
Does debt forgiveness ruin your credit?
We may receive commissions from some links to products on this page. Promotions are subject to availability and retailer terms.
Debt forgiveness can provide a path to becoming debt-free, but can you pursue it without destroying your credit score?
Getty Images/iStockphoto
If you're overwhelmed with the amount of debt you've racked up on your credit cards or by taking out personal loans, the idea of settling it for less than you owe might feel like the perfect solution to the issue. And, in many cases, it can be. After all, debt forgiveness promises an expedited path to freedom from crushing balances, and in today's high-rate environment, in which credit card rates are closing in on 22% and personal loan rates are inching toward 13% on average, that type of relief can be hard to find.
Today's high-rate environment is hardly the only issue at play right now, though. Americans are also carrying a significant amount of debt overall. The total amount of credit card debt alone is north of $1.18 trillion, and many borrowers are struggling just to make their minimum payments as the interest charges compound. So, debt forgiveness can seem like the only way to stay above water for those who feel like they're sinking due to their growing debt.
But like most financial shortcuts, it comes with a few catches. You could owe more on your taxes if your debt is forgiven and your credit score could be impacted during the process, too. Will debt forgiveness ruin your credit, though, or is that damage something you can easily overcome? That's what we'll examine below.
Start the process of settling your debt for less today.
Does debt forgiveness ruin your credit?
In general, yes, debt forgiveness will hurt your credit. Whether or not it ruins it, though, is an answer that's a bit more nuanced.
Here's how it works: When you settle a debt, you negotiate with a creditor to pay a lump sum that's less than what you owe. In return, the creditor agrees to forgive the remaining balance. Sounds like a win, right? It can be, but when that debt is reported to the credit bureaus, it's typically marked as "settled" rather than "paid in full," and that can raise red flags for future lenders.
Because payment history and account status make up a large portion of your credit score, having a portion of your debt forgiven, thus "settling" your debt, can cause your score to drop significantly. And the more accounts you settle, the more damage you're likely to see.
That's not the only issue, either. When you pursue debt forgiveness, you typically stop making payments while negotiating with creditors and saving up for lump-sum settlements. This shows creditors that you're unable to keep up with the payments, but it also adds late payments and possibly charge-offs to your credit report before the forgiveness process is complete. So, the actual hit to your score can start long before the debt is forgiven.
That said, this damage isn't permanent. Debt forgiveness stays on your credit report for seven years, but the impact lessens over time, especially if you rebuild your credit with on-time payments, a low credit utilization ratio and responsible financial behavior. And, if you already have late payments reflected on your credit report, the settled debts and further late payments may not have as much of an impact as they otherwise would.
Learn more about your debt relief options and chat with a debt expert now.
Is debt forgiveness worth the credit damage?
Whether debt forgiveness and the credit damage it can cause is worth it depends on your financial situation and your goals.
If your credit is already in poor shape due to missed payments, high balances or collections, the damage caused during the process might not feel like a major downgrade. In fact, for people on the verge of bankruptcy, debt forgiveness can be a preferable alternative. It lets you resolve your obligations for less than you owe while avoiding some of the long-term consequences of bankruptcy, like a 10-year hit on your credit report and public court records.
Debt forgiveness can also be a smart move if you're trying to avoid wage garnishment, lawsuits or a growing mountain of interest charges. By negotiating a lower payoff, you stop the damage and give yourself a clean slate, especially if you can afford to pay the settled amount in a lump sum and move forward without relying on credit for a while.
On the other hand, if you have a decent credit score, a steady income and manageable debt, you might have better options. A debt consolidation loan, for example, can help you roll multiple balances into one fixed payment, often at a lower interest rate. That keeps your accounts in good standing and doesn't tank your credit. Credit counseling agencies can also help you set up a structured debt management plan that avoids the "settled" mark entirely.
It all comes down to how much debt you have, how far behind you are and how important your credit score is in the short term. If you're planning to buy a house, refinance or apply for new credit soon, the damage from a settlement could cost you more than the savings.
The bottom line
Ultimately, debt settlement doesn't ruin your credit forever, but it does put a dent in your financial record that can take time to recover from. But in certain situations, those downsides can be a necessary tradeoff. The key is to weigh the immediate relief against the long-term impact. If you do decide to settle your debts, make sure you understand the process, the tradeoffs and take steps to rebuild your credit as soon as possible.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

E&E News
26 minutes ago
- E&E News
Trump's coal frenzy clashes with market realities
President Donald Trump's mad dash to unleash more mining and burning of 'beautiful clean coal' across the U.S. is running face-first into unfavorable market realities. The president has vowed to reverse Biden-era policies, rev up U.S. mining, and keep aging coal-fired power plants alive. But hundreds of miners have been laid off in states like West Virginia in recent weeks, prices remain low and a growing number of small, metallurgical coal producers across the U.S. continue to declare bankruptcy. Last week, Core Natural Resources laid off 200 miners in West Virginia at a metallurgical coal mine. The announcement arrived after Coronado Global Resources laid off workers at its coal mine in the state. Miners were also laid off at Alpha Metallurgical Resources' mine in Boone County last year. At the same time, companies like Corsa Coal Corp. and Coking Coal, LLC, have declared bankruptcy, and some say the industry will continue to face turbulence. Advertisement 'I wouldn't be surprised if we see several other producers either go out of the market or … you'll see substantial cutbacks, layoffs,' Randall Atkins, founder of Kentucky-based Ramaco Resources, which mines both coal and rare earths, told POLITICO's E&E News. 'There are plenty of others that are not in good shape. There are more companies out there that are teetering.'


Bloomberg
28 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Crypto-Wallet Spat Ends With World Liberty Buying Memecoin
Eric Trump signaled that the tension between the competing factions of Donald Trump's crypto empire has cooled and the family's World Liberty Financial will buy a 'substantial' amount of the memecoin at the center of the dispute. The president's son said in a post on X on Friday that the company responsible for the Trump memecoin isn't moving forward with a digital-wallet offering that has caused a fissure with World Liberty Financial, the crypto company owned in part by the Trump family.

Los Angeles Times
28 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
DOGE employees can search Social Security records, Supreme Court says
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court cleared the way Friday for the DOGE team that had been led by Elon Musk to examine Social Security records that include personal information on most Americans. Acting by a 6-3 vote, the justices granted an appeal from President Trump's lawyers and lifted a court order that had barred a team of DOGE employees of freely examining Social Security records. 'We conclude that, under the present circumstances,' the Social Security Administration, or SSA, 'may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work,' the court said in an unsigned order. In a second order, the justices blocked the disclosure of DOGE operations as agency records that could be subject to the Freedom of Information Act. The court's three liberals — Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan — dissented in both cases 'Today, the court grants 'emergency' relief that allows the Social Security Administration (SSA) to hand DOGE staffers the highly sensitive data of millions of Americans,' Jackson wrote. 'The Government wants to give DOGE unfettered access to this personal, non-anonymized information right now—before the courts have time to assess whether DOGE's access is lawful.' The legal fight turned on the unusual status of the newly created Department of Governmental Efficiency. This was a not true department, but the name given to the team of aggressive outside advisors led by Musk. Were the DOGE team members presidential advisors or outsiders who should be not given access to personal data? While Social Security employees are entrusted with the records containing personal information, it was disputed whether the 11 DOGE team members could be trusted with same material. Musk had said the goal was to find evidence of fraud or misuse of government funds. He and DOGE were sued by labor unions who said the outside analysts were sifting through records with personal information which was protected by the privacy laws. Unless checked, the DOGE team could create highly personal computer profiles of every person, they said. A federal judge in Maryland agreed and issued an order restricting the work of DOGE. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander, Obama appointee, barred DOGE staffers from have accessing to the sensitive personal information of millions of Americans. But her order did not restrict the Social Security staff or DOGE employees from using data that did not identify persons or sensitive personal information. In late April, the divided 4th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to set aside the judge's order by a 9-6 vote. Judge Robert King said the 'government has sought to accord the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) immediate and unfettered access to all records of the Social Security Administration ('SSA') — records that include the highly sensitive personal information of essentially everyone in our country.' But Trump Solicitor Gen. D. John Sauer appealed to the Supreme Court and said a judge should not 'second guess' how the administration manages the government. He said the district judge had 'enjoined particular agency employees — the 11 members of the Social Security Administration (SSA) DOGE team—from accessing data that other agency employees can unquestionably access, and that the SSA DOGE team will use for purposes that are unquestionably lawful. ... The Executive Branch, not district courts, sets government employees' job responsibilities.' Sauer said the DOGE team were seeking to 'modernize SSA systems and identify improper payments, for instance by reviewing swaths of records and flagging unusual payment patterns or other signs of fraud. The DOGE employees 'are subject to the same strict confidentiality standards as other SSA employees,' he said. Moreover, the plaintiffs 'make no allegation that the SSA DOGE team's access will increase the risk of public disclosure.' He said checking the personal data is crucial. 'For instance, a birth date of 1900 can be telltale evidence that an individual is probably deceased and should not still receive Social Security payments, while 15 names using the same Social Security number may also point to a problem,' he said.