security source said Mossad commandos had been operating deep inside the Islamic Republic before the attack and the Israeli spy agency and military had mounted a series of covert operations against Iran's strategic missile array. Israel also established an attack-drone base near Tehran, the source added. The military said it had bombarded Iran's air defences, destroying "dozens of radars and surface-to-air missile launchers". Iran said several top commanders and six nuclear scientists had been killed, including the armed forces chief of staff, Major General Mohammad Bagheri, and Revolutionary Guards chief Hossein Salami. In all, at least 20 senior commanders were killed, two regional sources said. The head of the Revolutionary Guards aerospace force, Amir Ali Hajizadeh, was also reported to be among them. Iran's main nuclear enrichment facility at Natanz suffered significant damage, Israeli military spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin said. Briefing journalists online, Defrin said 200 Israeli fighter jets took part in the strikes, hitting more than 100 targets. He said the military was working through a phased attack plan and that the operation may be lengthy. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's longest-serving prime minister, invoked the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust to justify his decision to attack Iran, framing the strikes as a decisive step to protect Israel from a future existential threat. Just before 6 a.m. Washington time, Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. "I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal," he said. "There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end. Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left..." At one time, Israel might have expected a wave of retaliation from Iranian-backed militias around the region. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a statement that Israel had "unleashed its wicked and bloody" hand and would suffer "a bitter fate". But since war erupted in Gaza in October 2023, Israel has severely weakened Iran's allies, notably by assassinating the top leaders of the Palestinian militant group Hamas and Lebanon's Hezbollah and attacking the Houthis who control large parts of Yemen. Airlines quit the airspace over Israel, Iran, Iraq and Jordan after the Israeli strikes, Flightradar24 data showed, with carriers diverting or cancelling flights. Israeli airlines El Al, Israir and Arkia said they were moving their planes out of Israel and Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion Airport was shut. Dubai-based Emirates cancelled flights to and from Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Iran as Iran closed its airspace. Israeli military Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir said tens of thousands of soldiers had been called up and "prepared across all borders". Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi joined global calls for de-escalation and accused Israel of violating international law. "At an extremely critical time when the U.S. was negotiating a nuclear deal with Iran that would save the whole region and the world, a new vicious escalation," he said on X. Iran's armed forces spokesperson accused Washington of providing support for the operation. But Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. had not been involved and Israel had acted unilaterally in self-defence. U.S. officials have repeatedly said any new deal - to replace a 2015 accord between Tehran and six world powers from which Trump withdrew - must include a commitment to scrap uranium enrichment, a prerequisite for developing nuclear bombs. NUCLEAR TALKS WITH IRAN DUE ON SUNDAY The Islamic Republic insists it wants nuclear energy only for civilian purposes. But the IAEA's Board of Governors on Thursday declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in almost 20 years. Iran is a signatory to the global nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel is not, and is believed to have the Middle East's sole nuclear arsenal. Iran said in a statement that Israel's "cowardly" attack showed why Iran had to insist on enrichment, nuclear technology and missile power. Some Iranian citizens opposed to the ruling clerics expressed hope that Israel's attack might lead to their downfall, though one Tehran resident who was not a supporter of clerical rule said Iran must retaliate. "We can't afford not to respond. Either we surrender and they take our missiles, or we fire them. There's no other option — and if we don't, we'll end up surrendering them anyway." The Israeli military said it had been forced to act by new intelligence information showing that Iran was "approaching the point of no return" in the development of a nuclear weapon. But a source familiar with U.S. intelligence reports said there had been no recent change in the U.S. assessment that Khamenei had not authorised a resumption of the nuclear weapons programme that was shut in 2003. Trump was convening his National Security Council on Friday morning, the White House said. He had said on Thursday that an Israeli strike on Iran "could very well happen" but reiterated his hopes for a peaceful resolution. U.S. and Iranian officials are scheduled to hold a sixth round of talks on Tehran's escalating uranium enrichment programme in Oman on Sunday.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Israel-Iran conflict delivers double hit to airlines on security fears and fuel costs
Israel's attack on Iran is the latest in a series of global conflicts that are ratcheting airlines' security concerns, while weighing on their operations and profitability. An increasing number of conflict zones around the world means airlines are forced to take longer and costlier routes – impacting fuel, emissions and passengers. For passengers, this means flight cancellations and delays or longer journeys as jets are diverted away from conflict areas. Airlines are grappling with more airspace closures, threats from missiles or drones and GPS jamming. Israel's attack on Friday is part of a broader trend of escalating geopolitical tensions that are 'directly impacting global aviation', following the situations in Ukraine and the Red Sea, according to independent security, aviation, maritime and energy analyst Dean Mikkelsen. 'We're witnessing a growing patchwork of restricted airspace and this is putting considerable pressure on airlines and passengers alike,' he told The National. For travellers, the most immediate impact will be on fares as aviation disruption results in longer flight times due to rerouting. In this case, routes need to be adapted around Iranian, Syrian and at times even Iraqi airspace, Mr Mikkelsen said. Fuel consumption is expected to rise significantly. Jet fuel already makes up around 30 per cent of an airline's operating costs and that burden only grows when 30 to 90 minutes of extra flight time is needed. Mr Mikkelsen estimates that routes from Asia to Europe or the Gulf to North America could translate to a 7 per cent to 15 per cent increase in fares, particularly on long-haul itineraries, especially as the peak summer season approaches. Other knock-on effects are those on crew hours, insurance premiums and scheduling complexity, all of which erode profitability, he noted. 'Carriers already operating on tight post-pandemic margins will feel this sharply,' he added. The Israel-Iran conflict throws the region's aviation industry into question, especially with the uncertainty about how long the hostility will last. Airspaces should always remain neutral and accessible when it is safe to do so, according to the International Air Travel Association. Closures, in addition to using them in retaliatory ways, 'fragment global connectivity, disrupt operations and hurt passengers and economies', the Geneva-based Iata said. Conflict zones substantially add to the disruption risks: in 2024, geopolitical conflicts led to significant airspace restrictions, affecting a substantial portion of long-haul routes, according to Iata data. For instance, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, now in its fourth year, forced the rerouting of about 1,100 daily flights, leading to longer flight times and increased operational challenges, it said. Fuel and emissions have also surged. Detours around conflict zones can lead to an average fuel consumption increase of 13 per cent on affected routes, Iata added. When British Airways had to suspend flights to Beijing because it needed to avoid Russian airspace, the flight time was almost three hours longer and fuel costs increased by a fifth. In October 2024 alone, multiple flights encountered Iranian missiles aimed at Israel, leading to diversions and emergency manoeuvres, Iata said. The effect that conflict zones have on airspaces is also reflected in the shift of activity to other areas. For instance, countries like Egypt, with many rerouted flights passing through its airspace, would result in increased overflight fees and greater regional air traffic. 'The Cairo Flight Information Region is becoming a crucial alternative corridor, alongside Jordan and Saudi Arabia,' Mr Mikkelsen said. Airlines across the region have delayed and cancelled flights following Israel's early morning attack on Iran. Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv has shut down until further notice, Iran has declared its airspace closed and Iraq has temporarily suspended civilian operations at all its airports. In the UAE, Etihad Airways cancelled its services to and from Tel Aviv, as Israel placed its air defence systems on high alert in anticipation of possible retaliation. Other major airlines, including Emirates, Lufthansa and Air India, rerouted services mid-flight on Friday. An Emirates flight from Manchester was diverted to Istanbul, while an Air India flight from New York to Delhi was diverted to Sharjah.
