
Trump punishes Brazil with tariffs, sanctions over trial of ally Bolsonaro
Unlike the tariffs Trump is slapping on economies around the world, the measures against Brazil have been framed in openly political terms, sweeping aside centuries-old trade ties and a surplus that Brasilia put at $284 million last year.
The moves dramatically increased the pressure on Moraes, who has emerged as one of the most powerful and polarizing people in Brazil -- and a consistent thorn in the far-right's side, after clashing repeatedly with Bolsonaro and others over disinformation.
The Brazilian government's "politically motivated persecution, intimidation, harassment, censorship, and prosecution of (Bolsonaro) and thousands of his supporters are serious human rights abuses that have undermined the rule of law in Brazil," the White House said in a fact sheet announcing the tariffs.
It also cited Brazil's "unusual and extraordinary policies and actions harming U.S. companies, the free speech rights of U.S. persons, U.S. foreign policy, and the U.S. economy," and singled out Moraes by name.
It did not state what date the tariffs would come into effect, but Trump had previously cited August 1.
The new duties were announced shortly after the US Treasury slapped sanctions on Moraes, which followed a similar move by the State Department earlier this month.
The sanctions provoked a swift and furious response from Brasilia, where Attorney General Jorge Messias slammed them as "arbitrary," "unjustifiable" and "a serious attack on the sovereignty of our country."
There was no immediate reaction from Brasilia to the tariffs announcement, but President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva had earlier denounced Trump's threats as "unacceptable blackmail."
Bolsonaro is on trial for allegedly plotting a coup to stay in power after losing the 2022 election to leftist Lula.
He risks up to 40 years in prison if convicted.
Prosecutors say the plot included a plan to arrest and even assassinate Lula, his vice president Geraldo Alckmin, and Moraes.
Brazil has insisted it will proceed in its prosecution of Bolsonaro, and Trump's intervention in the case has so far improved Lula's popularity, as the Brazilian leader appeals for national unity in the face of US "interference."
'Witch hunt'
Both Marco Rubio, America's top diplomat, and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent issued statements Wednesday announcing the new sanctions against Moraes.
"Moraes has taken it upon himself to be judge and jury in an unlawful witch hunt against US and Brazilian citizens and companies," Bessent said.
Rubio, the secretary of state, accused Moraes of "serious human rights abuses, including arbitrary detention involving flagrant denials of fair trial guarantees and infringing on the freedom of expression."
Moraes, 56, has played a controversial role in fighting disinformation.
He was an omnipresent figure during the polarizing 2022 election campaign, aggressively using his rulings to fight election disinformation on social media.
That included blocking the accounts of some prominent conservative figures.
Last year, he ordered the shutdown of tech titan Elon Musk's X network in Brazil for 40 days for failing to tackle the spread of disinformation shared mainly by Bolsonaro backers.
Bolsonaro has called Moraes a dictator, while his son Eduardo, an MP, had lobbied for US sanctions against the "totalitarian" judge.
On Wednesday Eduardo Bolsonaro said the US action was "not about revenge, it's about justice."
"Abuses of authority now have global consequences," he wrote on X.
Trump's private media company has also sued Moraes over his social media-related orders.
The US Treasury cited the Magnitsky Act for the sanctions. It freezes US-based assets and bars travel to the country for foreign officials accused of human rights abuses or corruption.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
19 minutes ago
- France 24
West Ham's Paqueta cleared of betting charges
The Brazil international was charged with four alleged breaches of Football Association (FA) rules in relation to matches involving the Premier League side. It was alleged the 27-year-old directly sought to influence games by intentionally seeking to receive a card from the referee for the "improper purpose of affecting the betting market". The four charges against Paqueta related to a game against Leicester in November 2022 and matches against Aston Villa, Leeds and Bournemouth in 2023. He was facing the prospect of a lifetime ban if found guilty. The Brazilian denied the charges and the independent regulatory commission found them not proven following a hearing. The FA said two charges against Paqueta, related to a failure to cooperate with its investigation, had been found proven. It said a commission would decide on an appropriate sanction for those proven breaches "at the earliest opportunity". The Brazilian, who joined West Ham in 2022, said in a club statement that he had always maintained his "innocence against these extremely serious accusations". "I can't say anything more at this time, but I would like to express how grateful I am to God and how eager I am to return to playing football with a smile on my face," he said. "To my wife who never let go of my hand, to West Ham United, to the fans who always cheered me on, and to my family, friends and the legal team who have supported me." West Ham United vice-chair Karren Brady said: "We are pleased Lucas has been cleared. He has maintained his innocence from the outset, and as a club we have resolutely stood by him and supported him throughout the process." Alastair Campbell, a partner at the law firm Level and the head of Paqueta's legal team, said: "Few cases carry the gravity of this one -- professionally, personally and emotionally for our client. "Lucas has faced down immense pressure with remarkable strength and resilience." The FA said it was awaiting the written reasons from the independent commission in relation to its decision on the charges, and would not be commenting further until that time. Newcastle midfielder Sandro Tonali was given a suspended two-month ban in May last year over breaches of betting rules. It came as the Italian international was serving a 10-month ban handed down by the Italian authorities for betting offences.


France 24
19 minutes ago
- France 24
Feeding babies in Gaza: Palestinian mothers out of resources
02:02 31/07/2025 Israel: Reactions to Germany's shift on recognising a Palestinian state 31/07/2025 Germany: Process to recognise Palestine state "must begin now" 31/07/2025 War in Gaza: Washington's support for Israel is dividing the MAGA camp 31/07/2025 Arab nations call on Hamas to disarm and relinquish control of Gaza Middle East 31/07/2025 Trump's tariff policies: US consumers face price hikes 31/07/2025 Russian air strikes pound Kyiv, 6-year-old boy among dead, Zelensky says Europe 31/07/2025 Los Angeles: Some undocumented migrants scared to leave homes 31/07/2025 Trump announces 25% tariff on India and unspecified penalties for buying Russian oil 31/07/2025 Ukraine's parliament to consider restoring power of anti-graft agencies

LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
'Europe's ability to defend its interests, already questionable, is now seriously in doubt'
The announcement of a deal between the European Union and the United States has shaken up what looked set to be a quiet summer. The official confirmation that Europeans would meekly accept a 15% tariff on their exports to the US is, without doubt, striking. However, beyond the heated debate in France, which is known neither for its subtlety nor its benevolence toward the EU or the US, any definitive judgment seems premature. First of all, what do we actually know? As with all trade agreements from the Trump administration – fond of dramatic announcements – we can, for now, only rely on the words of the leaders. For details, we must wait for the publication of a jointly approved text, something this administration no longer guarantees. Incidentally, this will likely only be a political agreement on unilateral actions by each partner, not a trade agreement in the strict sense of the term. So it will not be subject to the usual approval and enforcement mechanisms. Scope still to be defined The main element of the agreement is that Europeans will accept 15% tariffs on all of their €532 billion in exports to the US in 2024, relinquishing retaliatory measures that this blatant breach of international law would have allowed them to take. That tariff rate will be the one currently applied, not an increase as in the case of the United Kingdom (+10%). While this may seem modest compared to the average pre-Trump tariff rate of about 3.5%, many sensitive products already faced tariffs between 5% and 15%, especially in the agricultural sector, which lessens the scale of the EU's concessions. Furthermore, vehicles, which have faced 27.5% tariffs since April, would, in practice, see a specific reduction for EU-made products. Exemptions also apply. Under a zero-for-zero framework, the entire aerospace and minerals sectors, as well as "certain" chemical, pharmaceutical, agricultural (including spirits) and semiconductor products would see their tariffs lifted. Depending on the final scope, which remains to be defined, this would affect 10% to 20% of EU exports to the US.